The Shawarma Initiative *SPOILERS* AVENGERS DISCUSSION *SPOILERS*
Goes to show that being "mostly" invulnerable can be REALLY inconvenient at times.
|
Same with HULK vs THOR. Both have a level of invulnerability, both heal fast though I suspect Hulk's rage would amp his healing abilities to above THOR. But their immense strength should also make the invulnerability useless.
Thought for the day:
"Hope is the first step on the road to disappointment."
=][=
I'm just glad the worthiness enchantment remains in the hammer, plus that scene was also a nice reminder to HULK fans that for all his brute strength that the hammer of THOR is not meant for him.
Granted HULK generally doesn't need a hammer or any other hand held weapons...... I lost track of all the easter eggs in the movie, but how cool was it that Stark was wearing a Black Sabbath t-shirt? Also I think I noticed twice in the movie when the arc reactor inside Stark wasn't glowing under the shirt. FX error? |
But when it didn't happen, I thought "Yeah, best to save that for #2."
BrandX Future Staff Fighter
The BrandX Collection
I don't know. I was hoping to see Hulk rage out enough to lift it just like in Ultimate Avengers.
But when it didn't happen, I thought "Yeah, best to save that for #2." |
No matter how mad Hulk gets in the mainstream comics or movies, he should never be able to lift Mjolnir.
I'm hoping that the sequel though shows THOR separated from his hammer and can't summon it back to him due to being pummeled in battle and Captain America picks it up as he is worthy.
Speaking as an English man, yeah, that word is considered a rude word, but honestly, I don't think I've ever heard anyone use it in 40 years on this planet
I'd be amazed if anyone in the general public complains about it, tbh. |
Haven't really heard it anywhere else.
Too many alts to list.
While I can appreciate the idea of Hulk having enough pure physical strength to lift the hammer...I definitely prefer the Hammer to be Thor's...and no one else's. I don't even care to see cap lift it.
|
1. Don Blake but then he is THOR or at least linked to him'
2. Beta Ray Bill
3. Dargo from the alternate future
4. Steve Rogers
5. Eric Masterson, not worthy at first but later proved himself worthy.
Steve Rogers has only wielded the hammer twice in the comics so it is not as if he walks up to THOR asks to borrow the hammer for a bit. But to me it makes sense that he can wield it.
Invulnerability is a relative thing. Look at the original Superman vs. Hulk.....er sorry I meant DOOMSDAY fight. Both are kryptonian, both are invulnerable, but both have tremendous strength which pretty much cancelled out their invulnerability.
Same with HULK vs THOR. Both have a level of invulnerability, both heal fast though I suspect Hulk's rage would amp his healing abilities to above THOR. But their immense strength should also make the invulnerability useless. |
It is also implied that a very long drop could seriously endanger Thor or Loki, where as the Hulk quite easily survives just such a drop.
I would say that Asgardian invulnerability is significantly reduced in this movie series.
I really should do something about this signature.
Tony Stark: "But... But you're dead..."
Agent Coulson: "Shield has a great medical plan." At least that's how I envision the explanation going if he is brought back. |
I think it's significant Coulson does not die on screen, we only hear it announced by Fury over the intercom. And he says he is "gone", which could be a euphemism for "dead", but could also be equivocation. And Fury is well established as a ruthless manipulative M-F.
I really should do something about this signature.
Yeah, "isn't that a very rude word" passed though my mind too. That it got through probably says something about the education of the censors. At least the UK censors should have known. Although they might have felt it was obscure enough that children wouldn't notice, and therefore it didn't matter. Being London based, they tend to forget places like Wales exist.
|
Proves to me that you can swear in a story and not be as crass as a lot of modern films are.
S.
Part of Sister Flame's Clickey-Clack Posse
What's unrealistic is for the lack of faith and religious practices being portrayed in movies and comic books (Nightcrawler notwithstanding). Eighty percent of the population in the US practices a religion, and over 90% consider themselves 'spiritual'; so why so little in pop media?
Now, *how* Cap responded may sound corny and old fashioned. A more modern person would have responded to claims of divinity with a string of obscenities indicating a certain lack of faith.
Speeding Through New DA Repeatables || Spreadsheet o' Enhancements || Zombie Skins: better skins for these forums || Guide to Guides
Just to pick up on some of the more recent thoughts and theories in this thread so far:
Asgardian invulnerability: They are significantly less powerful, as is just about everyone in the Marvel Movieverse, as it's being termed. And I can understand that, given the more outrageous and ridiculous power levels that get displayed in the comics universe. With the Hulk and Thor, that's about as powerful as you'd want to do in the movies, because then the 'logical' step viewers could then take would be Superman power levels. And even Superman movies have trouble dealing with that.
We are going cosmic in the next movie with Thanos most likely, but that leaves it open to involve the Surfer, depending on how the FF rights are sitting at the moment.
Agent Coulson: This has to be handled delicately, I think. If you bring him back, then you've undercut the dramatic reason for his death, which is the catalyst to unify the team. That being said, there's plenty of scenes up to and including him going to unlock the 'Phase 2' weaponry locker that could suggest an LMD. And I have no doubt the dialogue involving the LMD in the first place was deliberate. So long as you can do it in a way that won't insult or put off the audience from his loss, I think you can get away with it.
And his actor has a nicely laconic style that would just make it seem business as usual.
And yay, I've read Ruffalo has potentially signed for six appearances as Banner, though that just means two more Avengers movies, cameos in Thor, Iron Man, and Captain America, and a solo movie. This whole series can be elevating to one's career....
S.
Part of Sister Flame's Clickey-Clack Posse
We are going cosmic in the next movie with Thanos most likely, but that leaves it open to involve the Surfer, depending on how the FF rights are sitting at the moment. |
However the Surfer was THANOS' prime foe when he came back in the 90's.
For the movies, given that this is Thanos' first incarnation and that Surfer rights will likely be unavailable, then they will go back to Thanos' classic cosmic foes:
1. Drax the Destroyer
2. Adam Warlock (though he may need an origin movie due to the character being....complex)
3. Captain Mar-Vell
Actually, since 54% of the world's population (and *much* higher in the US) today follow a monotheistic faith wherein their one 'God' is perfectly transcendent and omnipotent, there'd be a whole lot of people who could respond as Cap did.
|
Or be more focused on jumping out of an airplane.
Whichever the case, I found the comment appropriate for a 90 year old man. You know, the way you just smile and nod when a senior citizen makes a racist comment.
Thought for the day:
"Hope is the first step on the road to disappointment."
=][=
They should introduce Ms. Marvel with the next movie, if only to make the Avengers less of a sausagefest. Give her the scarf thing that she got in Avengers: EMH. As she's got a cosmic origin, it'd be fairly easy to tie her into the Thanos arc.
Current Published Arcs
#1 "Too Drunk to be Alcoholic" Arc #48942
#2 "To Slay Sleeping Dragons" Arc #111486
#3 "Stop Calling Me"
They should introduce Ms. Marvel with the next movie, if only to make the Avengers less of a sausagefest. Give her the scarf thing that she got in Avengers: EMH. As she's got a cosmic origin, it'd be fairly easy to tie her into the Thanos arc.
|
Also Mar-Vell is one of Thanos' main arch-enemies, to have Thanos and not Mar-Vell....no. Bring on the Captain!
Well the idea was to have more female cast members, though I suppose the two Marvels could come as a package deal.
Current Published Arcs
#1 "Too Drunk to be Alcoholic" Arc #48942
#2 "To Slay Sleeping Dragons" Arc #111486
#3 "Stop Calling Me"
Well the idea was to have more female cast members, though I suppose the two Marvels could come as a package deal.
|
Also I sadly expect the villain for the next HULK movie to be the Red Hulk......
I can see them waiting until the third Avengers film for the team to actually confront Thanos. It seemed to me like this first wave was merely an attempt to test Earth's defenses. The next move will be to wipe them out, which may involve Thanos sending Red Skull, who was similarly shunted out of space and time, to form the Masters of Evil and take on the Avengers. It's also possible that Thanos just wanted the Cosmic Cube back on Asgard because that's an enemy he knows and Thanos and the Masters of Evil could attack Asgard first and steal all the weapons in Odin's armory.
- CaptainFoamerang
Silverspar on Kelly Hu: A face that could melt paint off the wall *shivers*
Someone play my AE arc! "The Heart of Statesman" ID: 343405
"I do so love taking a nice, well thought out character and putting them through hell. It's like tossing a Faberge Egg onto the stage during a Gallagher concert." - me
@Palador / @Rabid Unicorn
Granted HULK generally doesn't need a hammer or any other hand held weapons......
I lost track of all the easter eggs in the movie, but how cool was it that Stark was wearing a Black Sabbath t-shirt?
Also I think I noticed twice in the movie when the arc reactor inside Stark wasn't glowing under the shirt. FX error?
Take the Magic: The Gathering 'What Color Are You?' Quiz.