Bringer_NA

I'm slightly the same, even being IO'd.

My attack chain is always something like Slash -> Eviscerate -> Swipe -> Strike -> Dart Burst, then Placate and repeat assuming that it was above Boss grading.

Personally, I think Slash is the best opening attack for a critical, because you will kill most Minions and Lts with it. I've been playing my Night Widow since day 1 of VEAT release, and I'm quite used to hitting multiple targets with Eviscerate. It does have a long animation time, but if I use it on mob standing over a rescue or escort, I find that I can take out all the enemies in the mob. I am however, heavily IO'd and still working towards my 3rd LoTG +Rech.

As the the OP, if you enjoyed the Widow before branching, then the Night Widow is probably best for you. I got to level 32 then realized how awful I found Fortunatas to be, because the damage output and AoEs weren't on par with what I wanted. (Level 32 occurred in 1 day, I wasn't power leveling, just powering through content, which shows that a Fortunata is quite viable) Of course, all my characters that are level 50 are meleers, besides my first 50, which was a Storm/Dark Defender. On villain side, my first 50 was a Assassin Blade/Regen Stalker, and that may have also had an effect on my choice.

I do however have a dual build for using Fortunata, but I've only SO'd it out, which makes it comparatively weaker than my Night Widow.

I've experienced it with Unai and Maria over in Peregrine. I guess it is affecting NPCs who have new missions.

I'm pretty sure people team up, because every kill, no matter how close, counts for the badge. Same goes for Rikti bombs. More don't spawn because there is more players, they spawn faster because there are less Rikti bombs taking up a spawn point.

When there is a minimal amount of game breaking bugs. (Can't say NO game breaking bugs, because of when AE was released and all the exploits available there, as well as crashes.)

DCUO needn't be a problem. It's a game that has to reach our level of expansions and content, before people go crazy over it. Right now, it's just a bunch of promises they know they can't fully make on the development side.

The trailer for DCUO showed how clunky the physics were anyways. Watch the part where the guy gets punched and clock the time it takes for him to get knocked away. Makes me laugh every time.

I have to agree. I haven't had any of those problems on the Windows 7 RC, but I'm using an ATI Radeon 3200 HD graphics card and a AMD Turion X2 64-Bit processor.

I think they exact opposite has happened with me. I recieved less crashing and my computer actually had less of a load and stayed cooler longer with Windows 7 and CoH.

If you can obtain the 63 Month badge when you didn't subscribe but for 33 months, you shouldn't be able to obtain the 63 month. They continue to add, because it shows who was here at the beginning, who has dropped the game for a while, and who is new to the game.

You, as well as everyone in this thread, knows they read the veteran rewards to see if a player is new to the game. If a new player can obtain a veteran reward it took me 15 months to get, then it lacks the luster and we can't use that system of finding "newbs".

I think that maybe at a point, veteran rewards should have more "minor" rewards. For instance, like this 66 Month. This will dim down the fire of complaints, because people won't have a reason to be angry that veterans have some "over-powered" or "un-obtainable" veteran reward.

Adding some of the things players have suggested, are something that is generally un-obtainable from a coding standpoint.