Originally Posted by Mr. DJ
your alter-ego/wife/whatever needs to be the one posting instead of you.
|
Testing Shards to Incarnate Progression
His "better half".
.
Don�t say things. What you are stands over you the while, and thunders so that I cannot hear what you say to the contrary. - R.W. Emerson |
YUMMY Low-Hanging Fruit for BASE LUV
AE ARCs, flashback arcs with debuffs, the difficulty slider etc etc.
Thats true.
I don't suffer from altitis, I enjoy every minute of it.
Thank you Devs & Community people for a great game.
So sad to be ending ):
Arcanaville, I'm not following your post here. I'm guessing that you mean that shards were a bridge from standard content to the incarnate system and not the invention system.
But what's the purpose of the bridge when you can skip it completely by farming the baf/lam/keyes to slot up your alpha? For the rest, are you implying that the whole thing should just be ignored? That there's no point in trying to fix it now? |
The incarnate rewards are fundamentally very high escalations in power. Those things were intended to be tied to much more difficult end game content. If the players said, or the devs thought, that the players did not want such content, we wouldn't have gotten the incarnate system either. Period, end of story.
We got the incarnate system and the end game content tied together. But the problem that was perceived was that they were totally separate systems: the content didn't really overlap and the reward systems didn't really overlap. It was almost like two games side by side. So the devs used Alpha to bridge between the two. A *piece* of the Incarnate system would be the sacrificial lamb that would have two ways to earn: by end game content (which didn't really even exist when the Alpha slot was created) and from running standard content. So even if you were not running end game content, you could still make *some* progress in the incarnate system. First by earning shards which worked for Alpha, and later by trading shards for threads. This a compromise and not a necessary one: it was appealing to the players who wanted some continuity across the systems. I had reservations about the shard system because I thought it would have balance issues since it would have to be subject to multiple contradictory reward balance requirements. Incidentally, that objection tended to be acknowledged derisively if at all, I'm more than willing to point out. Just Arcana making ******** up again. But on the whole I accepted the shard system as a reasonable compromise, if a somewhat unstable one.
Awarding threads everywhere is tantamount to as saying let shards buy everything. But shards were intended to only buy Alpha: they are balanced on the presumption that its ok to award them everywhere, because they cannot efficiently unlock the other slots without passing through conversion gates that can be controlled and if necessary balanced over time. Now, when you say to remove shards and replace them with threads, I'm assuming you're asking for shards to be replaced with *more* threads and not just one to one, because we can already convert one to one through the conversion gate. The conversion gate is only a time gate if you can earn more than ten shards per day, every day, consistently. I'm assuming based on your OP that the actual earning rate is, separate from the multiple currency issue, unacceptable. So we'd be handing players more threads than shards now, they could earn them while completely avoiding end game content, and we'd have no gate control over this.
The shard system and its path to Alpha was a compromise between competing interests in connecting the power of the incarnate system to the end game content, and providing progressional continuity across the entire game. I thought it was a reasonable compromise. Its a compromise I expect the devs to honor. If it turns out that compromise forms the basis of overturning the end game reward system itself, that would mean I was mistaken. I won't make that mistake twice.
[Guide to Defense] [Scrapper Secondaries Comparison] [Archetype Popularity Analysis]
In one little corner of the universe, there's nothing more irritating than a misfile...
(Please support the best webcomic about a cosmic universal realignment by impaired angelic interference resulting in identity crisis angst. Or I release the pigmy water thieves.)
I see. Thanks for the post, A.
Be well, people of CoH.
Really? If I want to take my Bubble Defender into a +4x8 situation? These powers are going to destroy the challenge?
My *** they are! Sure, maybe for someone who's running a kitted-out "His level says "Chuck Norris" in it!" scrapper, all they're doing is making stuff that's already easy easier. But the second someone starts in with "my scrapper", any semblance of challenge goes completely out the window. This is NOT "City of Scrappers". |
@Golden Girl
City of Heroes comics and artwork
hmm to me what arcana says is making some sense, that getting rid of them entirely might unbalance things
i think a lot of the gripe that poeple have is
- shard drop rate is significantly lower than threads and
- conversion rate from shard to thread is extremely wasteful since its an 80% loss
if instead it was 10:20 (60% loss) or 10:30 (40% loss) in a shard:thread conversion that was time gated it would make it a lot more of a smooth transition, this would be our time gated conversion
then you could leave the 10:10 as the free anytime conversion since it is taking a very large loss
the reason behind the loss is the fact that 1 shard component is 4 shards and 1 thread component is 20 threads, so 1 shard is equal to 5 threads, so an even no loss conversion would be 10:50
the reason behind the loss is the fact that 1 shard component is 4 shards and 1 thread component is 20 threads, so 1 shard is equal to 5 threads, so an even no loss conversion would be 10:50
|
Basically, what I'm saying is that threads do more and thus are worth more than shards and so the conversion rate we have now is more than fair.
The City of Heroes Community is a special one and I will always look fondly on my times arguing, discussing and playing with you all. Thanks and thanks to the developers for a special experience.
We've been saving Paragon City for eight and a half years. It's time to do it one more time.
(If you love this game as much as I do, please read that post.)
Shards components work only for the Alpha slot, so I don't think it's a fair exchange rate to consider then 5 threads. It is true that it takes 60 threads to make a common Alpha and 12 shards, but IMO, that's covered by threads greater drop rate. Threads are more flexible and allow you to imbue an incarnate with higher tiers of power. Shards must be converted on a time-gate to even be worth any threads.
Basically, what I'm saying is that threads do more and thus are worth more than shards and so the conversion rate we have now is more than fair. |
its still gonna suffer some loss, but not such as an extreme lost as to significantly increase the time required to craft anything
going from 10 shards (2.5 components) to 30 threads (1.5) components seems more fair than going from 10 shards to 10 threads (.5 components) or 5 threads (.25 components)
right now it would require 60 shards (15 components) for 60 threads (3 components) or 30 threads (1.5 components)
60 shards being worth 15 common components is worth 5 tier 1 alphas, and to convert it to threads is 1 tier 1 component or full unlock of interface and judgement
with the drop rate being as low as it is this is why the conversion rate should be adjusted to help at least make it more even
if using the 10:30 conversion rate, then it would be 20 shards for 60 threads, 20 shards is 5 common components, and 60 threads is 3 common components
it would cut the solo route time significantly by requiring only 1/4 of the materials for the same tier 1 thread-based incarnate power
if we use arcana's earn rate of 2.5 shards per hour it would take about 4 hours to get the 10 shards to do either the 10:10 or the 10:30 (my suggested) conversions
for the 10:30 conversion you would only need 2 conversions or approx 8 hours of time to get the shards needed (plus 2 days for time gated conversion)
for the 10:10 conversion you would need 6 conversions or approx 24 hours or 3x longer at the above rate for the same payout
now 8 hours may not sound like a lot, but there are some poeple who barely have 8 hours a week play time and it would make for a lot more reasonable goal than 24 hours, which for someone limited to 8 hours a week, would take 3 weeks PER tier 1 (im excluding slot unlocks since thats a 1 time thing)
to expand it further, at the 10:30 rate it would take 4 weeks to get a single tier 4 in each of the thread-based slots
for the 10:10 rate, it would take 3 months to get 1 tier 4 in each thread-based slot
im not gonna go into further detail since to get the higher tiers would require a significantly long time regardless of which conversion you are going for, but a 10:30 conversion while still suffering a loss, is better than 10:10 conversion which is what the free conversion should be
hmm to me what arcana says is making some sense, that getting rid of them entirely might unbalance things
i think a lot of the gripe that poeple have is
if instead it was 10:20 (60% loss) or 10:30 (40% loss) in a shard:thread conversion that was time gated it would make it a lot more of a smooth transition, this would be our time gated conversion then you could leave the 10:10 as the free anytime conversion since it is taking a very large loss the reason behind the loss is the fact that 1 shard component is 4 shards and 1 thread component is 20 threads, so 1 shard is equal to 5 threads, so an even no loss conversion would be 10:50 |
But assuming most players can't actually solo task forces, looking at the WST as a teaming activity in the shard path, it awards a Notice of the Well which converts to 40 threads (if I'm remembering correctly). That is actually an extremely good time/thread ratio, depending on how fast you run task forces. But even if you end up taking three hours to solo a WST, that's still 13 threads per hour.
The strong time gate limits how fast you can earn threads this way, and its limited to "teaming" content. But it offers a path to incarnate power that is, while not literally using shards, technically part of the shard system.
By my calculations it takes 2390 threads to unlock and then slot all four incarnate slots with tier 3 powers. If you solo 10 hours a week averaging three shards per hour at BillZBubba's pace, and then run one WST a week separate from that, you'll be earning essentially 70 threads in about 12 hours (assuming two hours total to run the WST). It will then take about 34 weeks, or about 410 hours total to fully slot tier 3s, assuming you don't even get any shards or component drops convertible into a shard during the WST run. If we assume you get a few shards in those WSTs, the time drops to under 400 hours.
Still long, but not astronomically long. That's for tier 3 powers. Calculating for tier 4 powers triggers the discussion of whether it is reasonable to calculate average earning times for tier 4 without using its optimal methods of acquisition when its intended to be a longer term pursuit goal even under optimum conditions.
Incidentally, if you are a high performance player with alts then believe it or not, it actually gets better in a way. Because suppose you have exactly the same 12 hours to play, but decide to advance two level 50s at the same time. Now, you'll burn 4 hours running a WST for each alt, and you'll have only 8 hours left which you will split 4 and 4 between those alts. Each alt gets 12 shards and 40 threads from the Notice, or about 52 threads each for those same 12 hours of play. It will now take 46 weeks to fully tier 3 both alts, or about 551 hours of play. That's only 276 hours per alt. The more alts you spread yourself across (to a point), the more WSTs you do, the more efficient your earning time becomes. When you get to the point that those 12 hours are being burned doing 6 WSTs for 6 alts, it will take 60 weeks and 720 hours to get six alts to all tier 3 slotting. That's only 120 hours per alt. In calendar time, its taking progressively longer, but in terms of hours of play per alt the time is dropping quite fast. And even in terms of calendar time its taking less than twice as many weeks to progress six alts simultaneously as it does to progress one alt.
[Guide to Defense] [Scrapper Secondaries Comparison] [Archetype Popularity Analysis]
In one little corner of the universe, there's nothing more irritating than a misfile...
(Please support the best webcomic about a cosmic universal realignment by impaired angelic interference resulting in identity crisis angst. Or I release the pigmy water thieves.)
Never surrender! Never give up!
Help keep Paragon City alive with the unofficial City of Heroes Tabletop Role Playing Game!
now if you have the inf to spend on making shards into notice of the wells (since there is a way to do that now), would it be worth crafting up to a notice then converting to threads?
this is assuming you do not run the weekly target
...
If you solo 10 hours a week averaging three shards per hour at BillZBubba's pace, and then run one WST a week separate from that, you'll be earning essentially 70 threads in about 12 hours (assuming two hours total to run the WST). It will then take about 34 weeks, or about 410 hours total to fully slot tier 3s, assuming you don't even get any shards or component drops convertible into a shard during the WST run. If we assume you get a few shards in those WSTs, the time drops to under 400 hours. Still long, but not astronomically long. That's for tier 3 powers. ... |
I just see these types of time expenditures brought up now and then and usually passed over and passed off as "not as long as..." and I get the feeling that a lot of people file it as "not bad".
And I just wanted to say that... That's crazy!
But yeah, we all know the soloish path is crazy.
And that was interesting insight, in a previous post of yours, about the reasons for the shards. Thanks!
I've been wondering if they'll do a big Incarnate Salvage/Stuff consolidation some time after most of the Slots are live. However, I can see them leaving Alpha as separate.
and round up everyone that knows more than they do"-Dylan
Wait, wait wait. Back up. You've only ran one lambda trial, and one BAF trial?
|
MArcs:
The Echo, Arc ID 1688 (5mish, easy, drama)
The Audition, Arc ID 221240 (6 mish, complex mech, comedy)
Storming Citadel, Arc ID 379488 (lowbie, 1mish, 10-min timed)
When Freedim goes live, are they doing away with the minimum start limits for TFs?
Eco
MArcs:
The Echo, Arc ID 1688 (5mish, easy, drama)
The Audition, Arc ID 221240 (6 mish, complex mech, comedy)
Storming Citadel, Arc ID 379488 (lowbie, 1mish, 10-min timed)
So would you support locking out Incarnate powers beyond Alpha in non-Incarnate content?
|
Incarnates leave the current 50 content behind, just like 50s leave the level 40 stuff behind.
@Golden Girl
City of Heroes comics and artwork
So would you support locking out Incarnate powers beyond Alpha in non-Incarnate content?
|
The devs have taken the wise view to allow people who have went down the Incarnate path be overpowered in non-Incarnate content. If you take away the abilities, then folks will demand that ALL content be scaled to the power level of incarnates. Which creates, in fact, the very treadmill that people are imposing on themselves now.
Right now you really don't have to do the Incarnate trials. Incarnate power is fun, but certainly not necessary. I've seen what happens when the point you make is taken to its logical conclusion. I suspect many others here have as well, because many have expressed fears that the Incarnate powers would be necessary to "keep up" with new content. I have seen no significant evidence that the devs intend for that to happen. But it will happen should Incarnate powers be locked away as you suggest. Only it will be the players demanding it.
The City of Heroes Community is a special one and I will always look fondly on my times arguing, discussing and playing with you all. Thanks and thanks to the developers for a special experience.
Okay....come up with a definition of "fun" that every single player in the game will agree with, and they might get on that for you.
One person's fun is another person's horrible waste of time. That isn't going to change, because it's human nature. No two people in the world will enjoy exactly the same things to the exact same degree, and have the exact same opinion on what is fun about it. It just won't ever happen. "Make the game fun" is a ridiculous demand, simply because what is fun varies so widely from person to person. If everyone enjoyed exactly the same thing there would only ever be one kind of entertainment in existence. One kind of video game. One genre of movie, one sport, one type of music, one book. It might even go even further and there would only be one example of any of those things. If everyone liked the same movie, and didn't like any other movies, what would be the point of making any other movies? If everyone liked WoW, and nothing else, it's unlikely that anything would exist BUT WoW. The very fact that there is such a wide variety of things you can do to entertain yourself is, in and of itself, concrete proof that "Make it fun" is a completely impossible demand to meet. |
Wow Claws...nice legal stance.
Ok...how about 'Check your data and see what people are running the most and complaining about the least. The MAJORITY of the players who do THAT are obviously having fun. How can we tell? Because they're running it a lot and not complaining. Try finding out what makes THAT so much more fun and make the game more like it.'
Happier now? Sorry if my time-pressure prompted me to end with a one-liner.
"Comics, you're not a Mastermind...you're an Overlord!"
Is there a reason why incarnaes beig able to use their abilities in all normal content is bad? At that stage they've probably done all the story arcs etc anyway, right?
I'd quite like to be able to revisit all the TFs in the game after becomigg an Incarnate, to see if I could solo them. I don't see why this is undesirable.
I'm not even sure what the point of 'endgame' conent is anyway once you've ground enough trials to fully slot your Incarnate abilities. What do you do with your toon? Just repeat iTrials fOrever?
I'm honestly baffled as to why one mission (which the iTrials I've seen essentially are) is worth doing over and over and over. It's like havg a library available and just taking out one short book and reading it repeatedly and nothing else.
Eco
MArcs:
The Echo, Arc ID 1688 (5mish, easy, drama)
The Audition, Arc ID 221240 (6 mish, complex mech, comedy)
Storming Citadel, Arc ID 379488 (lowbie, 1mish, 10-min timed)
Is there a reason why incarnaes beig able to use their abilities in all normal content is bad? At that stage they've probably done all the story arcs etc anyway, right?
I'd quite like to be able to revisit all the TFs in the game after becomigg an Incarnate, to see if I could solo them. I don't see why this is undesirable. I'm not even sure what the point of 'endgame' conent is anyway once you've ground enough trials to fully slot your Incarnate abilities. What do you do with your toon? Just repeat iTrials fOrever? I'm honestly baffled as to why one mission (which the iTrials I've seen essentially are) is worth doing over and over and over. It's like havg a library available and just taking out one short book and reading it repeatedly and nothing else. Eco |
Boom, there's you additional Incarnate content.
EDIT: Yes I know that mode will take some time to created.
Blazara Aura LVL 50 Fire/Psi Dom (with 125% recharge)
Flameboxer Aura LVL 50 SS/Fire Brute
Ice 'Em Aura LVL 50 Ice Tank
Darq Widow Fortune LVL 50 Fortunata (200% rech/Night Widow 192.5% rech)--thanks issue 19!
I could get behind this and not even because of the data you posted. I just think we are getting weighed down with too many different "currency" forms.
|
Having just returned, having been away since the 5th Anniversary can I just say that this is me. I very carefully read all the in-game text but I am still coming here to work out the heck its all for. I dread to think what it must be like for someone completely new.
I'm still scratching my head over Hero Merits to be honest, "So I run a morality mission once and get Reward Merits but run a second one I get Hero Merits and they are spent on different things?"
This is a song about a super hero named Tony. Its called Tony's theme.
Jagged Reged: 23/01/04