Soloability and End Game


Adeon Hawkwood

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Zombie Man View Post
You know, I'm basically introverted, too. About 97% of my play time is solo. But I've found that if I'm able to get into Internet arguments in a forum, I have the capability to occasionally stand to deal with people in PuGs. Maybe you can find that same resource within yourself since your Introversion is not apparent in the forums.
Similarly here. I solo more than I team, by far, and when I do team I can't do it for long.

Doesn't keep me from being really pleased with the direction of the incarnate system.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Arcanaville View Post
Softcapping an Invuln is fantastic. Softcapping a Willpower is amazing. Softcapping SR is kissing your sister.

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Eiko-chan View Post
I speak a point of view that is rarely expressed on the forums. It's (highly) likely that I speak for a minority. Trying to make me feel like I am alone, however, will never make me cease to speak.
It's highly unlikely you're alone.

Being not alone doesn't make your position not irrational.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Arcanaville View Post
Softcapping an Invuln is fantastic. Softcapping a Willpower is amazing. Softcapping SR is kissing your sister.

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Eiko-chan View Post
I speak a point of view that is rarely expressed on the forums.
That's the way it is with tiny minorities


@Golden Girl

City of Heroes comics and artwork

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Zombie Man View Post
At this point, only datamining showing an actual and significant horrific drop rate for soloers will change the rate. I doubt that's the case.
Positron said he's very pleased with the reaction of the player base to the Incarnate system, and how it's working exactly the way they hoped it would, so that sounds like they're comfortable with the drop rate for Shards.


@Golden Girl

City of Heroes comics and artwork

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Eiko-chan View Post
Oh, I don't know, sometimes I suspect it is at least a little bit about what Arcanaville wants it to be.
A very, very, very little bit. Its mostly what Positron wants it to be. At the moment, my influence over the end game is probably somewhat lower than the average closed beta tester.

Most of my content-advocacy is on the public forums anyway: I rarely make content requests or suggestions in private. Powers and critter design on the other hand, I tend to be, shall we say, more vocal on both publicly and privately.


[Guide to Defense] [Scrapper Secondaries Comparison] [Archetype Popularity Analysis]

In one little corner of the universe, there's nothing more irritating than a misfile...
(Please support the best webcomic about a cosmic universal realignment by impaired angelic interference resulting in identity crisis angst. Or I release the pigmy water thieves.)

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Void_Huntress View Post
You know, you're absolutely right. It's TOTALLY Arcana's fault that Martial Arts is less useless than it was before.
My fault:

Eagle's Claw's crit booster
CAK's defense debuff
CAK's increased damage
Cobra's damage/recharge point
Total single target damage no longer sad

Not my fault:

Eagle's Claw's glitchy implementation (hopefully going to get that fixed)
CAK's defense debuff not slottable
Thunder Kick still worthless
Eagle's Claw stun still stand up comedy material


[Guide to Defense] [Scrapper Secondaries Comparison] [Archetype Popularity Analysis]

In one little corner of the universe, there's nothing more irritating than a misfile...
(Please support the best webcomic about a cosmic universal realignment by impaired angelic interference resulting in identity crisis angst. Or I release the pigmy water thieves.)

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Arcanaville View Post
At the moment, my influence over the end game is probably somewhat lower than the average closed beta tester.
I almost regret telling Castle that Super Stunners seemed out of place without a heal or rez. He went "They need a rez? Is that what you want?! FINE!" and gave them the painful, autohitting, end-draining, damage-dealing 100% rez.

But it's about time Freaks had a unit people cared about. I enjoy singling them out on my Scrapper and taking them out.


Quote:
Originally Posted by PRAF68_EU View Post
Dispari has more than enough credability, and certainly doesn't need to borrow any from you.

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Eiko-chan View Post
I've been "sucking it up and dealing with it" for twenty years (as a gamer) or forty years (personally), whichever way you meant this. I "suck it up and deal with" living in an extroverted world every single day. I've "sucked it up and dealt" with games becoming more and more focused on "challenge" (as well as "realism" and "shooting") for the past twenty years.

And frankly, I'm sick of having to bow to extroverts and challenge seekers. There's worlds and worlds of things out there for extroverts and challenge seekers already. One of the main points (not the main point, not the only main point, but one of a handful) that draws me to this game and keeps me with this game is the fact that it was unlike the rest, that it actually catered to ease and solo-play (solo play doesn't have to be easy, and easy doesn't have to be solo; these are separate things). I've seen franchises, companies, and genres I love morph, "evolve", and die many, many times, and of late the trend in the video game world has been towards conformity, towards making everything the same.

City of isn't there yet, but the steps they've taken in development of the Incarnate system have, thus far, seemed quite clearly to be steps towards that. I'm open to being pleasantly surprised by i20 content, and I'll be the first to praise Paragon if I'm wrong about it, but what I've heard and seen so far has not given me cause for hope.

I do not want to see this game's end-game be like every other game's end-game, where the idea is "tactics", "challenge", and "teams/raids". City of has, thus far, avoided that path, and I will not "suck it up and deal with" yet another game I love going down that same old path everyone else has trod before.

I've had quite enough of having to "suck it up and deal with it", thank you.
I think you are taking out your life frustrations on this game and on the other forumites who try to help you. Not that there isn't anything inherently wrong with that, but you do seem quite loquacious for an introvert.

While you do have a voice and are definitely allowed to participate in the discussion, overlaying your discussions about how others have treated you in another game or IRL isn't really germane to this discussion. I know there have been people here who have tried to help you in ways that they can, but your rebuffs to them aren't exactly engendering of a returned warmth.

You also refer to this game as 'yours', and ascribe ownership of this game to people who are casuals only. While it may be scarce in terms of the selection of the games that you desire versus the people who want an escalating challenge, CoX has always had a progression within its development and it has not always/solely catered to the (casual) soloist. The original Task Force design and AVs never were casual or for the soloist, although they softened some of the aspects to make them more casual friendly.

There have been many people who have been here as long as you and have requested content that is more challenging. It isn't 'their game' anymore than it is yours, but I feel that the devs have threaded a fine line in keeping the game and story going. And like any good story, it should come to a climax, lest the story become static and thusly stale.

I think that you brought up some good points about the mechanics of the game in previous posts but I don't really feel that this post is one of your best.

The dearth of challenge in this game has been a long standing hole in CoX and I'm glad that the devs are beginning to address it now. I just hope that they continue to look after the casuals, the soloists and the introverts as well. And I suppose the PvPers, wherever they may be.


 

Posted

Up front, I'm also a serious introvert. I disdain PuG's outright, and am perfectly content to run solo all night long.

That said, I haven't seen anything that has been done so far, or has been hinted at in the future that is in the least bit concerning to me. The new Incarnate system is very much solable. I've managed to solo my way through Ramiel on both a Scrapper and a Dom for instance.

I will agree, that it would be good to have more Incarnate class content, and will hugely agree we need more incarnate class content that is outside of TF's and Events. I have no idea what I20 is going to offer, but I'd love to see 2-4 fully new Arcs from a contact(s) who gets in touch with you when you finish Ramiel. In fact, if I were a Dev (oh, those words of doom) that would be a high priority. Then, each issue after that should have that many new arcs again. (For that matter, give the Mission Architect the tools to create Incarnate Arcs).

That said, I think it is rather apalling to declare that CoH is to be the "introverts" game and that any steps down the road to having more team-oriented content is "robbing us of our game". When you say that, you're essentially saying "My fun is more important than yours." Yes, Eiko, that's what you are saying. You are putting your own enjoyment above that of others.

What we need, and should be calling for is a balanced design. One that has more than enough room for someone who wants to solo, including incarnate level... as well as major challenges that are team focused. A game that doesn't declare the game is for "this group" or "that group" but a game that has stuff for both groups. Frankly, I think that this game has generally done a good job of that. To that end, I'd like to see our Devs stay the course, and frankly, I've not seen anything that really indicates they were planning otherwise.


(All on Virtue)
Guidestar: lvl50 Grav/FF Controller
Madame Insight: Lvl 50 El/El Blaster
Astrolabe Lvl 50 Grav/Eng Dom
Too many others to consider.

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Eiko-chan View Post
I've been "sucking it up and dealing with it" for twenty years (as a gamer) or forty years (personally), whichever way you meant this. I "suck it up and deal with" living in an extroverted world every single day. I've "sucked it up and dealt" with games becoming more and more focused on "challenge" (as well as "realism" and "shooting") for the past twenty years.

And frankly, I'm sick of having to bow to extroverts and challenge seekers. There's worlds and worlds of things out there for extroverts and challenge seekers already. One of the main points (not the main point, not the only main point, but one of a handful) that draws me to this game and keeps me with this game is the fact that it was unlike the rest, that it actually catered to ease and solo-play (solo play doesn't have to be easy, and easy doesn't have to be solo; these are separate things). I've seen franchises, companies, and genres I love morph, "evolve", and die many, many times, and of late the trend in the video game world has been towards conformity, towards making everything the same.

City of isn't there yet, but the steps they've taken in development of the Incarnate system have, thus far, seemed quite clearly to be steps towards that. I'm open to being pleasantly surprised by i20 content, and I'll be the first to praise Paragon if I'm wrong about it, but what I've heard and seen so far has not given me cause for hope.

I do not want to see this game's end-game be like every other game's end-game, where the idea is "tactics", "challenge", and "teams/raids". City of has, thus far, avoided that path, and I will not "suck it up and deal with" yet another game I love going down that same old path everyone else has trod before.

I've had quite enough of having to "suck it up and deal with it", thank you.

I'm just curious why play an MMO? I mean if your and introvert who doesn't like teaming why not just play single player games?



"Play Nice and BEHAVE! I don't want to hear about any more of your shenanigans brought up in our meetings at Paragon"
-Ghost Falcon @Tritonfree @Philly's 2nd Convenient CIGAL BoBC/INOANN Arts&Crafts Sporks
Average Joes FAP THE MENTOR PROJECT Justice Events

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Phillygirl View Post
I'm just curious why play an MMO? I mean if your and introvert who doesn't like teaming why not just play single player games?
At a guess, because sometimes I just like soloing for hours on end... there isn't a single player game out there as cool as this one.


City of Heroes was my first MMO, & my favorite computer game.

R.I.P.
Chyll - Bydand - Violynce - Enyrgos - Rylle - Nephryte - Solyd - Fettyr - Hyposhock - Styrling - Beryllos - Rosyc
Horryd - Myriam - Dysquiet - Ghyr
Vanysh - Eldrytch
Inflyct - Mysron - Orphyn - Dysmay - Reapyr - - Wyldeman - Hydeous

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by PumBumbler View Post
I don't really feel that this post is one of your best.
I'd agree. It's hard to be at your best when responding to being told to "suck it up and deal with it".

You might also notice that I tend to be more combative as the frequency of replies and threading goes on. That's the introversion coming out; as the thread continues without chances for me to break away (or if the breaks are for work, which aren't very restful either), my tolerance for stress decreases and it starts to come out more.

Whereas now, I have just returned from my lunch break, and am feeling quite a bit more rested.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Phillygirl View Post
I mean if your and introvert who doesn't like teaming why not just play single player games?
I don't dislike teaming. It's not my preferred playstyle, but there are times when I can enjoy a team (especially when my VG mates are around and we get together.) I don't generally seek them out, but I might join up if I see something interesting going on.

But even when I solo, I still enjoy chatting, especially helping people with issues or discussing random topics on the Help channel. Can't do that in a solo game - and I legitimately enjoy answering people's questions and helping them with problems. It's a large part of why I do the work I do; I might be expending myself a bit, but it's a good sort of tiring, like after a good workout.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Arcanaville View Post
Powers and critter design on the other hand, I tend to be, shall we say, more vocal on both publicly and privately.
That was the general area in which I thought you had more than average input, of course.


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Eiko-chan View Post
as the thread continues without chances for me to break away
You have every chance to break away. Nobody's holding you here forcing you to post.

Mind, I'm not telling you to go away, but this is representative of the rhetoric you've been using. You've decided to make yourself a martyr for a cause of which you seem to be the only proponent so far.

Casual players can ignore the Incarnate system, others can participate in it to any depth they desire. This is a win-win. I don't think it can necessarily be said that 100% of development time is going toward the Incarnate stuff, either; while it certainly is getting the focus right now, there are always additions made to the standard game, as Arcanaville so excellently put it.


De minimis non curat Lex Luthor.

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bosstone View Post
a cause of which you seem to be the only proponent so far.
I can point out at least one other prominent poster that is very much in favour of solo Incarnate content. He's not posting here, but he has been very vocal about his desire elsewhere. And there was a post right above one of mine with a poster espousing a "this was my game and you're ruining it" sentiment, expressed before I ever began to.

So claims that I'm the only one are patently and provably false. Please desist with them.


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Eiko-chan View Post
So claims that I'm the only one are patently and provably false. Please desist with them.
Sure. That doesn't really make the rest of my post wrong.


De minimis non curat Lex Luthor.

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bosstone View Post
Sure. That doesn't really make the rest of my post wrong.
That'd be why I only quoted part of it. I can't really refute your opinion of how the system works or will work, so I didn't.


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Eiko-chan View Post
I can point out at least one other prominent poster that is very much in favour of solo Incarnate content.
So you have an army of two then


@Golden Girl

City of Heroes comics and artwork

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Eiko-chan View Post
GG, I know you think you're being helpful,

I know you mean well, but seriously: stop it. You're not helping.
Actually, neither of these statements is true. She's just relying on her usual forum tactic of refusing to believe that any opinion but hers is correct, and padding her post count. Being helpful to you is the last thing on her mind. And it's also amazingly hypocritical that she's arguing with anyone saying they don't have a right to say how things should be...


Arc 180901: Flight of the Dreadnought

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Golden Girl View Post
So you have an army of two then
Honey, I'm an Army of Me, and have the badge to prove it.


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Eiko-chan View Post
I have two Incarnates (and another two waiting for me to care to play them enough to get the shards to fill their unlocked slots) already, that I got through soloing and light TFing.

"Challenge" is the issue here; my VG still fails the occasional ITF/LRSF/BSF. Not everyone I play with can solo x8 content or AVs (like I can). "Challenges" that require not only a team, but a team of Incarnates each capable to tackling challenges above and beyond the standard +0x1 difficulty themselves are going to be content I cannot access.

Thus far, the only such content in the game is the Hamidon raid (thus only because I have no desire to ever be in the same place and working with 50 people simultaneously; as an introvert, that level of interaction would simply be far too tiring and stressful to be something I'm going to do in my spare time) which was added so long ago as to belong to a different era altogether (the Mothership raid requires less coordination and less interaction. Being a large scale war, you actually can just charge in and bash things (once the shield is down) enough to still rank as "participating".)

Nothing else in this game requires a team of highly skilled and coordinated players - nothing requiring even a fraction of such needed by the monster MMO that I quit playing because its endgame required such five years ago - to complete (though some of the content already exists at a level that it is by no small means a surety that it will be completed by any team that tackles it, as the highly casual players I team with can attest.)

The addition of such content is not something I welcome, relish, or desire. If nothing in the game ever existed beyond the "difficulty" of the Barracuda Strike Force (or the Lord Recluse Strike Force, or the Imperious Task Force, whichever you wish to view as the capstone content), I would be overjoyed.

The direction shown in i19 for end game content - something I'm not just going to ignore, because there is no reason I should have to ignore any content in this game; I haven't had to for six years, why should I have to start now? - is not one I welcome.

Tin Mage is ... okay, if you take out Director 11, who is just patently ridiculous. Apex is ... meh. The hydra pylons require specific builds or strategies, something mostly unprecedented and greatly unwelcome, and Battle Maiden is just a gimmicky "phased" fight of the sort that drove me away from other MMOs. Neither is an ideal direction I would like to see the game travel in.

More content along the lines of the ITF/LRSF (Barracuda would be okay if Reichsman had about a third the health he does; the ambushes and the temp powers to deal with them are actually pretty interesting, but beating down Reichsman is less so) would be welcome. More content along the lines of the Apex or Tin Mage Task Forces, however, would not.
I see where you're coming from but honestly, without trying to be rude, I hope the Devs don't tailor all the future content to the skill level of a team of coordinated players that know eachother but routinely fail things like the ITF ...

I don't see Tin Mage as a bigger challenge than the LRSF. Nothing in there is harder than the final mission against the Phalanx. And once you get into the ritm of avoiding Battle Maiden's Nanite attacks, there's not *that* much challenge in Apex either. As far as the hydra pylons are concerned, I've never used another 'tactic' than charging the things and hitting em till they go down.

I'm far from a power gamer. Of my seven lvl 50's three are on SO's/White IO's and the other four have modest set IO builds (no purples/PVP). Add to that that all my builds are for concept first and performance second. With the exception of my brute (and my dark/dark corr, but she doesn't kill fast enough for it to be practical) none can solo at x8+0, and none of them can solo an AV.

I really like both Incarnate TFs, and I personally hope that there's plenty more where they came from. If the future TFs are of the same level of difficulty and nothing more I wont complain, but I wont complain if they do get harder either.


@True Metal
Co-leader of Callous Crew SG. Based on Union server.

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Golden Girl View Post
Just think of it as a kind of therapy to help you come out of your shell
Although I agree with the point that I think you are trying to make, as an introvert person, I can't help but feel slightly insulted by this ...

Being introvert is a character trait, just like being extravert. It's not some sort of mental condition that can be fixed, or needs fixing.


@True Metal
Co-leader of Callous Crew SG. Based on Union server.

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Golden Girl View Post
So you have an army of two then
Technically, I count as a prominent poster that is in favor of soloable Incarnate content. I just believe its perfectly reasonable that the teamed task force and raid content have development priority at the moment.

I believe that over the long haul, soloable Incarnate content will be important to the long-term health of the end game. But it has to be an interesting adjunct to the main task force and trial content, without either replacing it or diluting it. It cannot simply be the solo versions of the teamed content, nor can it simply be scaled down versions of the trial content. It has to be something uniquely designed to be soloed, without being a separate end game targeted solely at soloers. And that will be tricky to strike a balance for.

Until the devs figure out how to do that properly, I would rather they focus on the Incarnate task forces first. I would revoke their iterative design privileges if I could: they have to start getting things right the first time, on the assumption the market place isn't going to give them a second swing at the plate for free every time.


[Guide to Defense] [Scrapper Secondaries Comparison] [Archetype Popularity Analysis]

In one little corner of the universe, there's nothing more irritating than a misfile...
(Please support the best webcomic about a cosmic universal realignment by impaired angelic interference resulting in identity crisis angst. Or I release the pigmy water thieves.)

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Eiko-chan View Post
GG, I know you think you're being helpful, but you're clearly an extrovert. Introverts can actually empathise with extroverts because the culture forces your point of view on us, so we have no choice but to do so. But you clearly simply do not understand what introversion is.

It's not a defect, it's not a deficiency. It's simply a difference. We are not inherently inept at dealing with people (many introverts that are are so largely due to lack of practice), we are not incapable of dealing with people (I work a help desk. I get paid to deal with people, and am surpassingly good at it, if my performance reviews of the past five years can be believed), we simply are drained by doing so.

Extroverts are recharged by going out and mingling with people; interacting with groups, friends and strangers all get an extrovert pumped and relaxed, making them able to continue on with whatever tasks they need to expend their mental energy on. Introverts are the reverse; dealing with people drains us, and we have to recharge by withdrawing. That difference doesn't cripple us - it's just a difference.

Just like some people train for marathons for fun, play sports for fun, or engage in any other tiring activity for fun, an introvert can interact with people for fun as well (I do it all the time). But just like no one can run a marathon constantly, an introvert cannot interact with others constantly.

With as much as modern American society enforces the idea that extroversion is the only norm and introverts are somehow broken, we are often forced into that interaction even when our reserves are already drained. Forcing us into that is a lot like forcing an exhausted marathon runner to run another mile - you're not helping any one, and are very likely to be doing active harm.

I know you mean well, but seriously: stop it. You're not helping.
Very nicely put.


@True Metal
Co-leader of Callous Crew SG. Based on Union server.