Durakken

Renowned
  • Posts

    2381
  • Joined

  1. Durakken

    Why bother?

    Quote:
    Originally Posted by DeviousMe View Post
    It's not that. What we're getting bent out about is Durakken belittling the efforts of the people who are trying to save this game by saying things like that it would 'so easy' to do it by 'just' getting a pile of money together and tossing it at NCSoft. He doesn't understand that the business world doesn't work that way and is insulting the people putting in the effort to organize things (like negotiating with NCSoft to convince them to let the IP go) by telling them he knows better and their work is a waste of time. That's what we're getting bent out about here.
    That's what you got out of what I said and while it is a waste of time in my opinion, because it is only postponing the innevitable and wasting money on something that could be spent in other places, but if that's what you want to waste time and money on. Go right ahead.

    There is nothing "valuable" in my estimation about the game other than nostalgia, history, and brand name. And while those are nice to have sometimes, it is not the should be focused on. Are you really telling me that the devs can't create a newer better engine? or newer better lore? or newer better mechanics? i don't buy that for a second, but that's what trying to save this game really does. You're fighting for something that could be outdone in short order if you were to allow them to move on as a team.

    For bringing in new capital that a start up needs to get going the only thing that is valuable out of those 3 things is the brand name which holds only a small amount of value, but even that with enough of a loyal fan base word of mouth would spread that it is the same people and thus in that sense isn't that valuable either. The only value then of buying the IP is the lore. And while it is cool it'd be like saying that an artist should just keep painting their first painting because it's so awesome as it is, rather than taking those skills and creating something altogether new and likely better.

    Skip the buying the IP which will cost all that money, keep the team together, and create a new IP with the funds that you would spend on something that has relatively little value for what you'd pay for it. And maybe you find this all insulting that I would say your efforts are in folly, but they are. No matter what the result is, the best you can hope for is paying several million dollars for a game that due to these hits will continue to lose money likely only lasting a few more years before the numbers become too low to maintain anything more than the lights on with 2 of the 4 or 5 years left the game likely has left (now that it was hit with this) being in the red. And then where does this start up go from there? Nowhere because it doesn't have the money so it either dies or needs new investors and you are back at this same situation, pushed 5 years down road, working with a system that wasn't all that great to begin with from everything that is said.

    If you take the money you'd pay for the IP and dump it into a new IP you might be in the red for the same amount of time, but the game "should" be better, you have a clean slate with new fans, and the IP is likely better and you will have a lot more profit in the end.

    Assuming people follow the dev team with what they do Buying the game gives you a steady decline while building a new game the risk is virtually the same but it has a much higher RoI for an investor because there is always that spike of new people that are curious.

    So in the end all you are doing is wasting time and effort if you are looking for the best possible product and profit. If you're goal is simply to tarnish NCSoft... You're doing a decent job. Or if your goal is to get your game back it's a crap shoot, but I'd bet your largely wasting your time and even if it works out you're going to get a much diminished product.
  2. Durakken

    Why bother?

    Quote:
    Originally Posted by ChrisMoses View Post
    Durakken, obvious trolling aside, it was said at one point (by a redname, IIRC - Zwill?) that a Kickstarter campaign can't be used here, because this is an established, owned property, and Kickstarter doesn't allow that kind of funding.
    There is another option that I mentioned and that would be what you'd go with.

    Quote:
    A Pay Pal account would be the only feasible way, but I can't imagine a community of private citizens has the kind of liquid capital that would be needed.
    I think you're wrong, and even if I'm wrong you can always put in there "if you donate and we can't do this we'll give the money to charity" or something like that. It's a win all the way around.
  3. Durakken

    Why bother?

    Quote:
    Originally Posted by Techbot Alpha View Post
    Uh...I'm sorry, what? What guff is this that you're pulling out of your rear end?

    What turgid, trog infested rock did YOU crawl out from under? Kindly get back there and go back to sleep. It's better for everyone that way.
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by DeviousMe View Post
    Wow. Thank you for telling us what we do and don't care about. Please stop now.
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by Bill Z Bubba View Post
    Did you stop taking your meds or are you actually retarded?
    You guys do realize I was being sarcastic there right? Probably not. My point is that you should be loyal to the dev team, not the game. Loyalty to a creative team will always be more rewarding and better in the long run than holding on to whatever it is they last worked on. You say this is a great community and great devs but all I see being focused on really is "how do we save the game" which in my opinion really doesn't matter.

    Quote:
    Originally Posted by Captain-Electric View Post
    Someone who's familiar with Durakken, please tell me if we're being trolled.

    All I remember about him is when he made that City of Heroes Lore wiki (and worked his butt off on it for a couple weeks before forgetting about it and eventually letting the domain lapse). Fortunately, all of that content made it over to the Titan Network's Paragon Wiki, because I loved what Durakken managed to pull together. His master timeline was and is epic.

    But then I see this and it's like seriously, main screen turn on what is this I don't even know???
    Thank you Captain-Electric for saying you liked that. I quit doing that because no one else contributed. Glad you saved it some degree.

    Point blank, while I do like CoH. CoH is only as great as it is because of great devs working around a system that they need to revamp anyways. And I don't consider myself part of this community for certain reasons that people know about and I have been proven right about. I am more laughing at this than anything because to me it is a matter of reaping what you sow, but that's besides the point. I made peace with the death of CoH about a year ago now. That however doesn't mean that I won't get bored and push you fools into doing something that could be totally awesome... and that is not to save a 8 year old game with a hacked apart engine. And if nothing else at least 1 person saw what the right strategy is to do that which could change so much.
  4. Durakken

    Why bother?

    Quote:
    Originally Posted by DeviousMe View Post
    Oh, you already answered that then. You do not understand how things like this work and that they have to be carefully negotiated. Got it.
    I know how these things work, but that negotiation has nothing to do with what the community can do.

    Quote:
    Well hey then, why don't you go ahead and get started on that so that if we get NCSoft to sell (and to us, not one of the other companies we're trying to get interested in Para...oh wait, you said you didn't care about that, nevermind), we'll have all the 'contracts and such'?
    It is simple. It is more or less just a basic selling of share in a company or an RoI, but that's only if you go that route of ownership. If you go with a start up funded by one of those sites then I'm sure access to alpha and beta tests and all like that would be more than enough
  5. Durakken

    Why bother?

    Quote:
    Originally Posted by Le Blanc View Post
    "...if not, sink that into a newer better venture that is the "spiritual" successor."


    Now this might not be the worst idea. I admit I have not kept up on ALL the efforts and whats going on, but have any of the Dev's said they would be willing, with start-up cash provided by the community, to do this?

    I know I would drop a lifetime sub for something that I knew was going to have the same feel and flair of CoX, but under a different name. That cash would fly from my wallet so fast it would make my wifes head spin. And I'm talking sight unseen with the game even. Just lemme know that the folks at Paragon were putting together a new hero game, and Im there.
    Why would a community do that? They care about the game. Not the dev team, which should really make any creative person sad.
  6. Durakken

    Why bother?

    Quote:
    Originally Posted by DeviousMe View Post
    and obviously your so-called 'watching' is extremely limited in scope, otherwise you wouldn't be saying things like:



    So I suggest you do some actual watching, which will quickly show you that your 'unique idea' of:
    I never said the idea is unique. I said that the event would be unique.

    Quote:
    is about as wrong as can be. Thus far, NCSoft has made no indication whatsoever that they'd be willing to sell CoH and Paragon Studios - to anybody - rather than just can the whole lot, despite currently ongoing negotiations with the Paragon Studios leads. That doesn't mean there's not a chance of it still happening mind you, but it's nowhere near as 'easily handled' as you believe. The business world is a lot more complex than you realize, and frankly I find it insulting that you're mouthing off with this attitude when you clearly have no idea what's going on.
    First of all, It's always amazing that people don't realize the power of slapping the million down over saying that you can do it, and this uncertainty of "I'd do it! I really really would, but I don't know how much you want...so I can't" is utter idiocy. Do you not understand that the action alone would draw so much more attention from media and other companies that would go "oh hey if they will do that that how can we get in on that."

    Oh and I never said anything about the negotians with NCsoft. Don't know. Don't care. My comment was to how to handle ownership if you were to make a player own company which would require contracts and such, but that's not really all that hard to do.
  7. Durakken

    Why bother?

    Quote:
    Originally Posted by Steel_Golem View Post
    It is more complicated than that. Paragon Studios isn't a publicly traded company; you can't buy it unless NCSoft agrees to sell it. NCSoft has not yet given an indication that they are willing to do so, other than rumors of talks taking place with the Paragon Studios management.

    I would love for NCSoft to name a price and allow us to try and crowdsource funds for it, but unless they do, you can't set a fund raising target because you don't know what they would actually sell it to you for. Further, you can't just fund raise as the playerbase; you need to incorporate as an entity that can actually do multi-million dollar deals, which means you have to found some type of corporation or non-profit entity. This requires legal resources and has tax implications that could severely burn those setting it up if they do it wrong, and takes time to do. Things get further complicated because everyone has a different idea of what exactly buying the game would entail and how it would be run post-acquisition.

    And that is mostly why no credible attempts have been made to buy the game via crowdsourced funding--yet. I hope it gets a chance to happen, I have a decent chunk of cash blocked out from my budget in case we do get that chance, but am not holding my breath. I know I wouldn't want to be trying to set up a corporation to do this, so I am not terribly surprised noone else is either.
    Corporations don't take much if at all to set up. There are large benefits of doing it some places, like, if I remember right, Maryland.

    Who would set it up is easy. I would assume one of the head developer.

    There is also another strategy. Plan to develop a new game and start now, if you can't get CoH, the game, maintain the spirit. There is nothing that says that you have to raise the money to buy that game because what is really important is the dev team and community so set a goal based on that figure and if you can buy the IP and such, great, if not, sink that into a newer better venture that is the "spiritual" successor.

    Game companies and various enterprises have already raised insane amounts of cash and to say that you're worried you can't while bragging about your community is pathetic. And any amount you would need to buy CoH would likely be enough, several times over to fund development for a new game.

    What was the number of petitioners? 18,000? If each of them instead of signing that petition were to have donated to such a cause the VIP sub amount for 1 quarter it would 1.08million dollars and that is more than enough to get dedicated developers to working on something, but then I believe that this community is somewhat loyal and the devs do care enough to stay on with that budget.

    The question really then comes down to are you about community and loyalty to the developers or do you just want your game.
  8. Durakken

    Why bother?

    So I've been watching this since I heard about it and i don't get why people are bothering with it. No, I don't mean I don't know why you are feeling bad and trying to save this game. I mean why bother trying to get NCsoft to change their position when regardless of why they are doing this the reality of the matter is that this keeps happening over and over again with CoH. Loyal fans and Dedicated (well mostly dedicated) developers are great at what they do be damned.

    The idea that CoH had to be cut to make up for lost money elsewhere is ridiculous. MMORPGs pay for themselves after they've got to a certain point in their life cycles and until they fall below a certain point. Are you really believing that one of top most subscribed to games in the world is below the point of self sustainment? That is just foolish. So why would NCsoft do it? I have no idea. Most actions that people take look dumb to me.

    The fact is, let's say you all get this saved and celebrate, given the track record, what makes you think that this isn't just going to happen again? What makes you think that CoH as a product in the hands of NCSoft isn't damaged to a large degree already? This matters because if it is, then that will be used for the next argument to shut it down. Your subs are slipping again. So now they have a reason and now it looks like you're just complaining for the sake of complaining and all this outreach will have been wasted.

    So I say, why not do something relatively unique. You claim you have a great community here so why not try something more community based. As a community BUY the game. BUY Paragon Studios. Put up the money via kick starter or indiegogo or one of those sites. Show that you mean business with hard cash and grab control of the game that is as much if not more yours as it is theirs. All you are doing currently doing is relying on other people to work out the stuff with their money. You want it. You buy it. That's capitalism and we now have tools to do it so why not?

    Obviously there would have to be something worked out for the ownership and control and all like that, but that should be easily handled by anyone with a keen enough business mind. My point is. Put your money on the table and show them you want it. Many of you pay months ahead and that's a big amount of money quarterly. The worst that can happen is it doesn't work out, but if it does. You've then done something amazing and unique that no other community can say they've done and you essentially have control over the game and don't have to worry about these things that keep cropping up every few years.
  9. #1. I'm not back, just smirking a little.

    #2. I don't see why people think that NCsoft would just drop an IP into oblivion. Has none of you considered a restructuring and such for an upcoming new title that will bring in a new audience and new money with a CoH2 since really the only reason this game has low sub compared to a number of other games is because of its age.

    #3. Everything I said about the Comic Culture section seems to have been right. It's barely active from what I can see.

    #4. Everyone is welcome to come post on my forums at http://durakkenstudios.com

    ps. Oh I just noticed... My post count is over 9000 :P
  10. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Aneko View Post
    You can certainly argue that if you like, but I find it odd that no other character in the movie questions it. Is this some conspiracy theory?
    Well, it's largely because it's not said to other people...

    She attempts to say it to her father, but he blows her off
    She tells Carter, but he doesn't seem to care.
    Carter uses something similar to get the Tharks to fight which is Soldanga is going to conquer Helium and after they are done there they are going to kill you so you should team with Helium to deal with Soldanga before it's too late. This is not the same as "the end of Barsoom"
  11. Quote:
    Originally Posted by RemusShepherd View Post
    The princess doesn't trust Soldanga, and if they win then Barsoom loses. Soldanga had been destroying cities for years. All of this is in the film. Even if you didn't catch all that, it's clear that Helium are the good guys and Soldanga are the bad guys, so if Soldanga wins it's the end of the Barsoomian way of life.
    No it's not. It's the end of the Helium way of living or even just HER way of living.

    Quote:
    The therns 'eat' the energy from dying civilizations. They were helping Soldanga because it was destroying Barsoom. All of this is in the exposition from the thern that had John Carter captive.
    They don't explain that they feed on the energy... It also doesn't make sense how that even remotely works... but it's acceptable in fantasy...i guess.
  12. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Oliin View Post
    Eh, must have misunderstood you again. I figured you were saying that the more immediate threat of the atmosphere disappearing was a bigger and better threat than a guy who's explicitly stated to be going around conquering and destroying cities and that's why the Asylum one was better.

    The threat was pretty clear cut and explained in the first couple minutes of the movie. Stop Kantos Kan and save the day while leaving the 'bigger' threat of the priests there for a sequel. That he was marrying Dejah Thoris was just his means of conquering Helium.

    Still though, I don't see how the threat exactly makes a move better or worse. What makes the movie good or not (to me) are things like the script, acting, directing, cinematography and (to a much lesser extent) special effects. And in those regards the new one trumped the Asylum version in all cases. That's even with the somewhat average performances of Taylor Kitsch(John Carter) and Lynn Collins(Dejah Thoris).
    Sorta...

    Spoilers...
    The movie start and the Therm give the weapon to the conqueror. Ok.
    The Princess says that if the conqueror wins it will spell the end of Barsoom. Ok.

    And then you wait... and wait... and wait... and forget... and then realize... HOW will the Conqueror spell the end for Barsoom?

    No clue. There isn't any reason that is the case so the princess is idiotically talking in hyperbole the entire time.

    But wait, throughout the film we are shown that the real threat is the therm... in that they want the one side to win... for some reason and don't want the other side to advance for some reason and say all worlds are doomed to death because they suck apparently, but in the end they have equal tech and the blue power thing doesn't seem like it can do anything other than increase the speed of the destruction as we never really see it for anything that would prove useful other than a weapon immediately...

    So there is no threat there. The stakes are a lie, but that doesn't keep them from being built up... and then at the end we don't ever find out how exactly they were a threat, the blue power is evidently never developed, and the threat that we are lead to believe exist isn't revealed or defeated in any significant way.


    So in other words...
    The true stakes of the movie is "The Heart and Life of the Princess"
    The movie however builds and never does anything really with "The fate of Barsoom and whether it will die or not"

    So you have this confusion of Carter is truly questing for the hart of the woman and this whole other story is being focused on to make it larger than it is.

    The Lorax, according to Nchick, has the same problem, and Final Fantasy XII suffers from a similar problem where the story is focused on the wrong person so it cripples a lot of the story telling.

    Quote:
    Now for me at least there's a big difference between 'fun' and 'good'. I've seen plenty of movies that were undeniably bad, but I always find a ton of fun and I'll freely admit that John Carter of Mars as a film is more of a fun film than a good one. It's really only average as far as it goes, but I thought it was a lot of fun. The Asylum version on the other hand is neither fun nor good.
    II could really debate this whole fun vs good thing, but i get what you mean and i don't feel like it. Yes it is fun and it's one of the movies you can ignore the plot problems largely, but for something that should have brought this story more into the main stream it's a shame that because you can't really talk about it because once you do you'll start noticing all those problems and thus it is nothing more than a fun movie that noone will remember by years end.

    Quote:
    I do find it somewhat entertaining that the three writers (one of which is the director) of the recent film have so many awards between them and they ended up with an average to decent movie. They have 2 Academy Awards (and multiple nominations), an Emmy, a Pulitzer, and both the Hugo and Nebula. I know it happens, but it always strikes me as somewhat entertaining when it does.
    It's especially surprising consider the problem that this movie has Wall-E is an excellent example of how to do this type of movie right and the same guy that directed Wall-E directed this.
  13. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Oliin View Post
    I don't really agree that a film having bigger stakes than another makes it better. If you disagree that's fine, but it just doesn't make sense to me since I don't really think the stakes in a film have much bearing on the overall quality of the film.
    i agree, but that's not what I meant at all... the point is that the overall is better in this case because both plots propose to be a way to save Barsoom. The 2012 movie never specifies how this is the case and could be taken as metaphor if not for the Therms, but you only really get exposition about them so the story is incomplete because there is too much emphasis on the saving of Barsoom. where as in the Asylum movie you are told Barsoom is in danger, here's why, and then it is resolved. It's not about stakes it's that it follows through.

    Basically the 2012 film isn't really that good in terms of story telling and I'm pretty sure it's more on side of the Movie than the story itself being bad... i haven't read the book yet... I will I've decided to listen to the audiobook version of the Barsoom books and the Discworld books...If you think about it this movie is a Romantic adventure where there should be light amounts of background information that piques your interest, but is never focused on, BUT that's not what the movie does... The movie sets the stakes as saving Barsoom and gives you all this exposition and why Carter is doing this or that with an under lying Romance and you end with a big fight seen that ultimately ends in not saving the world but saving the princess so that you get a romantic ending.

    I don't know who made the decision to go with this script or this cut, but whoever it is I really wouldn't allow them those decisions in the future because they show a fundamental lack of understanding about story telling. If it's the Director then I would tell him to stick to directing and not those other parts because he doesn't know what he's doing there.


    Quote:
    See, for some reason I thought you were talking in general about the technology of the people from Barsoom, not specifically about how John got there.
    I love the post-apocalyptic science fantasy style tech... It's part of the reason I like Final Fantasy. I have no problem with the magic tech and indeed I have some of that stuff in the things I'm creating so it would be hypocritical of me to say the least lol

    Quote:
    Interesting note, in the Asylum version of the story John isn't sent there through technology from Barsoom, he's sent there as a scout by a secret shady government group that has technology to teleport people to a planet called Mars in another solar system. Of course they do that after sending an Afghani opium dealer through.

    Personally, of the two I like the newer version more.
    I'm not so sure that's right on the aspect of him being a scout. He's sent there with no way of getting back no way to communicate. Also if I remember right it's not instant teleportation tech, but rather it's like hundreds of thousands of years later when he wakes up.
  14. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Mental_Giant View Post
    Transporters... the idea has been around long enough that it feels less ridiculous than it is.

    I like your idea of him thinking he's in Hell, though, because that's a reasonable conclusion based on what happened to him.
    I don't have a problem with the transporter thing. It's the other parts of it that are broken due to them trying to maintain the story with the astral projection thing.

    i don't know if the therm are after him on earth in the books like they are in the movie, but that's enough for him to do the things he did for the goal that he achieved. The "copy" aspect and the "protector" aspect should have been dropped because they just don't work.

    And now that i'm thinking about it with the change in background of the therms they make even less sense with that technology because why are you making copies of yourself on barbarous worlds that are in the process of dying? Isn't the last thing you want to do... especially if you're doing it a lot. which means there are clones of you on multiple super dangerous barbarous worlds that are on the verge of some destruction... This is part of the reason you don't change certain elements of a story, in particular its "universe" because then a whole bunch of plotholes arise from those things that weren't there before.

    Imagine in the future someone in the future makes Tom Sawyer, but because "white washing" a fence by hand is silly because they have robots that ca do that so he changes it... You have just ruined the story because without that the following rest of the story makes no sense and you might as well just stop right there.
  15. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Mental_Giant View Post
    They know the trope, but do they know it as a means of interplanetary travel? I think that's beyond the limit of the suspension of disbelief.
    So an amulet that magically copies someone's body, transfers this new body to a different planet, keeping the other body in suspended animation, and at the same time transports itself without all this nonsense is more "realistic" than someone having a soul that can move magically between worlds... which is what the soul does in just about every mythology out there?

    If you want it to be "less" confusing, even though its not confusing to begin with. All you have to do is have Carter ask "Is this Hell?" when he gets to Barsoom and then he learns that he is on Mars through "magical" means and if he can find his way book to Earth he can return to life... One could even make the comparison to Dante's Inferno.
  16. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Mental_Giant View Post
    How would they communicate it visually without a lot of cumbersome voice-over explaining what was happening? I read the book and I don't understand what happened (although I'm not done yet, so maybe a better explanation happens later).

    I highly doubt that most people know what vision quests and astral projection are, although the core audience for this might. The problem is the core audience for this isn't going to make you the $600 million you need to break even. Having a device that does the translation to Mars makes it much easier for the average movie-goer to understand.
    ... Really? i'm sure if went and looked for it I could find tons of examples.

    All you have to do is have John get knocked out and then "from" his body he sits, and stands up, with his body still on the ground. He then just has to ask "am I dead?" walk outside and have the same zoom thing they have in the movie.

    This is a standard fair trope that happens in tons of stories. Maybe they won't know what astral projection, or vision quest, or out of body experience is by name... which I highly doubt... they know the trope. People understand this stuff more than the "science" thing that the directors/writers obviously don't understand.
  17. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Mental_Giant View Post
    I totally see why they didn't follow this in the movie, because no one would have bought it.
    ... Ummm What?

    The story is science fantasy. It's ok for that to happen. Souls and astral projection are completely within our list of global references and works. What is in the movie tries to keep it Science Fiction and doesn't work because we are given the Therms who supposedly go between planets at will and if that's the case then they'd have to have bodies laying around the universe which is extremely dangerous and no one in their right mind would even remotely use or develop that technology. It makes no sense to create that technology nor to use it and scientifically it's bankrupt. I see where they were going, but it simply doesn't work... and the only reason they did that is so thy can maintain the ERB part of the story which isn't necessary.

    Also How can you even remotely say that no one would buy it? "Most" people already buy that they have a soul and "most" people know what vision quests are and "most" people know what astral projection is... Its part of the fantasy element and it works perfectly reasonably in that, but a majority of people in the real world are betting on something like that being fiction so >.>
  18. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Oliin View Post
    Sorry, just noticed this.

    I'm not completely sure what you're talking about here. Granted it's been quite a while since I read the books, but I pretty much recall everything being presented as technology not magic. Granted, it's pretty absurd tech but so are a lot of other things in the sci-fi genre and not all of them were written 100 years ago.
    according to wiki the "transported" is treated as an astral projection of sorts where they aren't really on the same plain, if I'm reading it correctly... That being the case the point before where Carter is transported can't happen, the reason for the tomb is ruined, and the threat carter gives doesn't make much sense as does a few things that happen like the translator drink.

    In the movie the transportation is handled as some sort of technology that doesn't quite jive right.
  19. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Oliin View Post

    The only other version I'm aware of is Princess of Mars. It's kind of a terrible film, which makes sense since I believe it's done by The Asylum, and I'll grant that it's not bad for one of their films but it's still pretty horrible. They do have the same general plot since they're mostly based on the same book, but aside from a couple similarities they're pretty different I thought.
    I've not known about this being a book series and I knew most of the movie...

    The story diverges only a little when they leave the Tharks and is actually better in overall because of it because the story of the movie is "we must save Barsoom" but there is no "saving" of Barsoom in the 2012 one other than maybe in some meta way where saving the princess saves the planet where as in the other one I saw saves the planet via literal saving the planet's atmosphere, which if wiki is to be believed from a slight skimming seems to be taking a few elements from later stories or the book that this movie left out.

    I read the a little bit on some of the other stuff and it seems that one of the more interesting parts that could be expanded on in later sequels, the Therms, can't really be done right because no matter what they do you have to either break completely from the novels and if you do that, what's the point? Or they could keep the story from the novels and ruin the set up in the movie.
  20. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Aneko View Post
    I'd like to see a list of those other versions, since I'm only aware of one.
    My memory may be flawed and i saw the same movie several times. It's possible. I've seen the same name or nearly the same name as it so yeah... It's still nothing really different from that previous movie from my recollection.
  21. #1. For understanding how messed up the movie business is you should watch movie bob's explanation on hollywood history and such on the escapist.com. Not to bring in economics and such into this or anything but the shady business practices of these massive conglomerates is what is damaging them everything from how they treat the customer to the talent that creates the work is so irrational and illogical to obfuscate loses and gains so that they can grab every cent from every where that it is in end destroying their entire world.

    #2. The movie was decent, but considering I've seen several renditions of this movie, I don't think that this needed to be made if the weren't going to give us anything really different from the others.

    #3. The change they made to use technology rather than mysticism while it is interesting, ultimately cripples the story as it makes it less believable and makes it so if there are sequels they'll have a ripple effect causing tons more changes that aren't for the best.

    #4. On the plus side it has made me look into getting the audiobook form of these books and I'm going to listen to them as they sound interesting.
  22. Quote:
    Originally Posted by 2short2care View Post
    Not to mention that he had no respect for woman, even his wife, if you were a good looking woman and you wanted to be on an episode of Star Trek, well rumor has it you had to sleep with him, I know he is not the first man in Hollywood to pull that and his wife was kinda derp to stay with him, if she knew he did that.
    So Kirk got sloppy seconds?
  23. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Zombie Man View Post
    What struck me is that the mathematical models predict everything about it except its mass. And I'm like: Wait, what? The mass of a particle that fills in the gap of the next step toward a Theory of Everything could be arbitrary and totally unrelated to how it interacts with everything else?
    I think the models are wrong from what little i know of the subject and won't be even remotely surprised if they don't find it.

    I think mass is a result of energy in general...

    If you look at e=mc^2 it is energy = mass * the speed of light or in my opinion more accurately as energy/matter is curvature of space multiplied by the maximum amount of change in the area...

    or rather it is simply an equation that expresses the relationship between space-time and the stuff in it and how they effect each other.

    the equation is always used to figure out much energy you can get from an atom but as far as i know noone ever asked why it is the case that mass increases as you poor energy in it. Maybe i don't understand something, but it always struck me that there would have to me some sort of reason for why it does that and the answer i came up with is basically that there is a maximum amount of change that can occur in a given area and when you increase the amount of stuff there then the amount of change any one object can have is less over all and likewise this causes a drag through the other dimensions causing mass...


    It just crossed my mind that if this were the case the estimate for the universe's age would likely be quite different and would somewhat explain dark energy (time is accelerating in areas of less mass) but meh I'm no physicist so what do i know...
  24. Scientist create a theoretical model and a giant machine to test to see if they can find a particle that is called the higgs-boson, but was referred to as the god damned particle, but an editor took out a word and changed which made the sentence nonsense and some illiterates picked it up and ran with it...

    Scientists designed said machine knowing the upper and lower limits of the energy they needed to feed into the machine to see if their theories are right, created a schedule to slowly turn up the machine over time and this has all been set for years now...

    Internet news site reports nothing that hasn't been known for years as if it were new...

    It's a good thing we're not relying on that news site for important new otherwise it might report that the end of the world happened several years after it happened...
  25. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Kitsune9tails View Post
    I am not doing a Scrubs fanfic (nor is the hospital a teaching hospital), but the principle applies: Would JD or Cox be able to order the MRI/CAT, or would they need Bob Kelso's say so?

    Moreover I am thinking a relatively young/naive nurse, possibly one who was briefly homeless herself. Definitely not someone with decades of emotional calluses (callouses?) built up.
    Any of the Doctors can order that stuff as they want...

    Both JD and Elliot have dated patients so a Nurse taking a women in would not even raise an eyebrow, but both might talk to her about it.

    As far as care... I'd go with in between Redbone and HyperStrike's scenario as Kelso would be trying to get rid of the patient but the other Doctors would try to keep her and get her the best care possible. In fact I could see that Kelso's cutting her time could be the catalyst to a scheme to getting a Nurse to take her in to make sure she isn't lost in the system.