-
Posts
1484 -
Joined
-
I don't really like the whole "it was all a dream" aspect of it, but at least it's perhaps their way of admitting that previous movies were ****. And the only thing that gives me hope about this one is that there's an allusion to a potential endgame. As in:
1. Create virus that makes zombies and mutants to wipe out mindkind
2. ???
3. Profit
This needs to be explained so the heroes actually have a plan of their own as opposed to fighting zombie minions the whole time. If they can do this instead of backing out of it and making it yet another "to be continued" movie, it doesn't have to suck like the others. -
This will be rushed and horrible unless they have exactly the right people working on it being given total control. However, this is extremely unlikely given what happened to Green Lantern.
Simply put, DC is doing it wrong right now. They want the attention and success without putting in the groundwork. -
-
I thought it was funny. Some of the digs didn't really make sense but I think they knew that and sort of undercut their own criticisms by admitting it was still awesome and succeeded. And the Tommy Boy reference was win.
-
I think what makes people wary, fans and execs alike, is that some can have it in their head that because these movies are a part of the same universe, they have to have similar tones and styles. However, I think this would be a mistake since this is not how the source material is presented.
It's kind of like what's happening now with the Superman movies supposedly needing a darker, grittier tone because that's what works for Batman.
I think they need to be willing to take some of these characters in a lighter or darker tone accordingly. With She-Hulk, for example, it's a concept that can work if they follow along the lines of Dan Slott's super-lawyer run from the comics and perhaps the zanier "he/she's a mild-mannered person who thinks they have it all figured out until x circumstance comes along and changes their life" concept that's at the heart of (just an example) movies like Liar Liar or Big Daddy.
It doesn't all have to be some hardcore high-stakes story about the superhero needing to step up and save a city or the world, and even if it is, it doesn't have to approach it with the same tone and style as others have. -
Quote:The latter, I think. Marvel has some really unimpressive female characters. The stronger ones like Sue Storm are either on teams or out of their reach movie-wise too.geez, what a boring list.
Or maybe just an indictment of Marvel's unimposing stable of female heroes. -
Maybe it's just me but about the only ones I could see actually happening anytime soon are She-Hulk and Spider-Girl, more so with the former because the later could be bogged down with all the non-references to Spider-Man.
-
Go on YouTube and search for "Kevin Smith talks about Superman." And that's why. DC has its own movie production studio ready to go since Warner Bros. owns DC, but there's undoubtedly a lot of wishy-washy-ness and executive interference that prevents the people who actually know what they're doing from putting these movies together.
-
-
The T-1000 really gets staggered when it's blown up, though, as shown when it was hit with a grenade and all of those shotgun blasts. So an explosive-tip arrow from Hawkeye could stop the T-1000 long enough for Hulk or Thor just to pick him up and chuck him into the next state.
-
Er, in the latest Terminator, they had John Connor and Kyle Reese trapped and once again sent a single Terminator against them, and when it got within skull-crushing reach, it just kept throwing them across the room. Like it always does. Their ability to fail at assassination is second only to the guy who shot Gabrielle Giffords.
-
Avengers. Not even close.
The Terminators are historically, hilariously bad at their jobs. It's almost like they operate on the reverse-ninja rule except they still fail at the end. -
Quote:It's possible that's what he was doing. Also possible that Loki was manipulating people, since Banner seemed to rub his bridge as if warding off a headache after Loki passed his lab and Stark did the same thing when his argument with Cap was interrupted. However, Black Widow disrupted Loki's augmented manipulation of Hawkeye by resetting his consciousness, so while Banner may have started to feel the effects of Loki's influence, it's likely that the trauma of transforming into Hulk disrupted the connection as well. Banner and Black Widow were the ones who paired off during that group argument, so any hostility he was feeling toward her likely bled over into Hulk's persona. And he fought Thor and the jet because they attacked him. Hulk could have easily gone off and started attacking other SHIELD personnel while fighting in the docking bay with Thor; instead, he focused on Thor, who had already shown he could take his hits.This is something I was trying to figure out. Did Hulk catch the pilot after he ejected to check to make sure he had a parachute?
I'm having a lot of trouble not seeing the whole scene with Hulk on the carrier being Hulk manipulated by Loki, and actually wanting to hurt people, but luckily not doing so. The only other possibility I can think of is that he was mad and just wanted to scare the people he was mad at.
I can't wait for the DVD/Blu-Ray commentary. -
Quote:I think the movie alludes to their being bits of Banner and Hulk influencing each other. When Hulk falls off the jet, Banner says he was lucky he didn't hurt anyone when he crash-landed, but the old man says, "Or it was just good aim," which implies Hulk wanted to land somewhere with the least collateral damage. Not to mention he could've easily squished Black Widow or the pilot of the fighter jet and didn't.I also know there are people who think there are little hints that Banner is in there in partial control of the Hulk, but I think that except for the fact that the Hulk is Banner, or at least a part of him, I don't think that is the case. Rather, I think that unlike the first time the Hulk emerges on the Helicarrier this time Banner allowed the Hulk to simply emerge; his subconsicous and conscious mind were on the same page, and the Hulk behaved accordingly. Banner knew this was a time the Hulk was needed and needed to work with the others, so the Hulk instinctively knew that also and was far more cooperative. I don't think Banner even consciously remembered the events that occurred when the Hulk went on a rampage on the Helicarrier, so he couldn't have taken any satisfaction from sucker punching Thor. But the Hulk obviously remembered.
At least that's my interpretation of those events, and why I like that one moment in the movie. Its a little thing that evokes a lot of background on the Hulk, possibly better than anything in either of the actual Hulk movies combined. -
Quote:There's kind of a wink to it by the Hydra weapons having the same sound effect as Iron Man's repulsor beams.Also I do wonder what happened to Zola and his research over the years. SHIELD is trying to tap the energy of the tesseract but they still cannot despite Selvig's help, yet Zola in the 40's could. Also I still think that Howard Stark's research of the ammo and weapons Cap brought back to him for study then his later study of the tesseract is what led to the arc reactor research. Howard was probably trying to artificially replicate the tesseract and was limited by the tech of his era as they said in IM2 and left his research for Tony.
Also, let's not forget that the only reason Skull and Zola were able to store bits of Cube energy was because Red Skull took the experiment to unsafe levels. And Zola was undoubtedly sabotaging the Allies' efforts to duplicate the results. -
Quote:I don't think the terms of their arrangement were explicitly stated by the baddies, but the Avengers theorized Loki's getting Earth in exchange for the Cube.Unfortunately, I have a poor memory of the opening scene. I want desperately to see the movie again (and again, and again), so that I can pay more attention to it, but I just haven't had time. So yeah, if Thanos's speaker's dialogue implied (or outright stated) this offer in the beginning, that's cool, and makes even more sense.
-
I tend to think of it in terms of "Trade Paperback" being a collection of single issues comprising one or more specific story arcs, while "Graphic Novels" are singular stories told in comic book form. For example, Pride of Baghdad is a graphic novel because it's not a collection but rather printed as if it's all one comic book issue, and Watchmen is a trade paperback because it's collecting issues related to one story, whether it's a limited series being collected in full or one or two collected arcs of an ongoing series.
-
I prefer to think that Loki got information about Cap from Red Skull.
-
Supreme Power is like an Ultimate version of Squadron Supreme, Marvel's lesser known equivalent to the Justice League. It's a limited series that takes place outside the standard Marvel universe and it's intended for adult readers, as it contains graphic violence, nudity, and adult language. It mainly revolves around Hyperion, a Superman-like alien refugee turned superhero. However, it has a darker twist in that he's shaped from the get-go to turn out like a superhero. Things get really interesting when he starts to question whether or not he wants to keep taking orders. J. Michael Straczynski, Babylon 5 creator, gives it a sci-fi and gritty slant, but it's got its fun moments, as well as good art provided by Gary Frank. You'll notice some similarities to Secret Identity, but I think Supreme Power is a tad better.
-
I'd actually recommend against The Boys if he enjoys that Captain America type character. The Boys has some good moments but Ennis' utter distaste for superheroes makes the arcs where they hunt down Degenerate Superhero #437 seem drawn out and unnecessary compared to the ones that are actually relevant to the overall story.
-
Quote:Prior to Civil War they made a big deal about his unmasking after stopping a post-9/11 terrorist plot. In the movies though I'm not sure he thinks the secret identity is such a big deal.I am not 100% positive that his ID was public knowledge. I know that in the Civil War arc he fought REALLY hard to allow super heroes to keep their identities a secret, though. But maybe that was just him standing up for the rights of his fellow heroes, I dunno for sure.
-
I wonder how the sensors of these cars will respond to those daredevil animals that seem to take pleasure in diving in front of your car or only moving out of the way at the last second.
-
I'm going to go with:
Supreme Power
Marvel 1602
Superman: Secret Identity -
Quote:That's mostly my point. Thanos had to have other things going, and it's entirely possible that the Cube wasn't that important to his plans to begin with. Thor mentioned that the universe was becoming aware of Earth as being prepared for a higher form of war, so why not use this scenario to see what Earth's defenders are capable of? There's no reason to leave room for error by outsourcing if you believe you'll win no matter what resistance you face. I mean that's what Dr. Doom and Red Skull did in the movies.A random super awesome being maybe, but not Thanos. Stark had Loki pegged when he told Cap that Loki needed the adoration, the worship, the attention. He was setting them up to be defeated in public so the world could see him defeat the Avengers. Loki had to lead personally: its in his nature, and its ultimately part of his actual goal.
Thanos doesn't care about any of that. He doesn't care about attention or adoration. He basically worships death, and craves power only as a means to an end to make himself worthy of Death by having the power over life and death in the universe. And I'm certain that while Loki was on Earth Thanos wasn't at home watching cartoons. He had other things to manage, as all leaders do.
If he didn't think Earth was going to be a significant threat, he wouldn't go there just because he was confident: that's not what leaders do. Going there himself when he thought Earth was no threat is a waste of his time.
I'm just thinking about this in terms of how they'll explain it down the road with that classic "benefit from a loss" logic they tend to use with the likes of Doom and Thanos. -
Well I'd say a super awesome villainous being would be personally involved in retrieving the key to his plans if he were confident enough in his ability to overcome any likely resistance, but if he wanted to test those defenses first...