AT's, their desirability and usefulness in teams


Acemace

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Necrotron_RO View Post
Blasters are positioned to take advantage of damage buffs more than any other AT with the highest damage cap. Also, they can sustainably dish out the largest (non-buff enhanced) AoE damage with Defiance and a high damage modifier.
Not that I'm agreeing with the OP's list, but this is not true.

First the numerical facts:

Blasters do not have the highest damage cap: Brutes do (775% vs 500%)
Blasters do not have the highest melee modifier: Scrappers are higher (1.125) followed by Dominators (1.05) and then Blasters (1.0)
Blasters do not have the highest ranged modifier: Scrappers use the melee modifier for most ranged attacks (1.125) and are tied with Blasters (1.125) if you do not count criticals.

Blasters do not have the highest normalized damage cap (modifer x strength cap): their ranged value (5.625) is exceeded by Brutes (5.813) and Scrappers (5.906 @ 5% crit rate). Controllers and Corruptors can also situationally exceed these numbers (with containment and scourge respectively).

In the specific area of "enhanced non-buffed" AoE damage, Blasters are about numerically tied with Brutes [1.125 * (1.95 + 0.45) = 2.7 vs 0.75 * (1.95 + 1.6) = 2.66] but actually average slightly less AoEs - in terms of non-tier 9 ranged cones and AoEs the average blaster primary has 2.08 AoEs (25 in 12 sets) and the average brute primary has 2.2 (33 in 15 sets). And that doesn't include the fact that Brutes have more AoE potential in their secondaries than Blasters do in their primaries (damage auras are in 40% of secondaries and a couple have actual AoE attacks - Burn, Shield Charge).

Also, for the record, the strongest damage self-buff powers belong to melee archetypes and not blasters: Rage, Power Siphon, Against All Odds, Fiery Embrace.


[Guide to Defense] [Scrapper Secondaries Comparison] [Archetype Popularity Analysis]

In one little corner of the universe, there's nothing more irritating than a misfile...
(Please support the best webcomic about a cosmic universal realignment by impaired angelic interference resulting in identity crisis angst. Or I release the pigmy water thieves.)

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tyger42 View Post
Yeees. Disagreeing with you = "personal attacks" from people who "have no clue and are simply saying what they think they should say". Couldn't POSSIBLY be that you're, I don't know...WRONG.
Yes, this is clearly not a personal attack

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tyger42 View Post
Wow. Made an idiot of yourself on the first one! Good job!
Personal attacks are not a sign of confidence in your position, they are a sign of either childishness or knowing your position is wrong and trying to distract from that.

I assume that the posters on this board are not childish, I therefore assume that every personal attack or other content free comment is an acknowledgement that I am right and the poster simply does not want to admit it.


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by dugfromthearth View Post
Honestly, you lost all credibility when you claimed that I said VEATS are next to worthless. I said nothing like that.
Nitpicking exact wording. NO! You're not trolling at all!




Virtue Server
Avatar art by Daggerpoint

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by dugfromthearth View Post
Yes, this is clearly not a personal attack
Observation of fact, more like.

Quote:
Personal attacks are not a sign of confidence in your position, they are a sign of either childishness or knowing your position is wrong and trying to distract from that.
Your position was grossly ignorant of reality. Sorry if you take offense at having that point out.




Virtue Server
Avatar art by Daggerpoint

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tyger42 View Post
Nitpicking exact wording. NO! You're not trolling at all!
yes, nitpicking exact wording like the difference between "not useful" and "useful".

as to your continue attacks on me:
"Trolling is defined as deliberately posting derogatory, inflammatory comments/threads in order to bait other users into responding. Trolling or accusing someone of being a troll is also a form of trolling and is not permitted."


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by recalx View Post
this thread is mostly retarded because none of you would be willing to competitively pve to prove a point.
What point could it possibly prove?


[Guide to Defense] [Scrapper Secondaries Comparison] [Archetype Popularity Analysis]

In one little corner of the universe, there's nothing more irritating than a misfile...
(Please support the best webcomic about a cosmic universal realignment by impaired angelic interference resulting in identity crisis angst. Or I release the pigmy water thieves.)

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by dugfromthearth View Post
I assume that the posters on this board are not childish, I therefore assume that every personal attack or other content free comment is an acknowledgement that I am right and the poster simply does not want to admit it.
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!

Yes dug, you got us. We've realized that you are the ONLY person that knows how to properly play this game and we're jealous.

Please tell us how to play some more!

(This is called "sarcasm", for those readers unfamiliar with it's use.)


Quote:
Originally Posted by Dechs Kaison
See, it's gems like these that make me check Claws' post history every once in a while to make sure I haven't missed anything good lately.

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by dugfromthearth View Post
yes, nitpicking exact wording like the difference between "not useful" and "useful".

as to your continue attacks on me:
"Trolling is defined as deliberately posting derogatory, inflammatory comments/threads in order to bait other users into responding. Trolling or accusing someone of being a troll is also a form of trolling and is not permitted."
That's nice, but, you know, those words weren't used.

And I'd say knowingly posting blatantly wrong information then playing victim when people tell you you're wrong falls under your little definition there nicely, thanks.




Virtue Server
Avatar art by Daggerpoint

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by darth_khasei View Post
ah, another dugfromthearth provoke thread. Brilliant.
qft.


The development team and this community deserved better than this from NC Soft. Best wishes on your search.

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tyger42 View Post
That's nice, but, you know, those words weren't used.

And I'd say knowingly posting blatantly wrong information then playing victim when people tell you you're wrong falls under your little definition there nicely, thanks.
they weren't the exact words used - but I didn't think you would nitpick exact wording.

And you keep saying I am wrong, but post nothing substantive to show that I am. Your continued avoidance of substance simply convinces me further that I am right.

You have posted on this thread multiple times, you are not avoiding it. You have no reason not to post a substantive example of how I am wrong except that you do not have one.


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by dugfromthearth View Post
And you keep saying I am wrong, but post nothing substantive to show that I am. Your continued avoidance of substance simply convinces me further that I am right.

You have posted on this thread multiple times, you are not avoiding it. You have no reason not to post a substantive example of how I am wrong except that you do not have one.
You can see my post back on page 4 that you avoided spelling out how your original post was wrong.

Yes, Some ATs are stronger than others, however you really lack any good knowledge in any terms of gameplay about what specifically is good and what is bad and how ATs fair off in comparison to eachother.


 

Posted

Every AT is useful and I will take all of them. Variety is required however as too much of anything is either cumbersome or boring. The player makes or breaks the AT.


@bpphantom
The Defenders of Paragon
KGB Special Section 8

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by dugfromthearth View Post
I assume that the posters on this board are not childish, I therefore assume that every personal attack or other content free comment is an acknowledgement that I am right and the poster simply does not want to admit it.
I assume that everyone knows the same things I do. Therefore, if they disagree with me, it must be because they are stupid. I learned this from a brilliant management consultant named Dogbert.


Paragon City Search And Rescue
The Mentor Project

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Schismatrix View Post
i rate it 2.3 allosaurus bunions.
Really? I woulda thought more like 0.8 buffalo offal.



 

Posted

ATs from most to least desirable:

1: Whatever the first person who joins the team wants to bring.
2: Whatever the second person who joins the team wants to bring.
3: Whatever the third person who joins the team wants to bring.

And so on, until the team is full. If you seriously need to pick and choose ATs based on perceived usefulness, you're doing it wrong.


Eva Destruction AR/Fire/Munitions Blaster
Darkfire Avenger DM/SD/Body Scrapper

Arc ID#161629 Freaks, Geeks, and Men in Black
Arc ID#431270 Until the End of the World

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Eva Destruction View Post
ATs from most to least desirable:

1: Whatever the first person who joins the team wants to bring.
2: Whatever the second person who joins the team wants to bring.
3: Whatever the third person who joins the team wants to bring.

And so on, until the team is full. If you seriously need to pick and choose ATs based on perceived usefulness, you're doing it wrong.
^This


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Eva Destruction View Post
ATs from most to least desirable:

1: Whatever the first person who joins the team wants to bring.
2: Whatever the second person who joins the team wants to bring.
3: Whatever the third person who joins the team wants to bring.

And so on, until the team is full. If you seriously need to pick and choose ATs based on perceived usefulness, you're doing it wrong.
This is what I have seen for the past 7 years also.


Types of Swords
My Portfolio

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Zyphoid View Post
This is what I have seen for the past 7 years also.
In the old days, I used to hear people ask for Defenders, or "healers." But over the last few years, the vast overwhelming majority of advertised requests I've seen have been for either:

1. A Tanker
2. Buff, Debuff, or literally Buff/Debuff (overwhelmingly most common: Debuff)
3. Damage
4. Anything to fill the spot

At one time more common, but increasingly rare:

- Healer
- Defender
- "A Kin"

The only archetypes that have *some* difficulty fitting into *some* people's concept of the big three (Tanker, Buff/Debuff, Damage) on any consistent basis in my experience:

- Stalkers
- Peacebringers


[Guide to Defense] [Scrapper Secondaries Comparison] [Archetype Popularity Analysis]

In one little corner of the universe, there's nothing more irritating than a misfile...
(Please support the best webcomic about a cosmic universal realignment by impaired angelic interference resulting in identity crisis angst. Or I release the pigmy water thieves.)

 

Posted

For my last post on this thread I will skip any analysis or comments and just list a rank order of usefulness to a team for non-IO, non-incarnate, characters not going after an AV or GM.

Controller
Defender
Corruptor
SoA Crab
SoA Fortunata
Mastermind
SoA Bane
SoA Night Widow
Dominator
Tanker
Brute
Blaster
Stalker (with new buffs)
Scrapper

Too build specific to rank:
Peacebringer
Warshade

and for the record, I play Tankers and Dominators


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by dugfromthearth View Post
For my last post on this thread I will skip any analysis or comments and just list a rank order of usefulness to a team for non-IO, non-incarnate, characters not going after an AV or GM.

Controller
Defender
Corruptor
SoA Crab
SoA Fortunata
Mastermind
SoA Bane
SoA Night Widow
Dominator
Tanker
Brute
Blaster
Stalker (with new buffs)
Scrapper

Too build specific to rank:
Peacebringer
Warshade

and for the record, I play Tankers and Dominators
Nice, tyvm for providing a list of what you think in terms of usefulness based on the AT. Now all is right in the world.


The development team and this community deserved better than this from NC Soft. Best wishes on your search.

 

Posted

For me this whole thread boils down to one quote "I'm not a Brewster at all! I'm the son of a sea cook!!"


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mordakar View Post
This is an outrage!

Diet Dr. Pepper does NOT taste more like regular Dr. Pepper!
THANK YOU!!!

Why do so few people see that?!


I sit in my zen of not being able to do anything right while simultaniously not being able to do anything wrong. Om. -CuppaJo
It is by caffeine alone that I set my mind in motion. It is by the beans of Java that thoughts acquire speed, the hands acquire shaking, the shaking becomes a warning. It is by caffeine alone that I set my mind in motion.

 

Posted

I've been on a couple pugs with no repeat AT's and we steamrolled everything in sight. It was awesome. Everyone was useful and we all had great fun.


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by dugfromthearth View Post
Arachnos Soldier: Desirability low, usefulness medium. You bring buffs but not the kind people recognize. So you are useful but no one asks for you. Crabs with massive AoE are very useful.

Blaster: Desirability low, Usefulness low. You bring damage which everyone does. Fire and archery provide a lot of AoE which is very useful in teams. The others not so much. Exception: vs AV's your high single target damage is desired.

Brute: Desirability low, usefulness low. You bring damage which everyone does. Fire and electric provide a lot of AoE which is very useful on teams. Exception: vs AV's your high single target damage is desired.

Corruptor: Desirability high, usefulness medium. You bring buffs and healing which are often asked for. Your damage is nothing special although fire and archery are good AoE and useful.

Defender: Desirability high, usefulness medium. You bring buffs and healing which are often asked for. Your damage is nothing special although fire and archery are good AoE and useful.

Peacebringer: Desirability low, usefulness varies. No one knows what you can do until you do it. You might tank, you might have good AoE, you might be useless.

Warshade: Desirability low, usefulness varies. No one knows what you can do until you do it. You might tank, you might have good AoE, you might be useless.

Incarnate Powers:
With Incarnate powers, there is so much AoE that AT's providing it are no longer useful. Only single target damage AT's are important

Scrapper: Desirability low, usefulness low. You bring damage which everyone does. Unless you are fire, electric or spines, you are single target and not very useful. Exception: vs AV's your high single target damage is desired.
Contradicting himself in one simple sentence..meaning he has no clue what he is talking about.



Dark Energon, Founder of the Freedom Legion SG on Guardian server.
(SG founded on 12-08-'09, Top100: 08-17-'10, Top50: 12-23-'10, Top25: 12-11-'11)
Crab Spider Nephila on Titan Tracker
Weekly events on Guardian: W.A.V.E. & FNFN