Prometheus


2short2care

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Slaunyeh View Post
Personally, I didn't care whether the movie was a prequel that lead into Alien, as long as it was a good movie.
Making it a prequel to Alien was simply trading on the popularity of a far superior movie.

It would have been a better movie if it hadn't pretended to be an (alleged) prequel to Alien.


I really should do something about this signature.

 

Posted

Yeah, from everything I read about this before it came out, I was expecting there to be nods and winks to the "Alien" world and set in the same universe. What I didn't expect is there to be such a (perceived) deliberate connection. Maybe it was just subterfuge, but what we got I wasn't expecting (such a direct connection to the original). Now that doesn't mean that's what worked or didn't work though. The problem isn't what was or wasn't done to canon. The problem was weaknesses in the story and characters. If they didn't show the last images of the pseudo/proto xenomorph the movie wouldn't have been any stronger or weaker. The problems came way earlier in the film.....in the script actually.

It's a good science fiction movie but it's also a pretty flawed film. I think the sequal (if done) has potential to be a better movie and maybe (hopefully) fill in some of the blanks.


@Mental Maden @Maden Mental
"....you are now tackle free for life."-ShoNuff

 

Posted

I liked it, and give it 4/5 stars. It is well crafted and the performances by the principles were strong. I am actually a bit disappointed that Scott elected to revisit the Alien setting intstead of exploring something creatively new. It is the George Lucas "I must explore my created universe!" ego trap. Cameron has fallen into it, as has Peter Jackson. It is sad how short the journey from auteur to institution seems to be. At least Chris Nolan knows enough to disconnect from Batman after three films, and Guillermo del Toro seems to be stretching his legs a bit with Pacific Rim.


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by mousedroid View Post
B) When the xenomorphs (the ones we're familiar with) got loose on LV-233, one ship managed to take off, but crashed on LV-421 when the pilot died. The pilot was infected with a queen embryo and she was the origin of the leathery eggs in the ship on LV-421.
Okay I might be misremembering this from one of the Alien novels, but I thought drones had the ability to evolve into a queen if none was present.

But like I said I could easily be misremembering.


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Forbin_Project View Post
Okay I might be misremembering this from one of the Alien novels, but I thought drones had the ability to evolve into a queen if none was present.

But like I said I could easily be misremembering.
I was just supposing, but that could be. It does sound vaguely familiar, though I've never read any of the Alien novels (didn't even know there were any).

Also, I realized my mistake after the fact - it was LV-426, not LV-421.


(Sometimes, I wish there could be a Dev thumbs up button for quality posts, because you pretty much nailed it.) -- Ghost Falcon

 

Posted

Still looking forward to the film myself - maybe this weekend.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chazzmatazz View Post
I am actually a bit disappointed that Scott elected to revisit the Alien setting intstead of exploring something creatively new. It is the George Lucas "I must explore my created universe!" ego trap. Cameron has fallen into it, as has Peter Jackson. It is sad how short the journey from auteur to institution seems to be. At least Chris Nolan knows enough to disconnect from Batman after three films, and Guillermo del Toro seems to be stretching his legs a bit with Pacific Rim.
Cameron fell into it when? If you mean Avatar, he planned sequels before the first was done, so not sure that is a far comparison, exactly. Peter Jackson attempted to stay out of the Hobbit (assuming that's what you mean), but took over only when the other director pulled out...

Lucas remains in a class by himself.


City of Heroes was my first MMO, & my favorite computer game.

R.I.P.
Chyll - Bydand - Violynce - Enyrgos - Rylle - Nephryte - Solyd - Fettyr - Hyposhock - Styrling - Beryllos - Rosyc
Horryd - Myriam - Dysquiet - Ghyr
Vanysh - Eldrytch
Inflyct - Mysron - Orphyn - Dysmay - Reapyr - - Wyldeman - Hydeous

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chyll View Post
Still looking forward to the film myself - maybe this weekend.



Cameron fell into it when? If you mean Avatar, he planned sequels before the first was done, so not sure that is a far comparison, exactly. Peter Jackson attempted to stay out of the Hobbit (assuming that's what you mean), but took over only when the other director pulled out...

Lucas remains in a class by himself.
Sure, GL is still the uber primadonna, but Peter Jackson wasn't exactly "Oh, twist my arm. " when the Hobbit fell back in his lap. Jackson's handholding could have been a strong factor in delaying Hobbit production sufficiently for it to not fit into the schedule of someone with a lesser obsession (see G. del Toro), (note: pure speculation).

I didn't know about JC's plan for multiple films. That doesn't decrease my disappointment that he is giving in to vanity projects (with unprecedented box office for vanity projects) instead of taking on new things like Battle Angel which he has been teasing us with for over a decade.


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by mousedroid View Post
I was just supposing, but that could be. It does sound vaguely familiar, though I've never read any of the Alien novels (didn't even know there were any).

Also, I realized my mistake after the fact - it was LV-426, not LV-421.
At least one was written by novelisation-w**** Alan Dean Foster.


I really should do something about this signature.

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chazzmatazz View Post
I liked it, and give it 4/5 stars. It is well crafted and the performances by the principles were strong. I am actually a bit disappointed that Scott elected to revisit the Alien setting intstead of exploring something creatively new. It is the George Lucas "I must explore my created universe!" ego trap. Cameron has fallen into it, as has Peter Jackson. It is sad how short the journey from auteur to institution seems to be. At least Chris Nolan knows enough to disconnect from Batman after three films, and Guillermo del Toro seems to be stretching his legs a bit with Pacific Rim.
Jackson? Like many who read lotr first, he hated The Hobbit. It's really a much more off-kilter book when first encountered as an adult.

Nolan? I don't think overseeing the new Superman, and potentially a whole family of DC films is "letting go".


I really should do something about this signature.

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by mousedroid View Post
I was just supposing, but that could be. It does sound vaguely familiar, though I've never read any of the Alien novels (didn't even know there were any).

Also, I realized my mistake after the fact - it was LV-426, not LV-421.
Yeah there was an Aliens series, a Predators series, and an Aliens/Predators crossover series.


 

Posted

Yeah, lots of leeway with canon here: different planet/moon, different facehugger, different chestbuster, and an Alien bas relief. I see no problem with trying to force everything to fit if you want them to.


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Scythus View Post
Yeah, lots of leeway with canon here: different planet/moon, different facehugger, different chestbuster, and an Alien bas relief. I see no problem with trying to force everything to fit if you want them to.
As I understand it the Xenomorphs are the result of combining the DNA of Lawyers, Politicians, Corporate Executives, and TV Evangelists.


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Forbin_Project View Post
As I understand it the Xenomorphs are the result of combining the DNA of Lawyers, Politicians, Corporate Executives, and TV Evangelists.
You left out the cornerstone of their blind fury,

Forums Rage Guy.






 

Posted



Tough crowd here in the forums.


The development team and this community deserved better than this from NC Soft. Best wishes on your search.

 

Posted

Hmm...after seeing it, I could see how it can fit and still allow AvP & Predator 2 to be canon. Other than that bit at the beginning, was he on Earth or what? A sacrificial lamb to bring another species into existence?

Let's see if I can try to fit this into canon.

LV-233 was a weapons research outpost for the Engineers. Naturally, they'd want to isolate their work from the main body of their society. It's possible that each of those mounds was a different hot lab, working on different things.

The xenomorph we saw was the result of their research on a preexisting organism. Possibly to see if they could adapt and control the xenos. Maybe by including an automatic extinction switch that would shut 'em off when their work was done. The ship we saw on LV-426 in Alien was possibly a supply shuttle taking the eggs to one of their research facilities.

While the Engineers may have created humanity, the Predators took advantage of a perfect species to use as a host for the 'natural' xenomorphs. The Engineers didn't like their creation being used for such and had a, "Those are OUR toys! If we can't play with them, no one can!" mentality and decided to wipe out humans, which kinda sorta fits with the images presented in AvP.

Probably a lot of holes in the theory, but the idea that it tosses out established canon isn't necessarily completely true.



 

Posted

My take.

The Engineers are like us, from a world(s) with multiple factions who are now at war. They are looking to develop a bio-weapon that will infect and destroy the population of an entire world. The Engineer in the beginning isn't from the same faction as the later one. His ship isn't a horseshoe but a solid disk. He seeds this world and modern man develops.

LV-233 is a weapons development complex and the remaining engineer sees/senses that we are spawned from the other faction and wants to go off to drop his payload on Earth. The Xenomorph relief may be an indication that it's a species that the Engineers are looking to control by weakening them to a degree (they are simply to lethal to use in their natural state). The ship found in Alien may have simply been a Engineer ship overrun by an original Xenomorph species and it crashed on LV-426 maybe centuries before this movie is set.

As for my opinion of the movie, it was meh to me. Snow White and the Huntsman flowed better than this film. Technically the film was great. It was beautifully shot, the cast was excellent but it just didn't ... well flow from scene to scene well. It wasn't suspenseful and it wasn't all that scary.

It reminded me of the time I saw 2001 for the first time. I was 6 with my dad and first you had ape-men then you where in space, then a space station, then the moon, then another ship with a mean computer and then a pretty light show that ended with an old man in a bed. I couldn't see how that was all connected in a coherent plot at 6. Prometheus sort of made me feel like that again. It seemed disjointed.


Father Xmas - Level 50 Ice/Ice Tanker - Victory
$725 and $1350 parts lists --- My guide to computer components

Tempus unum hominem manet

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Father Xmas View Post
It wasn't suspenseful and it wasn't all that scary.
We've had 30 years to become desensitized to the Aliens. At least that's what happened to me. They just don't terrify me like they dd when I first saw so many years ago.

One of the things I love about the Weeping Angels in Doctor Who is they evoke the same response in me the Xenomorphs did as a kid. Don't close your eyes and RUN!!!


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dark One View Post
Hmm...after seeing it, I could see how it can fit and still allow AvP & Predator 2 to be canon. Other than that bit at the beginning, was he on Earth or what? A sacrificial lamb to bring another species into existence?
Yes, according to interviews, it's Earth, although exactly when, the writer didn't seem to know. Bad research and plotting is bad.

As for 2001, that deals with the same "big ideas" much more effectively, and did it 40-something years ago.


I really dislike all this "working around" Alien. It should either address that film, or not.


I really should do something about this signature.

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dark One View Post
Probably a lot of holes in the theory, but the idea that it tosses out established canon isn't necessarily completely true.
The movie doesn't really give any answers, so I agree. It doesn't deliberately violates any pre-established canon. Everything is guesswork and the only things we "know" are based on Dr. Shaw's theories about what's going on. And she's not basing those on evidence.


Thought for the day:

"Hope is the first step on the road to disappointment."

=][=

 

Posted

To those hoping a Prometheus sequel will provide some answers, you better hope they have a different screenwriter. Wrapping up open issues with a bow is not in Lindelof's wheelhouse.


Global = Hedgefund (or some derivation thereof)

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Deacon_NA View Post
To those hoping a Prometheus sequel will provide some answers, you better hope they have a different screenwriter. Wrapping up open issues with a bow is not in Lindelof's wheelhouse.
Which wouldn't matter, if you felt the writer actually had some answers...


I really should do something about this signature.

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Acemace View Post
You left out the cornerstone of their blind fury,

Forums Rage Guy.

That made me laugh



------->"Sic Semper Tyrannis"<-------

 

Posted

The timeline for the Weyalnd Corporation, both in the character of Peter Wayland and in the off-screen material, does not jive with the one in the Aliens vs. Predator movies, or so I'm told. I've avoided the who Aliens vs. Predator vs. Dracula vs. Frankenstein vs. Abbot and Costello thing.

It's safe to say, from that and Ridley Scott's comments, that he doesn't consider those movies to be part of his continuity.

Personally I liked Prometheus; it resolved its character arcs while leaving enough unexplained about its universe for a sequel. Or not; it also works, as the original did, as a Lovecraftian horror story IN SPACE.


Current Blog Post: "Why I am an Atheist..."
"And I say now these kittens, they do not get trained/As we did in the days when Victoria reigned!" -- T. S. Eliot, "Gus, the Theatre Cat"

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fista View Post
"It's beautiful" No it's not you moron! It's a giant (and I kid you not) wang!
I dunno *shrug* wangs are pretty beautiful.





But seriously, I liked the movie. And the dude was a biologist... entomologists think INSECTS of all shapes and sizes are "beautiful" while most folks are repulsed by them. It takes all kinds, and whatnot.



 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Venture View Post
it also works, as the original did, as a Lovecraftian horror story IN SPACE.
When people think it's less scary than Dr Who, I doubt that...


I really should do something about this signature.