I feel bad for Statesman...
Fair enough. I think the current layout works well though.
Quote:
He's been crammed down our throats as "the" hero of the CoX universe since release. We've been told and shown repeatedly that our characters will never be as cool as him and his friends. Meanwhile, he's just not that interesting of a character. He's a one-dimensional extension of his creator's ego. Is it any wonder he's the butt of so many jokes? Or that people enjoy beating the snot out of him so much?
|
Maybe, but I agree with what Troy Hickman wrote; I like the idea of an old and wise superpowered character who is benevolent and uplifting to those around him. Like Troy, I'm a fan of the Cary Bates Superman and the Kurt Busiek Captain America (there's just a genuineness in their characters that just makes me smile every time I read them and that Silver Age Superman is still a heroic ideal I like trying to emulate).
I didn't join CoH around the time of the backlash against Jack Emmert, so I don't have any bias towards Statesman's creator. So I strike out on that point also. And finally, I've never found him as written to be 'better than me' or insufferably arrogant. Maybe my memory's bad, maybe I've just tried to choose what it is I see in Statesman rather than try and reconcile the conflicting whole.
I grew up reading Superman, and will always, always love that character. And without meaning to belabor the point, I want what Troy wants; that potentially really interesting, really cool character. I guess if I choose to see him that way, he will be. My respect for him as a character went up doing the Incarnate arc because we learned he could give into rampant power and become a dictator, but he chooses not to. He's showing wisdom there that a lot of people may not given that situation (I'm lookin' at you, Recluse).
So I may not begrudge anyone who wants to make fun of him (I mean, this is nothing compared to the infamous site about Superman's behavior over the years, and it rhymes with hickory), but I'm not inclined to put the boot in as we say down here. To use another cliche from Star Wars: I still see the good in him.
S.
Part of Sister Flame's Clickey-Clack Posse
Quote:
You ARE being melodramatic, no one is taking this discussion super seriously.
At the risk of being melodramatic: you have to be freaking kidding me. No one actually thinks these two fictional characters are in a romantic relationship. They just thought it was humorous and interesting as a "what if." The "logical fallacy" here is that people are trying to apply logic to something that is completely emotional and arbitrary.
Is Stateman interested in men? I have no idea, but there seem to be quite a few people with emotions riding on "never never never." Conflating this emotion with "logic" is the first and biggest mistake. This isn't an argument about logic at all. If someone wants to imagine the character that way it's their perogative. Claiming that it is impossible for the character to proceed that way is, in fact, the much more egregious error, given that "logic" cannot possibly apply to this situation. |
You're also wrong. Matters of emotion are still matters of logic. It's bizarre that you feel otherwise. I realize that Star Trek's Vulcans suggest that logic and emotion are two sides of a coin, but they are not. There are reasons and rationalizations behind emotions, they don't just magically happen.
And yes, claiming it as impossible is an intellectual dishonest position for reasons stated earlier in the thread, because that isn't logical either.
My Going Rogue Trailer
Virtue (blue) - Wes The Mess
Virtue (red) - Jess The Best
@Razoras
No, no, no. It's the other party's burden to laugh, and then go write more fanfic. It's a tough job, but someone has to do it.
Arc#314490: Zombie Ninja Pirates!
Defiant @Grouchybeast
Death is part of my attack chain.
Quote:
Hey, are you trying to derail the derail??
Silver Age Superman is still a heroic ideal I like trying to emulate).
...I grew up reading Superman, and will always, always love that character. And without meaning to belabor the point, I want what Troy wants; that potentially really interesting, really cool character. |
What I read into Troy Hickman's depiction of Statesman was a combination of factors: First and foremost, being over 100 years old is a lot of territory to cover, especially with everyone in your age-group (save Recluse) dying off. Second, Statesman is also dealing with the aftermath of the first Rikti invasion, in which most of his super-powered peer group was killed off; his intial interaction with Moodswing reminded me of the story of the rude clerk: the customer's reaction to the clerk's rudeness was mollified upon hearing that their son had died suddenly two days earlier. I think Troy went a long way toward the "cool, noble but interesting" hero we would like to see in Statesman. (He also showed what high-level scripting can do for a comic, but that his another topic.)
Statesman, in the totality of his in-game and comic presentation, is currently a confused jumble and a poster boy for the perils of different writers with different agendas (and skill-sets), much like many Silver Age heroes are today, which is too bad. That particular point would take us pretty far afield, but I will note that Troy Hickman once said something to the effect of, "If you want a moody, psychopathic, adulterous, self-loathing vigilante 'hero,' then create one yourself--- don't ret-con an existing hero into one."
Quote:
My respect for him as a character went up doing the Incarnate arc because we learned he could give into rampant power and become a dictator, but he chooses not to. He's showing wisdom there that a lot of people may not given that situation (I'm lookin' at you, Recluse). |
"How do you know you are on the side of good?" a Paragon citizen asked him. "How can we even know what is 'good'?"
"The Most High has spoken, even with His own blood," Melancton replied. "Surely we know."
Quote:
True.
The burden of proof also falls onto the party that makes a claim. Without evidence for the claim that party fails the burden of proof. So if I reject the claim that Faultline and Statesman are in a relationship of some kind, it is NOT my burden to prove they aren't. It is the other party's burden to prove they are.
|
But if someone else rejects the claim that Faultline and Statesman aren't in a relationship of some kind, it is not their burden to prove that they are; it's the other party's burden to prove they aren't.
Quote:
You're treading on the edge of another logical fallacy (assuming you're doing more than just waving around your logical fallacy wand), which is Argument from Ignorance: a claim is true if it has not been refuted. |
Interesting trivia point: Not everyone's brain works the same way on this. For some people, a claim can be in a state of "don't have any reason to believe yes or no". For other people, the only options are believe or disbelieve. One of my friends is in the latter category, and he thinks things are false if they aren't proven true. I mean, not logically, he knows that's wrong, but his brain experiences them as though they're false.
So for instance, imagine the claim "the difference from the center of the earth to the center of the sun, measured in centimeters and rounded towards zero, is an even number." He has no evidence for it, so he thinks it's false. Now try the same claim, only with odd. He has no evidence for it, so he thinks it's false. If he tries to think about both at once, his head hurts. Me, I just don't think either of them is true, but that doesn't imply that I think they're false.
Quote:
You're also wrong. Matters of emotion are still matters of logic. It's bizarre that you feel otherwise.
|
What's bizarre is taking such a hardline logical stance on a fictional relationship between fictional people in a fictional world who have fictional super powers. You say you are not taking this seriously but that is very hard to tell based on the nature of the language you are using. My apologies for reading the intent of your statements incorrectly.
Anyway, even if we did apply logic to this super-serious-but-not-super-serious discussion, the only argument that I've seen made in favor of the pairing is that these two characters "could" be in a relationship. The burden is not to prove that they are. It's to prove that they could not be, which is an entirely different situation. Since in a fictional world the characters could be in a relationship at the stroke of a pen any logic folds on itself. It's like arguing about whether Statesman has relatives in Australia. The answer isn't logical, it's "he will if it's convenient to the plot."
I think the burden is on the paparazzi to get some photos.
Quote:
Good.
I think the burden is on the paparazzi to get some photos.
|
I needed some vermin to shoot at.
Quote:
GG, I would tell you that "I am killing you with my mind", but I couldn't find an emoticon to properly express my sentiment.
|
The only emotion I feel while reading this thread is amusement.
@MrsAlphaOne
Member of the [url="http://www.guildportal.com/Guild.aspx?GuildID=171543&TabID=1451954"]RIMC[/url]
[url="http://www.freewebs.com/mrsalphaone"]DA![/url]
[color=red]Official Beer Wench of PWNZ[/color] Arc 452196 When Madness Reigns over Reason. Play it and PM me your constructive criticism on what I can tweak before Oct 20th. <3 U all
Quote:
Seriously? No one else has ever seen the Statesman lazy eye in the loading screen? Load the game up now and look. It'll haunt you I tell you!
|
Yes. But there's something even more disturbing about that screen, and I'm not sure if I'm not the only one this happens to or whether I'm dirty for even noticing. The location of the "confirmation" button on the previous screen mixed with the fact that the cursor turns into a kind of grasping hand frequently has me end up groping Miss Liberty with cupped, blue fingers. The locations just seem to line up perfectly on my monitor. And Statesman is watching with his lazy eye. Ew.
If you type Statesline into Google images we're on the second row from the top, right behind a steam engine and a Nazi symbol.
Thank you whoever took the time to give me those Praetorian Demo Model Names
This reminds me to track down the program that lets me change the game's loading screens and log in page.
The Splasher program, courtesy of Leandro.
Michelle
aka
Samuraiko/Dark_Respite
Dark_Respite's Farewell Video: "One Last Day"
THE COURSE OF SUPERHERO ROMANCE CONTINUES!
Book I: A Tale of Nerd Flirting! ~*~ Book II: Courtship and Crime Fighting - Chap Nine live!
MA Arcs - 3430: Hell Hath No Fury / 3515: Positron Gets Some / 6600: Dyne of the Times / 351572: For All the Wrong Reasons
378944: Too Clever by Half / 459581: Kill or Cure / 551680: Clerical Errors (NEW!)
THE COURSE OF SUPERHERO ROMANCE CONTINUES!
Book I: A Tale of Nerd Flirting! ~*~ Book II: Courtship and Crime Fighting - Chap Nine live!
MA Arcs - 3430: Hell Hath No Fury / 3515: Positron Gets Some / 6600: Dyne of the Times / 351572: For All the Wrong Reasons
378944: Too Clever by Half / 459581: Kill or Cure / 551680: Clerical Errors (NEW!)
Nemesis/Reichsman? That has potential for Teutonic man-love.
@Golden Girl
City of Heroes comics and artwork
Now that's a love triangle with plenty of possibilities.
@Golden Girl
City of Heroes comics and artwork
No, no, no. If you're REALLY going to go for heavy metal love, it's got to be Nemesis/Clockwork King all the way.
Michelle
aka
Samuraiko/Dark_Respite
Michelle
aka
Samuraiko/Dark_Respite
Dark_Respite's Farewell Video: "One Last Day"
THE COURSE OF SUPERHERO ROMANCE CONTINUES!
Book I: A Tale of Nerd Flirting! ~*~ Book II: Courtship and Crime Fighting - Chap Nine live!
MA Arcs - 3430: Hell Hath No Fury / 3515: Positron Gets Some / 6600: Dyne of the Times / 351572: For All the Wrong Reasons
378944: Too Clever by Half / 459581: Kill or Cure / 551680: Clerical Errors (NEW!)
THE COURSE OF SUPERHERO ROMANCE CONTINUES!
Book I: A Tale of Nerd Flirting! ~*~ Book II: Courtship and Crime Fighting - Chap Nine live!
MA Arcs - 3430: Hell Hath No Fury / 3515: Positron Gets Some / 6600: Dyne of the Times / 351572: For All the Wrong Reasons
378944: Too Clever by Half / 459581: Kill or Cure / 551680: Clerical Errors (NEW!)
Quote:
It says he can't get it to work for Windows 7, which is what I use. And here I had hope of not staring at his face any longer...
I might change the layout to
scence 1 - scence 2
scence 3
instead of
1
2
3
I might add a flimstrip border.
I might give Faultline a stool.
I'm trying to work out the layout for Statesman Pinata, which will be anther thread, and I think it's going to be a big hit.
I can put the cat back with or without the fire, but I think your post works really well with that picture.