-
Posts
807 -
Joined
-
Quote:Actually, she said herself that she and Bane were trained by the League of Shadows.Actually I don't remember it being said at any point that Talia has League of Shadows combat training. As for her accomplishments in the film, "It is not supreme excellence to fight one hundred battles and win one hundred victories. Supreme excellence is to win a victory while fighting no battles at all." -- some dead Asian guy.
-
Quote:A more satifying ending for me would be Bruce and Lucious Fox meeting with Commisioner Gordon to lay out a plan to help rebuild Gotham and strengthen its Police force with tech from Wayne industries and those gathered as the Batman. He then leaves Lucious and Gordon to discuss the matter, then fly off with Selena. This makes it so that Bruce displays his growth by changing his tactics to making a better Gotham through his knowledge and recovered resources instead of donning the Batsuit as Alfred suggested. It also makes it so that Bruce remains true to his parents legacy to do honor to their memory instead seeking to avenge it.Bruce and Selina together makes sense in a way the end with Bruce being presumed dead and everything mirrors how the first movie began, I also have no doubt he had made arrangements for just such situation, and isn't living in the poor house.
With the ending they currently have, Gotham and its police force remains in shambles and have to start over from scratch on their own, with Bruce basically abandoning them to their own devices. This also makes it so that Ra's plan to destroy Gotham and forcing them to start from scratch succeeding. -
I saw TDKRises last night, though I enjoyed the movie, I was also very disappointed with it.
My issues were mostly with how the endings played out.
I didn’t like how Talia was so underwhelming. I mean she’s supposed to be a trained League of Shadows assassin that was also the legendary person who escaped the inescapable, yet all she does is stab Batman, and then gets killed in a truck wreck.
I liked that the movie was leading on that John Blake will be Robin/Nightwing. I mean his parents were killed like Bruce's, he looked up to Batman and was technically a ward of Bruce’s since Bruce was the beneficiary of the orphanage he came from, and he was a police officer and a skilled detective. I was like oh yeah, he’s Dick Grayson that had his name changed due to the circumstances of his parent’s death, as that would have fit in the context of the mythos and would have been a great intro for the character. However, when he said his real name was Robin, I was like what the hell? My friend who watched the movie argued, maybe they didn’t think that Dick Grayson’s name wouldn’t have resonated with the audience unfamiliar with the mythos, but I really can’t see how most people on this planet wouldn’t by now know who Dick Grayson is.
I liked that Alfred preached to Bruce how he’s wasted the past several years by not doing anything after retiring from being Batman, and that the world could have used and needed Bruce Wayne during that time, and that Gotham needs Bruce more than it needs Batman. Alfred was completely right, but then Bruce listens to none of it, instead he decides to just kill himself off at the end so he never fulfills the legacy of his parents. Batman may have had to die to give an ending to the series, but there was no reason for Bruce to do so as well. It didn’t make sense to me, as his fruition just made him seem like the selfish prig that the beginning of the movie made him out to be, which really peed me off, as it just steps on the central idea that permeated the film.
Overall, I thought the movie was a good one, but with a better ending, it could have been much greater. This movie may have served as resolution to the franchise, but it never really serves to resolve itself as a standalone film. -
You can but you need to find a trainer before you can slot the points into the skill.
-
Quote:Me and my friends gamed alot in the 80's-90's (From Table top RPGS to computer, console and arcade machines), no one tried to kick our butts because of it, and we probably turned quite a number of people onto those games because of our enthusiasm for it, as well as turned people on to comics, anime (I remember a time where you could only get anime from bootlegs sold at Asian owned video stores), and pretty much everything else in geekhood. More likely it's because you isolated yourselves from others outside your gaming buddies that caused people to turn on you and think you were weird, not because you were a gamer or geek. Gaming and social interaction have never been mutually exclusive.When I was in high school, my friends and I used to have people trying to kick the sh out of us every day because we played computer games. We were harassed constantly. When using the internet was a social stigma, we were the outcasts but we took our lumps and called ourselves geeks as a point of pride..
-
Quote:Like? I don't think he left anyone alive in the first film. I was actually shocked by the body count. You should see it. I'm not surprised that their family would go after him after that.Why do they put a commercial on before a commercial!?
I still need to see the first, but this sort of makes me want to, just for the sheer absurdity of the premise. "Hey, guys, remember last time, when we accidentally pissed that one guy off real bad and he murderized like everybody? Let's do it again, this time on purpose!"
Oh my favorites..2aken, Taken 2: Judgement Day, and Taken 2 The Limit -
-
My guess is that Disney has learned the hard lesson of todays economics...you can't make cartoons in 3D.
-
Quote:Didn't the scene in the beginning of the movie basically imply that Earth's Human race came from that lone Engineer who disintegrated into DNA after drinking the black goo? However, what his motives were are arguable.We have only the characters assumption the engineers creating humans, they were wrong about the nature of the planet they found, I don't think some other relationship has been ruled out. Other possibilities:
-Both were created by some other race - science origin
-the engineers discovered that evolution followed similar paths, pointing at God having multiple Edens
-Humans from earth are descendants of either an early colonization effert or desidents -
Isn't the main complaint against WB superhero flicks by critics is that they focus entirely too much on the villains already?
-
Quote:That and the Geologist was supposed to be in tune with the puppies, as he created them. In the beginning, he acted like he knew everything the puppies were relaying back to the ship, yet he was the one that got lost. Made no sense.The Biologist didn't seem too smart about unidentified animals, I grant you.
The plot hole that bugged me most was the "search" for the Biologist and Geologist. Didn't you have a video feed from them 24/7? Isn't it recorded? You should know EXACTLY what happened to them before you go off on your search.
Also, how did those guys get lost int he first place? No one from the ship could have walked them through it? They had a freakin' 3D map of every part of the complex they were in!
As for the creation of humans, me and a freind were debating it at the end of the movie.
His take was that it was an intended act, in which one of the Engineers sacrificed himself to create life on Earth with the black goo from the ornate ritual-like jar.
Mine was the creation of life on Earth wasn't intended, and the result of the bad batch of coffee he drank which may have been tampered with by another Engineer (just as David did later), and the ornate jar was nothing more than an alien Scooby-Doo thermos or office coffee mug. -
Didn't Rhodey steal the Mark 2 and turned it into War Machine?
-
Quote:Sam Raimi had originally planned 2 villains from the outset, only instead of Venom we would have gotten The Vulture played by John Malkovich (who had been cast), who was to have been a partner of Sandman who escaped together. Storywise this means we wouldn't have had the emo Peter Parker, no Eddie Brock Jr., played by Topher Grace, and probably no Gwen Stacy. Y'know that doesn't sound like a bad movie.I agree with both. They would be bad films anyway, but villain cramming is one of their many faults. But the problem with SM3 isn't really too many villains, three really isn't many. It's failing to choose one as the main antagonist.
Sam Raimi wouldn't have teamed up Sandman and Venom without being forced to do so, it just doesn't make sense to put two villains in a movie with pretty much the same powers. -
Hmmm...the conspiracy theorist in me is wondering if may be somehow related.
-
My babysitter's son had a collection of comic books he let us read. I remember that the first book I picked up and read was Daredevil #1.
-
Pouring liquid admantium on any terminator would pretty much destroy them. All the Avengers would need is Ant-Man.
-
I don't think Cap's shield ability to absorb impact in the movie does not work as well as it does in the comics, else Bucky should not have been blown out of the train when he blocked that attack in the Cap movie.
-
Well today's episode pretty much sinches Beast Boy's origin, and Connor's "condition". And Gar calls M'gann Sis!
-
Quote:I know the second Vision is no longer connected to the Torch. But the first one was maybe (built from parts or split from or not at all. I swear Marvel writers sometimes.)..they kind of left that open ended.Yeah, having that cameo in Cap was a nice touch and rather fitting since as I recall from the Timely era he predates Cap and Namor.
Would be nice if they get him into the movies. If Marvel Movie Studio can't have the F.F. since Fox retains the movie rights, they just might be able to get the Android Torch in instead.
Also Torch and Vision in comics are separate beings now. Long story.
It would be a fun scene, if in a Cap 2 flashback shows Steve taking the Synthoid, which he is unable to activate, lighting him on fire and somehow catapults him at the enemy to explode where he lands. That way they can get the Human Torch in it without license dispute. -
Quote:Actually, there was a Vision easter egg in Captain America, as the Android Human Torch (which later bacame Vision in the comics) did a cameo during the Expo scene. Edit: Oh wait, I see you knew that.Oh I knew you meant the main death, was just pointing out that deaths will occur.
Ah good, so I didn't miss any Vision related easter eggs, good thing I didn't or else I might need my own vision checked. (bad pun, I know) -
Who's doing a Marvel movie marathon tommorow? I and my friends are, seems like others are as well. I needed to buy a new Blu-ray of Ironman 2 since mine went missing, couldn't find Blu-rays of Ironman, Ironman 2, and Incredible Hulk anywhere in my town. Best Buy even had a display with all the Marvel Movies (to capitalize on The Avengers premiere) and those Blu-rays were sold out. I managed to get a used Blu-Ray of Ironman 2 at Rasputin, it was the last one they had.
-
-
Time was still a factor, and Spock couldn't be sure what the conversation would be like. Like Batman, Ol-Spock now has had plenty of time to plan, plus has the experience of having witnessed and scanned the event.
-
Quote:He still could. Nu-Kirk could still do it as well, but there are such things in the Trek universe as divergent timelines so Ol-Kirk could and will still do it. Ol-Kirk goes back into his past to steal a whale which in happenstance is also the past of the Nu-Trek. Nu-Kirk could still steal whales, but likely at a different time and place. Blows your mind..huh? I could draw you a chart...Yeah, about that...
Kirk & co went back to 19something but the alternate timeline started much later, like four hundred years or so.
So is there a point in space-time where old Kirk is stealing a whale, even though he never existed that way in the new timeline?
Just a thought: ...Or Ol-Spock could just create a device with the recorded whale conversations from his timeline to prevent the event from happening at all in the new timeline. He probably doesn't even need the previous recording, as he did mind meld with a whale so he should know how to simulate the conversation.