I think it'd be a good idea to announce if there are any MORE visual revamps.


AkuTenshiiZero

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Zwillinger View Post
The images that players are basing their judgments on are pictures of a screen from SDCC. This is both good and bad:
  • It's good because it's allowed us to get some unsolicited feedback upon which to act, and we are acting on it.
  • It's bad because we were unable to present this revamp on our own terms using appropriate screenshots and in game images.
Regardless of how it happened, we're listening to what everyone has to say, even going so far as to do a very granular breakdown of the post itself (how many unique posters, how many unique posters expressing what sentiment, etc...) to have a strong understanding of the feedback we're receiving.

-Z
Just in case I haven't posted on a thread you've tallied up yet, count me as extremely opposed to this change. The old CoT look was great. It had a clear theme the suited the Circle perfectly. In addition, it was quite distinctive from the other mobs in the game, so it helped the CoT stand out.

The new look does none of that. They not only don't look like a coven of mages, they look like a random assortment of costume bits. Perhaps the stills aren't doing the new costumes justice, but it doesn't even look like the texture or details are any better than the old ones.

I know it's unpopular to to have NPCs wear costume pieces we players can't use ourselves, but forcing them to wear generic castoff gear instead is a cure that's worse than the disease. Please leave the CoT as they were.

-D


Darkonne: Pinnacle's (unofficially) mighty Dark Miasma/Radiation Blast enthusiast!

Be sure to check out this mighty Arc:
#161865 - Aeon's Nemesis

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Zwillinger View Post
Regardless of how it happened, we're listening to what everyone has to say, even going so far as to do a very granular breakdown of the post itself (how many unique posters, how many unique posters expressing what sentiment, etc...) to have a strong understanding of the feedback we're receiving.
Thank you very much, Zwillinger, for posting this information! One reason I often either refrain from posting feedback or simply give rambling commentary when I do is that I've always assumed that feedback only ever reaches the devs in the form of "the players are saying [X general thing] on the forums." Knowing how you review and present our commentary to the devs makes it much easier for us to give feedback that might be useful or at least considered, rather than simply spouting our opinions.

Thanks again for your work for the CoH fan community.


"Bombarding the CoH/V fora with verbosity since January, 2006"

Djinniman, level 50 inv/fire tanker, on Victory
-and 40 others on various servers

A CoH Comic: Kid Eros in "One Light"

 

Posted

I am confident the devs will make changes based on our feedback. They tend to cater to us ever since they became sole owners of the game. I was not happy with the new look. I am sure they'll make a better look before it hits live. If I were to put my two cents worth in it would be this: If you want to make a new look for the CoT, how about a dark/evil version of the Legacy Chain?

*Runs off before the flaming on my 2 cents starts*


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Zwillinger View Post
There's a problem with that...concept art is just that...something designed to communicate a concept or an idea. The finished product very rarely has a strong resemblance to the concept art.

Concept art is usually best kept as something to show after the fact, as kinda a "Oh that's cool!" thing and to appreciate the amazing artistic talent of our art team. The most helpful feedback comes on the implemented and executed product.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Winterminal View Post
...That said, I do not think the Devs should post all of their concepts for public viewing, nor do I think they should feel obligated to do so. Something to remember is that a concept is just a beginning idea, and could very easily change in transition from paper to computer screen. ...
Zwillinger, c'mon man! I corrected myself in the post you quoted! *pulls out gangsta voice* You copyin' me or sumthin'?!

*ditches poorly done gangsta impression*
Was this due to that "no caffeine yet" problem you were having with your earlier posts?


@Winter. Because I'm Winter. Period.
I am a blaster first, and an alt-oholic second.

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Zwillinger View Post
  • It's bad because we were unable to present this revamp on our own terms using appropriate screenshots and in game images.
Well, you could post some posed shots of the new models in somewhere like Perez Park - it's not really going to be a spoiler now


@Golden Girl

City of Heroes comics and artwork

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Zwillinger View Post
The images that players are basing their judgments on are pictures of a screen from SDCC. This is both good and bad:
  • It's good because it's allowed us to get some unsolicited feedback upon which to act, and we are acting on it.
  • It's bad because we were unable to present this revamp on our own terms using appropriate screenshots and in game images.
Regardless of how it happened, we're listening to what everyone has to say, even going so far as to do a very granular breakdown of the post itself (how many unique posters, how many unique posters expressing what sentiment, etc...) to have a strong understanding of the feedback we're receiving.

-Z
Should've anticipated this?


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by je_saist View Post
It would make Virtue server happy.
Most of the changes made to the game since NCSoft bought City of Heroes out have been logically explained, yes even the I13 revamp.
Oh you mean the 'The changes were not designed for the pvp public, but to bring in new players, and even though we hear and will totally your objections/concerns to the changes, they are going to happen whether you like them or not!' Explanation? Ahhh, got you!


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by BrandX View Post
But what would we be surprised by?
There's plenty of other stuff for us to be surprised by. Costumes, not surprisingly, is something that many people see as SRS BZNSS in this game.

As an aside, the reaction to the COT costume revamp reveals an amusing and deep-seated hatred that many who play this game secretly have for that other game .


Blazara Aura LVL 50 Fire/Psi Dom (with 125% recharge)
Flameboxer Aura LVL 50 SS/Fire Brute
Ice 'Em Aura LVL 50 Ice Tank
Darq Widow Fortune LVL 50 Fortunata (200% rech/Night Widow 192.5% rech)--thanks issue 19!

 

Posted

eh i can see the reasoning behind this, but i disagree strongly. there are and will always be a vocal contrarian element on the forums and attempting to design by committee here would be a ripe target to stonewall any and all creativity. this change was poorly received, it is fairly unique in that it has been so strongly(but not universally) disliked, most other cases you invite factionalism and malcontents to stifle the game. vehemently unsigned.


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Calibre View Post
Should've anticipated this?
Meh. I can see being surprised. I know I have done things I thought were really cool only to have people have a lot of people have a negative or neutral reaction. Since they did not have anyone in studio that disliked the proposed changes (and I am sure they normally have enough dissenting opinions to generally cross-check each other decently), it is not terribly surprising that they did not expect this reaction.

They all loved the new stuff. I am sure that if one or two of them would have said, "Hmmm. That is a pretty radical change. I am not sure they really match the CoT," then they may have anticipated it.


Why Blasters? Empathy Sucks.
So, you want to be Mental?
What the hell? Let's buff defenders.
Tactics are for those who do not have a big enough hammer. Wisdom is knowing how big your hammer is.

 

Posted

Do the new look CoT still die when you shoot them? If so, I don't care if they look like sponge bob or barney - a dead mob is a dead mob.


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fritzy View Post
Do the new look CoT still die when you shoot them? If so, I don't care if they look like sponge bob or barney - a dead mob is a dead mob.
So why are you playing this instead of a MUD?


Branching Paragon Police Department Epic Archetype, please!

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cosmic_Herald View Post
Having us forum goers give a 'yes' / 'no' etc would be like sampling approx less than 1% of the whole player base (I think we are that low).
This is actually one statement given as fact that I'm tired of seeing misrepresented. As a percentage of population yes regular and even non regular forum posters are probably less than 1% of the games total population. The problem is that the statement assumes that only 1% of the many different types of gamers is represented. I am very sure that the more specific categories of gamers that the 1% of the general game population that posts here is comprised of is represented.

We have min/maxers and casuals on the forums. We even have "casually" purpled warshades. We have Content Police and we have What Stories? and even You read that stuff?!?. We have Spandex Lovers and we have Bulky Armor Lovers. We have Scifi fans and we have Medievil fans. We have Catgirls and we have Werewolves even "/e facepalm" Twilight Vamps. I could go on and on with the various differenet types of people that I've seen while lurking these forums for more than 5 years and I could go on and on with the more general groups I could fit them in.

The point is that in this 1% of the general population that posts here on the forums are a great many and varied voices from all walks of life that represent the general views of more than 1% of the general game population.


Work in progress no more. I have decided that I'm going to put my worst spelling errors here. Triage Bacon, Had this baster idea, TLR

"I'm going to beat the Jesus out of Satan!" My Wife while playing Dante's Inferno

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Friggin_Taser View Post
See also: Fifth Column into Council change?
I don't think anyone complained that the Council looked worse or more out of place than the 5th Column, with the possible exception of the Mexican Lucha Libre wrestlers. The Council, like the Column, was a paramilitary organisation staffed by masked soldiers. People did miss the skull-like WW2 German army helmet plus gas mask combo, but that's because it's iconic of Stupid Jetpack Hitler more than anything else. The space man helmets were just as good for the neo-fascist alien fanboys, and the variety in both powers and looks that the Council brought is significant. In fact, putting the Column soldiers against the Council ones, the Column looks very dated.

What people opposed to back then the merit of ostensibly renaming a faction and taking away a good story to replace it with a mediocre one, compounded by the "Devs hate Nazis!" arguments. Both the Council and the Column had and have their perks, and the smartest thing to do would have been what they ended up doing eventually anyway - put them both in the game.

---

What's a bit upsetting to me is the straw men being built around "the horrible conduct" of the Circle of Warcraft thread, like it's full of juvenile idiots who are having nerdrage episodes and demanding changes. Well I happened to read through most of it, and it's very little more than a bunch of people sharing their opinions of a change, which just happens to be negative. Occasionally there will be one who goes "This sucks! Change it back!" but for the most part we're just trying to verbalise why we dislike the change and what could possibly happen to mitigate it without requiring the scrapping of existing work wholesale.

In general, I find it profoundly unhelpful for people keep on arguing about how other people shouldn't express their opinions, or should only express their opinions a certain way. I'm glad the development team seem to know better than this, and their recent action have earned them a LOT of credit with me, so I'll trust them to sort this out without needing to be told which feedback to read and which feedback to ignore.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Arcanaville View Post
Samuel_Tow is the only poster that makes me want to punch him in the head more often when I'm agreeing with him than when I'm disagreeing with him.

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Crim_the_Cold View Post
The point is that in this 1% of the general population that posts here on the forums are a great many and varied voices from all walks of life that represent the general views of more than 1% of the general game population.
Forumites = that relatively small bit of the iceberg you can see poking above the water.

See also: "Where there's smoke, there's fire."
Extra Credit: "The Macrocosm is as the Microcosm."


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nos482 View Post
It´s not that I want to sparkle... Dark Armor just fits for a Vampire -.-



Clicking on the linked image above will take you off the City of Heroes site. However, the guides will be linked back here.

 

Posted

Of all the things for people to focus on. I only put the Twilight reference in to cause a few laughs.


Work in progress no more. I have decided that I'm going to put my worst spelling errors here. Triage Bacon, Had this baster idea, TLR

"I'm going to beat the Jesus out of Satan!" My Wife while playing Dante's Inferno

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Zwillinger View Post
The images that players are basing their judgments on are pictures of a screen from SDCC. This is both good and bad:
  • It's good because it's allowed us to get some unsolicited feedback upon which to act, and we are acting on it.
  • It's bad because we were unable to present this revamp on our own terms using appropriate screenshots and in game images.
Frankly, as a member of the community, this comment borders on the insulting - because it implies that the only reason we dislike the new look is because it wasn't properly marketed.

Have you even read the comments?

We don't like the new look because it doesn't look like the CoT. This isn't like the Rikti upgrade where they got a cool and spiffy new look. This is taking a unique look away and replacing it with something that looks like every bad costume contest ever held under Atlas' globe.

Do. Not. Want.


http://derekl1963.livejournal.com/

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Samuel_Tow View Post
but that's because it's iconic of Stupid Jetpack Hitler more than anything else.
+1 for the TVTropes reference.

That is all.


 

Posted

You do have to admit though that the picture with the aura bringing the focus right in on the mage's butt-in-tights isn't exactly showing them in the best light. For some reason everytime I see that image I picture that guy walking away with that aura on drawing attention to a place I'd rather not pay attention to while the music from the 6 million dollar man keeps playing in the background.


Work in progress no more. I have decided that I'm going to put my worst spelling errors here. Triage Bacon, Had this baster idea, TLR

"I'm going to beat the Jesus out of Satan!" My Wife while playing Dante's Inferno

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Doc_Scorpion View Post
Frankly, as a member of the community, this comment borders on the insulting - because it implies that the only reason we dislike the new look is because it wasn't properly marketed.

Have you even read the comments?

We don't like the new look because it doesn't look like the CoT. This isn't like the Rikti upgrade where they got a cool and spiffy new look. This is taking a unique look away and replacing it with something that looks like every bad costume contest ever held under Atlas' globe.

Do. Not. Want.
I think you're just looking for a reason to feel insulted.

"we were unable to present this revamp on our own terms" means that they could preface this with an explanation of what they hoped to accomplish, why other decisions weren't done, and what this means going forward. There's a good chance that this wouldn't change a person's opinion on the merits of the work, but it would give them insight in the devs' rationale, and that can help channel the discussion into more constructive directions.


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chase_Arcanum View Post
"we were unable to present this revamp on our own terms" means that they could preface this with an explanation of what they hoped to accomplish, why other decisions weren't done, and what this means going forward. There's a good chance that this wouldn't change a person's opinion on the merits of the work, but it would give them insight in the devs' rationale, and that can help channel the discussion into more constructive directions.
Well, wouldn't you think that would ENCOURAGE them to make a big fanfare and show their design plans on their own terms rather than letting us just be surprised with it and flip out?

I'm honestly willing to bet that a lot of people could have been suckered into accepting the CoT revamp if they'd had marketing dress it up some. I don't think most of us would have been HAPPY with it, but right now it looks like they were just going to SURPRISE us with it, and the howls would have been even louder.


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by bAss_ackwards View Post
How about a Facepalm instead?
At the risk of being ever so unnoticeably off topic, I really wish they'd Bassy's "Demon facepalm girl" image for a caption contest!


Still hate the visit Winscott mission- make it dropable, have it give actual exp or remove it altogether. PS- Down knows who you are.
J/ Wilde/
/ AIL - Celebrating five years!

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Doc_Scorpion View Post
Frankly, as a member of the community, this comment borders on the insulting - because it implies that the only reason we dislike the new look is because it wasn't properly marketed.

Have you even read the comments?

.
Closed beta family and friends is probably going on...if so enough said.