Sucker Punch


Agonus

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by TrueGentleman View Post
One could get away with the anime argument if the movies' themes weren't the same. When Gilliam has a giant samurai, though, he's using the visual image to shrink his protagonist down to a child's scale, undercutting the heroic fantasy at the heart of the escapism. When Snyder has one face off Baby Doll (and let's not try to unpack that misfiring nickname), he's only thinking of how cool it looks.
If you actually saw the fight, you couldn't help see the anime inspirations of it. My friend told me before he saw the movie, "Man, they are totally ripping off Silver Samurai in Marvel comics", but decided it wasn't the case after he saw the movie.

Quote:
Originally Posted by TrueGentleman View Post
If you're going to claim influence, don't use an example that suggests you don't get the original. (I'm struggling to avoid a derail into how poor the movie adaptation of V for Vendetta was, but that's a separate thread.)
I claimed I was influenced by a movie to make breakfast. I didn't claim any influence from the comic...maybe if I played the piano and sang songs.


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dark One View Post
Wait, what? You're calling District 9 "smart science fiction"? That steaming pile is one of the worst scifi movies ever. Horrible, horrible flick and ranks right up there with Watchmen in my, "I want those hours of my life back" list.
Totally agree with Dark One here. District 9 was terrible on almost every level. That thing was a mess.


The Alt Alphabet ~ OPC: Other People's Characters ~ Terrific Screenshots of Cool ~ Superhero Fiction

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Innovator View Post
The giant armored Samurai in the movie was more an hommage to anime then Brazil. The different fantasy sequences in the movie were homages to different fantasy and sci-fi genres...though mainly were obviously anime influenced.
Quote:
Originally Posted by TrueGentleman View Post
One could get away with the anime argument if the movies' themes weren't the same. When Gilliam has a giant samurai, though, he's using the visual image to shrink his protagonist down to a child's scale, undercutting the heroic fantasy at the heart of the escapism. When Snyder has one face off Baby Doll (and let's not try to unpack that misfiring nickname), he's only thinking of how cool it looks.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Innovator View Post
If you actually saw the fight, you couldn't help see the anime inspirations of it. My friend told me before he saw the movie, "Man, they are totally ripping off Silver Samurai in Marvel comics", but decided it wasn't the case after he saw the movie.
IIRC, the "Samurai" in Brazil even spewed out a fiery light in every location Lowry damaged it, much like what happened in Sucker Punch.

Honestly this whole back-and-forth discussion about whether or not Snyder "borrowed" from Brazil is basically pointless when it's quite obvious that it indeed happened. Sure Snyder may have been influenced by other anime/comic sources, but Sucker Punch was effectively his attempt to "re-imagine" Brazil, to a very poor result.


Loth 50 Fire/Rad Controller [1392 Badges] [300 non-AE Souvenirs]
Ryver 50 Ele� Blaster [1392 Badges]
Silandra 50 Peacebringer [1138 Badges] [No Redside Badges]
--{=====> Virtue ♀

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ironik View Post
Totally agree with Dark One here. District 9 was terrible on almost every level. That thing was a mess.
Ironik, I respect your movie opinions and know how, but here.......you're wrong.

Oh and you too, Dark One.


@Mental Maden @Maden Mental
"....you are now tackle free for life."-ShoNuff

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by MentalMaden View Post
Ironik, I respect your movie opinions and know how, but here.......you're wrong.

Oh and you too, Dark One.
I'm a huge fan of you, too, MM but you got some 'splainin' to do...

Like, why does the film start off as a documentary, then the film crew stops filming... but it somehow KEEPS ON BEING a documentary? How is that possible, exactly?

And speaking of that, what's with the absolutely pointless interviews with the main guy's friends and family? He does something, we see it, we know why he did it, and then they have an interview with someone telling us why he did it. Is it because Blomkamp thinks we're idiots?

Sometimes the interviews are a lazy way to save money by having people tell us the things that happen.

And let's talk about the acting, such as it is. No wait, let's not. Too painful to watch and way too painful to reminisce about.

What's up with the McGuffin? A bunch of goo that takes 20 years to make that both powers interstellar starships and alters human DNA? WTF indeed.

There's nothing original about it, despite so many proclaiming that. It's like no one has ever seen a movie where the bad guys turn out to be the corporation and military, which is only, like, half the movies ever made. (Blomkamp knows this is so lame, in fact, that he named his evil company "Multi-National United." He must've spent zero time and brainpower coming up with that.)

I don't know why people keep equating this movie with Apartheid, because it's not about that at all. It's about illegal aliens. (Which is a little on the nose, isn't it?) Refugees. Apartheid was a racist system whereby the white minority subjugated and dehumanized the black majority. That's got nothing to do with refugees. So the Apartheid metaphor? Broken from the outset. That doesn't bother you? Because it bothers me. Don't advertise something you aren't.

The subtext of racism is still there, but not how reviewers want us to think it is. The depiction of the black thugs is simply cringe-worthy. They're superstitious and simple to the point of being racist cartoons. Witch doctor? Eat the protagonist's arm? Why not just say "Oogah-boogah" and be done with it.

There's a bunch of other stuff I disliked about it, too, but it's been long enough that I've forgotten it in favor of more important information. Like where I put my boots.


The Alt Alphabet ~ OPC: Other People's Characters ~ Terrific Screenshots of Cool ~ Superhero Fiction

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Innovator View Post
The giant armored Samurai in the movie was more an hommage to anime then Brazil. The different fantasy sequences in the movie were homages to different fantasy and sci-fi genres...though mainly were obviously anime influenced.
Exactly... Brazil? When I think big guys with light shooting out of them before exploding, I think Voltron, as in, that's how almost every Ro-beast died. When did Voltron come out? 1984. Brazil. 1985.

Game, Set, and Match.

Also: people who didn't like District 9 can't be reasoned with.


Agua Man lvl 48 Water/Electric Blaster


"To die hating NCSoft for shutting down City of Heroes, that was Freedom."

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by RemusShepherd View Post
Brazil is a Monty Python film; the looks are not important. But for all that it does look pretty good. I didn't like it much, myself.

If the main character in Sucker Punch ends up lobotomized, it is not a movie I want to see. I don't care why it happens. I want a movie that either celebrates schizophrenia (Donnie Darko) or celebrates one's power to overcome it (A Beautiful Mind). I have no interest in a movie that says, 'Well, as a dreamer in a cruel world, you're better off dead.'
I think it needs repeating. If for nothing else, because the movie isn't about schizophrenia. The only thing the movie has to do with the mentally ill, is the fact that the movie takes place in a mental institution.

The world is a product of a non-mentally ill girls imagination, created due to the psychiatrist's form of therapy, where the patient (she was admitted by a stepfather who wanted her out of the way, and bribed the orderly to fake a signature to give her a lobotomy so she couldn't talk to the police) creates an imaginary world inwhich they control.

Remember, this is 1950 with different ideas on what was good for patients.


BrandX Future Staff Fighter
The BrandX Collection

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lothic View Post
***SPOLIER ALERT***



One of the worst parts of Sucker Punch is that it tries to have both a tragic ending and happy ending at the same time. It can't seem to decide what it wants to do. First you have the main character end up being lobotomized despite all her efforts to escape. But somehow we're supposed to think that's OK because she "sacrificed herself" for one of the other girls who ironically was the one who the most pessimistic and kept trying to keep the other girls from "risking" an escape attempt in the first place. The whole thing is just such a messy mess that it was very hard to care what happened to any of them.
*SPOILER ALERT*

Well, much like was said in the movie, it wasn't the main character's story. I personally took that to mean, this was really about how Sweet Pea was suppossed to escape, and my guess is, if the movie succeeded enough to get a sequal, we would of seen Sweet Pea some how become the lead of her own imaginary world.


BrandX Future Staff Fighter
The BrandX Collection

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by TrueGentleman View Post
Nobody's calling Snyder a thief (he's one the drawing comparisons between Sucker Punch and Brazil). He just puts me in mind of the saying "Good artists borrow. Great artists steal." He's inarguably good at design and action sequences, but he's emphatically not a great artist despite repeatedly drawing "inspiration" from them. Moore, a great artist who steals all the time, is quite open about his inspirations for V for Vendetta, but his final product actually backs them up.

Again, I'd be a lot less harsh about this film if it weren't an $82M would-be blockbuster whose track record is going to impact a comic book-based movie with much more potential. These days there are too many big-ticket geek-centric busts that should be low-budget b-movies. At a certain point after so many flops, it's going to be hard for anyone to receive studio financing of any sort for these kinds of movies.
big-ticket geek-centric busts? o.O

Transformers didn't bust.

Batman Begins/The Dark Knight didn't bust.

Superman Returns didn't bust (though sadly event though it was a big money maker it got seen as one).

Wolverine wasn't considered a bust. None of the X-Men movies period.

Iron Man 1 & 2, not busts.

Resident Evil series is getting a 5th movie.

As for Sucker Punch's geek centric style, I don't think any bust on it's part, and I fully admit, while I enjoyed it, it looks like it's going to be a bust at the box office (at least in the US), I don't think it will be an end to this style of movie, to those who want to make such a movie.

Hollywood still has people who are willing to take chances.


BrandX Future Staff Fighter
The BrandX Collection

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Defenestrator View Post
I think if you put GOOD science fiction out there, people will go see it. For example, "Inception" made quite a bit of money last summer. Keep in mind that I hold to the axiom that "90% of everything is crap." I would actually bump that up further. There was awful sci-fi in the 50s, 60s, 70s, 80s, 90s, 2000s, and I'm sure the 10s won't be any different. The difference is that, largely, enough time has passed that only the good stuff has pretty much survived from those older decades.

I have not seen "Sucker Punch" as of yet, and after reading through this thread I'm pretty sure I won't until it hits home video. It seems there are a lot of similar comments that this thread could almost replace "Sucker Punch" with "Transformers 2," the latter of which was garbage and I remember that discussion pretty clearly. I see a lot of the same comments along the lines of "good action scenes, so good story isn't needed," and the like. I beg to differ. Of course, there wasn't as much scrutiny regarding the hypersexualization of transforming robots, but I digress.
Some of us haven't said SUcker Punch had a bad story.

The story was simple. Simple doesn't mean bad. And while some see the connections of the imaginary to the real world, it sounds like some missed it.

If you're looking for character developement, then yes, Sucker Punch lacks that. I however, am of the opinion that not every movie needs character developement to be a good movie.


BrandX Future Staff Fighter
The BrandX Collection

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by TrueGentleman View Post
One could get away with the anime argument if the movies' themes weren't the same. When Gilliam has a giant samurai, though, he's using the visual image to shrink his protagonist down to a child's scale, undercutting the heroic fantasy at the heart of the escapism. When Snyder has one face off Baby Doll (and let's not try to unpack that misfiring nickname), he's only thinking of how cool it looks.


If you're going to claim influence, don't use an example that suggests you don't get the original. (I'm struggling to avoid a derail into how poor the movie adaptation of V for Vendetta was, but that's a separate thread.)
You're getting farther and farther off base. Sucker Punch blatantly homages anime and video games in its action sequences. There's no argument to that. But if you're analyzing why the movie shows a squad of girls in stripperific costumes with cool weapons, and a mech, sent FPS style after an army of steampunk nazi zombies, you're missing the point.


Tales of Judgment. Also here, instead of that other place.

good luck D.B.B.

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mental_Giant View Post
Also: people who didn't like District 9 can't be reasoned with.
It's the same with people who like the Bay Transformers movies.


Branching Paragon Police Department Epic Archetype, please!

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by MentalMaden View Post
...Snyder has never really shied away from darker material but I think he played a bit more to the masses with the tone of this movie. Personally, I would have liked it to be a little more brutal on the girls, to show why they want to leave so bad other than "I really want to get out of here" "Me too!" And again, I really don't think Oscar Isaac worked in that particular part of his role. He was fine as the weasel-ly orderly but didn't work as the scary pimp. A better actor could have made both roles work. The lack of sex is fine as that portion of the movie is from Baby Dolls perspective and her creation and we are told they are "holding her" for the High Roller, and it's implied she's "innocent" so to speak. ...
Snyder was forced to cut a lot of material from the movie to get the PG-13 rating. Supposed to be a Director's Cut DVD in the works that's a lot closer to what he wanted to do.


Tales of Judgment. Also here, instead of that other place.

good luck D.B.B.

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Agonus View Post
Snyder was forced to cut a lot of material from the movie to get the PG-13 rating. Supposed to be a Director's Cut DVD in the works that's a lot closer to what he wanted to do.
I can see why the wanted the PG-13 rating.

People often say "such and such movie" should of gone with an R rating, forgetting that when movies go with an R rating, it can easily lose a large part of it's audience.

Not to mention R rated movies aren't known for being the OMG HUGE SUCCESS (not that they can't be).


BrandX Future Staff Fighter
The BrandX Collection

 

Posted

I saw it, was liking it, following along with what I assumed the story to be as well as I could, not being particularily bothered. The action sequences were well put together, I had a grasp of the plot. I didn't go in expecting Casablanca, after all.

Where Sucker Punch lost me was the ending. As pleased as I was to see Sweet Pea escape, I truely dispised the injustice of the ending. Baby Doll ends up sacrificing her very self to make the escape successful and by way of sheer chance, happens to get Blue arrested. It was practically the only way it could have ended I suppose, given the way the narrative was framed, but damned if it didn't depress me.

I'd see it again, and I'd like to hear a Director's commentary track on it, but...the ending kind of puts it into the 'I'm in a mood to watch a downer.' category which translates into every three years or so.

Scott Glenn is awesome though.


Infinity
Sam Varden 50 MA/Reg Scrap
Doomtastic 50 SS/Inv Brute
Ceus 50 Eng/Kin Corr
Cinderstorm 50 Fire/Fire Blaster

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kasoh View Post
I saw it, was liking it, following along with what I assumed the story to be as well as I could, not being particularily bothered. The action sequences were well put together, I had a grasp of the plot. I didn't go in expecting Casablanca, after all.

Where Sucker Punch lost me was the ending. As pleased as I was to see Sweet Pea escape, I truely dispised the injustice of the ending. Baby Doll ends up sacrificing her very self to make the escape successful and by way of sheer chance, happens to get Blue arrested. It was practically the only way it could have ended I suppose, given the way the narrative was framed, but damned if it didn't depress me.

I'd see it again, and I'd like to hear a Director's commentary track on it, but...the ending kind of puts it into the 'I'm in a mood to watch a downer.' category which translates into every three years or so.

Scott Glenn is awesome though.
True. As often as I like the idea of a movie not having a happy ending, it can turn people off.


BrandX Future Staff Fighter
The BrandX Collection

 

Posted

It was weird. I liked it.

Which is a good thing since the ticket was 15.75 for the fancy theater. Bastards.


They ALL float down here. When you're down here with us, you'll float too!

@Starflier

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by BrandX View Post
I think it needs repeating. If for nothing else, because the movie isn't about schizophrenia. The only thing the movie has to do with the mentally ill, is the fact that the movie takes place in a mental institution.
The TV show Mad Men is not about smoking. But smokers should not watch it. That's all I'm saying.


...
New Webcomic -- Genocide Man
Life is funny. Death is funnier. Mass slaughter can be hilarious.

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by BrandX View Post
big-ticket geek-centric busts? o.O
How soon we forget (Tron, Scott Pilgrim, Serenity, Green Hornet, Kick ***, X-Men Origins: Wolverine, Superman Returns, Spider-Man 3, and, oh yes, Watchmen).

Quote:
Originally Posted by Agonus View Post
But if you're analyzing why the movie shows a squad of girls in stripperific costumes with cool weapons, and a mech, sent FPS style after an army of steampunk nazi zombies, you're missing the point.
Please believe me, I don't want to have to think about Sucker Punch at all - and the Comicon trailer strongly suggested its audience wouldn't - but once Zack the Hack invoked Brazil, he might as well have slapped me across the face with a kid glove and challenged me to pistols at dawn.

Fortunately, there are paid professionals out there who are more than ready to articulate how much they dislike this film.


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by BrandX View Post
Remember, this is 1950 with different ideas on what was good for patients.
I know they had anime in the 1950's, but those were more Disney like at the time, made with kids and cute animals, and WWII obviously had influence on Baby Doll's imagination. However, one of my issues with the dance sequences (other that what I had already mentioned) was how modern some of the concepts seemed and how modern some of the weapons were, which was kinda weird considering the era Baby Doll was living.


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by TrueGentleman View Post
How soon we forget (Tron, Scott Pilgrim, Serenity, Green Hornet, Kick ***, X-Men Origins: Wolverine, Superman Returns, Spider-Man 3, and, oh yes, Watchmen).
Is it sad that I loved a few of those? Hated Wolverine and spider-man 3 though :P


<:[ shark goes nom nom nom ]:>
[QUOTE=theOcho;3409811]As to the REAL reason I'll be leaving, I'm afraid it is indeed because Tamaki Revolution dc'd on me during a RSF.[/QUOTE]

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by TrueGentleman View Post
How soon we forget (Tron, Scott Pilgrim, Serenity, Green Hornet, Kick ***, X-Men Origins: Wolverine, Superman Returns, Spider-Man 3, and, oh yes, Watchmen).
Wait wait wait, are we talking "busts" in terms of quality or box office? In either case, that's a shaky set of examples.


- CaptainFoamerang

Silverspar on Kelly Hu: A face that could melt paint off the wall *shivers*
Someone play my AE arc! "The Heart of Statesman" ID: 343405

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by MentalMaden View Post
Ironik, I respect your movie opinions and know how, but here.......you're wrong.

Oh and you too, Dark One.
So nice of you to remember wit' yer stealth edit.

But yes, I have to agree with Ironik's summation. District 9 was horrible on many levels and I just can't understand the praise that is heaped upon that movie.

Quote:
It's the same with people who like the Bay Transformers movies.
I liked 'em for what they were...big robots fighting, Peter Cullen's VA'ing, stuff blowing up, and Megan Fox's body. I was under no impression that they were "deep" movies. They had problems, a lot of problems. But they were enjoyable nonetheless.

Quote:
Fortunately, there are paid professionals out there who are more than ready to articulate how much they dislike this film.
I don't think I've ever agreed with a "professional" reviewer. They are more concerned (IMO) with appearing to be above us plebian masses who don't find 8 hour subtitled films about the life of a pancake that is shot in some obscure dialect of Swahili enjoyable.



 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mental_Giant View Post
Exactly... Brazil? When I think big guys with light shooting out of them before exploding, I think Voltron, as in, that's how almost every Ro-beast died. When did Voltron come out? 1984. Brazil. 1985.

Game, Set, and Match.
I think you guys keep missing the fact that ZACK SNYDER said he based Sucker Punch on Brazil. The parallels are there because he put them there. He didn't base it on Volron, he based it on Brazil. And the giant samurai doesn't look like Voltron, it looks like the giant samurai in Brazil. Baby Doll doesn't go through the same character arc as Voltron, she goes through the same character arc as Sam Lowry.

Quote:
Also: people who didn't like District 9 can't be reasoned with.
I am always more than willing to discuss any film or book with someone who holds the opposite opinion. But you have to be able to explain to me logically why these obvious flaws exist in order for me to accept your point of view. There aren't many examples of me changing my mind on this forum, but those examples do exist.

In the case of District 9, though, you aren't going to achieve that feat, because it really is a stupendously stupid movie. This doesn't mean that you are a stupid person for liking it. That *might* be the case, but it's not an equation I make automatically, because you never know why someone likes something stupid. My mom liked watching Golden Girls when she came home from work, but she was an ER nurse who literally saved people's lives every single day. So she liked something that was neither emotionally nor intellectually taxing. If that's why you enjoy the stupidity of District 9, that's fine, but if you want to argue that it's a smart piece of cinema, I'm going to gut your argument like a fish and make you cry like a baby.


The Alt Alphabet ~ OPC: Other People's Characters ~ Terrific Screenshots of Cool ~ Superhero Fiction