g-a-y supergroup


Alasdair

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by New Dawn View Post
They're just words.
Right, and yet you're the one desperately trying to justify their use. Try harder next time.


 

Posted

I don't think this is an argument any of us can win over an Internet forum. For the record though, I think calling someone "straight acting" is at least as much of a backhand compliment as telling them they are "articulate for a minority." Even if you don't think it's an outright insult it definitely has a value judgment attached to it, which a lot of folks will see as unflattering. Beyond that there are some serious cultural and political nuances that go alongside this issue that run much deeper than we can hope to discuss here.


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by New Dawn View Post
No people here need to chill out. They're just words. People can use what words they like. Seems to be that it's "it's alright for some to use "straight acting" and not alright for others". What is "straight acting" by definition changes slightly wherever you go. For many young people it's simply not acting camp and we have gay comedians to blame for that.
The problem with the term straight acting is that it sets up an expectation that there this is one particular way that gay people should act and a different way that straight people should act. It can often be used to set up an "us" versus "them" mentality in which "straight acting" gays claim that they're different from "gay acting gays" who flaunt their sexuality in your face. (This attitude is prevalent in Lance Bass's coming out article from a few years back).

As many people have already stated in this thread, ideally we would all be able to act however we want without people making assumption about our sexuality (so that a straight male who likes to dance or a straight female who like to play rugby doesn't need to constantly defend their sexual orientation). Using a term like "straight acting" reinforces these stereotypes and makes them harder to break down.

While I would agree that "straight acting" is certainly leaps and bound above "normal" (because what on earth is "normal" anyway?) it is far from an ideal term. Unfortunately I don't have a good substitute term to offer, but for me at least "stereotypically straight" would be preferable, if more letters, because it reminds us that what we are talking about stereotypes and therefore the term is inherently flawed and not representative of everyone.


Draggynn on Virtue: lvl 50 Storm/Psi, 1389 badges
Draggynn's Guide to Storm Summoning(Gale-Tornado, updated 6/25/2011)
Avatar by Wassy full reference here

 

Posted

Although I said that I was offended by the term 'straight-acting', (and I would stand by this), I by no means wanted to get any argument going. I want people to do and say what they want, and I don't want to clamp down on what people can and can't say.

I was just stating my opinion, and everyone else's is just as valid. I find the term 'straight-acting' offensive because it claims that what many straight and gay people normally do as a straight thing, and that the gays who live this way are acting straight. Whether or not it's intended by the speaker, I feel that 'straight acting' implies that to be gay means to be camp. I'm not going to freak out over it or anything, I just find it offensive. Camp, however, is a word that describes a collection of mannerisms. It is far more common among the gay populace, yes, but its name doesn't tie it in with a particular sexuality. This is why I don't find the term 'camp' offensive at all, although I'll be offended if the presumption of gay=camp is made.

Like with my last post, I don't wish to be arguing with anybody. It's just a delicate subject with a considerable amount of people, and we're bound to be offended by all kinds of things. People shouldn't have to duck and step over all the little things that offend others, because with some people the amount they're offended by is ridiculous, but it can't hurt to know what does and what doesn't offend people.


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Oedipus_Tex View Post
I don't think this is an argument any of us can win over an Internet forum.
Indeed, it's hard to punch someone properly in the nose through a monitor.


@True Metal
Co-leader of Callous Crew SG. Based on Union server.

 

Posted

I came to a conclusion a few hours ago with people taking offense to the words I used in the beginning.

They can go to hell.

Remembering where I first learned the term "straight acting" things became clear. Gay guys and Bisexual guys use it in Blind Dating adverts in order to describe the type of man they liked.

So if they're using those words then the nobodies that are the self appointed forum police saying is offensive can just rack off. If it's good for the goose it's good for the gander. I no longer care if it is offensive.


He will honor his words; he will definitely carry out his actions. What he promises he will fulfill. He does not care about his bodily self, putting his life and death aside to come forward for another's troubled besiegement. He does not boast about his ability, or shamelessly extol his own virtues. - Sima Qian.

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by New Dawn View Post
I came to a conclusion a few hours ago with people taking offense to the words I used in the beginning.

They can go to hell.

Remembering where I first learned the term "straight acting" things became clear. Gay guys and Bisexual guys use it in Blind Dating adverts in order to describe the type of man they liked.

So if they're using those words then the nobodies that are the self appointed forum police saying is offensive can just rack off. If it's good for the goose it's good for the gander. I no longer care if it is offensive.
We arnt trying to cause an argument, or act like we are the forum police, we just said we don't like the term, maybe saying we found it offensive and not explaining ourselves properly was a bit unfair. Mostly my dislike of it comes from being a fairly redundant and silly term, your free to use it, as I don't find any word or phrase fully offensive, unless of course the intent behind it is to be offensive, and I will admit it rolls of the tongue a bit easier than saying non-camp.

Didnt mean to upset you so.


Quote:
Originally Posted by VoodooGirl View Post
[*]Watching out for the Spinning Disco Portal of D00M!*

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by New Dawn View Post
I came to a conclusion a few hours ago with people taking offense to the words I used in the beginning.

They can go to hell.

Remembering where I first learned the term "straight acting" things became clear. Gay guys and Bisexual guys use it in Blind Dating adverts in order to describe the type of man they liked.

So if they're using those words then the nobodies that are the self appointed forum police saying is offensive can just rack off. If it's good for the goose it's good for the gander. I no longer care if it is offensive.
Hahahaha. So much for 'just words' then.


 

Posted

WOW - a conversation that was informative, interesting and thought-provoking has suddenly got a little heated.

Let's please remember that this is in the Forum section "For Fun" and is about a game.

I am one of the oldest (in years) players on COX UK and have seen many phrases/labels used over my 50+ years for woman, black people, gay men etc. Thankfully some of most offensive seem to have passed into history and now seem stupid, ugly and out-dated.

I am a gay man - but I am also Welsh, British, male, a partner, blonde, blue eyed etc.... I do not put these into any kind of order as I am all these things and many more. I do not belong to any one "community" or even think that a sexual preference creates a community.

COX is a community I am happy to belong to as it seems to have have underlying shared values of friendship, maturity and respect.

Each of us will have our own, sometimes strongly-held views, but as long as you don't attack me then I am happy to live and let live.

I do not like the term straight-acting but know many gay man who use that term. Am I bothered by it? Not one little bit. They can wear a wig and call themselves Dolly Parton if they want to (and I know a few that do).

Yesterday I heard a guy on a team says his "Bird was makign tea". When I told him he had a very well trained parrot it seems to go over his head. But an ITF was not the time or place to challenge him over a term I personally do not like. Neither is this forum.

So back to the original question "are there any Gay SGs". Very few and probably with almost no members. But unlike many othere MMOs there are inumerable SGs in COX that will make you feel more than welcome.

Now where did I put that blonde wig


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by New Dawn View Post
I came to a conclusion a few hours ago with people taking offense to the words I used in the beginning.

They can go to hell.

Remembering where I first learned the term "straight acting" things became clear. Gay guys and Bisexual guys use it in Blind Dating adverts in order to describe the type of man they liked.

So if they're using those words then the nobodies that are the self appointed forum police saying is offensive can just rack off. If it's good for the goose it's good for the gander. I no longer care if it is offensive.
It's worth remembering that in the 'black community', there are plenty of people that reference each other using a fairly un-pc N-word. That doesn't mean that any 'gander' has a right to go throwing it around in conversation. The same can be said of some fairly derogatory terms for Gay people.
From another Gay man, I would find it a little (but not very much..) less insulting to be called 'Straight acting' than if somebody else said it.
In essence however, and to play devil's advocate a little and to use overt stereotypes- Straight men are stereotypically chauvinistic, beer swilling womanisers, so heck.. why wouldn't it be insulting?!
There has been a fairly interesting post on Pink news recently, it does tie in a little to much of what has been discussed here;
http://www.pinknews.co.uk/2010/06/11...m-study-finds/


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Draggynn View Post

While I would agree that "straight acting" is certainly leaps and bound above "normal" (because what on earth is "normal" anyway?) it is far from an ideal term.
Normal, the norm, that which is most common, what we are used to and accept as prevalent. Average, the same, normal.

This is a pet peeve of mine; normal is not bad, abnormal is not bad (unless specifically bad, such as "an abnormal tumour" but even a normal one would be a bad, so we're ignoring those) it's just a way of catagorising things. If someone was to say to me, "You're not normal," I'd automatically assume I was abnormal to them, but I'd not take offence until I was sure whether they meant it cruelly, or if it was just born from ignorance or naivety. It's just an easier way of going about life.

The term "straight acting" is a bit over my head. To me, it conjures images of blokes down the pub, talking about how many chicks/birds/"female dogs" and "gardening implements -e" they pulled last night. But to act "normally" just suggests behaving in a way that blends in with everyone else; and again, it goes both ways (hurr hurr).


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by poptart_fairy View Post
Hahahaha. So much for 'just words' then.
They are just words but I do try and see things from other peoples points of views for a while.


He will honor his words; he will definitely carry out his actions. What he promises he will fulfill. He does not care about his bodily self, putting his life and death aside to come forward for another's troubled besiegement. He does not boast about his ability, or shamelessly extol his own virtues. - Sima Qian.

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by New Dawn View Post
No people here need to chill out. They're just words. People can use what words they like. Seems to be that it's "it's alright for some to use "straight acting" and not alright for others". What is "straight acting" by definition changes slightly wherever you go. For many young people it's simply not acting camp and we have gay comedians to blame for that.

Graham Norton is camp. Alan Carr is camp. Lucas is camp. Chris Colfer from Glee. They're camp and it pays the bills. If they were to act straight then they probably wouldn't be so successful.

Camp by definition is more insulting than straight acting. Straight acting is a preferable word for me to use than "normal" and there is no need for me to say that as in "what's popularly accepted as normal around atleast 70% of the world" as people get my meaning.
There's a male waiter in my local restaurant who is really camp. And married to a woman. He's really camp. Should i describe him as ''gay acting'? Or 'camp acting', even?

Eco.

EDIT: He's been married to her very happily for over 5 years, btw, I'm pretty sure she isn't a beard.


MArcs:

The Echo, Arc ID 1688 (5mish, easy, drama)
The Audition, Arc ID 221240 (6 mish, complex mech, comedy)
Storming Citadel, Arc ID 379488 (lowbie, 1mish, 10-min timed)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Samuel_Tow View Post
[The Incarnate System is] Jack Emmert all over again, only this time it's not "1 hero = 3 white minions" it's "1 hero = 3 white rocks."

 

Posted

I have strong opinions on the subjects contained within this thread, but I will be a good boy and keep them to myself.


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Stasisesque View Post
The term "straight acting" is a bit over my head. To me, it conjures images of blokes down the pub, talking about how many chicks/birds/"female dogs" and "gardening implements -e" they pulled last night. But to act "normally" just suggests behaving in a way that blends in with everyone else; and again, it goes both ways (hurr hurr).
To be honest, that describes a lot of men - regardless of sexuality. And some lesbians I know too.

The problem with 'acting normally' is another 'back-handed compliment' thing for me. Who gets to define normal anyway?


 

Posted

"Doesn't act with the stereotypical mannerisms attributed to the sexuality of their choice."

Works for all of them! Straight, gay, bi, semi-skinned, Jersey. Can be shortened to 'They're not stereotypically <sexuality>', and it can be expanded to gender, fandom and so forth.

We all know there's stereotypes. They're there for a reason, as in, it's a natural part of the brain's way of ordering and classifying and grouping things, a schema if you will. The media's taken it and ran with it, which thus makes things that break from stereotype all the more exciting to report or show, but that's an issue with media, not the mind.

Ask people what a stereotypical straight guy is, you'll probably hear the words pub, football and tough. Stereotypically gay? Effeminate, talks in a certain mannerism, fashionable. Or for your lady, butch, manly, short hair.

So it's not a case of saying "You don't act straight." or "You don't act gay." That sounds more like an accusation. Along the lines of "This doesn't look like your car." Said by a traffic police officer on a motorway to the guy in the pink hairdresser mobile.

"You don't seem stereotypically <sexuality>." It's acknowledging the presence of the stereotype and how they are not associated with the stereotype. It's fine to be like the stereotype, really, knock yourselves out. Just like it's fine to be -not- like the stereotype. Great!

It's not perfect, it's probably not really needed, but it'll come up, and that's probably the best most brains can handle.

At least until we wire in microprocessors to our skulls.

Quote:
Who gets to define normal anyway?
The Ministry of Normality.


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Stasisesque View Post
Normal, the norm, that which is most common, what we are used to and accept as prevalent. Average, the same, normal.

This is a pet peeve of mine; normal is not bad, abnormal is not bad (unless specifically bad, such as "an abnormal tumour" but even a normal one would be a bad, so we're ignoring those) it's just a way of catagorising things. If someone was to say to me, "You're not normal," I'd automatically assume I was abnormal to them, but I'd not take offence until I was sure whether they meant it cruelly, or if it was just born from ignorance or naivety. It's just an easier way of going about life.
The problem with the term normal is that it doesn't only mean "most common" or "most prevalent". It can also mean "occurring naturally" or "free from mental disorder". To describe someone with stereotypically gay mannerisms (or anyone for that matter) as acting "abnormal" can imply that there is something about them that goes against human nature and is unnatural or that they simply have a mental disease.

Although the user may simply intend the word to mean "most prevalent", there are many users who instead intend to invoke these negative connotations, thus making it a risky term for everyone to use. It is good that you are not offended by the terms normal and abnormal, but many people may be. As I said in a post much earlier in this thread, I believe that the measure of whether a term is offensive should not be "Did I intend to offend someone?", but rather "Was someone offended?".

Quote:
Originally Posted by Zortel View Post
"Doesn't act with the stereotypical mannerisms attributed to the sexuality of their choice."

"You don't seem stereotypically <sexuality>." It's acknowledging the presence of the stereotype and how they are not associated with the stereotype. It's fine to be like the stereotype, really, knock yourselves out. Just like it's fine to be -not- like the stereotype. Great!
Thank you, that was phrased much better than I did.


Draggynn on Virtue: lvl 50 Storm/Psi, 1389 badges
Draggynn's Guide to Storm Summoning(Gale-Tornado, updated 6/25/2011)
Avatar by Wassy full reference here

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Draggynn View Post
As I said in a post much earlier in this thread, I believe that the measure of whether a term is offensive should not be "Did I intend to offend someone?", but rather "Was someone offended?".
I disagree strongly with this. People get offended by anything. If you take offense to a comment that wasn't intended to be offensive the problem lies with you, not with the person stating the comment.

If someone takes something I say the wrong way, I may elaborate trying to express my meaning better, but I see no need to apologise for any perceived offense on his part.


@True Metal
Co-leader of Callous Crew SG. Based on Union server.

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by TrueMetal View Post
I disagree strongly with this. People get offended by anything. If you take offense to a comment that wasn't intended to be offensive the problem lies with you, not with the person stating the comment.

If someone takes something I say the wrong way, I may elaborate trying to express my meaning better, but I see no need to apologise for any perceived offense on his part.
It really depends on the sort of person you want to be. Yes, there are people in the world who are overly sensitive, and the people that can keep from offending them are the ones who I truly admire. I endeavor in my life to avoid offending people whenever possible, and yes, there are some people who no matter how hard I try seem to take things the wrong way, but at least I know I tried.

It all depends on the qualities that you value in people. Some people put great weight on those that are "Outspoken and speak their mind", personally I put great emphasis on empathy. Which to me means that if a comment "causes resentful displeasure", even it one person, it is offensive. Yes, this is a much harder criteria to attempt to meet to avoid being offensive, but it's one that I strive for.


Draggynn on Virtue: lvl 50 Storm/Psi, 1389 badges
Draggynn's Guide to Storm Summoning(Gale-Tornado, updated 6/25/2011)
Avatar by Wassy full reference here