Super Packs on the PMarket 2/14/12


Acroyear2

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by TrueGentleman View Post
When did I, or anyone in this thread apart from you, start talking about the legal definitions of gambling? I brought up the AGA precisely because that was the direction you were detouring this discussion with your objections over using the general term. Because of such reactions on the other side of the argument, I've taken to calling the Super Packs a "game of chance", which is a little euphemistic but at least is intended to avoid this kind of pedantic objection to describing the business model behind them. Painting your opponents as Gamblers Anonymous advocates is just handwaving.
It's gambling. Let folks who don't like it being called that deal with it.

The irrational fear of that term is just that: completely irrational.


Blazara Aura LVL 50 Fire/Psi Dom (with 125% recharge)
Flameboxer Aura LVL 50 SS/Fire Brute
Ice 'Em Aura LVL 50 Ice Tank
Darq Widow Fortune LVL 50 Fortunata (200% rech/Night Widow 192.5% rech)--thanks issue 19!

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Oliin View Post
Doesn't that definition pretty much apply to almost anything in this game? From combat rewarding you randomly with salvage, recipes, shards and whatnot all the way to the Incarnate trials. Oh, and don't forget the whole rolling for random rewards using merits and AE tickets.
Arguably some folks don't roll at all. The simply use merits and AE tickets to outright buy what they want. There are plenty of people who don't mind spending 35 days to outright BUY a pvp IO.

but I do see your larger point.


Blazara Aura LVL 50 Fire/Psi Dom (with 125% recharge)
Flameboxer Aura LVL 50 SS/Fire Brute
Ice 'Em Aura LVL 50 Ice Tank
Darq Widow Fortune LVL 50 Fortunata (200% rech/Night Widow 192.5% rech)--thanks issue 19!

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by TrueGentleman View Post
When did I, or anyone in this thread apart from you, start talking about the legal definitions of gambling? I brought up the AGA precisely because that was the direction you were detouring this discussion with your objections over using the general term. Because of such reactions on the other side of the argument, I've taken to calling the Super Packs a "game of chance", which is a little euphemistic but at least is intended to avoid this kind of pedantic objection to describing the business model behind them. Painting your opponents as Gamblers Anonymous advocates is just handwaving.
Well then I guess I was wrong. You think that all gambling of any sort is bad, then? Why?


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Coyote_Seven View Post
Well then I guess I was wrong. You think that all gambling of any sort is bad, then? Why?
Err, what? That's not what I got from his post at all. No where did he say he thinks gambling is bad. Or did you mean an earlier post?

Also why do you fear so much the super packs being called gambling? I'm . . . just not seeing the issue with calling it that.

There's no moral or immoral connotation here unless folks specifically try to fit there own morality on it. Which I find completely silly.


Blazara Aura LVL 50 Fire/Psi Dom (with 125% recharge)
Flameboxer Aura LVL 50 SS/Fire Brute
Ice 'Em Aura LVL 50 Ice Tank
Darq Widow Fortune LVL 50 Fortunata (200% rech/Night Widow 192.5% rech)--thanks issue 19!

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mazey View Post
Yes, intermittent rewards.

Gambling is psychologically powerful because most of the time you get nothing, and occasionally you get $1000. With the super packs, you get a very rare card 80% of the time, and when you don't, you still get a rare. Not to mention 4 others on top. That's not intermittent, that's bloody consistent.

Yes, there's some level of inconsistency to the rewards, but to claim it's anywhere near the same as your standard kind of gambling is absurd and pure hyperbole.
Yes, thank you! I was starting to wonder if maybe I was suddenly on a ship filled with crazy people, lol.

CCGs are not even gambling in the general sense, let alone the legal definition.


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Oliin View Post
Doesn't that definition pretty much apply to almost anything in this game? From combat rewarding you randomly with salvage, recipes, shards and whatnot all the way to the Incarnate trials. Oh, and don't forget the whole rolling for random rewards using merits and AE tickets.
Yup, and Video Game addiction is becoming a real problem. However, so is anything that people over indulge in.


Types of Swords
My Portfolio

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Coyote_Seven View Post
That's another reason why I think people like Snow Globe are using very underhanded tactics in attempts to enforce their positions.
There was nothing underhanded about it. It is what it is: gambling.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Coyote_Seven View Post
As soon as I saw that song and dance about "looks and quacks like a duck" I knew he was just more interested in being right than anything else, and he was just throwing everything onto the wall in hopes that something would stick. I'm not about to take someone like that at all seriously.
And I'm not going to take anyone seriously that is either unwilling or unable to call something exactly what it is. You want to pretend that these packs are something other than what they are. At best, that is self-delusional. At worst, that is downright dishonest.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Coyote_Seven View Post
If they want to be a pack of chicken littles running around and waving their arms about in a moral panic, well I'm not about to stop them. But I'm just as free to point out how silly their reactions are to something like this.
And, again, you are resorting to slinging mud. Very mature.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Coyote_Seven View Post
I've played videogames since I was a little kid, and I've played games of chance for actual money quite often. As well, my own family history is filled with problems of addiction.
Same here. I had an uncle die of alcohol addiction, one of my friend's parents is also an alcoholic, and I have a family member that is addicted to gambling.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Coyote_Seven View Post
So if nobody minds, I think I'll take my own experiences over those of some guys who are butthurt that they can't just get all their shinies at once and instead have to play a little game of gotta-catch-em-all in order to get them.
And I'm getting a laugh over YOUR butthurt that you can't even call these packs exactly what they are: gambling.

For the record, the items I want the most from these packs are the ATOs and I'm going to get them with in-game actions.




Triumph: White Succubus: 50 Ill/Emp/PF Snow Globe: 50 Ice/FF/Ice Strobe: 50 PB Shi Otomi: 50 Ninja/Ninjistu/GW Stalker My other characters

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Coyote_Seven View Post
Using their own logic, I've already pointed out that everything is gambling. And since gambling is wrong, that means that everything is wrong. And the universe is one giant duck.

This is soooo funny.


The development team and this community deserved better than this from NC Soft. Best wishes on your search.

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Aura_Familia View Post
Err, what? That's not what I got from his post at all. No where did he say he thinks gambling is bad. Or did you mean an earlier post?
You tell me. If he doesn't think gambling is bad then why does he even care in the first place? Let alone the fact that CCGs or anything like them (like Super Packs) really are not even in the first place.


 

Posted

Oh my gosh I am super excited these are finally out!!!! Sorry to all those who dislike (to put mildly) the gambling packs but this is exactly the kind of thing I love to buy (love buying Heroclixs and most CCGs) and I have been waiting patiently to have something I want to spend points on for a while now. Thank you thank you thank you for getting this out!!!

With luck and time there'll be a secondary option for those who only want the costume so we can all be happy. Even though currently it seems to be a "no" I've seen a lot of things in the game change so it's hard to take the "no" as a permanent one. Crossing my fingers for you all who want it since I'll buy the packs either way. =)


Liberty!
Black Dawn/Shattered Dawn
Chaos Legion

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Snow Globe View Post
There was nothing underhanded about it. It is what it is: gambling.
You do realize that just because you keep saying it's gambling doesn't actually make it so?

I don't want to make any assumptions here, you know, 'cause that's apparently a bad thing.


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Coyote_Seven View Post
You tell me. If he doesn't think gambling is bad then why does he even care in the first place? Let alone the fact that CCGs or anything like them (like Super Packs) really are not even in the first place.
You do realize that there are some people that don't gamble, are personally against gambling (for themselves), but don't have ANY issue with 'you" or anyone else gambling if they choose too AND they don't think the gamblers are ebil sinners etc... right?


The development team and this community deserved better than this from NC Soft. Best wishes on your search.

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Coyote_Seven View Post
You tell me. If he doesn't think gambling is bad then why does he even care in the first place? Let alone the fact that CCGs or anything like them (like Super Packs) really are not even in the first place.
Who the hell cares?

As I said before you can call it whatever you like, it's still spending real life money for a CHANCE AT in-game items.

Doesn't change the fact that some like that and some like to buy the items in them in question, outright.

Doesn't matter if we call it gambling, rutebega, cross words of idicoy with friends, etc. LOL.


Blazara Aura LVL 50 Fire/Psi Dom (with 125% recharge)
Flameboxer Aura LVL 50 SS/Fire Brute
Ice 'Em Aura LVL 50 Ice Tank
Darq Widow Fortune LVL 50 Fortunata (200% rech/Night Widow 192.5% rech)--thanks issue 19!

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Coyote_Seven View Post
Yes, thank you! I was starting to wonder if maybe I was suddenly on a ship filled with crazy people, lol.

CCGs are not even gambling in the general sense, let alone the legal definition.
Why do you feel the need to keep name calling? Perhaps you would like some time on my couch to tell me about your life and what is bothering you?

The random chance is what gives the rush. That is me speaking from personal experience. It was the same for a pack of cards, or hero clix, or even a random grab of comics. The thing is I am stimulated by geeky things more than the rush of just getting more money.


Types of Swords
My Portfolio

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Darth_Khasei View Post
You do realize that there are some people that don't gamble, are personally against gambling (for themselves), but don't have ANY issue with 'you" or anyone else gambling if they choose too AND they don't think the gamblers are ebil sinners etc... right?
SHOCKING!! LOGIC!!!!

Not allowed on an internet forum! Dirty blasphemer!!




Was that too much sarcasm?


Blazara Aura LVL 50 Fire/Psi Dom (with 125% recharge)
Flameboxer Aura LVL 50 SS/Fire Brute
Ice 'Em Aura LVL 50 Ice Tank
Darq Widow Fortune LVL 50 Fortunata (200% rech/Night Widow 192.5% rech)--thanks issue 19!

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Snow Globe View Post
Does it look like a duck? Pay money for a random chance at something you want.
Does it quack like a duck? You might not get what you want.
Odds are, it is a duck: It fits the definition of gambling, so I don't see the need to avoid the term.
My understanding is that the current legal definitions of gambling have a series of tests, and that one of the required criteria is that there is a chance of output of either cash, or something that is readily converted to cash.

There was a fascinating story on NPR a while back about an online casino game site that was doing very well, and had successfully avoided all the legal problems that other sites have had lately, because they had a brilliant idea: they never pay out. You get some initial chips for signing up, a certain number of chips per day added to your account, and you can pay real money any time you want for more chips. There were a variety of games you can play against various combinations of computer and live opponents... but there was no way to convert your chips back to real money, or get them out of the system. Therefore, not gambling.

CoH's situation seems similar; there is no legal, supported, or easy way to convert your randomized card draws back into real money. (This is unlike a physical CCG, where that Alpha Mox could pay your real rent for the month fairly easily.) You're paying to play a game, but it's not gambling; there's no situation in which you can end up with more real money than what you started with.

From a moral standpoint, however... anyone who has self-control issues with actual gambling and a limited budget should not play this, as it's likely to trigger some of the same excitement/risk/reward centers in your head. (On the other hand, it's far more limited than a casino or certain Korean games... chances are most folks aren't going to need to drop more than a few hundred even if they obsess over the pet and get unlucky. I've been involved with testing for other MMOs where it was not unusual for people to have to drop four figures to have a decent chance of getting the rare mount; the odds on the rarest item were at least an order of magnitude less than here, and possibly more like two.)

TL;DR: IMO it's not gambling, and significantly less dangerous than most common things that are. But if you have medical or moral issues with even small amounts of gambling, it's probably close enough to trigger related issues.


Miuramir, Windchime, Sariel the Golden, Scarlet Antinomist...
Casino Extortion #4031: Neutral, Council+Custom [SFMA/MLMA/SLMA/FHMA/CFMA]
Bad Candy #87938: Neutral, Custom [SFMA/MLMA/SLMA/FHMA/HFMA]
CoH Helper * HijackThis

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Miuramir View Post
My understanding is that the current legal definitions of gambling have a series of tests, and that one of the required criteria is that there is a chance of output of either cash, or something that is readily converted to cash.

There was a fascinating story on NPR a while back about an online casino game site that was doing very well, and had successfully avoided all the legal problems that other sites have had lately, because they had a brilliant idea: they never pay out. You get some initial chips for signing up, a certain number of chips per day added to your account, and you can pay real money any time you want for more chips. There were a variety of games you can play against various combinations of computer and live opponents... but there was no way to convert your chips back to real money, or get them out of the system. Therefore, not gambling.

CoH's situation seems similar; there is no legal, supported, or easy way to convert your randomized card draws back into real money. (This is unlike a physical CCG, where that Alpha Mox could pay your real rent for the month fairly easily.) You're paying to play a game, but it's not gambling; there's no situation in which you can end up with more real money than what you started with.

From a moral standpoint, however... anyone who has self-control issues with actual gambling and a limited budget should not play this, as it's likely to trigger some of the same excitement/risk/reward centers in your head. (On the other hand, it's far more limited than a casino or certain Korean games... chances are most folks aren't going to need to drop more than a few hundred even if they obsess over the pet and get unlucky. I've been involved with testing for other MMOs where it was not unusual for people to have to drop four figures to have a decent chance of getting the rare mount; the odds on the rarest item were at least an order of magnitude less than here, and possibly more like two.)

TL;DR: IMO it's not gambling, and significantly less dangerous than most common things that are. But if you have medical or moral issues with even small amounts of gambling, it's probably close enough to trigger related issues.
/thread?


Blazara Aura LVL 50 Fire/Psi Dom (with 125% recharge)
Flameboxer Aura LVL 50 SS/Fire Brute
Ice 'Em Aura LVL 50 Ice Tank
Darq Widow Fortune LVL 50 Fortunata (200% rech/Night Widow 192.5% rech)--thanks issue 19!

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Aura_Familia View Post
Who the hell cares?

As I said before you can call it whatever you like, it's still spending real life money for a CHANCE AT in-game items.
You mean paying real money to play a game, and then get a chance to win in-game items? I think that used to be called a "subscription". These new F2P models do kind of dial that up to 11 though, so I can see where it might get confusing for a lot of people.

Quote:
Doesn't change the fact that some like that and some like to buy the items in them in question, outright.

Doesn't matter if we call it gambling, rutebega, cross words of idicoy with friends, etc. LOL.
It apparently bothers a subsection of the rather vociferous minority who engage in, ahem, "healthy" discussions on this very bulletin board, LOL. It bothers them so much that they won't shut up about it even when that wasn't even the original topic of the thread.

I'm surprised any one of them even bothers to respond to my posts, even. It's not like I have any kind of influence over the devs... or do I? >.>


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Coyote_Seven View Post
You mean paying real money to play a game, and then get a chance to win in-game items? I think that used to be called a "subscription". These new F2P models to kind of dial that up to 11 though, so I can see where it might get confusing for a lot of people.



It apparently bothers a subsection of the rather vociferous minority who engage in, ahem, "healthy" discussions on this very bulletin board, LOL. It bothers them so much that they won't shut up about it even when that wasn't even the original topic of the thread.

I'm surprised any one of them even bothers to respond to my posts, even. It's not like I have any kind of influence over the devs... or do I? >.>
Really I don't care what you think.

Quote:
But if you have medical or moral issues with even small amounts of gambling, it's probably close enough to trigger related issues.
This was more of my issue with what it is called.


Types of Swords
My Portfolio

 

Posted

I spent £13 on packs today, I hope Paragon are happy because that is the last money that is coming from me.

Futher more that £13 has cost their parent company at the very least £30, since I've canceled my GW2 pre-order as well as the subscription on my CoH account.


Brawling Cactus from a distant planet.

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mazey View Post
Gambling is psychologically powerful because most of the time you get nothing, and occasionally you get $1000.
That's an enormous oversimplification that ignores everything from scaled betting in casinos and odds-making at race tracks to different varieties of Lotto tickets and Bingo prizes. It also misses the psychological point underscoring Ironik's posts - it's not the payoff that stimulates the brain, it's the anticipation. But that's for another thread.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Aura_Familia View Post
It's gambling. Let folks who don't like it being called that deal with it.
Apparently some posters can't. It would be interesting to see how many of them have regularly played CCGs, purchased lottery tickets, gone to casinos, etc., etc.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Miuramir View Post
TL;DR: IMO it's not gambling, and significantly less dangerous than most common things that are. But if you have medical or moral issues with even small amounts of gambling, it's probably close enough to trigger related issues.
My standpoint is that it's a purchasing issue. If I wish to buy an item, then I don't want random substitutes, nothing more. I'm fully aware of the business and marketing behind Super Packs and the like, so it's a little disappointing for Paragon Studios to be playing us like this.


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Zyphoid View Post
Really I don't care what you think.
That's OK. I don't care what you think, either.

Kind of makes you wonder why anyone is bothering to post anything here? Maybe we all hope there's a chance that we'll find someone who agrees with us and we'll make a new friend.

But that... is a gamble.


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by CactusBrawler View Post
I spent £13 on packs today, I hope Paragon are happy because that is the last money that is coming from me.

Futher more that £13 has cost their parent company at the very least £30, since I've canceled my GW2 pre-order as well as the subscription on my CoH account.
Why not just not buy the packs?


@Golden Girl

City of Heroes comics and artwork

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by TrueGentleman View Post
But that's for another thread.
I beg to differ. This thread has been so thoroughly derailed that there's no longer any hope of it ever getting back on track. Why, I'm entirely certain that the mods have it targeted from orbit already.


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by CactusBrawler View Post
I spent £13 on packs today, I hope Paragon are happy because that is the last money that is coming from me.

Futher more that £13 has cost their parent company at the very least £30, since I've canceled my GW2 pre-order as well as the subscription on my CoH account.
I'm going to take this as a challenge and match those funds. Think of the devs' children.