Dr.Who news....


AaronH

 

Posted

I dunno if this has been mentioned previously, however it is kinda big news in the Dr. Who Universe.


You only fail if you give up. - Dana Scully

Time Jesum Transeuntum Et Non Riverentum - Nick Cave

We're not just destroyers, at the same time we can be saviors. - Allen Walker

 

Posted

For a show that has a very strictly observed continuity for over 40 years, this is more than a little disappointing.

Still, I just got into Doctor Who two months ago, so there's not much indignation to which I'm entitled.


 

Posted

Should deserve a full episode or two rather than a passing comment.


The first step in being sane is to admit that you are insane.

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by starphoenix View Post
Should deserve a full episode or two rather than a passing comment.
Yeah, if they're going to be changing such a fundamental aspect of the Doctor's species that's been a part of the show for a long long time, then it merits more than a passing comment in one of the spin-off shows.


Goodbye, I guess.

@Lord_Nightblade in Champions/Star Trek Online

nightblade7295@gmail.com if you want to stay in touch

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Zombie Man View Post
Ummm, who didn't see this coming?

If the series is popular and the actor playing the Doctor bows out and they need a 13th regeneration, did anyone think, "Aww, too bad. We have to cancel the series now!" would be an acceptable solution?

Non-issue.
Obviously they would need to address it. The way they are addressing it seems inadequate.


 

Posted

I agree, and im a relatively new convert to the series. But it does seem like for as long as this lore has been around the 12 regen limit has been in place. And yes you knew it was going to get delt with they wouldnt just end the series.

But to my understanding there were already timelords that had regenerated past 12 lives, like rassilon if i am not mistaken wasnt he considered immortal?

So they opened the door to extended regenerations being possible, i really think they should have delt with the issue in the show and given it a good storyline. I think changing something this dramatic and deeply inbeded in the show and character deserves more then a passing one liner in a spin off series that doesnt explain anything.


 

Posted

I'm certainly not surprised by this move. As the article stated we only have 2 more regenerations left. I knew something like this would be comming around, heck, even way back yonder with the "5 Doctors" episode when we learned that a Time Lords life cycle could be rebooted.

But really? A passing comment on a spin off show? Seriously? Perhaps they just decided to get this news out of the way and will expand on it in the future (when they figure out just how they are going to explain this)


 

Posted

I wouldn't be surprised if this has been misunderstood.

Time Lords can be immortal but a limit of 12 regenerations was put in place by Rassilon IIRC. Now given that he broke that limit himself, and granted a new set of regenerations to The Master for his help in the Time War, there is precident for that limit being lifted. So if the Doctor was asked how many times a Time Lord can regenerate, he would still be correct in saying 'none'. It just depends on how the question was asked.

So I'd put my money on this being a misunderstood quote from the episode rather than a rewriting of Who lore. I would be hugely surprised if a big Whovian like Moffat let something like that slide. Of course the BBC will continue to make Who after his 12 regenerations are up, that's a no brainer. It's just how they go about it that will be interesting.

So no, not convinced by this leak just yet.


@Dante EU - Union Roleplayer and Altisis Victim
The Militia: Union RP Supergroup - www.themilitia.org.uk

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Zombie Man View Post
Continuity?

Did you see the ways they keep bringing back The Master?

They've already established immortality for Time Lords.
They've also established that the Doctor has a final regeneration. Yes yes, wibbly-wobbly timey-wimey, but it would be nice if they actually did address it in that fashion as opposed to a complete retcon delivered via a single off-handed line in a crappy spin-off show written for children.


"You don't lose levels. You don't have equipment to wear out, repair, or lose, or that anyone can steal from you. About the only thing lighter than debt they could do is have an NPC walk by, point and laugh before you can go to the hospital or base." -Memphis_Bill
We will honor the past, and fight to the last, it will be a good way to die...

 

Posted

This isn't April first! What the heck?


 

Posted

Most of the Doctor's regenerations were required due to damage, poison, etc. Other Time Lords seemed to have a more cavalier attitude towards it however.

The second Doctor said that Time Lords were "Immortal, barring accidents".

The Time Lords allowed the second Doctor to choose the face of his next regeneration, which he refused to do, so the Time Lords chose for him.

The fourth Doctor mentioned the 12-regeneration limit into canon, which got reinforced by the fifth Doctor and was mentioned by the sixth with reference to the Valyard.

Romana demonstrated the ability to control regeneration to the point of being able to 'try on' several new bodies, and duplicate the appearance of someone she had seen previously.

There were at least two sets of people in the original series that used Time Lord technology to give them unending regenerations. The scientists led by Mawdryn, and the Minyans.

The Master exceeded the limit, but kept himself alive first just through force of will and stolen technology from other advanced peoples, and then via stealing other people's bodies. He was then offered a new set of regenerations by the Time Lord Council. Then, in the new series he says he was resurrected by the Time Lords to fight the Time War, and demonstrated he could regenerate (and *refuse* to regenerate), and then later he was resurrected again, in a sort of incomplete state.

The tenth Doctor showed that you could start a regeneration, and as long as you had the right maguffin, you could abort it and 'store' the remainder of the 'energy'.

Now, the eleventh says there is no limit. I can't say he's wrong, really.

To be honest, I got the impression (from having lived long enough to see the entire old and new series from the original broadcasts), that the abitlity to regenerate was something that was instilled artifically and the 12-regen limit was more a legal and medically advisable limit than a hard and fast rule. Everyone extended beyond the 12-regen limit seemed to have serious side-effects like mutations, mental unbalance, and debilitating exhaustion.


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Zombie Man View Post
Ummm, who didn't see this coming?

If the series is popular and the actor playing the Doctor bows out and they need a 13th regeneration, did anyone think, "Aww, too bad. We have to cancel the series now!" would be an acceptable solution?

Non-issue.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Marcian Tobay View Post
Obviously they would need to address it. The way they are addressing it seems inadequate.
Yeah, this is weird. First of all, if anyone actually thinks 13'd be the last, you're crazy. Also, those calling foul on continuity shouldn't, it's been shown repeatedly that the regeneration limit can be surpassed. A lot of people decided that it was likely a deliberate limit set by the Time Lords rather than a natural limit. Especially since they could actually hand out new sets of regenerations and regenerations could be stolen.
It seems like this limit either died with the Time Lords or they gave him infinite regenerations for the Time War or something.

Having said that...

They're completely dropping the ball here on having an awesome series finale one day.

It just seems wasteful and just bad storytelling.


 

Posted

The Doctor also has taken on energy from the Mawdryn during their attempt to end their life. Who knows how that could have messed up his psysiology. In addition, it was an artificial limit imposed by the Time Lords, and numerous mechanisms to proceed past it were presented. It could be one of a number of systems, and I'd be curious to see it addressed.


 

Posted

Meh.

What do you do when a child asks you if you're going to die?

Particularly a child that's relying on you to save him?

You lie your 900-year-old tail-end off.

I still expect them to deal with the impending end of regenerations in some dramatic fashion.

This just delays the 'need' some fans feel for the issue to be addressed NAOW! and gives some Dr. Who blogger something to post for another day.


Statesmonkey Sez: Lighten up! It's a game, for Lincoln's sake!
Also: Six years of casual play begins to look an awful lot like one year of hardcore play.

 

Posted

I expected them to pull out the half human duplicate Doctor from Journey's End somewhere down the line.


 

Posted

The Doctor is already on his 12th regeneration. He regenerated twice during David Tennant's run. There was a comment that the Master's regenerations were reset during the Time War, I just assumed the Doctor's was reset as well. The Doctor's might have been made unlimited considering he was a leader during the Time War.


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Innovator View Post
The Doctor is already on his 12th regeneration. He regenerated twice during David Tennant's run.
That doesn't count.


 

Posted

I always thought the 12 Regenerations thing was more a tradition more than a hard limit. Which would be consistent with what's occurred in the past since the Doctor is the Only remaining Time lord (that we know of)


On Justice
Global @Desi Nova Twitter: @desi_nova Steam: Desi_nova. I don't do Xbox or PS3

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Zikar View Post
That doesn't count.
If that doesn't count then the "Renewal" from Hartnell into Troughton shouldn't count either, as it was stated by Doctor Who writers Lawrence Miles and Tat Wood in the Doctor Who Monthly column "Matrix Data-Bank" in 1982, that that change was a "Rejuvination" and wasn't the same as the Regenerations of later Doctors, which kinda brings him to now the 10th "Regeneration".


 

Posted

As a friend of mine pointed out when I emailed him the link:

The Doctor lies to children. A LOT.

In fact, it's easier to quote him and I trust his vast knowledge on things Whovian:

A) The Doctor Lies, especially to children about difficult subjects like his own death,
B) It wouldn't be the first time Doctor Who writers have ignored things that have been said in the past on this subject, and the older quotes actually suggest there no limits but are also almost certainly exagerations see point
A)
C)Time Lords are NOT naturally immortal. Otherwise Rassilon wouldn't have been such a big deal. Bottom line is if you shoot at the Doctor he is still in jeapordy an can be killed. Whether he is or not references point E)
D) I can think of a thousand plot device reasons why the Time War has changed the rules and so can you guys and
E) Details like this don't matter a fraction as much as the quality of the writing.


I like these arguments.


S.


Part of Sister Flame's Clickey-Clack Posse

 

Posted

I don't believe it is a physical limitation so much as a law. It's a rule put in place by Rassilon. No more time lords = no more time lord rules = no more limit on regenerations.


Don't count your weasels before they pop dink!

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mandu View Post
I don't believe it is a physical limitation so much as a law. It's a rule put in place by Rassilon. No more time lords = no more time lord rules = no more limit on regenerations.
So when a Gallifrain becomes a time lord they gain the ability to regenerate, with a imposed limit of 12 times, enforced by law. Since those laws and law makers are no longer there to enforce them, then the doctor is essentially immortal if he chooses to keep regenerating?

You know i can get behind that pretty easily and its a nice simple solution. I just still think it deserves some explanation in the prime series rather then just being passed off in the SJC. It also leaves it open to the plot points of there being a last doctor because its already been said that if you die before you regenerate then your dead. So a situation could come up that kills the doctor at some point.


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mandu View Post
I don't believe it is a physical limitation so much as a law. It's a rule put in place by Rassilon. No more time lords = no more time lord rules = no more limit on regenerations.
I don't think its a rule placed by Rassilon. If it was just a law, the Master would have just kept regenerating as he doesn't really care about Time Lord laws anyway. Rassilon himself was immortal with unlimited regenerations, it was a secret the Master was trying to get back in the 5 Doctors. I'm still going with the theory, that during the Time War the Time Lords were all granted unlimited regenerations by Rassilon (who was woken) to fight the Daleks. How else can you go win a Time War with the Daleks who are easily manufactured/cloned at tremendous speeds. I remember accounts by the Tenant talking about the Time War seeing Time Lords die over and over again during the war (I think the episode was the Doctor's Daughter, I can't be sure).

I expect the glib line in Sarah Jane was just Russell T. Davies leaving something for Moffat to handle..a sorta playful FU.