No hablo "FF Defender" ...


3dent

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Clouded View Post
Oh look, another thread from another poster telling others what powers they must take since they joined a team. How original.
This...


 

Posted

When you join a PuG people have expectations about you based on your powersets. If you aren't going to fulfill those expectations then you should really warn the team ahead of time to avoid conflict. If the team is cool with it then no problem but if not it's better for everyone to find out ahead of time.


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Adeon Hawkwood View Post
When you join a PuG people have expectations about you based on your powersets.
In my experience, this is simply untrue. People don't care what you are, and most of the time they don't even care if you're somehow preventing them from being as effective as they would be without you. What they care about is if they have someone to play with and enjoy the game with... Heck, lots of people join/form teams just to fill up the chat window.

This elitist mentality the forums claim exists is mind-boggling. Nobody cares if you're min/max'd; nobody cares if you're just min'd. People like the OP are such a rare occurrence that the only place they exist is here on the forums. You're certainly not likely to find anything close to it based on "PuG expectations."


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Laevateinn View Post
I would've just shrugged, maybe shared a few laughs over it in a private channel, and moved on. This is a casual-oriented MMO. Expecting a majority of players to have effective builds, a solid grasp of game mechanics and the ability to follow complex orders is unrealistic. Even if it turns out the team can't survive at all without the bubbles, what are you going to do, make her respec on the spot?
This. But if blame has to be placed somewhere, it's with the team leader. S/he should've checked the defender's info if something specific was desired. If not, s/he should've informed the team that any build would be welcome (to flush out the uptight types who believe X AT should always take/have Y power). There are going to be people on the team who believe in full optimization and maximizing efficiency, regardless of how casual the game is in general. Full disclosure by the organizer/person holding the star would prevent this from being an issue, I think. Too much information is far better than too little when making any decision (regardless of importance).


@Remianen / @Remianen Too

Sig by RPVisions

 

Posted

I would have just put a note on the player that they were useless and should be avoided in the future. Kicking? Not my style. Wouldn't have objected to a leader who did it though. If you have a buffing set and don't buff teammates who would benefit, you are playing poorly.


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Balanced View Post
Dispersion Bubble alone is a non-trivial team buff--not so much for the defense, which isn't huge on its own, as for the mez protection. People who don't play ATs without their own mez protection may not appreciate how much good always-on AoE protection does. Of course, with the prevalence of defense-centric IO set builds among squishies, the defense from Dispersion Bubble will help some characters more than you'd think. (It sounds like the defender in question had such a build.)

That said, the individual bubbles contribute a lot to survivability for most characters. Even if I decided to make a solo build that skipped them, I'd make a second build with them specifically for teaming. I wouldn't kick/yell at/rant about/insult someone who didn't take them for concept reasons, though. (Though I'll admit I might whine a bit in SG chat.)
I like how it took you 2 paragraphs to say I was wrong and then say what I said pretending you thought of it first.


 

Posted

The player has every right to build their toon however he/she desires.

As does the team leader have every right to build their team how they see fit.


Personally I never take a concept build on a PUG out of respect for the other players, but that is just silly ol' Cal and his nice ways


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Techbot Alpha View Post
Concept builds are fine. But we have dual builds now. Having a concept/RP build and then a functional build would be, while not mandatory, would be expected/polite/nice.
My FF defender has a solo build and a team build. Isn't that one of the things dual builds are for?

--NT


They all laughed at me when I said I wanted to be a comedian.
But I showed them, and nobody's laughing at me now!

If I became a red name, I would be all "and what would you mere mortals like to entertain me with today, mu hu ha ha ha!" ~Arcanaville

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Techbot Alpha View Post
Concept builds are fine. But we have dual builds now. Having a concept/RP build and then a functional build would be, while not mandatory, would be expected/polite/nice.
Come play with me, read my bios and look at my costumes. My global is @Laevateinn and I'm on Virtue server. My various concept builds can solo AVs, solo Pylons, solo Vanguard Sword at +4/x8, farm and ghost missions. None of this second build stuff. The entire functional build/"concept" build idea is based on the false dichotomy that reducing performance magically improves your concept.


 

Posted

I don't really get kicking someone from a team for any reason other than they're being a jerk and/or really really stupid. In fact, it bothers me a lot most of the time.

For instance, over the double xp weekend I joined a PuG for some random radio missions in Talos. The team leader invited a bunch of people, and one of them, a warshade, zoned into Talos and after a minute or so the leader said, "Dude, sorry, you're level 6" and kicked him. I was kinda shocked about that, so I didn't even have the presence of mind to tell the leader what a jerk he was before I quit the team.


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Laevateinn View Post
Come play with me, read my bios and look at my costumes. My global is @Laevateinn and I'm on Virtue server. My various concept builds can solo AVs, solo Pylons, solo Vanguard Sword at +4/x8, farm and ghost missions. None of this second build stuff. The entire functional build/"concept" build idea is based on the false dichotomy that reducing performance magically improves your concept.
There are some concepts, however, that are not possible to remain true to without sacrificing performance.


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Part_Troll View Post
No hablo "FF Defender" ...
Since you weren't the FF Defender, and we weren't the FF Defender, this thread should be 'No habla "FF Defender" ...'

This has been your Spanish lesson for the day.
To Speak: Hablar

(Present Indicative tense)
I Speak: Yo Hablo
You Speak (Familiar): Tú Hablas
He/She Speaks and You Speak (Formal): Usted/Él/Ella Habla
We Speak: Nosotros/Nosotras Hablamos
You Speak (Plural Familiar)*: Vosotros/Vosotras Habláis
They Speak and You Speak (Plural Formal): Ustedes/Ellos/Ellas Hablan

* The plural familiar form of a verb goes unused in many Spanish-speaking countries, and the plural formal is used for all forms of the plural "you".


http://www.fimfiction.net/story/36641/My-Little-Exalt

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fleeting Whisper View Post
Since you weren't the FF Defender, and we weren't the FF Defender, this thread should be 'No habla "FF Defender" ...'

This has been your Spanish lesson for the day.
To Speak: Hablar

(Present Indicative tense)
I Speak: Yo Hablo
You Speak (Familiar): Tú Hablas
He/She Speaks and You Speak (Formal): Usted/Él/Ella Habla
We Speak: Nosotros/Nosotras Hablamos
You Speak (Plural Familiar)*: Vosotros/Vosotras Habláis
They Speak and You Speak (Plural Formal): Ustedes/Ellos/Ellas Hablan

* The plural familiar form of a verb goes unused in many Spanish-speaking countries, and the plural formal is used for all forms of the plural "you".
I thought he was saying he doesn't speak the language of FF defenders. In that case, "No hablo" would be correct.

Anyway, I can understand booting someone if you put the call out for a buffer and they responded to it, but came with no buffs. Then they intentionally misled you. That deserves a boot. Otherwise, you're just making assumptions about what they can and should do. As long as they're making a meaningful contribution like soaking up the alpha and blasting away then they're still good in my book.


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by rian_frostdrake View Post
ok, i'm normally more tolerant about cluelessness, but you did read in his freaking location that he is Australian, right? pointless sweeping nationalistic generalizations only make a poster look stupid.

ANNNND i guess you didnt read his post... so hes not from the US, hes on a US server...hence why i said next time im on us side..cos virtue is US.

+1 for YOUR cluelessness.


 

Posted

I'm with the OP. If I'd been team leader I'd have given her the boot immediately (At least, as soon as I was able to /info her and see her gimpy build). Sure, the ITF is easy, but if people are forming a team to run it then they're after exp/inf/merits/whatever and nobody wants to have to do it slower because the team's only defender can't pull his/her weight.

If the difference is doing the thing in 30-45 minutes, or taking an hour or more, I'm gonna boot the sucker and get us someone who's more likely to let us destroy everything faster. If I just wanted to chat with fun people I'd hang out in Pocket D or something.

I don't care what you want to build. But if you're joining my team you'd better have a build that's not skipping powers that are extremely beneficial to the team.

If I'd been team leader and the defender had made that "Oh, but I tank so well when I'm solo with this build!" remark, I'd have said "Fine, go solo then" and booted her. Not like it's ever hard to find a replacement player for an ITF.


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dr_HR View Post
ANNNND i guess you didnt read his post... so hes not from the US, hes on a US server...hence why i said next time im on us side..cos virtue is US.

+1 for YOUR cluelessness.
Also +1 irony point.


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fleeting Whisper View Post
We Speak: Nosotros/Nosotras Hablamos
And we have a character name folks! I'm thinking Sonic/Traps.

(Blammos!)


The Abrams is one of the most effective war machines on the planet. - R. Lee Ermy.

Q: How do you wreck an Abrams?

A: You crash into another one.

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by ketch View Post
I thought he was saying he doesn't speak the language of FF defenders. In that case, "No hablo" would be correct.
I've always heard if that is the intended meaning, you'd have to make it passive voice, a la "Se habla espanol" (i.e. "Spanish is spoken here"). So it'd be "Se habla 'FF Defender' (por me)". Been awhile since I've had to use my Spanish though so you may be righter than I.

I don't understand why the FF Defender didn't have dual builds, but honestly I have to agree with the ones who allow for one "useless" spot on a team. Even if she did nothing at all everyone else could've stood no problem, and if she was attacking it's all good.


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Adeon Hawkwood View Post
When you join a PuG people have expectations about you based on your powersets. If you aren't going to fulfill those expectations then you should really warn the team ahead of time to avoid conflict. If the team is cool with it then no problem but if not it's better for everyone to find out ahead of time.
Or just respond with the entirely reasonable, "no thanks," if someone decides they want you on his team and then thinks he has the right to 'vet your build' prior to deigning to allow you to join the team that... uh... he asked you to join.


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Part_Troll View Post
it was 'okay'
Which means no one was exactly gimped. You've completed the TF, you've got your rewards, everything's perfecty-perrfect. You want a REAL horror story? Here it is: There's a certain friend of mine who has VERY specific idea of how every TF in the game should be played. Mind you, their ideas are good, their builds are top-notch, in fact as long as you agree with them, they're a perfect player to team with and I mean it.

Until they're on team with someone who has no less specific but contrary idea. It always ends up with someone being kicked (or quitting), EVEN IF THEY WERE THE ONLY MELEE TOON ON THE LGTF, just before Hami mish. Then the quitter had sent us all tells of how leader was stupid b/c they wanted to fight Dra'Gon, why only stupid RPers do that, and how we should all quit and restart the TF under their brilliant leadership.

Both our TF and their recruiting failed. No one got ANYTHING for their efforts. Despite all the perfect builds (And yes, I've checked. Everyone was softcapped, had silly global +rech, and so on. First few missions of the TF were pure steamrolling too.) Two hideless stalkers played by AE babies would have been more useful than 10-billions builds by excellent players, just because both parties had WAY TOO SPECIFIC expectations about how everyone else "had to" play. Seriously, if either of them was just a tiny bit more tactful it would have been the best LGTF ever... Now it's a contender for the most awful TF I ever personally participated in, right there with a 15-hours Citadel and other horrors.



P.S. If you read this, and remember that LGTF... Yes, it rubbed me VERY wrong way, but aside from that you still are great.


 

Posted

I suspect if the people here who say "allow any concept build on a team" were to make an empathy defender with NO heals and join PuGs, they'd find quite a few that were not happy with that build. Although it might be fun to try. ^_^ (You'd have to use "Doctor" or "Nurse" or some sort of Healzor name just for added stupidity.)

To me, a shield defender (of any stripe) without shields is the same thing. It's true that people don't pay as much attention to what the shield defender is doing -- in fact the team I was on tonight had a bubbler who would allow bubbles to drop for sometimes half a mission before remembering to apply them again -- but as I was playing an ice defender, nobody really noticed or said anything. If I let my ice shields drop as well though, people started taking damage quickly.

Shields -- and especially defensive shields -- make such a huge difference in a team's survivability (unless everyone on the team is softcapped, I suppose). I can understand joining random pickup groups with odd builds but for a Task Force you really gotta warn people, they're committing to maybe an hour or two to finish it, and not everybody checks your build before starting the TF. If you can't keep people alive in some way, then you're not fulfilling the role people expect of a defender (what the AT was created for), and could potentially cripple the team's ability to finish. Warn people.

I know people say ITF is easy, and it is, but teams still fail it. I was on one two weeks ago that failed, in my opinion because more than half of the team were builds that required someone else to carry the weight, and there weren't enough useful people on the team to make up for them.



my lil RWZ Challenge vid

 

Posted

thi sis common on the handful of MM I have with FF I never liked the power set and haven't grabed the grant bubbles powers.


Doom/Batman in 2012

The Resistance has boobs too, and better hair!

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Organica View Post
I know people say ITF is easy, and it is, but teams still fail it. I was on one two weeks ago that failed, in my opinion because more than half of the team were builds that required someone else to carry the weight, and there weren't enough useful people on the team to make up for them.
This is true. I was on an ITF not to long ago that failed for a similar reason. In theory we had a great team. A tank, a scrapper, two corruptors, two defenders, a mastermind and a widow. So we should have had way more buffs and damage than we needed. In practice... not so much. One of the defenders was basically useless, he was an empath who only used the three heals and occasionally fortituded ONE person (I mean literally just that, he wasn't blasting either) he had the auras but NEVER used them, not even right before AV fights (and yes, I sent him tells asking him to use them, no response). I think one of the corruptors was doing the same, but I'm not certain since I couldn't check his powers. The Mastermind didn't seem to control his pets at all and consequently they spent a lot of time not attacking. The scrapper was ok, but kept aggroing new groups before we were done with the old ones causing at least one team wipe. The rest of the team was ok but in the end we didn't have the survivability to make up for our lack of damage output.


 

Posted

To be honest, I'd consider a bubbleless FF along the same lines as a Kin without speed boost, a buffless Emp, or a petless Mastermind; sure, do whatever you want on your own time and with whoever will put up with you, but you're basically gimped, not using the best powers your toon has, and if I can find a more competent player to fill your spot I'd gladly boot you.

I know we all like to say how we're wonderful flower children who accept every toon's personal choices, but seriously, at least show common sense. If the team's having trouble and you could help but aren't, it's a problem.


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Prof_Backfire View Post
To be honest, I'd consider a bubbleless FF along the same lines as a Kin without speed boost, a buffless Emp, or a petless Mastermind; sure, do whatever you want on your own time and with whoever will put up with you, but you're basically gimped, not using the best powers your toon has, and if I can find a more competent player to fill your spot I'd gladly boot you.

I know we all like to say how we're wonderful flower children who accept every toon's personal choices, but seriously, at least show common sense. If the team's having trouble and you could help but aren't, it's a problem.
Having the "essential" powers in no way makes a player competent. Transversely, a player is not incompetent for skipping them. Nor are they necessarily gimped. They are only gimped in the role that you want them to play, while they may very well excel at other tasks. For example, that /kin without speedboost and ID could have spent the powerslots picking up more personal defense that allows him or her to stand up against AV's. If you want a buffer then ask for a buffer when you recruit. Now, if someone intentionally misleads you... boot them by all means. If you're misled by your own assumptions though, that's your fault.

Additionally, if a team is having trouble, it's usually not the failing of one person that did or didn't take a power. It's happening in the way people are playing together. Did the tank not gather aggro? Did the controller not control? Did the scraps fall into scrapper lock and leave their squishy teammates behind? Did the blasters not wait for the aggro to be grabbed? I suspect that the problems with the team went far beyond a single player with a sub-optimal build for the task.