Suppose an emulator shows up, How many of you would go on?


8_Ball

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tenzhi View Post
Take away the motivation and make it objective: if two unconnected people paint the same scene and one manages to sell their painting and the other cannot, is it stealing?
nope. assuming the other person didnt know the other one existed.

Seeing as how it's well known by players this IP exist and owned by NCSoft, then it would be. But if it so happen that somewhere that two people developed the same game with the same code at the same time and one sold, and the other one is sitting underground somewhere waiting for it's chance, then by all means. Yet, still, legally they still would have to prove that this was the case.

not to mention that with the talk of making a emulator here on this forum, that case went down the tube. It's just blatant stealing. Given that they know the IP isnt theirs, yet they decide to just take it anyways regardless.


-Female Player-
Quote:
Originally Posted by mauk2 View Post
Evil_Legacy became one of my favorite posters with two words.
"Kick Rocks."
I laffed so hard. Never change, E_L!

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Evil_Legacy View Post
You paint a picture out of your own mind, and someone offers to buy it, you decline, so they replicate your picture and sell it as if they created it. Not to mention they made cash off your stuff and didnt have decency to cut you in on the profits but because you wouldnt sell it to them and they felt you was wasting the picture, they just "took" it and claimed it as theirs.
The point isn't to make a profit on others' work, it's to maintain its availability to a public that also wishes to see that picture. An emulated server makes no claims on ownership, just like the fact that I can buy a copy of Van Gogh's Starry Night or Da Vinci's Mona Lisa doesn't mean I have any right of ownership to the original. Likewise, prints of a painting don't do anything to devalue the original work of art.

IF an emulated CoH server comes to be, nobody will claim that it was their inspiration that brought it into being. Nobody will say, "Yes, I invented Statesman." Nor should they require substantial fees for access to that content--any money earned for the effort of creating an emulator needs to go to maintaining the servers and the effort of improving the emulator (i.e., a small stipend to pay the people who maintain the game).

Anything else would, in fact, be immoral, and I would no longer support the project, but in fact oppose it.


Main Hero: Chad Gulzow-Man (Victory) 50, 1396 Badges
Main Villain: Evil Gulzow-Man (Victory) 50, 1193 Badges
Mission Architect arcs: Doctor Brainstorm's An Experiment Gone Awry, Arc ID 2093

-----
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nethergoat View Post
it's NEVER too late to pad your /ignore list!

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chad Gulzow-Man View Post
The point isn't to make a profit on others' work, it's to maintain its availability to a public that also wishes to see that picture. An emulated server makes no claims on ownership, just like the fact that I can buy a copy of Van Gogh's Starry Night or Da Vinci's Mona Lisa doesn't mean I have any right of ownership to the original. Likewise, prints of a painting don't do anything to devalue the original work of art.

IF an emulated CoH server comes to be, nobody will claim that it was their inspiration that brought it into being. Nobody will say, "Yes, I invented Statesman." Nor should they require substantial fees for access to that content--any money earned for the effort of creating an emulator needs to go to maintaining the servers and the effort of improving the emulator (i.e., a small stipend to pay the people who maintain the game).

Anything else would, in fact, be immoral, and I would no longer support the project, but in fact oppose it.
Yes but unlike those paintings mentioned, which entered public domain iirc, the IP is still owned by NCSoft directly. And the keyword there is money earned. Money earned off work of someone else that they are not getting compensation for nor was purchased from the owner. Making money off a product that they have no ownership of. Sounds illegal in the trademark/copyright/IP law realm.

Wouldnt it be better to just wait and see what they do with it first and get it the legal way? Or just create a new game instead of this illegal stuff? As mentioned earlier, I dont see the logic in investing time or money is even less stable and can be shut down anytime or interupted because of NCSoft wants a cut and or wants people to stop making money off of their work that they paid millions for, even if that money is just to cover the maintence, it's still charging people for a service and is still is income.

Why not just ask if they would bless an emulator version of the work instead of trying to take it by force and go through all the risk and trouble. 8 years seems to be considered young for this game, and at this rate, it may not make it half that depending soley on NCSoft's move anyways.


-Female Player-
Quote:
Originally Posted by mauk2 View Post
Evil_Legacy became one of my favorite posters with two words.
"Kick Rocks."
I laffed so hard. Never change, E_L!

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Evil_Legacy View Post
Yet, still, legally they still would have to prove that this was the case.
I'm not debating the legality. I can simultaneously accept that the law may consider it to be stealing while still asserting that in actuality it is not.


Goodbye may seem forever
Farewell is like the end
But in my heart's the memory
And there you'll always be
-- The Fox and the Hound

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tenzhi View Post
I'm not debating the legality. I can simultaneously accept that the law may consider it to be stealing while still asserting that in actuality it is not.
true.


-Female Player-
Quote:
Originally Posted by mauk2 View Post
Evil_Legacy became one of my favorite posters with two words.
"Kick Rocks."
I laffed so hard. Never change, E_L!

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tenzhi View Post
I'm not debating the legality. I can simultaneously accept that the law may consider it to be stealing while still asserting that in actuality it is not.
Totally this.

Like I said, I'm perfectly willing to pay money to whomever wants to legally run a server. But I consider donating to a fan-run emulator server a far more fair solution than the fact that the person/people/corporation that technically owns it are refusing my money and not letting me play at all.


Main Hero: Chad Gulzow-Man (Victory) 50, 1396 Badges
Main Villain: Evil Gulzow-Man (Victory) 50, 1193 Badges
Mission Architect arcs: Doctor Brainstorm's An Experiment Gone Awry, Arc ID 2093

-----
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nethergoat View Post
it's NEVER too late to pad your /ignore list!

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Evil_Legacy View Post
But either way it seems a bit odd to do that. If it was evil to do it to us, with refunds, it is surely evil to do it to them without refunds. Yet I think one importance difference is that Blizzard probably didnt have much say in the matter, compared to NCSoft.
Minor thread derail:

The original thought was that Iran had blocked access because WoW features scantily-clad female avatars, and we cant have teh mens all hot-n'-bothered by a bunch of pixels, nosirree. Jihad has been declared for less.

This went on and on until Blizzard actually admitted that they had pulled the plug in compliance with US sanctions. And no.... they were *not* offering refunds, to refund money would have been to break current US law.

With that said, someone please hurry up with the CoX emulator already.


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chad Gulzow-Man View Post
Well, if another company legitimately purchases the CoH IP and restarts lawful servers, they'll be the ones who get my patronage. I'm not about to support illegal activity if a legal option exists simultaneously.

For the rest of your post... there's no reason to shut off the existing CoH game now if the plan is to make a sequel in a few years. And since Paragon won't be having anything to do with a sequel, should it ever come to pass, it's doubtful that it would really carry on the same spirit as the original. It would likely end up being a superhero-shelled version of a generic Korean grindfest with a heavy loot and PVP focus, and therefore be something I have no interest in playing at all.
Quote:
And since Paragon won't be having anything to do with a sequel, should it ever come to pass, it's doubtful that it would really carry on the same spirit as the original.
Why? Nearly all of the current devs are unfamiliar to me, and I only left three years ago. Only War Witch and Positron are still around, at least the ones I'm familiar with. The current game is practically unrecognizable to what was released in 2004. To say it wouldn't have the same "spirit" is pretty silly. And who knows? Maybe they'll try to poach some of the old guys back.


Doom.

Yep.

This is really doom.

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Xieveral View Post
I would play an emulaor.

I am wondering what people's reasons are for playing or not playing an emulator. Is it a moral reason? Paranoia?

My reason is because I can make my own fun through the costume creator and roleplaying, so even if an emulator is buggy and missions are lacking, there's still plenty to do. I'm not afraid of legal repercussions because its highly unlikely to happen. Should the original game be revived, I'd go back in a heartbeat. If the real thing exists, what need is there for the emulator after all?
Emulators=eventual hacked gameplay and "fixes " that won't fix anything. Stalkers with blaster nukes and tankers with Defender debuffs. Emulators will kill an already dead game, perverting the gameplay.


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by CyberGlitch View Post
Emulators=eventual hacked gameplay and "fixes " that won't fix anything. Stalkers with blaster nukes and tankers with Defender debuffs. Emulators will kill an already dead game, perverting the gameplay.
I hope this is sarcasm.

This is already in the game, see: Incarnate abilities.


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gaming_Glen View Post
I hope this is sarcasm.

This is already in the game, see: Incarnate abilities.
Ha, no. I'm talking completely rewriting the powers in this game.


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by CyberGlitch View Post
Ha, no. I'm talking completely rewriting the powers in this game.
Oh come on, I want Assassin's Heal.


Doom.

Yep.

This is really doom.

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by CyberGlitch View Post
Emulators=eventual hacked gameplay and "fixes " that won't fix anything. Stalkers with blaster nukes and tankers with Defender debuffs. Emulators will kill an already dead game, perverting the gameplay.
It's not like the gameplay isn't broken enough as is. With IOs people can already become unstoppable juggernauts, and Incarnate powers just make that problem worse. If anything, hacking powers may even serve to improve certain aspects of the game like PvP, for example.

It'd also be nice if someone could figure out how to make actual storyarcs without AE so we can get a better writer to make arcs that make sense and don't take inspiration from DBZ.


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Golden Girl View Post
Progress is being made.
What is it with you? Every subject similar to this, involving the continuement, legal or illegal you reply with some mysteriously coy statement.

Know something? Stop acting like a secret agent and tell us.


 

Posted

Nope already moved on, I am just hanging about trying to bring a few friends along for my journey


TSW
Krovus - Templar - Arcadia

Infinity & Virtue
@WAR HAWK

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cag View Post
What is it with you? Every subject similar to this, involving the continuement, legal or illegal you reply with some mysteriously coy statement.

Know something? Stop acting like a secret agent and tell us.
Nearly 67K posts all like that* and you expect change ?


*This determination is made by random sample. I.E. every post I have ever seen has been like that with a few exceptions about boobs.


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by CyberGlitch View Post
Emulators=eventual hacked gameplay and "fixes " that won't fix anything. Stalkers with blaster nukes and tankers with Defender debuffs. Emulators will kill an already dead game, perverting the gameplay.
Frankly, the arguments about legality have more going for them. Where did you make this up from? You have no way to know that things like that would happen, that it would "ruin" the game for anyone except apparently you if it did.

Seriously, this sounds to me like proclaiming no one should get out of bed tomorrow because the day might suck for completely out-of-the-blue reasons. Yeah, it might. Everything and every day is like that. It's only a reason not to get out of bed if you're a terminal pessimist.


Blue
American Steele: 50 BS/Inv
Nightfall: 50 DDD
Sable Slayer: 50 DM/Rgn
Fortune's Shadow: 50 Dark/Psi
WinterStrike: 47 Ice/Dev
Quantum Well: 43 Inv/EM
Twilit Destiny: 43 MA/DA
Red
Shadowslip: 50 DDC
Final Rest: 50 MA/Rgn
Abyssal Frost: 50 Ice/Dark
Golden Ember: 50 SM/FA

 

Posted

Would play everyday...just as in game today !


 

Posted

Hm, Question, Hypothetically, If a local version was made, Couldn't something like Heidisql and MYSQL make it like the online version, but make it harder for NCsoft to really catch us?

I'm more of a program type of person, So i have no idea how stupid/smart the above statement is.


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by DarkBlaster_NA View Post
Hm, Question, Hypothetically, If a local version was made, Couldn't something like Heidisql and MYSQL make it like the online version, but make it harder for NCsoft to really catch us?

I'm more of a program type of person, So i have no idea how stupid/smart the above statement is.
The private server project I mentioned above uses a MySQL database to mimic the real thing. I don't know how much it copies from the real deal, though. Interestingly, a lot of the actual functionality, everything from NPC scripts to quests and even how abilities work is handled by lua scripting. The servers (login/map/search) can be set to run for localhost.


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Golden Girl View Post
Progress is being made.
I'm sure you hope so, or your online persona becomes even more meaningless.

Oh and an update for you from this morning:

Quote:
"All Plan Z is right now is brainstorming along with engine testing. It's a fallback worst-case scenario. Until we know CoH is lost forever, that is all it will remain, a brainstorm."


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by UberGuy View Post
Frankly, the arguments about legality have more going for them. Where did you make this up from? You have no way to know that things like that would happen, that it would "ruin" the game for anyone except apparently you if it did.

Seriously, this sounds to me like proclaiming no one should get out of bed tomorrow because the day might suck for completely out-of-the-blue reasons. Yeah, it might. Everything and every day is like that. It's only a reason not to get out of bed if you're a terminal pessimist.
Every game in history that has a server component controllable by players has been hacked in one fashion or another to create "new derivatives."

I have historical evidence to back up my beliefs. You have wishful thinking to back up yours. And cluelessness.


 

Posted

Cluelessness. Ha.

"Monty Haul" private servers are by no means in the majority. Double XP or "Start at level 50" maybe, but not uber powered toon servers. Cox's casual playstyle and our player demographics wouldn't likely produce or support one.

For what it's worth: Yes, private servers are technically "illegal" but it's incredibly rare for judges and prosecuting attorneys to become involved over them. The only people that ever get into trouble are those that charge money for access or game loot.


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Positivity View Post
Cluelessness. Ha.

"Monty Haul" private servers are by no means in the majority. Double XP or "Start at level 50" maybe, but not uber powered toon servers. Cox's casual playstyle and our player demographics wouldn't likely produce or support one.

For what it's worth: Yes, private servers are technically "illegal" but it's incredibly rare for judges and prosecuting attorneys to become involved over them. The only people that ever get into trouble are those that charge money for access or game loot.
Yea figured so. I guess that includes even if the money is merely to cover the operating expenses and stipend to the people that does the work.

Which I wonder, in theory, what happens to the extra money that is laying over if say there are more than enough players to cover the expenses? Is that returned to the players, pocketed by someone, or what


-Female Player-
Quote:
Originally Posted by mauk2 View Post
Evil_Legacy became one of my favorite posters with two words.
"Kick Rocks."
I laffed so hard. Never change, E_L!