Dark Knight Rises *there be spoilers here, seriously don't click if you don't want spoilers*


2short2care

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Zombie Man View Post
Those walking bags of mostly water would've been in a lot of trouble if they were wearing metal pipes!
Bye-bye Iron Man?


 

Posted

Just got back from it. I really enjoyed it, it surprised me and gave me what I wanted out of it which was a lot of fun action and some twists that caught me off guard.

I don't really want to go in-depth into it, but there are a few things that come to mind that bothered me some.

There was just a smidge too much convenient movie timing for me. So many characters showing up 'in the nick of time' where in many instances they really shouldn't have had any idea where said character was. Or the travel time just seems very clipped, especially the long distance between Gotham and The Pit. The way it's shown in the movie you'd think the place was just a hop skip and a jump away. They do illustrate that a month passes but it goes at such a quick clip it feels like too much passes within a single jump cut. Obviously it would've been anticlimatic to show 'the journey' or anything and it's more for the story telling, it still seems too quick and easy. I was also put off by the liberal use of the "SURPRISE!" as something jumps on screen that by all rights the characters should've seen well ahead of time, particularly 'The Bat'.

Second was Bane's mask, which rolls into my third point. I still don't quite get what the function of the mask was. Something about a plague, painkillers, and being horribly disfigured. I just never really caught the exact purpose, like what exactly it was doing for him other than 'holding back the pain', so, was it like a continuous dose of painkiller? It seems kind of contrived when, y'know, painkillers can just be taken. It seemed more just a gimmick because 'He's Bane' than serving any realistic purpose that could've have been done with something more practical.

Which actually rolls into my next point. This movie feels much more like a direct sequel to Begins than Dark knight did and it kind of removes what I felt was one of the themes of the Dark Knight and that is the growing 'madness' of superheroes. The whole escalation of 'you fight thugs wearing a mask they're going to start coming up with their own masks'. The Joker exemplified this so perfectly and was a true 'Super Villain', Two Face was leaning into that 'madness' of being a 'freak' which to me has always been part of the appeal of the Rogue's Gallery. Bane and by extension Talia are villains, but in a more realistic terrorist feel. They're almost a step backward. That's another reason why Bane's mask doesn't work for me because it feels so superficial. It felt more like a tacked on ornament than anything truly defining about the character.

Even Scarecrow's cameo plays into that feeling. We're introduced to the whole mask/supervillain feel in Begins and even in Dark Knight he's still running around as The Scarecrow. But in this he's simply back to 'Dr. Crane'. It was a wonderful cameo and I quite liked it, but it felt less like he was 'One of the Freaks' and more like 'Just Another Criminal' in this.

Even Catwoman, actually. It's never about BEING Catwoman, it's never even a thought that she's a 'costumed freak', she's literally just a cat burglar and by coincidence her preferred outfit happens to have goggles that flip back to 'kind of' look like cat ears. But that's about it.

I'll be honest I was never that big on the whole 'League of Shadows' thing. It worked well enough as a set up for begins, and thematically it makes sense to bring it full circle but at the same time I kind of think it's disappointing to book end it like that so much.

Still I really quite enjoyed it. The gripes I cite above are really relatively minor, they're hardly make or break for the film. I enjoyed all the characters and the twists legitimately caught me by surprise. The action was great and it had a few moments that really hit me right. While I wasn't thrilled with the characterization of Catwoman as it pertained to her being any kind of superhero/villain, I think her personality was just perfect and Hathaway did a killer job, I just think her theme was a little mishandled. Bane was great too as a very imposing and downright frightening character, his voice just gave me chills. But really thinking on it now it just feels like they dialed back the 'superhero' feel a notch below even what Begins had (which was already, and practically, minimal to begin with).

I do agree a bit that it's not really a proper ending for batman, it felt less like 'The Dark knight Rises' and more like "Bruce Wayne Ends".


 

Posted

Quote:
Its certainly far more reasonable than the microwave vaporizer from Batman Begins that vaporizes water contained in metal pipes but does nothing to the walking bags of mostly water that are standing around unprotected.
<treknobabble>Different harmonic frequencies, obviously.</treknobabble>


Current Blog Post: "Why I am an Atheist..."
"And I say now these kittens, they do not get trained/As we did in the days when Victoria reigned!" -- T. S. Eliot, "Gus, the Theatre Cat"

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Agent White View Post
Which actually rolls into my next point. This movie feels much more like a direct sequel to Begins than Dark knight did and it kind of removes what I felt was one of the themes of the Dark Knight and that is the growing 'madness' of superheroes. The whole escalation of 'you fight thugs wearing a mask they're going to start coming up with their own masks'. The Joker exemplified this so perfectly and was a true 'Super Villain', Two Face was leaning into that 'madness' of being a 'freak' which to me has always been part of the appeal of the Rogue's Gallery. Bane and by extension Talia are villains, but in a more realistic terrorist feel. They're almost a step backward. That's another reason why Bane's mask doesn't work for me because it feels so superficial. It felt more like a tacked on ornament than anything truly defining about the character.

Even Scarecrow's cameo plays into that feeling. We're introduced to the whole mask/supervillain feel in Begins and even in Dark Knight he's still running around as The Scarecrow. But in this he's simply back to 'Dr. Crane'. It was a wonderful cameo and I quite liked it, but it felt less like he was 'One of the Freaks' and more like 'Just Another Criminal' in this.
Actually, I think that was the whole point of The Dark Knight. Bruce Wayne realizes in TDK that Gotham can't be ruled by people in masks: it needs to ultimately save itself. Gotham can't be constantly saved by Batman because in many ways, Gotham would still be controlled by costumed criminals. At the end of TDK, he realizes that Gotham needs to believe it can be saved by people like Dent, and doesn't need people like Batman. If even Batman is the villain, then Gotham needs to save itself, which it does.

I think people are slightly misinterpreting the ending of TDKR. I don't think Bruce is simply passing on the torch to Blake. I think he's realized that the Batman was something Gotham needed, and no longer needed. But it could need again, and if so, he planted the seed so the Batman could rise again. That's the symbolism of the repaired bat-signal.


Quote:
I do agree a bit that it's not really a proper ending for batman, it felt less like 'The Dark knight Rises' and more like "Bruce Wayne Ends".
I think the title is partially supposed to mean that the Batman is a necessary evil; sometimes necessary but still evil in the sense of being something we almost never want: someone above the law and beyond the rules the rest of us have to follow. He's not needed, so he goes away. If he's needed again, he'll rise again. In a sense, The Dark Knight Rises makes a point of saying that the Batman rises from pain. Bruce's pain at the loss of his parents and his inability to do anything about their death drives him to become the Batman. But he's incapable of meeting the challenge years later because there's no such thing as a retired Batman: without the constant fight Bruce is just a shell of his former self. It isn't until he drives himself singularly to escape the prison that he basically becomes Batman again: someone singularly focused on his mission.

If the Batman is needed again, he can't simply come out of retirement. He'll have to rise again, from whatever pain compels the need for a Batman.


[Guide to Defense] [Scrapper Secondaries Comparison] [Archetype Popularity Analysis]

In one little corner of the universe, there's nothing more irritating than a misfile...
(Please support the best webcomic about a cosmic universal realignment by impaired angelic interference resulting in identity crisis angst. Or I release the pigmy water thieves.)

 

Posted

Certainly food for thought but at the same time, get your moral positing and symbolism out of my superhero movie. I agree with you and I think you're right but at the same time, I don't really want it to be that 'simple' and black and white. I really just don't want that point made at all because to me it's dipping too far into the realm of the real and the practical instead of the fantastic that batman and the superhero genre really represent. it's a great ideal, but not the one I really want to have.

Then again I'm an escapist


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Arcanaville View Post
*SNIP*
You forgot to include the percentages and probabilities with that Arcana!

You're slipping!



Clicking on the linked image above will take you off the City of Heroes site. However, the guides will be linked back here.

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Agent White View Post
I agree with you and I think you're right but at the same time, I don't really want it to be that 'simple' and black and white.
It only seems black and white because it takes more words to properly convey shades of grey. But by the time I was finished conveying grey your eyes would be bleeding and then the grey would get all fuzzy.


[Guide to Defense] [Scrapper Secondaries Comparison] [Archetype Popularity Analysis]

In one little corner of the universe, there's nothing more irritating than a misfile...
(Please support the best webcomic about a cosmic universal realignment by impaired angelic interference resulting in identity crisis angst. Or I release the pigmy water thieves.)

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Arcanaville View Post
It only seems black and white because it takes more words to properly convey shades of grey. But by the time I was finished conveying grey your eyes would be bleeding and then the grey would get all fuzzy.
Yeah my eyes bleed enough with 50 Shades of Grey. I don't think I can handle even more.


 

Posted

So is Bruce Wayne dead or is he alive? All that we saw at the end was very ambiguous...from Alfred seeing what he saw, could that have just been something that he imagined or did he actually see Bruce? To Lucious Fox wondering if he could have done something different to perhaps save Bruce from having to manually pilot the Bat...and finding out that Bruce had indeed fixed the auto pilot....

Reason I say this is that the timer only showed 5 seconds left with Batman/Bruce still in the cockpit....could he have escaped?


You only fail if you give up. - Dana Scully

Time Jesum Transeuntum Et Non Riverentum - Nick Cave

We're not just destroyers, at the same time we can be saviors. - Allen Walker

 

Posted

Yeah, he lives. The movie doesn't give us any reason to doubt that what Alfred sees is any kind of delusion.

As for the internal shot... he could've set the autopilot and ejected well before, we don't know what kind of ejector system The Bat had. Apparently it was enclosed instead of like the ejector seat on a jet where the canopy is released and the chair jettisons separately.


Also I was a little sad to see the EMP gun only got use in the initial motorcycle chase. You think he could've given it to someone.


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Agent White View Post
Yeah, he lives. The movie doesn't give us any reason to doubt that what Alfred sees is any kind of delusion.

As for the internal shot... he could've set the autopilot and ejected well before, we don't know what kind of ejector system The Bat had. Apparently it was enclosed instead of like the ejector seat on a jet where the canopy is released and the chair jettisons separately.


Also I was a little sad to see the EMP gun only got use in the initial motorcycle chase. You think he could've given it to someone.

Speaking of said EMP gun, would that have not affected the laptop that uploading all that information? I do not believe that it was "hardened" against an EMP attack...


You only fail if you give up. - Dana Scully

Time Jesum Transeuntum Et Non Riverentum - Nick Cave

We're not just destroyers, at the same time we can be saviors. - Allen Walker

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sevenpenny View Post
So is Bruce Wayne dead or is he alive? All that we saw at the end was very ambiguous...from Alfred seeing what he saw, could that have just been something that he imagined or did he actually see Bruce?
Nolan is deliberately ambiguous. It's up to the watcher. You want Bruce to be dead? He is dead. You want him to be alive? He is alive.


I really should do something about this signature.

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Agent White View Post
Yeah, he lives. The movie doesn't give us any reason to doubt that what Alfred sees is any kind of delusion.
Apart from it exactly matching what Alfred says he likes to imagine.

The move doesn't provide any evidence that it's NOT Alfred's imagination, either.


I really should do something about this signature.

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by PRAF68_EU View Post
Apart from it exactly matching what Alfred says he likes to imagine.

The move doesn't provide any evidence that it's NOT Alfred's imagination, either.
The movie doesn't provide any evidence it's not all a fast time delusion as Thomas Wayne dies from his gunshot wounds, either.


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lazarillo View Post
The movie doesn't provide any evidence it's not all a fast time delusion as Thomas Wayne dies from his gunshot wounds, either.
True, and you could go with that interpretation if you wished.

But since Thomas Wayne doesn't say "I like to imagine that my son grows up to be a costumed vigilante" there is rather less reason to suppose this is the case.

Blade Runner: Unicorn. Sometimes director subtlety is lost on people....


I really should do something about this signature.

 

Posted

Quote:
Blade Runner: Unicorn. Sometimes director subtlety is lost on people....
And sometimes directors creatively reinterpret their work after the fact, and sometimes people read way too much into things. There is no reason to believe the end of TDKR is anything but what it appears to be.


Current Blog Post: "Why I am an Atheist..."
"And I say now these kittens, they do not get trained/As we did in the days when Victoria reigned!" -- T. S. Eliot, "Gus, the Theatre Cat"

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by PRAF68_EU View Post
Apart from it exactly matching what Alfred says he likes to imagine.

The move doesn't provide any evidence that it's NOT Alfred's imagination, either.
Other than the techs saying that the auto-pilot has been fixed in the airship. Granted, Alfred didn't, iirc, know about that.

Alfred could be imagining it, but he did tell Bruce what he did on his vacations so it is conceivable that Bruce did it to let him know he was alive without having to get into the whole awkward reunion thing. And then there was the lawyer-guys going over the estate not being able to find Bruce's mother's pearl necklace.



 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Venture View Post
And sometimes directors creatively reinterpret their work after the fact, and sometimes people read way too much into things. There is no reason to believe the end of TDKR is anything but what it appears to be.
Apart from the director's past movie history. In this case, Inception. Which is surely not so subtle that people who missed it first time round have to make up excuses...


I really should do something about this signature.

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dark One View Post
Other than the techs saying that the auto-pilot has been fixed in the airship. Granted, Alfred didn't, iirc, know about that.

Alfred could be imagining it, but he did tell Bruce what he did on his vacations so it is conceivable that Bruce did it to let him know he was alive without having to get into the whole awkward reunion thing. And then there was the lawyer-guys going over the estate not being able to find Bruce's mother's pearl necklace.
Which is exactly the effect Nolan is trying to achieve. Just enough uncertainty to allow people to make up their own minds.


I really should do something about this signature.

 

Posted

Why would Alfred imagine his perfect wife to be Selina Kyle? He never witnessed any of the romantic fascination Bruce had with her. For all he knew, she was just a jewel thief he took an interest in tracking down, nothing more.

There's more evidence to support he escaped and survived. It's just not ambiguous in the -slightest-.


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by PRAF68_EU View Post
Which is exactly the effect Nolan is trying to achieve. Just enough uncertainty to allow people to make up their own minds.
There is no uncertainty. Had they not included those scenes, then there would be uncertainty. But since they did, it is pretty much a massive flashing light saying, "Bruce Wayne is alive!".

Also, what Agent White said. Was there any indication to Alfred that Selina was anything to Bruce other than a thief?



 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by PRAF68_EU View Post
Nolan is deliberately ambiguous. It's up to the watcher. You want Bruce to be dead? He is dead. You want him to be alive? He is alive.
Nolan is a story teller. There's an actual story being told. Real life is sometimes ambiguous, but Nolan would rather the story speak for itself.

I don't think he *minds* people gnashing teeth over his stories, but he does not tell vague things that could be stories. He tells stories, with beginnings, middles, and endings.


[Guide to Defense] [Scrapper Secondaries Comparison] [Archetype Popularity Analysis]

In one little corner of the universe, there's nothing more irritating than a misfile...
(Please support the best webcomic about a cosmic universal realignment by impaired angelic interference resulting in identity crisis angst. Or I release the pigmy water thieves.)

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Agent White View Post
Why would Alfred imagine his perfect wife to be Selina Kyle? He never witnessed any of the romantic fascination Bruce had with her. For all he knew, she was just a jewel thief he took an interest in tracking down, nothing more.
No he did know, he encouraged Bruce to take her out for coffee at one point.


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Agent White View Post
Why would Alfred imagine his perfect wife to be Selina Kyle? He never witnessed any of the romantic fascination Bruce had with her. For all he knew, she was just a jewel thief he took an interest in tracking down, nothing more.

There's more evidence to support he escaped and survived. It's just not ambiguous in the -slightest-.
Agree, just because Nolan put out Inception doesn't mean all his movies will have that type of ending. The pearls went missing, he passed the mantle off, the Auto-Pilot was fixed. If the ending was meant to be vague then it would have been better to blur the woman that Bruce was with. Instead you could clearly tell it was Selina, who has a new lease on life due to the clean slate program. If anything that ending was a way for Bruce to say "I'm sorry" or "You were right." to Alfred.



Paragon Unleashed Forums
Twitter: @Alpha_Ryvius

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Adeon Hawkwood View Post
No he did know, he encouraged Bruce to take her out for coffee at one point.
He also followed that up with he would pair Bruce with an ape if it meant he would get out of the house. Hardly counts as believing in any romantic involvement.