Doctor Who 27/8 (or 8/27)


Casual_Player

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr_Samoa View Post
Then, obviously, she becomes River Song (did she really 'concentrate on a dress size' and guide how she would appear?)
I think she was probably joking, but there is precedent for Timelords having some control over their regenerations (see Romana in "Destiny of the Daleks", or K'anpo in "Planet of the Spiders"). The Doctor never seems to, but that might just be because he's always fighting/postponing the process instead of accepting it peacefully ("I don't want to go!").


99458: The Unbearable Being of Lightness
191775: How the Other Half Lives
My Webcomics

 

Posted

Just had a thought. What was the deal with that jacket the Doctor was wearing for the entire episode? In the preview for next week he's back to the tweed...so why the different jacket for this episode? Is it simply a matter of giving the Eleventh Doctor a slightly more varied wardrobe...or something else?


"You don't lose levels. You don't have equipment to wear out, repair, or lose, or that anyone can steal from you. About the only thing lighter than debt they could do is have an NPC walk by, point and laugh before you can go to the hospital or base." -Memphis_Bill
We will honor the past, and fight to the last, it will be a good way to die...

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr_Samoa View Post
personally I'd love to see something where regeneration resulted in a different gender too, but nevermind that
In "The Doctor's Wife", he mentioned knowing another Timelord that always had the same tatoo, even over multiple generations, and I believe he mentioned that Timelord swapping genders a couple of times during said regenerations. Awesome episode that one, will have to watch it again.

Between that episode and this one, we've pretty much confirmed cross-gender and cross-racial regenerations. Always assumed possible, but nice to see direct references to it.

-LR


Lightning Rod
<Guardians>

"I am certain that all CoX will be humbled by the might of the Lightning Rod." -Lady_Sadako

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by DarkGob View Post
Just had a thought. What was the deal with that jacket the Doctor was wearing for the entire episode? In the preview for next week he's back to the tweed...so why the different jacket for this episode? Is it simply a matter of giving the Eleventh Doctor a slightly more varied wardrobe...or something else?
Wasn't he wearing that formal wear in the first episode of this season? As well as Amy's wedding? Pardon my fuzzy memory.


Goodbye may seem forever
Farewell is like the end
But in my heart's the memory
And there you'll always be
-- The Fox and the Hound

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by DarkGob View Post
Just had a thought. What was the deal with that jacket the Doctor was wearing for the entire episode? In the preview for next week he's back to the tweed...so why the different jacket for this episode? Is it simply a matter of giving the Eleventh Doctor a slightly more varied wardrobe...or something else?
Pretty much, from what I can tell. I guess Matt Smith actually owns that style of coat, so they wanted to work it into the Doctor's wardrobe.


There is an art, or, rather, a knack to flying. The knack lies in learning how to throw yourself at the ground and miss. --The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy

 

Posted

An interesting background detail.


Goodbye may seem forever
Farewell is like the end
But in my heart's the memory
And there you'll always be
-- The Fox and the Hound

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tenzhi View Post
Wasn't he wearing that formal wear in the first episode of this season? As well as Amy's wedding? Pardon my fuzzy memory.
He was wearing the formal wear after he came out of the TARDIS, but before that and for the rest of the episode up to that point he was wearing a long jacket.

But the formal wear thing does raise further questions...


"You don't lose levels. You don't have equipment to wear out, repair, or lose, or that anyone can steal from you. About the only thing lighter than debt they could do is have an NPC walk by, point and laugh before you can go to the hospital or base." -Memphis_Bill
We will honor the past, and fight to the last, it will be a good way to die...

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tenzhi View Post
Wasn't he wearing that formal wear in the first episode of this season? As well as Amy's wedding? Pardon my fuzzy memory.
He probably wore the formal wear because he wanted to use the cane and the formal wear goes with the cane. I can see The Doctor thinking like that.


But it's MY sadistic mechanical monster and I'm here to make sure it knows it. - Girl Genius

List of Invention Guides

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by TerraDraconis View Post
He probably wore the formal wear because he wanted to use the cane and the formal wear goes with the cane. I can see The Doctor thinking like that.
Canes are cool.


"You don't lose levels. You don't have equipment to wear out, repair, or lose, or that anyone can steal from you. About the only thing lighter than debt they could do is have an NPC walk by, point and laugh before you can go to the hospital or base." -Memphis_Bill
We will honor the past, and fight to the last, it will be a good way to die...

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by DarkGob View Post

But the formal wear thing does raise further questions...
How so? The only thing that comes to my tired little grey cells is that's probably the tux he'll wear to the Opera we've all heard about and dread.


Quote:
Originally Posted by JKCarrier View Post
I think she was probably joking, but there is precedent for Timelords having some control over their regenerations (see Romana in "Destiny of the Daleks", or K'anpo in "Planet of the Spiders"). The Doctor never seems to, but that might just be because he's always fighting/postponing the process instead of accepting it peacefully ("I don't want to go!").
I could have sworn I'd heard years ago on some episode from, oh, Doctors 4 thru 6, that Romana was among the minority of Time Lords who can control their regenerations. The Doctor admitted that he was one who had no control. With the modern series, its pretty obvious with #10 that if he could control his regeneration, he would have, forcing the outcome closest to his appearance and personality.


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rodoan View Post
I could have sworn I'd heard years ago on some episode from, oh, Doctors 4 thru 6, that Romana was among the minority of Time Lords who can control their regenerations. The Doctor admitted that he was one who had no control. With the modern series, its pretty obvious with #10 that if he could control his regeneration, he would have, forcing the outcome closest to his appearance and personality.
My understanding of it has always been that Romana was able to control her Regeneration because she was choosing to regenerate, rather than being forced into it as the Doctor always seems to be.


Goodbye may seem forever
Farewell is like the end
But in my heart's the memory
And there you'll always be
-- The Fox and the Hound

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tenzhi View Post
My understanding of it has always been that Romana was able to control her Regeneration because she was choosing to regenerate, rather than being forced into it as the Doctor always seems to be.
Indeed, her regeneration process seemed to take much longer than the Doctor's and there was no sense of urgency.

Think of it like City of Heroes. You want to change your costume? Cool, take as long as you want.
But, say, if you get killed you are forced to pick a new costume... and you only have 5-30 seconds to do it in... and you'll lose your character forever if you don't chose a new costume... you'll probably just hit random and hope for the best.


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tenzhi View Post
My understanding of it has always been that Romana was able to control her Regeneration because she was choosing to regenerate, rather than being forced into it as the Doctor always seems to be.
That makes a certain sense. I'd always read that Doctor #1 had delayed his regeneration too long (implying there previously would have been a moment of control). And we saw the Master (Derek Jacobi) will himself to become a younger man, though he didn't seem to exert a lot of control on the decision.

(now I'm thinking it again: why couldn't they have kept Jacobi on longer as the Master? )


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rodoan View Post
(now I'm thinking it again: why couldn't they have kept Jacobi on longer as the Master?
The answer to that is that the production team wanted him to be the dark mirror of the Doctor, as was the original intention way back in the 70's with the 3rd Doctor. Thus, they needed a young, manic Master to play against the young, manic 10th Doctor.


 

Posted

So has anyone noticed any oddities of costuming or dialogue yet? Remember last seasons we were shown two time periods of the doctor at the same time and most of use did't pick up on it other than it seemed a bit weird somehow... and then it was shown that it was the doctor traveling backwards through time and that;s why he looked different at those precise moments that intersected with the previous episodes.


 

Posted

I'm still trying to work out if there was any relevance to the Fish Fingers and Custard bit, or if it was just a throwaway reference to the original one.

He seemed to react to it, I thought he'd figured out a surprise way for an antidote, but it wasn't, clearly.


We built this city on Rock and Roll!

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by DarkGob View Post
Just had a thought. What was the deal with that jacket the Doctor was wearing for the entire episode? In the preview for next week he's back to the tweed...so why the different jacket for this episode? Is it simply a matter of giving the Eleventh Doctor a slightly more varied wardrobe...or something else?
This is the Moff, we know from last season that changes in costume are significant.

In this case, we have two. The 3/4 long tweedy coat, which is featured in a number of publicity stills, and the tux.

The coat, I think indicates that several hundred years have passed for the Doctor between this episode and the previous.

The tux, I think will be explained in future episodes. Hypothesis: he went back to the wedding to check Mel's story (eating fish fingers and custard whilst there to resist the poison.)

In the next epsiode, the Doctor will go back to his normal costume, so Amy and Rory don't twig that a lot of time (with River) has passed for him.

Remember they are travelling in opposite directions in time, so many of the Doctor's encounters with River that have been hinted at should have occurred before this first encounter with the "River" incarnation. And it must be a previous, Melody or Mel, incarnation, who shoots the Doctor in Utah, or someone else entirely.


I really should do something about this signature.

 

Posted

I am definitely thinking that he did something after he heard "fish fingers and custard" in the Tardis. He had 30 minutes to do something whether it was to visit someone or set something in motion and here is some time missing from when he sent the Tardis off after that segment and when he showed up wearing the suit.


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rodoan View Post
That makes a certain sense. I'd always read that Doctor #1 had delayed his regeneration too long (implying there previously would have been a moment of control). And we saw the Master (Derek Jacobi) will himself to become a younger man, though he didn't seem to exert a lot of control on the decision.

(now I'm thinking it again: why couldn't they have kept Jacobi on longer as the Master? )
The Deadly Assassin novelization suggests that one reason the Master has run out of regenerations is he has used some to change his appearance as a disguise.


I really should do something about this signature.

 

Posted

Here's an interesting interview with Moffat, done before this episode:

http://www.aoltv.com/2011/08/26/doct...song-matt-smi/

He appears to acknowledge that there's now a lot of wiggle room within established Time Lord rules. He says River is being "poetic" when she says she's meeting the Doctor traveling backwards in time. That strict sequence has already been jumbled up.

But in a general sense, the last time he meets her being her first, likely means she was in the spacesuit as a young girl when she shot the Doctor. Although it appears his 200 year older version is truly dead, she is still trying to kill him later in her subjective timeline when she actually becomes River. So it seems as if the first killing didn't take, or the programming would have evaporated. By circular reasoning, the Doctor lives. hehe.

Time Lords have pills for time-travel conundrum induced headaches.


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Marsquake View Post
Here's an interesting interview with Moffat, done before this episode:

http://www.aoltv.com/2011/08/26/doct...song-matt-smi/

He appears to acknowledge that there's now a lot of wiggle room within established Time Lord rules. He says River is being "poetic" when she says she's meeting the Doctor traveling backwards in time. That strict sequence has already been jumbled up.

But in a general sense, the last time he meets her being her first, likely means she was in the spacesuit as a young girl when she shot the Doctor. Although it appears his 200 year older version is truly dead, she is still trying to kill him later in her subjective timeline when she actually becomes River. So it seems as if the first killing didn't take, or the programming would have evaporated. By circular reasoning, the Doctor lives. hehe.

Time Lords have pills for time-travel conundrum induced headaches.
Another missing thing...

That "death" that happened at the beginning of the series happened in june or july right?

The death that the little guys were talking about happens in April

So obviously one or both deaths recorded are wrong.


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dr_Mayhem View Post
I am definitely thinking that he did something after he heard "fish fingers and custard" in the Tardis. He had 30 minutes to do something whether it was to visit someone or set something in motion and here is some time missing from when he sent the Tardis off after that segment and when he showed up wearing the suit.
I wondered at that too, but then remembered that "fish fingers and custard" was what Amy told him to show him he could trust her with his life. Adding that to his secret knowledge of his "death" date, and I think the words were more of a reminder of the promise and a rallying point for him. Amy is, in a sense, his champion now, just as he for her. Or perhaps, to reference Man of La Mancha, she is his "Dulcinea".


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Durakken View Post
Another missing thing...

That "death" that happened at the beginning of the series happened in june or july right?

The death that the little guys were talking about happens in April

So obviously one or both deaths recorded are wrong.
Airdate of The Impossible Astronaut was April 23, 2011. Death of the Doctor per the records of the little people was April 22, 2011.


Kyle Al'Mordu - Lvl 50 MA/SR Scrap
Fusion Force!
TRIUMPH

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Marsquake View Post
Time Lords have pills for time-travel conundrum induced headaches.
And they have 337 words for "now".


 

Posted

Just a quick thought/personal theory... Back in Day of the Moon, the Silence were praising Amy because "she would bring the silence" or whatever.
Now if this comes to be true, then surely it will be Amy who asks 'the question' that brings the silence?

Amy grew up with a time crack in her wall, so she can remember people back into the universe. But what if the Silence was a way of making her forget the doctor forever. Perhaps the silence are working on a way for everyone to forget the doctor. "doctor who?" could be the question, but maybe that is too cheesy and obvious