Team Etiquette: My Misconception?


Afterimage

 

Posted

We all know that teaming with other players, especially with those you haven't played with before, brings together different playstyles. I'm sure most anyone on these forums can recall several bad PUGs they've been on. Hopefully they would also recall really good teams. I mostly solo myself, so I consider myself leaning towards the "hermit" side of the game. Even so, I thought I had picked up on a few "rules" (guidelines, more like, I'm sure) of etiquette when teaming.

I'll throw out an example of what I'm talking about. If it isn't your mission specifically, you don't click the glowie or otherwise end the mission without the mission-holder/team-leader's okay. There are others, to be sure, but they're probably not universal. It frustrates me when others on the team act differently than I expect them to. Not that everyone has to play like I do, but I think I try to mix courtesy in with my play when teaming, and I think I see other players not being concerned with such nonsense lately.

The real question is: have I misunderstood the way team members interact with each other? I think I've gotten "team rules" mixed up with being polite, but maybe that has no place in the middle of a fight?

I am indeed an old man with kids on my lawn, but this post isn't intended to be a whiny screed. Am I completely off-base? On-base and need to get over it already, Pops? Both? Both and something else, too?

Geez, I need my pills.


M. Bison: For you, the day Bison graced your village was the most important day of your life. But for me...it was Tuesday.
-- Street Fighter (1994)

McClane: Hey, thanks for saving my daughter's life.
Farrell: What was I going to do?
McClane: That's what makes you "that guy."
-- Live Free or Die Hard (2007)

 

Posted

Completing the mission is the expected behavior of this game. This isn't a matter of ettiquette. 99.999999999% of the time you will complete the mission. It is only that one farming mission that you wouldn't click the glowies.


And in that case, it is clearly the responsibility of the holder to state that anomoly. No one is going to play every mission in this game without taking the steps to complete it just because of a few farmers like to hoard their 'soon to be added timed' missions.

Actual etiquette examples that come up constantly:

Letting the tank do his job. Don't throw immobs until he grabs aggro. Don't throw AOEs til he has aggro. It takes him 2 seconds to grab all of the aggro in a nice neat pile, so give him that courtesy.

Tanks letting their teammates do their jobs. Don't take a nicely placed mob and string them out 50 feet just because you feel like taunting. It is OK to jump in that pack. You have an entire team supporting you. Get in there and grab aggro and it will all be over soon.


 

Posted

I don't think you have it wrong at all, I would also wait for the mission setter to click his glowie himself rather than racing up to it and clicking or, as often happens, stopping fighting to grab the glowie before anyone else can.
So whilst we. and lots of others will honour this particluar piece of team etiquette, lots wouldn't. Nor I am sure would they even give a second thought to it.

My other respected rule when joining anyones built team is to not start requesting changes, (up the rep/difficulty, do my mission, do another's mission. find us an xyz at) I just think it is poor show to come into an established team and rather than settling in and observing, start demanding. I therefore take a fairly dim view of the player who arrives and asks we change things to their liking within 5 seconds.


 

Posted

I'm sometimes dismayed by the fact that although it should be fairly clear to players who have PUGd even a little that yes, there are different ways of playing adopted by different players, its rare that i see any 'so, 'rules' for this PUG?' discussions when I PUG. I dont expect anything very long, but 'follow the tank/leader', follow the left/right wall', clear/stealth to boss', 'pull/herd', glowies for everyone/just mission holder' are things which could for example avoid the common comment mid mission of 'we're split' and 'boss here' - 'and here'.

I'd like to see a standard of Mission Holders Choice, personally. That way, everyone gets to play their way.

Eco


MArcs:

The Echo, Arc ID 1688 (5mish, easy, drama)
The Audition, Arc ID 221240 (6 mish, complex mech, comedy)
Storming Citadel, Arc ID 379488 (lowbie, 1mish, 10-min timed)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Samuel_Tow View Post
[The Incarnate System is] Jack Emmert all over again, only this time it's not "1 hero = 3 white minions" it's "1 hero = 3 white rocks."

 

Posted

About the only rule (outside of "don't be a jerk") that I think really matters is letting the mission holder feel like the action hero of his own mission. It's his mission, damn it! I'm certainly not going to run around, grab his glowies, defeat his boss while he's resting and otherwise finish his mission without his involvement. It's his mission, an in it, he is the hero.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Arcanaville View Post
Samuel_Tow is the only poster that makes me want to punch him in the head more often when I'm agreeing with him than when I'm disagreeing with him.

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Samuel_Tow View Post
About the only rule (outside of "don't be a jerk") that I think really matters is letting the mission holder feel like the action hero of his own mission. It's his mission, damn it! I'm certainly not going to run around, grab his glowies, defeat his boss while he's resting and otherwise finish his mission without his involvement. It's his mission, an in it, he is the hero.
"His"? "His"? "His"? "His"? "He's"? "His"? "His"? "His"? "He"?
Girls play too, you know


@Golden Girl

City of Heroes comics and artwork

 

Posted

There are no girls on the internet.. heh


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Golden Girl View Post
"His"? "His"? "His"? "His"? "He's"? "His"? "His"? "His"? "He"?
Girls play too, you know
Not enough of them, and even when they do, people assume they're male. I was on a team with my girlfriend the other day, and while we were playing, I asked her in team chat if she had any dresses like one her character wore. I heard all kinds of "How do you know she's a girl?" etc. I didn't want to tell the truth, which was that I knew she was female because I'd seen her with her pants down.

Moral of the story--women play the game (I know, I've seen them), but no one believes this to be the case.


Feel free to try out my AE mission arc, # 473452: Praetorian Redemption
@Valerika

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Golden Girl View Post
"His"? "His"? "His"? "His"? "He's"? "His"? "His"? "His"? "He"?
Girls play too, you know
"His," as was recently pointed out, is actually the English language's gender-neutral pronoun when used in context which does not assume gender. Since the language lacks gender on nouns and adjectives, that's what's left. Either that, or the English language HAS no gender-neutral pronoun, and we have to resort to cumbersome addresses like "he/she" or the gramatically incorrect "their."

Unless gender matters, it's a "he."


Quote:
Originally Posted by Arcanaville View Post
Samuel_Tow is the only poster that makes me want to punch him in the head more often when I'm agreeing with him than when I'm disagreeing with him.

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by rian_frostdrake View Post
I usually ask about glowies if its not my mish because there is a very small extra reward for clicking some of them. but really its not a big deal.
Yep usually if I find one I call it and wait to see what the mish owner wants to do. Most of the time I just get "Click it" back but it's always good to ask.


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Samuel_Tow View Post
"His," as was recently pointed out, is actually the English language's gender-neutral pronoun when used in context which does not assume gender. Since the language lacks gender on nouns and adjectives, that's what's left. Either that, or the English language HAS no gender-neutral pronoun, and we have to resort to cumbersome addresses like "he/she" or the gramatically incorrect "their."

Unless gender matters, it's a "he."
This is not without controversy, largely due to the assumption that masculine is the default for person. "He", "him", and "his" are never gender neutral, even when they're used as gender neutral pronouns. There's a reason many businesses and style guides have shifted to other, less androcentric pronoun usage - and "they/their/theirs" is not universally considered grammatically incorrect.

I think it's appropriate to point out that your use of language excludes women. You can justify it, but I'll just point out that masculine pronouns were defined as gender neutral in a time period that was pretty thoroughly sexist, and linguistically excluding women was simply one of the milder ways that exclusion occurred. There's no reason to continue reinforcing that exclusion.


Elsegame: Champions Online: @BellaStrega ||| Battle.net: Ashleigh#1834 ||| Bioware Social Network: BellaStrega ||| EA Origin: Bella_Strega ||| Steam: BellaStrega ||| The first Guild Wars: Kali Magdalene ||| The Secret World: BelleStarr (Arcadia)

 

Posted

I've never come across that etiquette, so I'd probably just click the glowie. I'll have to start asking the mission holder now.

Worse etiquette I've even come across happened just this weekend. Teams waiting for the last member to arrive at the mission door. One team member (NOT the mission holder) enters the mission, ghosts it and clicks the glowie. Last team member arrives just at the mission ends! Leader did kick said person but let them back in.

Same team next mission. X "Sorry guys having problems with my PC, need to reboot, can you save me a place?". Leader "Sure". Few moments later 8th spot filled by another alt, player returns and is a bit miffed (to say the least).

We left the PUG soon after and joined up with the player who'd had to reboot, built a new team and had much more fun.


 

Posted

I think if you want to be sure to get the glowy, it might help to mention it. I know the teams I'm on generally don't sweat it - they won't complete the mission without the mission holder present, but it doesn't really matter to us who clicks the glowy as long as it gets clicked. Missions that I do care about, I just do solo.


Elsegame: Champions Online: @BellaStrega ||| Battle.net: Ashleigh#1834 ||| Bioware Social Network: BellaStrega ||| EA Origin: Bella_Strega ||| Steam: BellaStrega ||| The first Guild Wars: Kali Magdalene ||| The Secret World: BelleStarr (Arcadia)

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by KaliMagdalene View Post
This is not without controversy, largely due to the assumption that masculine is the default for person. "He", "him", and "his" are never gender neutral, even when they're used as gender neutral pronouns. There's a reason many businesses and style guides have shifted to other, less androcentric pronoun usage - and "they/their/theirs" is not universally considered grammatically incorrect.

I think it's appropriate to point out that your use of language excludes women. You can justify it, but I'll just point out that masculine pronouns were defined as gender neutral in a time period that was pretty thoroughly sexist, and linguistically excluding women was simply one of the milder ways that exclusion occurred. There's no reason to continue reinforcing that exclusion.
Lacking a proper, grammatically correct and non-cumbersome way to say this, I would still choose to say "he" over "they" or "he/she." I've spent years trying to write around it, but I inevitably keep writing myself into corners and ending up having to reword entire sentences for no reason other than because enforced gender neutrality is unnatural and forced, purely from a language standpoint.

That, and I'm getting more than a little tired of this endless drive towards complete and utter correctness, in that every word I utter, regardless of context or intent, has to be mindful of everyone else's sensitivities. It doesn't have to be, nor would I WANT it to be. It's cumbersome, it's obstructive, it's restrictive, and it's downright unnecessary. Unless you, or anyone else, assumed I meant that I would show this courtesy to a team-mate if and only if he were a man, but would decidedly NOT show this same courtesy if he were a woman, I don't see why it has to be a problem. And, at least to me, that's not how my statement came off.

Seriously, this is getting to ridiculous levels, like people deciding not to wish each other Merry Christmas because not everyone celebrates Christmans and people who don't might feel "left out." Let's not reduce everything to absolutes, please. Not everything is a sign of segregation.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Arcanaville View Post
Samuel_Tow is the only poster that makes me want to punch him in the head more often when I'm agreeing with him than when I'm disagreeing with him.

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Samuel_Tow View Post
Lacking a proper, grammatically correct and non-cumbersome way to say this, I would still choose to say "he" over "they" or "he/she." I've spent years trying to write around it, but I inevitably keep writing myself into corners and ending up having to reword entire sentences for no reason other than because enforced gender neutrality is unnatural and forced, purely from a language standpoint.
It's not unnatural and forced, certainly not moreso than using masculine pronouns to refer to men and women. I find it unnatural and forced to refer to women as "he" or "him." At best it's unfamiliar usage.

Quote:
That, and I'm getting more than a little tired of this endless drive towards complete and utter correctness, in that every word I utter, regardless of context or intent, has to be mindful of everyone else's sensitivities. It doesn't have to be, nor would I WANT it to be. It's cumbersome, it's obstructive, it's restrictive, and it's downright unnecessary. Unless you, or anyone else, assumed I meant that I would show this courtesy to a team-mate if and only if he were a man, but would decidedly NOT show this same courtesy if he were a woman, I don't see why it has to be a problem. And, at least to me, that's not how my statement came off.
"If he were a woman." Talk about cumbersome and unnatural.

And I didn't say that every word you utter has to be mindful of everyone else's sensitivities, but when you deliberately choose to not give a rat's *** about any particular person's (or a group of people's) sensitivities, it does kinda send a message, you know?

Also, how your statement comes off "to you" is not how it comes off "to everyone."

Quote:
Seriously, this is getting to ridiculous levels, like people deciding not to wish each other Merry Christmas because not everyone celebrates Christmans and people who don't might feel "left out." Let's not reduce everything to absolutes, please. Not everything is a sign of segregation.
Hahaha. "War on Christmas". Epic bull ****. It doesn't exist, and there's not a damned thing wrong with saying "Happy Holidays" if you're not oversensitive and defensive about your cultural preferences not being central to everyone.


Elsegame: Champions Online: @BellaStrega ||| Battle.net: Ashleigh#1834 ||| Bioware Social Network: BellaStrega ||| EA Origin: Bella_Strega ||| Steam: BellaStrega ||| The first Guild Wars: Kali Magdalene ||| The Secret World: BelleStarr (Arcadia)

 

Posted

Shouldn't you all be using Shmee and Shmer?


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by KaliMagdalene View Post
"If he were a woman." Talk about cumbersome and unnatural.
Maybe you should take this he/she thing to a different topic rather than derail this topic.


 

Posted

General rule of thumb etiquette:

-Watch each others backs
-Listen to the guy with the star and/or the folks who are organising
-(So long as they aren't flailing miserably! )
-Let people do their jobs
-Do your job
-Don't be a numpty

Numpty being smack-talking and bad-mouthing people and generally slinging mud to the point of being slung.

Oh, and if your a tanker, know how to tank We had a tank on out team with the most ironic name, because they, frankly, couldnt tank. Stoney/SS with no mud pots and no taunt. Ergo, no taunting. We had a controller or two, dark/dark fender, my scrapper and some blasters, so aggro was going pretty much everywhere. The tanker had no taunt capabilities and, to boot, didnt talk. At all.
What was hilarious was how the all turned on them, to the point of being kicked
(it was getting people killed, although I made a point of using Confront on anything that went after the fenders and trollers. I now love that power )

We then got a new tanker with lightning field. He was awesome, and massacring ensued ^^


Quote:
Originally Posted by Zwillinger View Post
GG, I would tell you that "I am killing you with my mind", but I couldn't find an emoticon to properly express my sentiment.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Captain_Photon View Post
NOTE: The Incarnate System is basically farming for IOs on a larger scale, and with more obtrusive lore.

 

Posted

To add to the 'list' a very important one

Be polite and listen to what others say.

Small example:
For example, don't leave the team without saying goodbye and especially not in the midst of a mission. Or someone demanding to be rezzed, sb'ed, healed etc. Basic courtesy goes a long way.


 

Posted

I think there's a line where I do find glowy clicking impolite. Not all the time - say you're running paper missions, mobs are killed... doesn't matter to me who clicks the glowy.

However, if someone stops helping the rest of the team mid fight to click a glowy, it really irritates me. We're going to finish the fight either way, so what's the point? Also, in Mayhem Missions, mission owner should be given the chance to take the glowy which gives a temp power if they want it, and take the firebombs for the badge - I tend to speak up to make sure others allow this to happen, as I think sometimes people just go on to auto and don't realise what they're doing.

The one thing that I think is really, really off on the glowy topic is people ghosting missions without consulting the team lead/mission owner. Especially on mission arcs, some of which I really enjoy playing through. I've had to tell people to stop it and came back to the rest of the team before. The decision to ghost should be one that comes from the team leader or the team as a whole, and I think running off like that is really impolite. One time I clearly remember it happening we were absolutely blasting through a mission, going really well, and I think it was a Stalker who just took off. Promptly told them that she'd better come back and help the team, as we were going to be killing all the mobs regardless.


 

Posted

Generally, as far as etiquette goes, I'd say "try to be nice" is about all that needs to be said. If you want your glowies, say so. If someone takes your glowies, ask them to leave them for you. If someone asks you to leave their glowies, politely do so. Communicate with your team, settle problems as they occur (as opposed to two hours later when you're boiling mad) and try to make sure everyone's on the same page and meshing in well.

It's surprising how well people can get together when they talk to each other and try to be nice. The very WORST thing that could happen, really, is someone will decide he (or she ) just doesn't want to be on the team, which, really, is perfectly acceptable in my book. Try to play with the team, and if you can't, leave. No harm, no foul.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Arcanaville View Post
Samuel_Tow is the only poster that makes me want to punch him in the head more often when I'm agreeing with him than when I'm disagreeing with him.

 

Posted

*laughs at languages who lacks gender-neutral personal pronouns*

And no, there is no etiquette against clicking on glowies, unless someone specifically tells you not too.


"Men strunt �r strunt och snus �r snus
om ock i gyllne dosor.
Och rosor i ett sprucket krus
�r st�ndigt alltid rosor."