Team Etiquette: My Misconception?


Afterimage

 

Posted

If the team's doing radio/paper missions there is a zero chance of the glowy granting any special power. Doesn't matter who clicks it in that case. But I generally wait for the team leader/mission holder anyway.

If it's a contact mission, then yeah it could be a problem if someone else clicks and gains whatever prize/reward there might be. But if the mission holder doesn't warn people ahead of time, then it's their fault really.



my lil RWZ Challenge vid

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Samuel_Tow View Post
It's cumbersome, it's obstructive, it's restrictive, and it's downright unnecessary.
So is assuming everyone is a man when you write.


@Golden Girl

City of Heroes comics and artwork

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Golden Girl View Post
So is assuming everyone is a man when you write.
Saying "he" isn't assuming a gender-unidentified individual is a man. It's a speech convenience, so I don't have to keep saying he/she all the time, or try to figure out how himself/herself would work if I used "they." It's not a mark of disrespect, it's just a simple convenience that makes it easier for me to speak when it is PERFECTLY CLEAR what I mean.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Arcanaville View Post
Samuel_Tow is the only poster that makes me want to punch him in the head more often when I'm agreeing with him than when I'm disagreeing with him.

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Klatteja View Post
We all know that teaming with other players, especially with those you haven't played with before, brings together different playstyles. I'm sure most anyone on these forums can recall several bad PUGs they've been on. Hopefully they would also recall really good teams. I mostly solo myself, so I consider myself leaning towards the "hermit" side of the game. Even so, I thought I had picked up on a few "rules" (guidelines, more like, I'm sure) of etiquette when teaming.

I'll throw out an example of what I'm talking about. If it isn't your mission specifically, you don't click the glowie or otherwise end the mission without the mission-holder/team-leader's okay. There are others, to be sure, but they're probably not universal. It frustrates me when others on the team act differently than I expect them to. Not that everyone has to play like I do, but I think I try to mix courtesy in with my play when teaming, and I think I see other players not being concerned with such nonsense lately.

The real question is: have I misunderstood the way team members interact with each other? I think I've gotten "team rules" mixed up with being polite, but maybe that has no place in the middle of a fight?
It doesn't matter who clicks the glowie most of the time. Most glowies give a clue, which should appear in the clue window of the mission holder. Occassionally, a glowie grants a temporary power. This is where the problem comes. To be honest, most of these temporary powers are not really uber nor essential. If somebody clicks it, it's not the end of the world. It would be nice if people can ask before clicking to make sure that the glowie is not something special. I don't think people need to be too mad about it, but this is the internet.

Actually, I have problems with people being too strict with the team "rules." I formed a team to do some story arcs. As usual, there were some glowies. And certain team mates insisted that the glowies were "mine," I had to click it myself. I asked them to click it, but they stood beside the glowie and refused to click it. I really /em facepalm.


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Samuel_Tow View Post
Saying "he" isn't assuming a gender-unidentified individual is a man. It's a speech convenience, so I don't have to keep saying he/she all the time, or try to figure out how himself/herself would work if I used "they." It's not a mark of disrespect, it's just a simple convenience that makes it easier for me to speak when it is PERFECTLY CLEAR what I mean.
Yes, it's perfectly clear that you find it easier to assume regard men as the "defaut setting" for humans.


@Golden Girl

City of Heroes comics and artwork

 

Posted

Etiquette really depends on who you're teaming with. Not every team feels the same way and not every person on every team will agree. I find it's easiest to just ask the team I'm on instead of making assumptions about what's acceptable/the norm.

I don't assume we follow the tank or the person with the star, I ask "who are we following?"

I don't assume everyone on my team will know what I want them to do in a particular situation, so I tell them.

Easy.


~Missi

http://tinyurl.com/yhy333s

Miss Informed in 2016! She can't be worse than all those other guys!

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by brophog02 View Post
Completing the mission is the expected behavior of this game. This isn't a matter of ettiquette. 99.999999999% of the time you will complete the mission. It is only that one farming mission that you wouldn't click the glowies.


And in that case, it is clearly the responsibility of the holder to state that anomoly. No one is going to play every mission in this game without taking the steps to complete it just because of a few farmers like to hoard their 'soon to be added timed' missions.

Actual etiquette examples that come up constantly:

Letting the tank do his job. Don't throw immobs until he grabs aggro. Don't throw AOEs til he has aggro. It takes him 2 seconds to grab all of the aggro in a nice neat pile, so give him that courtesy.

Tanks letting their teammates do their jobs. Don't take a nicely placed mob and string them out 50 feet just because you feel like taunting. It is OK to jump in that pack. You have an entire team supporting you. Get in there and grab aggro and it will all be over soon.
There are missions that award the clicker temp powers and inf. only the clicker. Dont click the glowies without at least some permission. Wait to click till all are in the mission. I have kicked people from teams because of this. One guy runs across 2 zones to go to the contact and some jerk doesnt even let him get in the mission before clicking.


Lots of 50's yada yada. still finding fun things to do.
Cthulhu loves you, better start running

I�! I�! Gg�gorsch�a�bha egurtsa�ar�ug d� Dalhor! Cthluhu fthagn! Cthluhu fthagn!

You are in a maze of twisty little passages

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Samuel_Tow View Post
Saying "he" isn't assuming a gender-unidentified individual is a man. It's a speech convenience, so I don't have to keep saying he/she all the time, or try to figure out how himself/herself would work if I used "they." It's not a mark of disrespect, it's just a simple convenience that makes it easier for me to speak when it is PERFECTLY CLEAR what I mean.
Looks like I'll have to start using "incident report" language while talking about people. In place of a he or a she, I'll just have to use the inconvenient words "Individual", "Victim" and "Suspect". All three of which are gender neutral.

For the record, I never talk about a known female gendered Individual/Victim/Suspect (take your pick) using a masculine pronoun. However, I do talk about unknown gendered Individuals/Victims/Suspects (take your pick) using the simple He/Him/His. Generally, because I assume that the female gender wouldn't be as rude as a the male gender. But, I guess there is equality there as well. I suppose they could be even worse than the male, but I'd rather not assume that.

As for the actual topic of the thread...

I tend to let the mission holder click the glowy and follow the star holder's lead. I might offer suggestions at times, though. But, I rarely ever PuG.


There I was between a rock and a hard place. Then I thought, "What am I doing on this side of the rock?"

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Golden Girl View Post
Yes, it's perfectly clear that you find it easier to assume regard men as the "defaut setting" for humans.
It's been that way for centuries. It doesn't bother me. If I want to fight for gender equality, there are far more serious issues on which to spend my time. The use of "him" vs "her" isn't high on my list. When I write for business I alternate for each example or use "him/her." I also alternate names like Smith with Garcia, Huynh, etc. I don't agree with using plurals for a singular, so I avoid that.

My dilmena with the "him/her" issue is the global economy/business world. When I get an email from someone about another person, I often have no idea how to respond with a pronoun, since I don't know if the person named is male or female. I find myself writing very long sentences repeatedly referencing the person by name. Rufus Xavier Sarsparilla, indeed.


~Missi

http://tinyurl.com/yhy333s

Miss Informed in 2016! She can't be worse than all those other guys!

 

Posted

A few comments. I run teams 95 percent of the time rather then joining them.

Glowies don't matter (any more). They used to back in the day, but just about all rewards were taking away from glowies due to be "abusing" stealthing missions, most notably grabbing glowies, resetting mission, etc etc. Now all the xp has been transfered to mission completion. At best, you get the occasional inspiration. I fail to see the need to slow down the team calling out and waiting for the team leader to notice/grab each glowie. My only restriction; don't grab glowies if the fighting is still heavy.

The tank isn't the team leader. The tank doesn't decide which way to go.

Don't scout/stealth unless the team (leader) agrees.

Don't move on to the next spawn until the vast majority of the first group is down.

Don't massively aggro the room "just to spice things up" unless the team agrees.

Don't expect the team to do everything you want unless you're the team leader. While your buffs are nice, they're not needed to complete the mission. Don't expect the team to gather between each spawn or for 30 seconds for you to use AM. Just apply buffs as you can between spawns and/or when the fighting is dying down. If only four members of the team gather for AM after five seconds, just fire it off and move on.

Wait until most of the team is on map before starting.

Don't spend 5 minutes leveling/marketing/selling between each mission unless the team is fine with it and/or told.

Don't spend more time chatting in global/vent/sg/coalition/whatever then you do actually playing on the team.

Don't assume that you're actually needed on the team to finish the TF and that means you can mouth off all you want and/or go in any direction on the map you want, regardless of what direction the rest of the team is going.

Don't whine that teammates who's main most powerful damage or mez powers kb's people.

___________________
Currently listening to Death Cab for Cutie's Transatlanticism


Chief Hamster of the Fist of Justice / Shadows of Victory
Victory Server: Join Victory Forum for team forming and general game chat and IRC Chat: irc.hashmark.net #victory for offline chatting.
Rock, rock on Hamster.

 

Posted

I'm curious what the thoughts are on the etiquette involved with a certain subset of the forums goers here who can solo team-sized mobs by themselves. I know the Scrapper forums typically consider it perfectly fair game to strike off on their own and kill things willy-nilly, but it seems to me at times that a team might need the Scrapper helping them more than the Scrapper needs to maximize bodies per second.


 

Posted

Etiquette Rule #1: The Team Leader will outline his desires and plans for a mission BEFORE anyone (A-N-Y-O-N-E) sets foot in the mission. This prevents "why did you touch my glowies?" misunderstandings.

Etiquette Rule #2: The Team Leader will look for specific confirmation from each of his prospective teammates.

Etiquette Rule #3: When bringing someone on mid-mission, the Team Leader will observe Rules 1 and 2 for the new member during the invite process.

Etiquette Rule #4: If you don't like the restrictions put on you by a Team Leader, QUIT THE TEAM AND DO SOMETHING ELSE!

Had an instance of this last night. Had a team leader who had the misfortune of pulling a bunch of Malta missions when his team was comprised of mostly lowbies. So he tried a new contact to see if he could get something else. Carnies AND Malta!

I let them know that this would be my last mission, then crashed out during the first mob. Merely confirmation that I needed to do something else.



Clicking on the linked image above will take you off the City of Heroes site. However, the guides will be linked back here.

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by FunstuffofDoom View Post
I'm curious what the thoughts are on the etiquette involved with a certain subset of the forums goers here who can solo team-sized mobs by themselves. I know the Scrapper forums typically consider it perfectly fair game to strike off on their own and kill things willy-nilly, but it seems to me at times that a team might need the Scrapper helping them more than the Scrapper needs to maximize bodies per second.
Generally, you should stick with the team.

If the scrapper wants to solo, the scrapper can go solo and free up the team slot for someone else.


___________________
Currently listening to Eric Sardinas' Treat Me Right


Chief Hamster of the Fist of Justice / Shadows of Victory
Victory Server: Join Victory Forum for team forming and general game chat and IRC Chat: irc.hashmark.net #victory for offline chatting.
Rock, rock on Hamster.

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by brophog02 View Post
Completing the mission is the expected behavior of this game. This isn't a matter of ettiquette. 99.999999999% of the time you will complete the mission. It is only that one farming mission that you wouldn't click the glowies.
Not true at all. There are numerous missions where some special benefit (badge progress, a temp power) is conveyed only to the player who clicks the glowie. Courtesy dictates that the mission owner should always have first shot at those glowies.

And if someone isn't knowledgeable about these circumstances, then don't touch!


Paragon City Search And Rescue
The Mentor Project

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Golden Girl View Post
So has inequality
Then step away from your computer and do something real about it. Harrassing people for pronouns and winking isn't going to remove any glass ceiling.


~Missi

http://tinyurl.com/yhy333s

Miss Informed in 2016! She can't be worse than all those other guys!

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Klatteja View Post
We all know that teaming with other players, especially with those you haven't played with before, brings together different playstyles. I'm sure most anyone on these forums can recall several bad PUGs they've been on. Hopefully they would also recall really good teams. I mostly solo myself, so I consider myself leaning towards the "hermit" side of the game. Even so, I thought I had picked up on a few "rules" (guidelines, more like, I'm sure) of etiquette when teaming.

I'll throw out an example of what I'm talking about. If it isn't your mission specifically, you don't click the glowie or otherwise end the mission without the mission-holder/team-leader's okay. There are others, to be sure, but they're probably not universal. It frustrates me when others on the team act differently than I expect them to. Not that everyone has to play like I do, but I think I try to mix courtesy in with my play when teaming, and I think I see other players not being concerned with such nonsense lately.

The real question is: have I misunderstood the way team members interact with each other? I think I've gotten "team rules" mixed up with being polite, but maybe that has no place in the middle of a fight?

I am indeed an old man with kids on my lawn, but this post isn't intended to be a whiny screed. Am I completely off-base? On-base and need to get over it already, Pops? Both? Both and something else, too?

Geez, I need my pills.
Yes it is your misconception.

Without some kind of etiquette guide, there are no standards of behaviour to follow with regards to the items you brought up. Each person approaches such a situation with his own preconceptions and experiences. There is no right or wrong where there is no help nor harm.

With the exception of farm missions which are never completed, it does not matter who clicks on glowing items. The mission owner is not injured by another player clicking on a glowie. The mission owner may have a perception that it the glowie is its personal property, and that by clicking on the glowie, the other player has somehow robbed it. But if the other player doesn't share the perception that a glowie is property, it has no idea that the mission owner would be offended.





(BTW, English has a neutral pronoun: it. It is usually not used to refer to a person but to a thing. But we can change that if we like. This is conversation, not a grammar class.)


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by MissInformed View Post
Then step away from your computer and do something real about it. Harrassing people for pronouns and winking isn't going to remove any glass ceiling.
It's not harrassing - it's just pointing out how silly it is


@Golden Girl

City of Heroes comics and artwork

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Afterimage View Post
Yes it is your misconception.

Without some kind of etiquette guide, there are no standards of behaviour to follow with regards to the items you brought up. Each person approaches such a situation with his own preconceptions and experiences. There is no right or wrong where there is no help nor harm.

With the exception of farm missions which are never completed, it does not matter who clicks on glowing items. The mission owner is not injured by another player clicking on a glowie. The mission owner may have a perception that it the glowie is its personal property, and that by clicking on the glowie, the other player has somehow robbed it. But if the other player doesn't share the perception that a glowie is property, it has no idea that the mission owner would be offended.
You are correct that there are no standard guidelines.

However, it not quite accurate that it does not matter who clicks the glowies. Several missions have glowies which grant temporary powers. IMO, it is polite to give the mission holder the opportunity to say whether they wish to retain that power. YMMV, however.

--Rad


/whereami:

 

Posted

My main rule of etiquette on teams I lead, as long as the team has been formed to satisfaction before getting to the door, is to wait for everyone to load in the mission before starting.

As for pet peeves, if someone catches me after we've already started a mission and wants to join, I try to give them an idea of how far along we are. I appreciate the same thing in turn. For example, if you're in northern Nerva and almost done with your mission when you invite me, warn me about that so that I don't waste time traveling to the mission door and zone in for the mission to be completed 3 seconds later.

Also, within reason, listen to the leader. I remember one time when the mission objective was a glowie, and there were at least 2 mobs well within site of the glowie but solidly out of aggro range. We get the glowie, and another player starts talking about going after the remaining mobs. Leader says exit the mission. The other player started -arguing- with the rest of the TEAM that you always clear a mission. No ifs, ands, or buts. That's how it was done.


Tales of Judgment. Also here, instead of that other place.

good luck D.B.B.

 

Posted

By-and-large, there is not etiquette in regards to completing missions. And I never ask if it is okay for me to complete a mission.
If someone is farming a mission, they should be polite enough to tell me before I accept an invite to join the team.

As far as glowies go, most of the time all you get is some small amount of xp. It isn't really that much, and it doesn't make that much of a difference in the long run or in my enjoyment of the game if someone else clicks a glowie.
If I was on a certain mission where I knew that I have the potential to get a temp power and it was my mission (and I really cared enough), I would make it clear to the team that it is my mission and there is a temp power in one of the glowies, so don't click them and to let me know where they are so I can click them.
I have never done that. I really don't care if the rest of the team clicks the glowies and/or gets the temp power.

If you are on a PuG, it is going to tend to be a bit wild.
Players tend to be a bit disorganized initially, and they may have preconceived notions about the way teams behave in general instead of figuring out what the other players can do and working to use their powers to augment the rest of the team.

In general, I tend to run "No Tanker/No Scrapper" PuGs. We do pretty good generally if people work together. The time that things tend to go wrong is when someone decides that they are a Tank (and don't have powers to cover that illusion) or automatically think there is a Tank on the team (apparently don't have their team window open), and race into a group of foes when they don't have the protection of Taunt (not that many Tanks seem to have Taunt anyway...) or their own defenses to deal with the agro.

Remember that the leader of the team has the star and they may very well have a good plan of how to get through missions with the kind of team that they have built.
Most PuGs end up just being a group of people running around until something gels -- when couple of players or the whole team start working together. When that happens, the enemies don't stand a chance.

I'd say that a good PuG team etiquette point is that you do not become the leader of a team simply because you were invited to a team....regardless if you are a tank/"can tank" or not.
The Tanker-centric team is not the only kind of team. It is not the only kind of team dynamic or team tactic that will work and/or be efficient in this game.
Tankers certainly don't become the team leader simply because they were invited to a team.

You don't need a "H3A70R" in order to defeat the enemy. H3A70Rs tend to do very little damage. You have to do damage to defeat the enemy.
There isn't always one to recruit. No reason to stand around all day looking for one or to keep complaining that there isn't a "healer" on the team.
Heals are nice, but buffs and debuffs are very powerful as well and can often compensate for not having a character with the ability to heal other players on the team.

Team tactics win out over almost any foe regardless of which ATs are on the team.
It is unfortunate that I have to be picky about the ATs that I select for a mission in order to vary my play experience by changing team dynamics. Some players are picky feeling that they have to have a tank and a "healer" on their team; many PuGs are like this.

Keeping all the enemy bunched up is not always the way to defeat them.
Stringing them out means that fewer of them are attacking your group at one time and you can defeat several as the rest are running up to catch up. Sure you can't pile on AoEs if they are stretched out and a Tank would have to Taunt a couple of times to group them once the enemy arrives (having been whittled down a bit), but I think that's better than eating floor.
Other AT's using tactics work just as well as a Tanker herding or pulling.
The point of this game is the variety of powers that are given to us. It is a shame to think that there is only one right way to play the game. You don't need to min-max in order to make a successful character or run a successful team.

I PuG pretty much all the time because I'm alt/side/server jumper. I'm a 60+ month vet and I try to play some almost every day.
I have only been on a small handful of teams where the leader wanted to click their own glowies - and they did make that clear in advance. The majority of PuGs that I have been on the motto is "If you see a glowie, click it - but help us fight any enemies that were are in combat with first".

The only teams that I have ever been on that don't complete missions were farm teams - that's the only reason to reset a mission and run it again. These team leaders tended to wait to announce that they were going to reset the mission until the mission is almost over ... and the mission tends to be a very long mission that has a very good end mission reward.
I have a right to that very good end mission reward, if I helped to complete that mission. The rude behavior at that point is on the side of the person running the team that is suddenly telling me that they are behaving in a non-standard manner once it is time to collect the reward - aka the last minute reveal that they are farmers and that they are going to reset the mission.
It is also rude to form a team, wait for players to cross zones to get to a mission, expect them to stand around while everyone assembles before going into a mission, and then, right before clicking on the door or right after going into a mission, saying that they are farming the mission and not to click the glowies or complete the mission. That's wasted my time.
If they knew they were going to be farming, they could have said so during the invite or as soon as I joined the team.
If I knew it was a farming team, I wouldn't have joined in the first place. If they said it was a farm once I had joined, I would have quit the team.
Of course, once farmers are out of the equation, I usually don't have to bother about the glowie clicking or missions ending questions; the team is trying to click glowies and complete the missions!


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Golden Girl View Post
It's not harrassing - it's just pointing out how silly it is
Which is lame. Leave Sam alone. :P


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Golden Girl View Post
The she needs to start using the correct terms
For you...he can't, there is a profanity filter.


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Clouded View Post
For you...he can't, there is a profanity filter.
"She" and "her" are censored? I'm sure some people might quite like that


@Golden Girl

City of Heroes comics and artwork