Who is dead?


Adeon Hawkwood

 

Posted

Quote:
Nice caveat B) there; anything you can find, I can gainsay by espousing a universal truth that no one else agrees.
Sorry, but it's necessary. Philosophy as a field has more than its fair share of crackpots since anyone who can write even semi-coherently can call himself a philosopher. Just to toss out a high-profile example, Ayn Rand may have a great following amongst the lay people but if you seriously try to advocate her work in a university philosophy department you'll get laughed off the campus.

Quote:
What does that even mean?
It means that treating characters in stories that have committed monstrous crimes against humanity as though they were faces and heels in pro wrestling is a mistake. It robs the work of vitality, reminding everyone in its audience that it's just product shaped by the needs of the marketing department.

Quote:
(It is, however, nice to see Godwin's Law is still in full effect)
Right, because it's completely out of line to bring up a historical fascist regime that committed (actually, practically defined) war crimes when discussing a fictional fascist regime whose members committed war crimes.

Quote:
You believe that the idea of a villain working to redeem himself is "ridiculous", and your idea of "something better" in fiction (in fiction, mind you) is that good people are forever good, bad people are forever bad, and nobody can ever change or grow as a character?
Hell no. Good people aren't forever good, they can trip up easily. As for bad people, it depends on how bad they are. Like it or lump it, there is such a thing as a Moral Event Horizon and anyone who has murdered thousands of people has pole-vaulted over it. That includes Tyrant and his cronies, no saving throw.


Current Blog Post: "Why I am an Atheist..."
"And I say now these kittens, they do not get trained/As we did in the days when Victoria reigned!" -- T. S. Eliot, "Gus, the Theatre Cat"

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Venture View Post
Hell no. Good people aren't forever good, they can trip up easily. As for bad people, it depends on how bad they are. Like it or lump it, there is such a thing as a Moral Event Horizon and anyone who has murdered thousands of people has pole-vaulted over it. That includes Tyrant and his cronies, no saving throw.
See, this is what I don't get about the argument that Tyrant and his crew could or should be "redeemed". In the real world, we either execute people who do those things or we assist in the deposing of the government and allow the previously oppressed masses to execute them for us.

There's no "but he feels bad about it now and if he was just managed adequately then he could be a force for good". Fiction-wise, that sort of thing is how Morgoth got out of jail after trying to destroy everything the Valar created, and we all know how that turned out in the end.

"But Slick, this isn't the real world, this is comic book world and that kind of thing happens in comics a lot!"

To that, I say, "Tough noogies."

First off, this world we play in was NOT intended to be comic book world, despite the fact that the current management does in fact treat it that way. It was meant to be a version of what the real world might be like if real super heroes existed. That's why we have hero licenses and official status as deputy police officers instead of just having the comic book ideal of "it's genre, don't question it, that's not interesting".

Additionally, comic book publishers do things like redeem irredeemable villains because doing so sells comic books, not because it is high literature or anything like believable. Paragon Studios is not in the business of selling comic books. They're in the business of selling a world where the people think and act like the people in our world except that some of them have super powers and society has to deal with that issue.

Marcus Cole would not be put in the Zig. He'd be put on trial before a war crimes tribunal and convicted of being the worst kind of despot - the kind that tortures, maims, brainwashes and ultimately murders his own people. Was Idi Amin redeemable? Do you think that anyone actually cared about that question by the time he was deposed and chased into exile? How about Saddam Hussein? Should he have been "managed" and allowed a chance to change his spots? He was just in a bad place emotionally when he gassed all of those people and murdered Shi'ites in Iraq for adhering to a different religion and being general pains in his governmental ***. <sarcasm>With the right guidance, I'm sure that he could have been a force for good. </sarcasm>

Redeeming Marcus Cole or any of his crew would require such a strong story that I can't see it being pulled off successfully, and I certainly can't see it ending any way except with the death of the person being redeemed.


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by SlickRiptide View Post
Redeeming Marcus Cole or any of his crew would require such a strong story that I can't see it being pulled off successfully, and I certainly can't see it ending any way except with the death of the person being redeemed.
This is part of why Fable 3's story blew so hard.

EDIT: ..... and now that I look at it, Tyrant's story is almost an exact copy of Logan's own.


My guides:Dark Melee/Dark Armor/Soul Mastery, Illusion Control/Kinetics/Primal Forces Mastery, Electric Armor
"Dark Armor is a complete waste as a tanking set."

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Venture View Post
Hell no. Good people aren't forever good, they can trip up easily. As for bad people, it depends on how bad they are. Like it or lump it, there is such a thing as a Moral Event Horizon and anyone who has murdered thousands of people has pole-vaulted over it. That includes Tyrant and his cronies, no saving throw.
Absolutely. Harry Truman and the crew of the Enola Gay are over that horizon. Jimmy Doolittle too. Is Jean Gray over the horizon, or is not being in your right mind an out?

The cold hard truth is that, with remarkably few exceptions, war criminals are the guys that lost the war. Had the final Praetorian trial ended with the destruction of Paragon City and the annihilation of the Portal Corp program, our player characters would have been the war criminals. How many Praetorians have we slaughtered in the intro to the trials? I hear there are even criminals who do nothing but continually go to the Magesterium, slaughter the defense forces, and withdraw.

I'm not denying that there are acts while are inherently evil, and the Praetorians have committed them. But as much as we'd like to pretend otherwise, there's a line between waging war and committing war crimes but it's not as wide as you're implying or always so clear when you're in the middle of the war.

In terms of redemption, one aspect is going to be the why. "I killed them because I love to hear them scream" is not a good candidate to redeem. But let's talk about one of the examples that have been thrown around, Magneto. Of course, one of the problems is he's been written by multiple groups and originally was the paper thin "I do these crimes because I are a bad guy" type who named his group "The Brotherhood of Evil Mutants". But when put in the hands of more competent writers, he lived through an experience of seeing a vile out of control government try to wipe a race of people out of existence. Now he sees at many governments trying to wipe out his people, mutants, and he's fighting back. His path to redemption was seeing a different way to protect his people from being wiped out.

Also, when it comes to the Praetorians, no one is talking about Going Rogue "do the right 22 missions and you're a squeaky clean hero" redemption. The only way any of them are joining the Freedom Phalanx is if the Battalion has wiped out just about every powerful super on Primal Earth and dammit we've got to stop them. They will spend the rest of their lives under suspicion and under restrictions and hated by a good portion of the citizens of Primal Earth (and refugees from Praetoria) for what they've done. It's more an internal redemption, a change of heart, a sense of remorse. (And then probably some permanent sacrifice - dramatically speaking, redeemed villains don't have long life spans.)


My arcs are constantly shifting, just search for GadgetDon for the latest.
The world beware! I've started a blog
GadgetMania Under Attack: The Digg Lockout

 

Posted

Quote:
Absolutely. Harry Truman and the crew of the Enola Gay are over that horizon.
No, they're not. Bombing a legitimate military target in a declared war is not an act of murder.

Quote:
Is Jean Gray over the horizon, or is not being in your right mind an out?
As long as the mental defect can be shown to have a physical cause, or is the result of some kind of invasive agent like drugs (not taken voluntarily) or (in our case) possession, mind control, etc.

Quote:
The cold hard truth is that, with remarkably few exceptions, war criminals are the guys that lost the war.
No, they're the guys who lost the war and committed war crimes. We didn't make every card-carrying Nazi dance at the end of a rope. We didn't even shove them all into prison cells.

Quote:
How many Praetorians have we slaughtered in the intro to the trials? I hear there are even criminals who do nothing but continually go to the Magesterium, slaughter the defense forces, and withdraw.
Asked and answered. Killing uniformed enemy soldiers in open combat during a declared war is not a war crime; it's not even murder.

Quote:
I'm not denying that there are acts while are inherently evil, and the Praetorians have committed them.
Then you concede the argument.

Quote:
But as much as we'd like to pretend otherwise, there's a line between waging war and committing war crimes but it's not as wide as you're implying or always so clear when you're in the middle of the war.
Yeah, actually, it is. It's people trying to justify bad acts that claim it isn't.

Quote:
But when put in the hands of more competent writers, [Magneto] lived through an experience of seeing a vile out of control government try to wipe a race of people out of existence.
As it turns out, two wrongs actually don't make a right. Magneto is just another in a long line of people who turned into what he hated.

Quote:
Also, when it comes to the Praetorians, no one is talking about Going Rogue "do the right 22 missions and you're a squeaky clean hero" redemption.
Please, it's exactly what we're talking about. Do you honestly expect otherwise from the writing team that brought us the Well storyline? Dominatrix is already strutting around like she's practically a member of the club.

Quote:
It's more an internal redemption, a change of heart, a sense of remorse.
The word you're looking for is "denial".


Current Blog Post: "Why I am an Atheist..."
"And I say now these kittens, they do not get trained/As we did in the days when Victoria reigned!" -- T. S. Eliot, "Gus, the Theatre Cat"

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Venture View Post
No, they're the guys who lost the war and committed war crimes. We didn't make every card-carrying Nazi dance at the end of a rope. We didn't even shove them all into prison cells.
I believe the intent was to say that you (almost) never have someone on the WINNING side declared a war criminal.


Orc&Pie No.53230 There is an orc, and somehow, he got a pie. And you are hungry.
www.repeat-offenders.net

Negaduck: I see you found the crumb. I knew you'd never notice the huge flag.

 

Posted

A big problem is that you continue to ignore one important difference between reality and fiction. In the real world, we can't really know what people are thinking, because in real life, we do not have magical mind-reading powers. We don't know people's true movies for doing anything. We can't ever really know if someone has turned over a new leaf or is only paying lip-service to the idea.

In fiction, however, thanks to things such as "omniscient third-person narrators" and "Word of God", we can know exactly whether these fictional characters truly regret what they've done, and whether they really want to try to make amends. (That's not even counting the fact that, in the world of CoH, magical mind-reading does actually exist)

So if the author tells us that a character in the author's story has undergone an "internal redemption, a change of heart, a sense of remorse", that's not "denial", that's the author telling us what's actually happening in that character's mind.

Using Dominatrix as an example of a Praetorian character who is now considered a "hero" is ridiculous. She simply makes sure that, every time we meet her, the choice is between going after her, or going after a bigger threat like Mot or Tyrant. She's not a hero, she's just a temporary ally in larger fights. (Just as Blue Steel and Lord Recluse team up for the final mission of the Mot arcs, but that doesn't make Lord Recluse a hero)

We, the players, have heard Dominatrix's thoughts (in her Personal Mission), and we know that she doesn't regret anything she's done, not even killing her own mother. She's a villain. We've heard Cole's thoughts, and know that he also thinks that brainwashing, enslaving, and slaughtering people was the right way to go about things, right up until the end, and he regrets nothing. He's a villain.

The only names suggested who have a chance at any sort of redemption have been Keyes and White, for reasons already stated. (And "a chance" doesn't mean "a certainty", it just means "a chance"). Cole and Duncan are not on that list.


 

Posted

Quote:
In fiction, however, thanks to things such as "omniscient third-person narrators" and "Word of God", we can know exactly whether these fictional characters truly regret what they've done, and whether they really want to try to make amends.
I. DON'T. CARE. What their "internal mental state" is. Once someone has committed these kinds of atrocities they are way, way beyond the point of atonement. This gets us back to the "morality is not fungible" thing. If you murder 5,000 people but then save 5,000,000 guess what, you're still a monster. It doesn't matter how "sorry" you are for what you've done, and frankly, the idea that someone could systematically commit crimes against humanity and then one day suddenly "see the light" is ridiculous. No one with a functioning conscience could do these things in the first place. These people are sociopaths at best.


Current Blog Post: "Why I am an Atheist..."
"And I say now these kittens, they do not get trained/As we did in the days when Victoria reigned!" -- T. S. Eliot, "Gus, the Theatre Cat"

 

Posted

I have to assume that Venture is the only one taking the conversation seriously. I can’t honestly believe that there are people who believe beings that are directly responsible for the murder, kidnapping and torture of hundreds to thousands of people or at the very least have supported the same are redeemable.

The fact that Magneto has tried to kill the X-Men on numerous occasions not to mention all the innocents he’s either killed or put in danger and is now redeemed is poor writing. You can add Angel and Spike to that list too.


Something witty and profound

 

Posted

I could see Tyrant being useful as a source of info for better understanding the Well - or he might even be able to help us lern something about the mind of the Hamidon that would give us a chance of taking it down.


@Golden Girl

City of Heroes comics and artwork

 

Posted

In a "lock him in a cell in a remote corner of the Negative Zone, five billions years in the future" way, yeah, I could see maybe keeping him alive as a very-carefully-guarded source of information. That's not exactly "redemption", though.


 

Posted

An alternative could be that he was actually able to destroy the Hamidon when he first fought it, but it would have required his death to - like it could only be destroyed by the death of an Íncanrate, and that he'd backed out of the idea and struck a deal with it instead - but now he could decide to sacrifice himself to destroy it, and finally do something heroic at the end of his life.
And as he'd be much weaker now after his defeat, he'd need us to escort him to the Hamidon and keep it distracted while he made his sacrifice.


@Golden Girl

City of Heroes comics and artwork

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Venture View Post
Please, it's exactly what we're talking about. Do you honestly expect otherwise from the writing team that brought us the Well storyline? Dominatrix is already strutting around like she's practically a member of the club.
Was Dominatrix found guilty of any "irredeemable" crime that crossed your alledged moral event-horizon? What exactly are you accusing her off, selling fixadine? Making her mommy look bad in front of grampa? Wearing skimpy clothes?

Venture, at some point you've got to start judging the praetorian antagonists for crimes we can actually prove they committed, which means listening to their defense before reaching a veredict. And no using your revisionist tendencies like you did regarding who struck first.

And yes, only utterly defeated armies who oppress powerful people ever get to see their officers tried for crimes against humanity. That's why we're still waiting for Pakistan to be held accountable for the atrocities committed in Bangladesh in 1971 (with Nixon's backing, btw, he must be a tyrant as well) or why no one ever bothered to press Japan about comfort women - cold-war western nations just didn't care about chinese or hindu women, not when they were mere pawns of the evil soviets.

You say none of the Praetors would walk if it were up to you, and that no reasonable jury would see past their guilt - I say that upon reviewing the evidence presented, I'd be forced to release Cole, Duncan and Keyes (regrettably, this one, but I can't prove he murdered Rusty). The ones I'd lock up for good would be Berry (for kidnapping innocents and turning them into ghouls), White (for the systematic murder of refugees in the 70's), Duray (for his actions against civilains in Skyway city, though Cole dealt with him before me), Sinclair (for murdering Miss Liberty and BV's parents), Maelstrom (for killing "Melee" Ironsides, assuming he's actually dead and not simply injured), Diabolique (for being really, really evil everytime she shows up) and Tilman (for feeding on the Seers, assuming she can be proven to be sane and in control of her actions).


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fista View Post
I have to assume that Venture is the only one taking the conversation seriously. I can’t honestly believe that there are people who believe beings that are directly responsible for the murder, kidnapping and torture of hundreds to thousands of people or at the very least have supported the same are redeemable.
Well, I've written some fan fiction on the redemption of Tom Riddle, so yeah, I think it's possible to be redeemed. In our own world, there are those who have created horrible crimes and found a change of life in prison. There's a reason that executives are granted the pardon power and we have parole boards.

But again, redemption doesn't mean "Hey, that stuff you did, it's all OK". Those acts remain, it will affect what restrictions they live under for the rest of their life, it will affect how people view them and treat them for the rest of their lives. It just says the story isn't over. The dead cannot change, but the living can.

And it's too easy to say "they're a sociopath, might as well throw them against the wall and shoot them." There are those with a real mental deficiency, unable to generate any concern for others, but it's rare. Far more common are those who for one reason or another never learned to care, had fatally flawed world views, or other reasons. And those are treatable, changeable. Not easily, change is hard, and most won't be redeemed. But it is possible.


My arcs are constantly shifting, just search for GadgetDon for the latest.
The world beware! I've started a blog
GadgetMania Under Attack: The Digg Lockout

 

Posted

Frankly, if Keyes is alive and he has any brains, then he'd jump the first portal he could get to a world where nobody knew him, and he'd keep jumping until he got far enough distant in time-space that it wasn't worth chasing him any more.

Let's face it, the whole Going Rogue storyline depends on insanity. You're Emperor Cole and you have this machine fall into your hands that reveals the existence of alternate realities and the ability to travel between them. You surreptiously investigate the source of this machine and discover a world that is not under a single government, that has its own Hamidon but that has managed to contain it.

You could ask for help from your analog in this world, make deal with him and the government(s) that he represents, and work to find a pastoral reality that you could relocate your people to, leaving your current hellhole of a world to the Hamidon.

If you don't trust your analog, you can steal the technology and reality catalog from Portal Corp and do the same sort of relocation on your own.

You could also invade that other reality and attempt to subdue it despite the fact that it has billions of people and the "invaders" were not really representatives of any government in that reality and there are hundreds or even thousands of meta-humans there to defend it, just because the people there are not under your thumb and that just ain't right.

The people running the show in Praetoria make the insane choices over and over, and some like Tilman are not just borderline but are out and out loonies.

There's no room here for redemption unless you come up with some problem that nobody in the multiverse can solve except for the person being redeemed, and that dealing with that problem either causes them to change their ways or expresses the sincerity of their change of heart or it just lets them at least demonstrate that they've changed allegiance and gained a modicum of sanity in the process.

Frankly, I just don't see it and I would look poorly on an attempt to shoehorn the Praetorians into the "main story" in that fashion.


 

Posted

Do I think they could be redeemed? My faith depends on the notion that ANYONE can be redeemed if they choose to be.

BUT...

My faith also teaches that redemption of one's soul is NOT the same thing as temporal forgiveness.

If they are truly redeemed in their hearts then they would be willing to stand trial and accept the just punishment decided by the court (up to and including a death sentence for their crimes). Anything less and they're not REALLY repentant or redeemed, they're just looking for a way to get out of their just punishment.

So yes, if Keyes or the former Praetorian Emperor were to stand trial, not be sentenced to death, and served out his sentence, he could THEN become a hero... though given the likely length of such a sentence, their release date probably wouldn't be until some time AFTER the heat death of the universe.


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Golden Girl View Post
On what grounds?
Assuming I was on the jury stand? On the grounds that I can't link a single piece of evidence directly to him, which fails to meet the requirement of guilt beyond reasonable doubt. I have doubt. Not saying he's innocent, I'm pretty sure he's evil and rotten to the core, but unless I can prove it, there's nothing I can do about it. Go talk to a vigilante if you want more.

What I can do is join a league to disarm Praetoria as retaliation for their attempt to invade Primal Earth (Lambda), ensure the freedom of their press (TNP), prevent their population from being mind-controlled (MoM) and force their leader to surrender (Mag). I'll leave the issue of Cole's trial to the courts, but if I'm asked to join the jury bench, I don't see how they'll manage to convict him at a fair trial.

We need more proof, we need an excerpt from Cole's diary saying "I did it, I forged the election!", we need a videotape of him holding a smoking gun over Recluse's corpse, we need an eye-witness testifying that he saw him grinning as Hamidon burned Rome to the ground. We don't have any of that, all we have is a biased assumption that Cole had to know about the oppression happening in Praetoria and that he chose to do nothing about it. I challenge both claims.


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Venture View Post
I. DON'T. CARE. What their "internal mental state" is. Once someone has committed these kinds of atrocities they are way, way beyond the point of atonement. This gets us back to the "morality is not fungible" thing. If you murder 5,000 people but then save 5,000,000 guess what, you're still a monster. It doesn't matter how "sorry" you are for what you've done, and frankly, the idea that someone could systematically commit crimes against humanity and then one day suddenly "see the light" is ridiculous. No one with a functioning conscience could do these things in the first place. These people are sociopaths at best.
Calm down.


My guides:Dark Melee/Dark Armor/Soul Mastery, Illusion Control/Kinetics/Primal Forces Mastery, Electric Armor
"Dark Armor is a complete waste as a tanking set."

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fista View Post
I have to assume that Venture is the only one taking the conversation seriously.
Why would anyone take a conversation here seriously is beyond me. Time to switch back to my Joel, Tom, Crow, and Gypsy avatar.


Blood Widow Ricki * Tide Shifter * T-34 * Opposite Reaction * Shaolin Midnight * ChernobylCheerleader

 

Posted

"On the contrary, sir, I think this project is very important. It is you I take lightly."

And continuing the topic, such as it is:

"'Once ze rockets are up, who cares vere zey come down?
Zat's not my department,' says Wernher von Braun."


My characters at Virtueverse
Faces of the City

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Zemblanity View Post
Assuming I was on the jury stand? On the grounds that I can't link a single piece of evidence directly to him, which fails to meet the requirement of guilt beyond reasonable doubt. I have doubt. Not saying he's innocent, I'm pretty sure he's evil and rotten to the core, but unless I can prove it, there's nothing I can do about it. Go talk to a vigilante if you want more.

What I can do is join a league to disarm Praetoria as retaliation for their attempt to invade Primal Earth (Lambda), ensure the freedom of their press (TNP), prevent their population from being mind-controlled (MoM) and force their leader to surrender (Mag). I'll leave the issue of Cole's trial to the courts, but if I'm asked to join the jury bench, I don't see how they'll manage to convict him at a fair trial.

We need more proof, we need an excerpt from Cole's diary saying "I did it, I forged the election!", we need a videotape of him holding a smoking gun over Recluse's corpse, we need an eye-witness testifying that he saw him grinning as Hamidon burned Rome to the ground. We don't have any of that, all we have is a biased assumption that Cole had to know about the oppression happening in Praetoria and that he chose to do nothing about it. I challenge both claims.
That's not the way accountability works

As the supreme ruler of Praetorian Earth, Tyrant is accountable and responsible for the actions taken by those under him - especially those he has personally appointed to positions of power, and allowed to keep their positions even when he knew they were carrying out crimes against hiumanity.
The whole feeble "maybe he didn't know" defense collapses at once when the scale of the crimes committed by his underlings and the length of time they were allowed to go on for becomes clear.
All the Paretors are bad people, but Tyrant still gave them all the important roles in his dictatorship - where they kept on being bad people for years and years, while Tyrant did nothing about them.

Plus, there's also things like the invasion plans revealing that Tyrant was not only aware of the planned genoice on Primal Earth but had actually given the order for it, along with him telling ex-loyalists escaping to Paragon City that he has blood on his hands.

Tyrant is fully aware of, and responsible for, the suffering of the Praetorian people under the loyalist dictatorship, and the planned war crimes against Primal Earth and the rest of the multiverse.


@Golden Girl

City of Heroes comics and artwork

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Megajoule View Post
"On the contrary, sir, I think this project is very important. It is you I take lightly."
Ah, I loved that episode...

Also, as a slight counter-point to something that was said here...
If a man had to sacrifice 50,000 people in order to save 5,000,000, does that make him an irredeemable murderer?

Or could the argument be made that...
"The needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few?"


"The part of me that is leaving... is going to miss the part of me that is staying..."

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Golden Girl View Post
That's not the way accountability works

As the supreme ruler of Praetorian Earth, Tyrant is accountable and responsible for the actions taken by those under him - especially those he has personally appointed to positions of power, and allowed to keep their positions even when he knew they were carrying out crimes against hiumanity.
The whole feeble "maybe he didn't know" defense collapses at once when the scale of the crimes committed by his underlings and the length of time they were allowed to go on for becomes clear.
He did, however, abandon First Ward and completely ignored it. To say he didn't know about the Mother of Mercy hospital is completely plausible; the dude had a lot on his plate in the way of INTERDIMENSIONAL WAR. His personal story arc even states how he remembered Praetor Sinclair in a very "Well that **** got out of hand without warning" kind of way. I'm willing to consider that he may not have had the full picture on what Praetor Funbags had going on in her happy house of horrendous hallucinations.


My guides:Dark Melee/Dark Armor/Soul Mastery, Illusion Control/Kinetics/Primal Forces Mastery, Electric Armor
"Dark Armor is a complete waste as a tanking set."

 

Posted

Talking about the "threshold of morality," what is it in the "needs of the many" scenario? One for one million? Does that number exist?

Was Superman held culpable for the destruction of Coast City, even though he's saved the entire WORLD's population hundreds of times?

And then, of course, you have the Stanford incident as well...


Carl and Sons @Aurora Girl (Pinnacle)
Quote:
Originally Posted by EarthWyrm View Post
But I do understand that there is an internet rule that any bad idea must be presented by someone at least twice a year to remind everyone who hasn't already read every previous thread on the topic precisely why the idea is bad.