WIR? (Spoilers)
To throw an interesting twist...
Unfortunately, Statesman has no male heirs in-game (that we know of). If Alexis Cole-Duncan were actually, say, Alexander Cole (his son) and everything stayed the same (former hero, father instead of mother to Ms Liberty, now retired, 77-going-on-45-ish look, etc)... would it have the same impact?
Go one worse... Ms. Liberty runs security, rather than Manticore, in an attempt to better her image (and Longbow's) as the loose cannon of the Isles, trying to turn over a new leaf with Warburg... and THIS happens.
Would Statesman ever forgive his granddaughter for failing to prevent the death of her father, his son? Or would we be chewing her out as an example of a woman 'failing to do a "man's job"'?
Michelle
aka
Samuraiko/Dark_Respite
THE COURSE OF SUPERHERO ROMANCE CONTINUES!
Book I: A Tale of Nerd Flirting! ~*~ Book II: Courtship and Crime Fighting - Chap Nine live!
MA Arcs - 3430: Hell Hath No Fury / 3515: Positron Gets Some / 6600: Dyne of the Times / 351572: For All the Wrong Reasons
378944: Too Clever by Half / 459581: Kill or Cure / 551680: Clerical Errors (NEW!)
Uh, yeah I'm going to call foul, because women are not the only ones dying tragically lately, and in fact it's kind of sexist just to zero in *solely* on the female deaths.
The Ghoul King was murdered by Calvin Scott early in the First Ward arc, a character in the final Crusader arc in Praetoria the players helped elevate back to human intelligence and forge an alliance with the resistance.
Cerulean is a member of the Carnival of Light fighting against the evils in First Ward before breaking off with the Carnival of War to take a more proactive approach and ending with being corrupted by the Talons of Vengeance so he has to be put down by the player.
And there's Master Midnight (Praetorian Percy) who sacrifices himself in the end to stop Diabolique from being consumed by Selene in a last act heroism after doing so much evil.
And that's just First Ward.
As was said, Statesman doesn't have many close male friends/relatives and the point of killing Miss Liberty was to get Statesman and Manticore involved in the encroaching plot web, as explicitly stated in the end of the 2nd SSA. It only feels pointless because due to lack of development we feel little about the specific character, we've only seen her once prior (and that's only in one Ouroboros Flashback Taskforce Villainside) and unless we're well versed in the lore we don't really know much about her. It's tragic for Statesman, which is pretty much the whole point. Definitely not a case of WIR. Which btw people are including Seer Katie in, who has explicitly *not* been killed.
I bet he still has that drawing she stuck in his stuff when he tried to give up being a hero when his wife died.
The problem I have with tropes in general is if you see it happen more than twice... or even more than once... the concept of a trope means you have the right to instantly scream "Hey! It's no longer original so it must be a gimmick!"
The danger of such thinking is that it robs you of the drama of the writing because it turns every thing into a parody or cliche.
Here's the truth about our world: Everything has been done.
There you go... writing today in a nutshell. No matter how original you think your idea is... no matter how artfully you contrive it... it's been done by someone at some other time. You don't have to be Professor Chaos watching Simpsons reruns to understand that.
Here's another way of looking at it... 50% of the population (roughly) is female... don't you think that's a helluva lot of refrigerators?
My mind wanders so often you've probably seen its picture on milk cartons. - Me... the first person version of the third person Steelclaw
My honest opinion is that people are looking for a problem to get riled up about. Stuff happens to characters, other characters react to said stuff, and whether or not any of them are female should really be more of an afterthought, if it's even considered at all.
Furthermore, that WIR list is fairly pointless in my book. You can't trot out a highly selective list and say "look at how bad this is" without giving any sort of contrast.
A circle forms, everybody comes round
Just to hear the incredible sound
Of a genius smashing expectations
- Jonathan Coulton
My honest opinion is that people are looking for a problem to get riled up about. Stuff happens to characters, other characters react to said stuff, and whether or not any of them are female should really be more of an afterthought, if it's even considered at all.
Furthermore, that WIR list is fairly pointless in my book. You can't trot out a highly selective list and say "look at how bad this is" without giving any sort of contrast. |
Male characters die all over comics (recently Nightcrawler and Human Torch). I completely disagree with the OP.
I think the term 'WIR' is ridiculous. The idea, the name...ridiculous. It seems to be some fanboy's tainted interpretation of the facts.
![Smile](images/smilies/smile.gif)
The problem I have with tropes in general is if you see it happen more than twice... or even more than once... the concept of a trope means you have the right to instantly scream "Hey! It's no longer original so it must be a gimmick!" |
As for the OP, I never accepted the WIR thesis in the first place. I do think Alexis' death is exploitive, though, and was not very well-handled. The "negotiation" scenario is really not credible and even without the Liberty Belt she should have been able to at least try to fight back.
Current Blog Post: "Why I am an Atheist..."
"And I say now these kittens, they do not get trained/As we did in the days when Victoria reigned!" -- T. S. Eliot, "Gus, the Theatre Cat"
It wasn't exploitative in the least. She's showed up for all of 1 mission which odds are good you haven't done because it's an Oro task force, and that was her in the past. There's literally no emotion to exploit there apart from "someone died".
Now exploitative in the sense of "We killed someone! OH SNAP! This story just got edgy"... Yeah, I guess. This SSA really kind of lost me, to be honest, and not even on plot alone like it tends to be of late.
As for the OP, I never accepted the WIR thesis in the first place. I do think Alexis' death is exploitive, though, and was not very well-handled. The "negotiation" scenario is really not credible and even without the Liberty Belt she should have been able to at least try to fight back.
|
And yes, her death is a fridging. It was clearly set up to upset Statesman and discredit Manticore. If they had killed her for her "magic blood" or because she knew something they didn't want her to talk about, it wouldn't have been, but they didn't.
Incidentally, that page the OP linked to isn't really a good representation of the Stuffed in the Fridge trope, as it simply lists all the examples of female characters in comics having bad things done to them. The trope is more specific than that. It applies only to women having bad things done to them for the sole purpose of motivating another character. In other words, if the victim hadn't been important to that other character, they would have been left alone. Ms Liberty's "death" in the RSF is another in-game example; we beat her up for the sole purpose of getting Statesman to fight us, and he only does this because she's personally important to him. If we'd beaten her up to get Longbow off our backs and someone with no personal relationship to her had decided that we were too dangerous for anyone else to handle, send in the Freedom Phalanx, the trope wouldn't apply.
Eva Destruction AR/Fire/Munitions Blaster
Darkfire Avenger DM/SD/Body Scrapper
Arc ID#161629 Freaks, Geeks, and Men in Black
Arc ID#431270 Until the End of the World
Incidentally, that page the OP linked to isn't really a good representation of the Stuffed in the Fridge trope, as it simply lists all the examples of female characters in comics having bad things done to them. The trope is more specific than that. It applies only to women having bad things done to them for the sole purpose of motivating another character. In other words, if the victim hadn't been important to that other character, they would have been left alone. Ms Liberty's "death" in the RSF is another in-game example; we beat her up for the sole purpose of getting Statesman to fight us, and he only does this because she's personally important to him. If we'd beaten her up to get Longbow off our backs and someone with no personal relationship to her had decided that we were too dangerous for anyone else to handle, send in the Freedom Phalanx, the trope wouldn't apply.
|
Striking at an enemy's weak points seems to me to not only be a classically comic book, but also the smart thing to do when your only advantage over an opponent is your lack of scruples.
![Smile](images/smilies/smile.gif)
Personally, I don't care if I'm beating up Statesman's granddaughter or Sister Psyche's uncle, but attacking a hero's weaknesses sounds like perfectly acceptable villainy to me. That's why secret identities are so popular!
To quote Patriarch from ME2: ""You said he had close family. They'll just want revenge. Kill the family first. Then he'll get angry and come at you stupid... and then you kill him."
Thought for the day:
"Hope is the first step on the road to disappointment."
=][=
The problem is mostly a sex relation one. If it were Sister Psyche's uncle we basically wouldn't have this thread.
It's a deep seated issue that's had a lot of debate in comics circles, and a lot of people feel very strongly about it, so I'd read up before you wade in with your opinion, if only to prevent this devolving into a flame war.
Yes, she should have, and that bugged me too.
And yes, her death is a fridging. It was clearly set up to upset Statesman and discredit Manticore. If they had killed her for her "magic blood" or because she knew something they didn't want her to talk about, it wouldn't have been, but they didn't. Incidentally, that page the OP linked to isn't really a good representation of the Stuffed in the Fridge trope, as it simply lists all the examples of female characters in comics having bad things done to them. The trope is more specific than that. It applies only to women having bad things done to them for the sole purpose of motivating another character. In other words, if the victim hadn't been important to that other character, they would have been left alone. Ms Liberty's "death" in the RSF is another in-game example; we beat her up for the sole purpose of getting Statesman to fight us, and he only does this because she's personally important to him. If we'd beaten her up to get Longbow off our backs and someone with no personal relationship to her had decided that we were too dangerous for anyone else to handle, send in the Freedom Phalanx, the trope wouldn't apply. |
The problem is mostly a sex relation one. If it were Sister Psyche's uncle we basically wouldn't have this thread.
It's a deep seated issue that's had a lot of debate in comics circles, and a lot of people feel very strongly about it, so I'd read up before you wade in with your opinion, if only to prevent this devolving into a flame war. |
![Frown](images/smilies/frown.gif)
Thought for the day:
"Hope is the first step on the road to disappointment."
=][=
(Playing Devil's Advocate)
Are the villains' male enemies (the heroes) somewhat chivalrous/chauvinistic? If so, going after the female proteges of the male enemies might be more tactically sound, to enrage/weaken the judgement of the male enemies. This is quite eeevil, which would make sense.
Also, Eva's suggestion that 'maybe if she had had magic blood, etc.,' - is it possible that there may be more to the reasons for these actions that we have yet to learn? Could it be an onion, rather than an apple?
-----
All that being said, I agree that I think we've had enough 'fridging', so to speak.
Arc #6015 - Coming Unglued
"A good n00b-sauce is based on a good n00b-roux." - The Masque
(Playing Devil's Advocate)
Are the villains' male enemies (the heroes) somewhat chivalrous/chauvinistic? If so, going after the female proteges of the male enemies might be more tactically sound, to enrage/weaken the judgement of the male enemies. This is quite eeevil, which would make sense. Also, Eva's suggestion that 'maybe if she had had magic blood, etc.,' - is it possible that there may be more to the reasons for these actions that we have yet to learn? Could it be an onion, rather than an apple? ----- All that being said, I agree that I think we've had enough 'fridging', so to speak. |
Note: The fact that Statesman doesn't have any living male relatives makes Alexis Cole-Duncan the only viable option the baddies have for their plot. And there are examples in game of villains kidnapping male characters in order to upset female heros. Mother Mayhem's arc has you kidnap Wu Yin in order to get Vaness DeVore out in the open. A similar arc in Sharkhead (I think) has you kidnap Iron Billy just to get closer to the Sea Witch.
_________
@Inquisitor
This.
Male characters die all over comics (recently Nightcrawler and Human Torch). I completely disagree with the OP. I think the term 'WIR' is ridiculous. The idea, the name...ridiculous. It seems to be some fanboy's tainted interpretation of the facts. ![]() |
The WIR hypothesis is that women get killed specifically to provide motivation to the protagonists.
Miss Liberty was not killed because she was fighting for justice. She was not killed because she had a McGuffin. She wasn't established as a character in her own right, but pretty much solely by her relationship to other characters (daughter of States, mom of Ms. Liberty).
Yes, I'm aware she shows up once in the one villain Ouro arc - with the exact same powers as her daughter. That's not an independent character, that's a continuity nod.
To have her show up a second time with no fanfare, and to be killed solely to provide motivation to our signature heroes? Yeah, that's stuffing her in a refrigerator.
Had the negotiations with Marshall Blitz and Miss Liberty been a B plot withing the SSAs, had the character any sort of presence in the game... there were ways that could have avoided WIR. As it is, she shows up in the game once to be established and once to die providing pathos and motivation to our protagonists (which are not our player characters mind, but the signature heroes.)
It's pretty much the definition of WIR.
Comrade Smersh, KGB Special Section 8 50 Inv/Fire, Fire/Rad, BS/WP, SD/SS, AR/EM
Other 50s: Plant/Thorn, Bots/Traps, DB/SR, MA/Regen, Rad/Dark - All on Virtue.
![](http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v489/baisleac/Sig%20Requests/ComSmersh.png)
I'm not sure I understand what the problem is. Is it a problem when a cowardly villain strikes at the hero's loved ones? Or is it only a problem if the loved one is female?
|
I did run the villain arc. The magic blood seemed to have been thrown in as an afterthought, and they didn't even need to kill her for it. The emphasis of the arc was clearly "we're going to kill Miss Liberty to upset Statesman and discredit Manticore." Malaise even gloated over it.
Eva Destruction AR/Fire/Munitions Blaster
Darkfire Avenger DM/SD/Body Scrapper
Arc ID#161629 Freaks, Geeks, and Men in Black
Arc ID#431270 Until the End of the World
I only have a problem with it if the death was particularly gruesome or humiliating, which as far as I can tell Alexis' was not (Katie on the other hand suffered a fate worse than death, at least for her). To me a WIR is not necessarily how many get killed but how they are killed.
It was sad, and I hate it when anyone dies in the game, but it didn't seem overly violent or gratuitous. I've only done the hero-side and I'm really itching to do the villain side because I have SO many questions left.
First rule of the hero - keep that mask on!
Oh, good. I was worried I wouldn't miss more important plot details by playing the hero version first. I'm glad to see I wasn't let down.
SSA 3 gets worse and worse...
I only have a problem with it if the death was particularly gruesome or humiliating, which as far as I can tell Alexis' was not (Katie on the other hand suffered a fate worse than death, at least for her). To me a WIR is not necessarily how many get killed but how they are killed.
It was sad, and I hate it when anyone dies in the game, but it didn't seem overly violent or gratuitous. I've only done the hero-side and I'm really itching to do the villain side because I have SO many questions left. First rule of the hero - keep that mask on! |
It's about the author doing these things so that the hero has something to angst about and have character development over.
In general, it's about having horrible things happen to female characters so that male characters can react to it.
Comrade Smersh, KGB Special Section 8 50 Inv/Fire, Fire/Rad, BS/WP, SD/SS, AR/EM
Other 50s: Plant/Thorn, Bots/Traps, DB/SR, MA/Regen, Rad/Dark - All on Virtue.
![](http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v489/baisleac/Sig%20Requests/ComSmersh.png)
The problem I have with tropes in general is if you see it happen more than twice... or even more than once... the concept of a trope means you have the right to instantly scream "Hey! It's no longer original so it must be a gimmick!"
The danger of such thinking is that it robs you of the drama of the writing because it turns every thing into a parody or cliche. Here's the truth about our world: Everything has been done. There you go... writing today in a nutshell. No matter how original you think your idea is... no matter how artfully you contrive it... it's been done by someone at some other time. You don't have to be Professor Chaos watching Simpsons reruns to understand that. Here's another way of looking at it... 50% of the population (roughly) is female... don't you think that's a helluva lot of refrigerators? |
I will echo this statement by repeating something I've stated elsewhere: tvtropes may be fun to read, but if one of your rules of fiction is "it can't appear there," then you're going to be constantly disappointed, and your standards are, dare I say, out of whack.
"Bombarding the CoH/V fora with verbosity since January, 2006"
Djinniman, level 50 inv/fire tanker, on Victory
-and 40 others on various servers
A CoH Comic: Kid Eros in "One Light"
It's not about the gruesomeness of the death - Gwen Stacy counts as stuffed in a fridge.
It's about the author doing these things so that the hero has something to angst about and have character development over. In general, it's about having horrible things happen to female characters so that male characters can react to it. |
BrandX Future Staff Fighter
![Wink](images/smilies/wink.gif)
The BrandX Collection
Oh, no, it's still terrible storytelling.
It's just not (potentially) misogynist.
CoH does a good job of doing violence to everyone regardless of race, creed, or gender. That's kinda the point of a Superhero game, really. However, a few people are starting to call 'Women in Refrigerators' on the recent in-game events.
For an in depth look at the phenomenon, visit the above link. However, a brief description is having BAD THINGS happen to female characters in order to move the story along, be it to give major male characters grief to emote against or a reason to strike at their enemies.
Some people simply call 'Misogyny'. However, one of the more common, more reasonable explanations is that since most comic writers are male, it's easier to write for male characters than it is to write for females. They get more mileage out of griefing their male leads by heaping torment upon their female leads than the other way around. Murder, ****, and other kinds of torture are doled out to be reacted to.
Barbara Gordon's crippling and subsequent sexual harassment at the hands of the Joker in 'The Killing Joke' solely as a measure to torment Jim Gordon stands out as the most prominent example in my mind, but there are many, many others.
(CoH spoilers ahead)
Certain in-game deaths in the last few pieces of content released seem to focus more heavily upon female characters than male characters. Praetorian Vanessa's death seems rather heroic rather than pointless. She died for the sake of getting the truth out.
However... Miss Liberty's death (and Manticore's reaction to its possibility) seems rather pointless and plotted solely to grief Statesman and spur him to possibly irrational action in future episodes of 'Who Will Die?'.
I don't know that this is 'Women in Refrigerators', but I think it may be coming close. Is it intentional on the part of the writers, say purposefully reflecting the phenomenon in comics? Is it simply one of many minor characters who are about to tally their bucket lists?
What do you think?