All Things Art: 'Lost' Costume Pieces
Wow, maybe its from clipping but it almost looks like a fur mozzetta (the bishop-y shoulder capes). Here is the pic I have of the fur shoulders option:
/mozzettas would be an AWESOME costume option! |
Wish we could have recluses fur collar option too!
Post Comic book Fan Films that ROCK!
Fight my brute
WHAT?!
Your telling me that back part was actually possible in game, didn't clip, didn't slip and fulfilled the back criteria a la capes and wings etc? And we STILL dont have it?
...Someone better have a DAMN good reason why this is still player locked, or so help me...
GG, I would tell you that "I am killing you with my mind", but I couldn't find an emoticon to properly express my sentiment.
|
Possibly posted already, but the four "skull" brooches for capes.
Where to find me after the end:
The Secret World - Arcadia - Shinzo
Rift - Faeblight - Bloodspeaker
LotRO - Gladden - Aranelion
STO - Holodeck - @Captain_Thiraas
Obviously, I don't care about NCSoft's forum rules, now.
Wait, wait, wait...
WHAT?! Your telling me that back part was actually possible in game, didn't clip, didn't slip and fulfilled the back criteria a la capes and wings etc? And we STILL dont have it? ...Someone better have a DAMN good reason why this is still player locked, or so help me... |
The same reason other NPC pieces aren't available that fulfill those requirements? I don't see a problem here.
|
They've said for a long damn time that backpieces, like the VG back armour, haven't been possible for 'technical reasons'.
Going on that post, not only is it possible to give characters back details so long as they are exclusive to capes and the like, AND hip details like the VG plates, but it's been available since I9. And hasn't been given to Player Characters yet.
Why? I'm waiting to see if David actually gets back to that one or not. But I'd be very interested in an answer.
GG, I would tell you that "I am killing you with my mind", but I couldn't find an emoticon to properly express my sentiment.
|
Wait, wait, wait...
WHAT?! Your telling me that back part was actually possible in game, didn't clip, didn't slip and fulfilled the back criteria a la capes and wings etc? And we STILL dont have it? ...Someone better have a DAMN good reason why this is still player locked, or so help me... |
You'll rave and rant?
Nerdrage quit?
THE DEVS HAVE BEEN DENYING ME MY RIGHTFUL BACKPACK OF JUSTICE!!! THEY'RE ONLY DOING IT SO THEY CAN LAUGH AT ME AS I RUN AROUND BARE-BACKED, WHILE THEY PLAY WITH THEIR SEKRIT STUFF!!!
Seriously...
The reasons why we don't have backpacks have been thoroughly explained (In short it requires a modification of the skeletal rig to add another mounting point). The fact that a single NPC back-detail happend to bug its way through and looked half-way decent (and really it's a slightly raised texture) on a particular model does not mean that backpacks are suddenly possible.
well, i understand the rigging issue, but here is the thing, right now, we have jetpacks, a lot of people would like a jetpack for thematic reasons, even if it did not automatically give flight, now i certainly respect their desire not to do things half heartedly, if the pieces exist right now, have been put on characters, even if it is with clipping, and the people are content with that, then perhaps it could be like tails, put it in the back category now, like wings and capes, use the existing art that already exists and they could make people happy until such time as they could make a node, then, like tails, they could transition them to a better rigged one, if they get around to it. seems like a win win here to me, we have jetpacks, several actually, right now, just let them be non functional back pieces and i think you will make many people very very happy. I cant obviously say it is easy, but compared to rerigging or making new art assets, i think it would be less work intensive. no nerdrage here, and im subbed till september of next year as of today, so i doubt im going anywhere just a modest proposal to make some people happy with less investment of work.
I do.
They've said for a long damn time that backpieces, like the VG back armour, haven't been possible for 'technical reasons'. Going on that post, not only is it possible to give characters back details so long as they are exclusive to capes and the like, AND hip details like the VG plates, but it's been available since I9. And hasn't been given to Player Characters yet. Why? I'm waiting to see if David actually gets back to that one or not. But I'd be very interested in an answer. |
Freedom Phalanx pattern. I used to have this on a few chars. Probably a bug, but it was nice to have.
Ability to use wings with trenchcoat and bolero. Said numerous times that wings aren't part of the 2-cape block (which isn't consequential, since it's still allowed with some costume pieces). So want those back, please.
The short tail version which used to be with the bolero and tenchcoats, helped with clipping.
A bug i know, but the 90 degree rotated skirts were nice, looked really nice with some combianations.
And another bug. Where you could lose the trenchcoat-tail which ended up being a rather cool leather jacket imo.
Skintones for costume pieces. I know why they were removed, but could limit the options to pieces so chars cannot look nude. Mostly want for chest emblems, gloves, boots.
Self Proclaimed KING of Radiation
My Post count is > Dave Winfield
The Smoking Lounge. Saturdays @ Midnight on The Switch
The reasons why we don't have backpacks have been thoroughly explained (In short it requires a modification of the skeletal rig to add another mounting point). The fact that a single NPC back-detail happend to bug its way through and looked half-way decent (and really it's a slightly raised texture) on a particular model does not mean that backpacks are suddenly possible.
|
Tyger (50), Mutation-Controller Mind/FF - oldest Mind/FF on Union
I do.
They've said for a long damn time that backpieces, like the VG back armour, haven't been possible for 'technical reasons'. |
Plus there're possible clipping issues, but I think the developers are slowly realizing we don't care about clipping as much as they think we do.
The 'technical reasons' they mention (and this has been spelled out by Positron, IIRC) is that they can only add 2 more attachment points to the player skeleton due to engine limitations; and they want to make really sure we want backpacks / knee guards before they do it so we don't then clamor for arm bands and hip holsters.
|
Branching Paragon Police Department Epic Archetype, please!
I've been hoping for a serious engine re-write for the game just so we don't have these kinds of 'engine limitation problems' (only 2 more skeletal points, no quadrupeds, etc) for quite a while now. I don't *expect* it, but I'd love it.
Sh'loads of work? Obviously. Free the devs hands to potentially do a lot of things we clamor to have, but pose serious engine limitation problems? Would stand to reason.
It just irks me that the devs are constantly having to work with, and work around, limitations in the engine of a game that was never initially coded to provide the level of dynamic, adaptable, and awesome gameplay that the devs now are constantly trying to deliver to us, while having the engine seemingly fight them on the issue at every turn.
Upper and Lower baggy pants. You could set the pattern on both separate with their own colors as seen here. I'm not sure witch of these are the right one from an old demo record of it has this listed:
0 1 PARTSNAME Pants_Baggy Pants Flames 0000ff 316131 0 1 PARTSNAME Baggy Cargo_01 Flames 00ff01 316131 |
Jay added back the ability to kind of recreate these with tight pants but not with baggy and not on Huge characters.
Back-Fire just wants to go to Icon and keep his pants!
Craft your inventions in AE!!
Play "Crafter's Cafe" - Arc #487283. A 1 mission, NON-COMBAT AE arc with workable invention tables!
I'd like to have back the original skirts that didn't hug your hinder quite so much.
The 'technical reasons' they mention (and this has been spelled out by Positron, IIRC) is that they can only add 2 more attachment points to the player skeleton due to engine limitations; and they want to make really sure we want backpacks / knee guards before they do it so we don't then clamor for arm bands and hip holsters.
Plus there're possible clipping issues, but I think the developers are slowly realizing we don't care about clipping as much as they think we do. |
Well unless they've done some major shifting since i9; I have seen it's possible to have a backpack as a back detail and it must've hooked on to the same point as the cape being that it was mutually exclusive with them, much the same as wings are. And it wasn't a bug in the creator; it was a bug from using the character transfer before they fixed it so we didn't get turned into G-Ms by using it.
|
GG, I would tell you that "I am killing you with my mind", but I couldn't find an emoticon to properly express my sentiment.
|
At one time I think that this bandoleer, was available for females but not any more.
Now females only have access to the crossed bandoleer. Note both these toons are useing the armored torso, however only males get the single bandoleer. I have no proof of this other than my faulty memory. It should be changed in any case.
All of this is incredibly useful, guys. Thank you very much. Just wanted to let you know that I've compiled a list, and that we're looking into it. Please continue to post if you remember anything else.
David Nakayama, Lead Concept Artist
COH Concept Art Gallery now open at http://pixelsaurus.deviantart.com/
The 'technical reasons' they mention (and this has been spelled out by Positron, IIRC) is that they can only add 2 more attachment points to the player skeleton due to engine limitations; and they want to make really sure we want backpacks / knee guards before they do it so we don't then clamor for arm bands and hip holsters.
Plus there're possible clipping issues, but I think the developers are slowly realizing we don't care about clipping as much as they think we do. |
I don't see how the node issue applies to backpacks since they can always attach at the same point that wings do. And if that fails we've seen that chest details are capable of wrapping around the back (Roman and samurai chest details do this the most, but also older pieces like the ring strap and the stealth detail).
|
What shall claim a Sky Kings' Ransom?
PPD & Resistance Epic Archetypes
After almost 7 years we didnt had a backpart or leg/arm detail or single neck detail added, I doubt we ever see a new attachment point added to the players models.
But, hey, who knows. We now have tails separated from bells.
I think backparts are the most demanded new part to be added.
And for this thread, I want the legacy tight boots back.
Also would be cool if we could add textures, like metallic, leather straps, medieval, etc...
Not sure if this is a "Lost" costume piece, but one of the "suit" pieces, I think the double breasted blazer has a pinstripe texture and as far as I can see, there are no corresponding matching sleeves.
(Liberty) Trick Dacy - Forge Steel - Hypother Mia
(Freedom) Folgus Sprit
(Infinity) Marcus Solomon
(Protector) Thylacine
(Justice) Ashkicker - Revile
I'm not sure if this qualifies as a 'lost' costume piece, but it is definitely something I want. The female merit vendor in Sharkhead Isle near the black market truck is wearing a very awesome looking belt.
It seems to be a common trend for the Merits Vendors to be created from existing player enabled costume pieces, why is her belt an exception.. and can we have it? please?
Story arcs:
The Golden Scepter: #9852 [Winner of American Legion's July 2011 AE Author Contest]
Let your voice be heard! Sign the petition to keep CoH alive.
Add me as a "me too!" for the Malaise pants!