Avengers shatters all boxoffice opening weekend records.


Acemace

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Golden Girl View Post
That's the whole point - there wasn't enough interest to get Firefly brought back, or to make a movie that'd even be able to earn back its budget at the box office.
Wouldn't the 3 years between the end of the series and the release of the movie have helped to build up a bigger fanbase like other "cult" seires?
To quote Serenity, "the situation is even less simple than you think." It's close-minded to attribute Firefly's cancellation to one thing. To say Firefly failed because it was not good shows a lack of nuanced thinking and explains why you were unable to enjoy it to begin with but that's a whole 'nother thread entirely. You need to take into account Firefly had to contend with all the other networks covering 9/11 as well as the advent of the reality TV age. A sci-fi program with an (at the time) obscure pedigree pitted up against news networks and shows like Fear Factor? It really never stood a chance.


Magus Prime- lev 50 kin/ elec defender
Meta-Human- lev 50 fire/ ss tank
Cabal Bravo- lev 50 merc/ ff master mind
Schwarzchild- lev 50 grav/ ff controller
Shanghai Storm- lev 50 ma/invinc scrapper
Nicodemus- lev 50 db/ regen scrapper
Dragonhyde- lev 50 wp/ sm tank
On The Pinnochle server!

 

Posted

edit: post deleted because, well, it's kind of like sticking your tongue in a light socket...


Arc 180901: Flight of the Dreadnought

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by starphoenix View Post
According to wikipedia, Avatar made about $2.8 billion in the box office. Should be interesting to see how badly Avengers trounces Avatar's record.
While I think Avengers has enough world-wide appeal to easily blast past a billion in world wide grosses quickly, I don't think its likely to cross three billion. My best guess is that three months from now we'll be seeing Avengers coast into about two billion in total world wide grosses.


[Guide to Defense] [Scrapper Secondaries Comparison] [Archetype Popularity Analysis]

In one little corner of the universe, there's nothing more irritating than a misfile...
(Please support the best webcomic about a cosmic universal realignment by impaired angelic interference resulting in identity crisis angst. Or I release the pigmy water thieves.)

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Arcanaville View Post
While I think Avengers has enough world-wide appeal to easily blast past a billion in world wide grosses quickly, I don't think its likely to cross three billion. My best guess is that three months from now we'll be seeing Avengers coast into about two billion in total world wide grosses.
Kick in DVD sales, and it might threaten 3 Bil.

In other news from the "Well, Duh!" desk: The official announcement for Avengers 2 was made today. Yes, there will be a sequel, like there was a doubt. If they wait till after the next Captain movie, it would be holiday time in 2014. Cap 2 comes out in the spring of that year. I don't see them waiting till the next summer.


Loose --> not tight.
Lose --> Did not win, misplace, cannot find, subtract.
One extra 'o' makes a big difference.

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by White Hot Flash View Post
Kick in DVD sales, and it might threaten 3 Bil.

In other news from the "Well, Duh!" desk: The official announcement for Avengers 2 was made today. Yes, there will be a sequel, like there was a doubt. If they wait till after the next Captain movie, it would be holiday time in 2014. Cap 2 comes out in the spring of that year. I don't see them waiting till the next summer.
Last I read was that we get Iron Man 3, Cap 2 and THOR 2 and then Avengers 2 with a possible Hulk movie in 2015


 

Posted

Okay, the down side:

It makes it less likely they can get Whedon to write an episode for Dr Who...


I really should do something about this signature.

 

Posted

Whedon/Moffat co-production. Ta-da. Whedon guarantees budget, Moffat writes amazing script, Whedon goes all Avengers, instant blockbuster.

...I should be a Hollywood producer.



S.


Part of Sister Flame's Clickey-Clack Posse

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hestis View Post
This is one point that I just can't agree on. To say this about any from of entertainment is just, I think, not a valid argument. How many bands/musicians don't get popular until 10 or more years into their career? Metallica is a pretty good example here; they have a decently sized, hardcore following, then they release an album more aimed at a mainstream audience, get radio and MTV/media coverage, and turn into one of the biggest bands on the planet. Look at how long it took Lord of the Rings to go from something "nerds" read in their parents' basement to being part of pop culture. Look at Family Guy, which got cancelled, and brought back through word of mouth and DVD sales. Star Trek. If any of these things had gotten the "1 and done" treatment that Firefly got, we wouldn't still be talking about them today.

And as for the order the episodes aired in not having an effect, I think that can relate directly to Avengers. If it had come out first, before the general, non comic book crowd, saw the individual movies, would it have been as successful? Would it have worked if the general viewing audience had no idea who these characters were? Personally, I think one of the reasons it worked so well was because it was built up the right way. Marvel took a chance giving each of those characters their own movies to set the stage, and it paid off in a big way.

I've introduced a lot (in relative terms) of people to Firefly, and it has almost unanimously been met with praise, even from friends who don't like sci-fi. I realize that's just anecdotal evidence, but I think that it does speak to the possibility that Ff could have been more successful given studio support and publicity. I'm not going to argue whether Serenity was better than Avengers or Star Wars, I like them all, and everybody is going to like different things, so that doesn't bother me. But some people () (not you, Oz) have reverse fanboy blinders on when it comes to Firefly.
Heh. Nice points, but I dunno. I grew up in an era where a nothing show that completely was hated by the establishment aired in all sorts of random ways, spread by word of mouth, became a cult hit and eventually spawned hit movies.

It was Monty Python. And this was in the seventies. Some shows, regardless of how they're presented, how they're treated by their parent company, and even regardless of when it's aired, get over because people want to see more of it. It's that intangible thing that seperates Star Trek from other sci-fi, for instance. And Star Trek was pretty much buried by Paramount until the fans got behind it, big time.

It's one of those things where the fans will embrace something just on its quality, no matter what the Powers That Be will do to it.



S.


Part of Sister Flame's Clickey-Clack Posse

 

Posted

And... this thread sums it up perfectly...

The GEEKS inherit the Earth... And ruin it within seconds by trolling and having utterly ridiculous debates focused on citing opinions as facts against opposite opinions expressed!!



@Zethustra
"Now at midnight all the agents and the superhuman crew come out
and round up everyone that knows more than they do"
-Dylan

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by SuperOz View Post
Whedon/Moffat co-production. Ta-da. Whedon guarantees budget, Moffat writes amazing script, Whedon goes all Avengers, instant blockbuster.

...I should be a Hollywood producer.



S.
You really shouldn't. Because there's an actual grain of truth in what you just said, not one misuse of "air quotes", and I quite like you and don't want to have to put you up against the wall when the revolution comes.

...bitter, moi?


Is it time for the dance of joy yet?

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by DreamWeaver View Post
You really shouldn't. Because there's an actual grain of truth in what you just said, not one misuse of "air quotes", and I quite like you and don't want to have to put you up against the wall when the revolution comes.

...bitter, moi?
I'd be one of the new breed of Hollywood producers who remember the 1930's and the great film noir of the 1940's and gave a damn about their product, though....



S.


Part of Sister Flame's Clickey-Clack Posse

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Electric-Knight View Post
And... this thread sums it up perfectly...

The GEEKS inherit the Earth... And ruin it within seconds by trolling and having utterly ridiculous debates focused on citing opinions as facts against opposite opinions expressed!!


so in other words, we turned on the internet


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by SuperOz View Post
Heh. Nice points, but I dunno. I grew up in an era where a nothing show that completely was hated by the establishment aired in all sorts of random ways, spread by word of mouth, became a cult hit and eventually spawned hit movies.

It was Monty Python. And this was in the seventies. Some shows, regardless of how they're presented, how they're treated by their parent company, and even regardless of when it's aired, get over because people want to see more of it. It's that intangible thing that seperates Star Trek from other sci-fi, for instance. And Star Trek was pretty much buried by Paramount until the fans got behind it, big time.

It's one of those things where the fans will embrace something just on its quality, no matter what the Powers That Be will do to it.



S.

There was like 3 channels in the 70s and no internet. Nowadays I wont watch primetime TV cause id rather watch it later on hulu with less commercials. And later may be more than a year or two.


Jay Doherty: Yes, there was this one night that I was ready to go home but had to drop the browns off at the super bowl before I left for home. While on the throne it hit me. I stayed for a few more hours and that why we have the pain pads in the game.

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Zombie Man View Post
I thought the movie actually cost 200 mill to make?? Evry time I see the cost it seems to have gone up another 100 mill.


Now we aren't ready quite yet to let the catgirls out of the bag.... (quote from ex libris)

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Head_Kracker View Post
I thought the movie actually cost 200 mill to make?? Evry time I see the cost it seems to have gone up another 100 mill.
Magic movie accounting.
Quote:
In the second phase of the trial in which the court determined the appropriate amount of damages to be paid to Buchwald, Paramount testified that despite the movie's $288 million in ticket sales, it had spent so much money on the movie's development and marketing that, according to the formula specified in Buchwald's contract, Paramount had made "no net profit". The court then found that the formula was "unconscionable" and that Buchwald therefore could pursue a separate tort lawsuit against the company.


Speeding Through New DA Repeatables || Spreadsheet o' Enhancements || Zombie Skins: better skins for these forums || Guide to Guides

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Zombie Man View Post
is that the same accounting method that generates the "losses" due to Piracy?


On Justice
Global @Desi Nova Twitter: @desi_nova Steam: Desi_nova. I don't do Xbox or PS3

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Desi_Nova View Post
is that the same accounting method that generates the "losses" due to Piracy?
Hah... I watched that TED video!



------->"Sic Semper Tyrannis"<-------

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Father Xmas View Post
Only a 50% drop off from opening weekend, which is great for a blockbuster.
First $100M+ second weekend. Very nice.

Saw it again with my teenager daughter this weekend. Interesting contrast in perspective. She was all grumpy because "Avengers" trumped out her "Hunger Games" so soon. She understood that it isn't a zero sum game, but she wanted the rosy period of recognition for her favorite to last longer.

She also thought that once it got going there was too much boom and not enough dialogue. Her favorite scenes that she quickly rattled off when asked were when the characters were interacting and talking. I thought that was interesting.


City of Heroes was my first MMO, & my favorite computer game.

R.I.P.
Chyll - Bydand - Violynce - Enyrgos - Rylle - Nephryte - Solyd - Fettyr - Hyposhock - Styrling - Beryllos - Rosyc
Horryd - Myriam - Dysquiet - Ghyr
Vanysh - Eldrytch
Inflyct - Mysron - Orphyn - Dysmay - Reapyr - - Wyldeman - Hydeous

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chyll View Post
First $100M+ second weekend. Very nice.

Saw it again with my teenager daughter this weekend. Interesting contrast in perspective. She all grumpy because "Avengers" trumped out her "Hunger Games" so soon. She understood that it isn't a zero sum game, but she wanted to the rosy period of recognition for her favorite to last longer.

She also thought that once it got going there was too much boom and not enough dialogue. Her favorite scenes that she quickly rattled off when asked were when the characters were interacting and talking. I thought that was interesting.
I find this funny because my mother the whole time was "I just want it to beat Hunger Games...A LOT!"


BrandX Future Staff Fighter
The BrandX Collection

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chyll View Post
First $100M+ second weekend. Very nice.

Saw it again with my teenager daughter this weekend. Interesting contrast in perspective. She all grumpy because "Avengers" trumped out her "Hunger Games" so soon. She understood that it isn't a zero sum game, but she wanted to the rosy period of recognition for her favorite to last longer.

She also thought that once it got going there was too much boom and not enough dialogue. Her favorite scenes that she quickly rattled off when asked were when the characters were interacting and talking. I thought that was interesting.
That's kind of interesting - I hadn't really thought to compare Hunger Games and Avengers directly but I guess it's worthwhile since they both made a ton of money recently.

To my mind neither film was absolutely perfect, but strangely enough they missed that mark almost for opposite reasons. The Hunger Games needed about 10 more minutes of action where the Avengers needed about 10 minutes -less- action. The Hunger Games dragged a bit in a few places and the final arena fight scenes were a bit lacking. On the other hand Avengers sort of glossed over the relevance of invading army a bit too much. It almost didn't matter who they were just like it doesn't matter in most video games and while that's fine for your average video game I would have liked a few more minutes to fully understand why they'd bother to invade Earth in the first place. As someone who hasn't read the Avengers for decades like other fans out there it would filled in the backstory a bit more for me.

All in all I'd give both movies 8/10. Since we're guaranteed to get sequels to both we'll just have to see if they can both shore up their minor failings in their pacing next time around.


Loth 50 Fire/Rad Controller [1392 Badges] [300 non-AE Souvenirs]
Ryver 50 Ele� Blaster [1392 Badges]
Silandra 50 Peacebringer [1138 Badges] [No Redside Badges]
--{=====> Virtue ♀