Enhancement Proc Changes


Agent White

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by UberGuy View Post
Well, I'd advise at least waiting to see how it plays out in the end. Your total lost DPS, expressed as a percentage of your total, may not be that bad that it is worth abandoning your concept.
Yeah, I know better than to jump ship too early. The increased Proc damage from Lightning Field (assuming the period is 10 and not 2) may make up for it, along with some tweaking.

edit: LF looks to gain only 2-3dps if my AoE modifier guesstimate is close. blah

edit2: Now, I seriously wish I hadn't used (wasted) all those enhancement boosters on him.

As an aside...
Proc-Brawl is officially dead.


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Caulderone View Post
As an aside...
Proc-Brawl is officially dead.
Proc Brawl was never really alive. >_>


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by firespray View Post
For a normal proc (20% chance or 3 PPM) we have the following.

Fireball with 0% recharge enhancement = 39.5% chance to fire
Fireball with 33% recharge enhancement = 30.3% chance to fire
Fireball with 66% recharge enhancement = 24.7% chance to fire
Fireball with 100% recharge enhancement = 20.9% chance to fire

Fire Breath with 0% recharge enhancement = 62.4% chance to fire
Fire Breath with 33% recharge enhancement = 49.1% chance to fire
Fire Breath with 66% recharge enhancement = 41.1% chance to fire
Fire Breath with 100% recharge enhancement = 35.7% chance to fire
Are those numbers for every target? While I am all for not reducing the chance of my beloved procs in Fireball and Hot Feet and other such powers, I think it would be fairly ridiculous to increase the chance in any of those powers.

If this new formula ends up buffing what the procs do in AoEs, it may be more wrong than when it nerfed what they did in AoEs.


Why Blasters? Empathy Sucks.
So, you want to be Mental?
What the hell? Let's buff defenders.
Tactics are for those who do not have a big enough hammer. Wisdom is knowing how big your hammer is.

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by firespray View Post
They're detrimental (quite so at large amounts of recharge) to rain of fire though. The low percentage chance to proc is based both on it's large area of affect (25 feet) and the fact that as a patch, the 'recharge' that the PPM is based on is the 10s of its activation time rather than the 60 seconds of the power's actual recharge.
I do not believe that is how maintained powers with activation periods are intended to work.


[Guide to Defense] [Scrapper Secondaries Comparison] [Archetype Popularity Analysis]

In one little corner of the universe, there's nothing more irritating than a misfile...
(Please support the best webcomic about a cosmic universal realignment by impaired angelic interference resulting in identity crisis angst. Or I release the pigmy water thieves.)

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by eth_Nargy View Post
Spiritual and agility already get ignored by every incarnate power
Spiritual is not ignored by every incarnate power.

Rebirth gets a nice bonus from Spiritual.

Agility is not ignored by every incarnate power. Ageless and Barrier both get nice bonuses. Ionic Judgement also gets a bonus if you go the endurance drain route.


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Synapse View Post
Okay, here's what I've come up with. The differences are FAR less dramatic than my first proposal:

1) Increase the PPM value by 20-25% (So a 4 PPM proc would become 5ish PPM) NOTE: The exact amount is still being figured out.
2) Replace the Base Recharge used by the PPM formula to only take into recharge enhancements affecting that power. This means recharge boosts from powers like Speed Boost, Hasten, Chrono Shift and Global Recharge from Enhancement effects like Luck of the Gambler's: +Def/+Global Rech 7.5% are not factored in.
3) Procs will have a maximum chance to trigger. I'm leaning toward 90-95%. There will be a minimum chance to proc equal to 5 plus 1.5 per PPM. Only the most extreme instances of very low recharge, cast time and area factor will cause this to occur.
4) All non-PPM enhancements with a chance to trigger less than 100% will use PPMs. (Note: Enhancements like Numina's Convalesence: Regen/Recovery will not be affected by this change as they have 100% chance to trigger).
5) The formula will treat Area Factor differently. Instead of simply using the flat Area Factor of the power, it will use 1 plus 75% of the difference between 1 and its actual AF. I think I heard a couple of you say "Huh?" Let me give you an example and then explain why.

Let's take a look at Dark Regeneration shall we? It has an Area Factor of 4, base recharge of 30 seconds and cast time of 1.17s. Using current PPMs with Essence Theft (3PPMs) it has a 39% chance to proc per target.

With the new formula we'll treat area factor as being slightly smaller than it is now. So the new formula would treat this Area Factor as 3.25. (1+(.75*(Actual Area Factor-1)). The simple version is: Area Factor will have a smaller impact on proc chance reduction.

Okay, now onto the example. Let's use Assassin's Strike slotted with Stalker's Guile: +Rech/Chance to Hide (Standard):

CURRENT PPMs
Assassin Strike
Base Recharge: 15 seconds
Cast Time: 1 second
Area Factor: 1

Stalker's Guile: +Rech/Chance to Hide
PPM: 4

Proc Chance: 106.7%

PROPOSED PPMs
Assassin Strike
Base Recharge: 15
Cast Time: 1 second
Area Factor

Stalker's Guile: +Rech/Chance to Hide
PPM: 5

0% Power Recharge
Proc Chance: 90%

33% Power Recharge
Proc Chance: 90%

66% Power Recharge
Proc Chance: 83.6%

100% Power Recharge
Proc Chance: 70.8%

Superior Stalker's Guile: +Rech/Chance to Hide

0% Power Recharge
Proc Chance: 90%

33% Power Recharge
Proc Chance: 90%

66% Power Recharge
Proc Chance: 90%

100% Power Recharge
Proc Chance: 88.5%

PPM: The above values are assuming we apply a 25% bonus to existing PPMs.

Now the why...

As many of you have mentioned it seems odd to penalize players' proc chances for strengthening their builds with global recharge. So, only recharge modification from enhancements and enhancement-like effects (like Alpha Slot effects) will modify proc chance. We also realized, after looking at a great number of affected powers, that we were over penalizing AoE powers with PPMs. So, we've lightened the impact Area Factor has on the formula.

Thanks for all the great feedback and really making me look for creative, but appropriate ways to solve this problem.

Thoughts?

Synapse
I like this much, much more! Good job!


"Hi, my name is Ail. I make people sick."
A partial selection from my 50's on Freedom: Ail = Ice/Traps, Luck = Street Justice/Super Reflexes Stalker, Mist = Bane, Pixy = Trick Arrow/Archery, Pure = Gravity/Energy, Smoke = Fire/Fire Dominator

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Arcanaville View Post
I do not believe that is how maintained powers with activation periods are intended to work.
You may be right, I wasn't sure based on Synapse's OP, and I haven't tested them in-game.


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Synapse View Post
There will be cases where your performance will decrease. That is by design. Speaking of which, it was never the DESIGNED intent to have SBEs consistently grant a superior benefit than their IO counterpart. However, there are instances where this has occurred. Again, my goal here is to create balance and address some issues with IO procs and Attuned procs.

Also, this PPM change will have no affect on Interface Incarnate powers.
Nope!

SBEs were advertised for their benefits including the ability to proc 100% of the time even with high recharge

http://boards.cityofheroes.com/showt...27#post4120527


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by StratoNexus View Post
Are those numbers for every target? While I am all for not reducing the chance of my beloved procs in Fireball and Hot Feet and other such powers, I think it would be fairly ridiculous to increase the chance in any of those powers.

If this new formula ends up buffing what the procs do in AoEs, it may be more wrong than when it nerfed what they did in AoEs.
I'm not sure to be honest. I haven't actually used the PPM procs other than the chance for fury proc in footstomp. I don't know what the PPM on that one is, but it doesn't seem to go off hardly at all. Maybe the numbers I posted above are the total chance to proc, though if they are, I'm not sure how it decides which target to proc against. If that's the case, then if you're hitting more than just a couple targets, those are pretty hefty nerfs.


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Synapse View Post
I need to know what power it is slotted in to tell you exactly how it will be affected.
Dark Regen is the only power worth slotting it in.


Infinity and Victory mostly
dUmb, etc.
lolz PvP anymore, Market PvP for fun and profit

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vauluur View Post
What about procs slotted into pet summoning powers. For example, if I had a Soulbound Allegiance: Chance for Build Up slotted in Dark Extraction. Will that proc function based on the recharge of the Extracted Essence's attacks and thereby gain an increase in proc rate since they can't be slotted? Or will it function based on the recharge in summoning power?
That proc works 2 ways when you summon the pet that you slot it into, there is a chance for the proc to benefit you for 5 secs, after that it can only benfit your pet every time it attacks.

so the pet proc chances should only be effected by the base recharge of the pet's powers


 

Posted

I'm just curious why did all this start? I mean this new proc mechanic. Was there like a group complaining about how the old school procs worked before anyone even knew about ppm procs? Seems like a case of if it aint broke don't fix it. But you did fix it and now your gonna have teeth gnashing and angry customers was it worth it?

I'm glad this aint coming till i24 hopefully I'll be burnt out by then and this wont even be a blip on the radar.


 

Posted

I'd really like to know how the Powers Team feels about the "10 second rule" regarding all this.

The entire reason it even exists is to prevent damage auras and Rains from not demolishing everything in sight with procs. I think it would be very cool if, out of all this, we could see that rule get abolished, since PPMs would solve that issue much more elegantly.


@Draeth Darkstar
Virtue [Heroes, Roleplay], Freedom [Villains], Exalted [All Sides, Roleplay]
Code:
I24 Proc Chance = (Enhanced Recharge + Activation Time) * (Current PPM * 1.25) / 60*(1 + .75*(.15*Radius - 0.011*Radius*(360-Arc)/30))
Single Target Radius = 0. AoE Non-Cone Arc = 360.

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lucky666 View Post
I'm just curious why did all this start? I mean this new proc mechanic. Was there like a group complaining about how the old school procs worked before anyone even knew about ppm procs? Seems like a case of if it aint broke don't fix it. But you did fix it and now your gonna have teeth gnashing and angry customers was it worth it?

I'm glad this aint coming till i24 hopefully I'll be burnt out by then and this wont even be a blip on the radar.
For my main my io proc slotting in caltrops and acid mortar is getting ripped to shreds my io proc slotting for brawl and boxing take a huge hit too but the hits don't stop there because I was dumb enough to buy SBE procs for their performance for all the characters I felt got good return on nvestment for them and they are all getting downgraded severely

its one of those things where there is give and take for IO procs but all who bought SBE procs for their performance got ripped off though that part is clear and its looking like there will be no recompense


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cheetatron View Post
Nope!

SBEs were advertised for their benefits including the ability to proc 100% of the time even with high recharge

http://boards.cityofheroes.com/showt...27#post4120527
If you actually read that thread, Arbiter Hawk was being asked how the PPM procs specifically worked at that time, he wasn't commenting on their design intent. In fact one poster explicitly asked him to state how they worked directly and not explain side issues beyond that.

In fact, Arbiter Hawk all but said he wasn't specifically involved in their design in the same thread, and thus his comments should only be taken to describe the procs, and not state their design intent:

Quote:
Their proc chance is decreased by the amount of area the attack covers and the maximum number of targets it hits. I don't have access to the actual numeric guts of this system since it's all handled in code, but the basic design principle for them is that you could put the Blaster ATO in Explosive Blast, Power Bolt, or Total Focus, and as long as you were using the power every time it came off recharge, you should see the proc occur about an equal number of times per minute.
He knew the basic idea, but not the precise details of the system or its design or implementation at the time he was speaking and admitted so. Under those circumstances, his opinion is no more relevant to the design intent of the procs than mine is.


[Guide to Defense] [Scrapper Secondaries Comparison] [Archetype Popularity Analysis]

In one little corner of the universe, there's nothing more irritating than a misfile...
(Please support the best webcomic about a cosmic universal realignment by impaired angelic interference resulting in identity crisis angst. Or I release the pigmy water thieves.)

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by MajorDecoy View Post
Spiritual is not ignored by every incarnate power.

Rebirth gets a nice bonus from Spiritual.

Agility is not ignored by every incarnate power. Ageless and Barrier both get nice bonuses. Ionic Judgement also gets a bonus if you go the endurance drain route.
I think it's pretty obvious from context that he meant the +recharge part. And that part is ignored.


Blue
American Steele: 50 BS/Inv
Nightfall: 50 DDD
Sable Slayer: 50 DM/Rgn
Fortune's Shadow: 50 Dark/Psi
WinterStrike: 47 Ice/Dev
Quantum Well: 43 Inv/EM
Twilit Destiny: 43 MA/DA
Red
Shadowslip: 50 DDC
Final Rest: 50 MA/Rgn
Abyssal Frost: 50 Ice/Dark
Golden Ember: 50 SM/FA

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by UberGuy View Post
I think it's pretty obvious from context that he meant the +recharge part. And that part is ignored.
Yes, but for good reason. If the +recharge was not ignored then Spiritual would be the only Alpha worth slotting. The benefits of faster recharging Lore, Judgement, and Destiny would far outweigh whatever benefits the other Alpha powers might give you.

With the second round of proposed changes, there shouldn't be an appreciable drop in proc chance from the Alpha slot alone. Not to the point that it would make Spiritual a bad choice or significantly penalize those that have it. All it would require is a bit more creative slotting which anyone who cares enough to know the proc rate is reduced by higher recharge enhancement would be more than capable of doing.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cheetatron View Post
For my main my io proc slotting in caltrops and acid mortar is getting ripped to shreds my io proc slotting for brawl and boxing take a huge hit too but the hits don't stop there because I was dumb enough to buy SBE procs for their performance for all the characters I felt got good return on nvestment for them and they are all getting downgraded severely

its one of those things where there is give and take for IO procs but all who bought SBE procs for their performance got ripped off though that part is clear and its looking like there will be no recompense
Well, I've seen it floating around for some time now that SBEs were never intended to work better than standard IOs. They just did work significantly better because of their better design. I wouldn't have (and didn't) buy any SBEs for the better procs. I bought the sets because:
a.) I have limited play time and they were a convenient way to get IOs without going through the hassle of crafting them
b.) They are attuned, making them highly desirable for those of us who primarily use an existing main to experience new content at all levels.

Frankly, being surprised that a change is coming down the pipeline that stops players from turning powers into something they aren't supposed to be is a little childish. Caltrops are not supposed to be a damage patch. They are supposed to be a crowd control tool. Brawl and Boxing are supposed to be low cost, low recharge, fast animating attacks that deal a small amount of damage. Not something you can load up with procs and expect to solidly deal substantial damage essentially for free.

You got your fun out of the exploit while it existed, but that's no excuse for pretending it isn't an exploit now that they want to fix it.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lucky666 View Post
I'm just curious why did all this start? I mean this new proc mechanic. Was there like a group complaining about how the old school procs worked before anyone even knew about ppm procs? Seems like a case of if it aint broke don't fix it. But you did fix it and now your gonna have teeth gnashing and angry customers was it worth it?

I'm glad this aint coming till i24 hopefully I'll be burnt out by then and this wont even be a blip on the radar.
It's not really something to get upset about. In a very large percentage of cases this will increase proc rate. Only in edge cases where flat rate procs could be exploited will this be a nerf. And it's one that needs to happen and should have happened a long time ago.

The one legitimate argument against this amounts to "I paid money to be better than everyone else and now I don't get to be." Which I can't really take seriously because really?


@Rorn ---- Blue Baron ---- Guardian

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Arcanaville View Post
If you actually read that thread, Arbiter Hawk was being asked how the PPM procs specifically worked at that time, he wasn't commenting on their design intent. In fact one poster explicitly asked him to state how they worked directly and not explain side issues beyond that.

In fact, Arbiter Hawk all but said he wasn't specifically involved in their design in the same thread, and thus his comments should only be taken to describe the procs, and not state their design intent:

He knew the basic idea, but not the precise details of the system or its design or implementation at the time he was speaking and admitted so. Under those circumstances, his opinion is no more relevant to the design intent of the procs than mine is.
Its not about opinions on what design intent is or was. I'm not interested in a debate on that
When official policy includes consistently following a formula and the claiming an example of that formula being followed was actually unintended and a "bug"

It's about how it works, it's also about what "they"(staff) told us about how it works, it's also about how they advertise/promote how it works (see the hecatomb announcement thread listing its proc rate as 4.5 ppm)

It's about selling us on all three, selling to us with all three and then changing the item in the sale, the performance element of the sale but leaving the purchase part of the sale final.


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cheetatron View Post
For my main my io proc slotting in caltrops and acid mortar is getting ripped to shreds
I'm actually pretty curious about this, so I'm going to run through the math here.

Acid Mortar (the power the pet launches):
Activation Time 0.0s (this is probably a bug, good thing we have The Powers Guy in here, huh?)
Recharge Time: 5.5s
Radius: 8
Area Factor: 2.2 (1 + 0.15*8)
Adjusted Area Factor: 1.9 (1 + (2.2-1)*0.75)

The Recharge can't be adjusted, because it's a pet power, so we shouldn't have to worry about variable recharge levels.

Proc Chance = PPM * (5.5 + 0.0)/(60 * 1.9)
Proc Chance = PPM * 5.5/114
Proc Chance = PPM * 0.04825

A 20% proc now will convert into a 3.75 PPM proc, and a 33% proc will convert into a 5.625 PPM proc under the proposed changes.

3.75 * 0.04825 = 0.1809
5.625 * 0.04825 = 0.2714

So, yes, Acid Mortar will see a slight reduction in proc rate, decreasing it's proc chances to ~18% with normal procs and ~27% with Ragnarok, but I'd hardly call it "ripped to shreds."
Note that ATO procs put into Acid Mortar will actually increase unilaterally in proc rate because the Recharge can't be reduced, but the PPM value of those procs will be increased by 25%.

Caltrops I'm afraid I can't help you with, as I don't feel like hunting down the pseudopet in City of Data to calculate it's Area Factor.

As a note regarding Traps, according to the Real Numbers info the powers Trip Mine and Time Bomb use to deal damage have 16 minute 40 second recharges, and Poison Trap's is 0.0 seconds, all which will break the PPM formula gloriously.

Edit:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vauluur View Post
b.) They are attuned, making them highly desirable for those of us who primarily use an existing main to experience new content at all levels.
Once again, being attuned is irrelevant to procs. They work purely as a function of your combat level, the level of the enhancement is used for nothing but set bonus calculation. Disregarding the Flat%/PPM disparity and set bonus calculations, a minimum-level IO proc, a maximum-level IO proc, and an Attuned proc are functionally identical.
After IO procs are converted to PPM, minimum-level IO procs will be completely identical to Attuned procs.


@Draeth Darkstar
Virtue [Heroes, Roleplay], Freedom [Villains], Exalted [All Sides, Roleplay]
Code:
I24 Proc Chance = (Enhanced Recharge + Activation Time) * (Current PPM * 1.25) / 60*(1 + .75*(.15*Radius - 0.011*Radius*(360-Arc)/30))
Single Target Radius = 0. AoE Non-Cone Arc = 360.

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cheetatron View Post
Its not about opinions on what design intent is or was. I'm not interested in a debate on that
When official policy includes consistently following a formula and the claiming an example of that formula being followed was actually unintended and a "bug"

It's about how it works, it's also about what "they"(staff) told us about how it works, it's also about how they advertise/promote how it works (see the hecatomb announcement thread listing its proc rate as 4.5 ppm)

It's about selling us on all three, selling to us with all three and then changing the item in the sale, the performance element of the sale but leaving the purchase part of the sale final.
As far as I'm concerned, its about the facts, and the misrepresentation of the facts. Everyone is entitled to their opinion, but that right ends where the facts begin.


[Guide to Defense] [Scrapper Secondaries Comparison] [Archetype Popularity Analysis]

In one little corner of the universe, there's nothing more irritating than a misfile...
(Please support the best webcomic about a cosmic universal realignment by impaired angelic interference resulting in identity crisis angst. Or I release the pigmy water thieves.)

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Arcanaville View Post
As far as I'm concerned, its about the facts, and the misrepresentation of the facts. Everyone is entitled to their opinion, but that right ends where the facts begin.
Is the current Synapse proposed formula really a potential buff for procs in some AoE powers (from the flat rate of in-game earned procs)?


Why Blasters? Empathy Sucks.
So, you want to be Mental?
What the hell? Let's buff defenders.
Tactics are for those who do not have a big enough hammer. Wisdom is knowing how big your hammer is.

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vauluur View Post
Well, I've seen it floating around for some time now that SBEs were never intended to work better than standard IOs. They just did work significantly better because of their better design. I wouldn't have (and didn't) buy any SBEs for the better procs. I bought the sets because:
a.) I have limited play time and they were a convenient way to get IOs without going through the hassle of crafting them
b.) They are attuned, making them highly desirable for those of us who primarily use an existing main to experience new content at all levels.

Frankly, being surprised that a change is coming down the pipeline that stops players from turning powers into something they aren't supposed to be is a little childish. Caltrops are not supposed to be a damage patch. They are supposed to be a crowd control tool. Brawl and Boxing are supposed to be low cost, low recharge, fast animating attacks that deal a small amount of damage. Not something you can load up with procs and expect to solidly deal substantial damage essentially for free.

You got your fun out of the exploit while it existed, but that's no excuse for pretending it isn't an exploit now that they want to fix it.



It's not really something to get upset about. In a very large percentage of cases this will increase proc rate.
Only for IO procs, and only outside of 1. Quick charging powers that don't get to benefit much from slotting recharge
and
2. Pseudo pets/Auras which were already nerfed in many ways including the 1 chance every 10 seconds rule for the sake of IO procs
Quote:
Only in edge cases where flat rate procs could be exploited will this be a nerf. And it's one that needs to happen and should have happened a long time ago.
wow you should apply to be a gm! staff says red is blue and you just nod your head don't you
Quote:
The one legitimate argument against this amounts to "I paid money to be better than everyone else and now I don't get to be." Which I can't really take seriously because really?
I paid good money for the performance i got and I didn't lord it over anyone, if you don't believe I deserve the performance I paid for that's one thing but if you think they deserve my money for the performance I paid for but dont have that's a whole nother subject. Feel free to roll your eyes, I am unmoved by trolls and sychophants and this shall be the last time I respond to you have a nice life


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vauluur View Post
Yes, but for good reason. If the +recharge was not ignored then Spiritual would be the only Alpha worth slotting. The benefits of faster recharging Lore, Judgement, and Destiny would far outweigh whatever benefits the other Alpha powers might give you.
Context is important. I wasn't bemoaning the Spiritual situation. Someone was mentioning Spiritual as a possible example of a mechanic for distinguishing actual slotting from Spiritual's effect. (That seems highly unlikely to be shown by what they were pointing out, but it is the context in which MajorDecoy replied, and I replied to him.)

Did you know that in early betas of Incarnate powers, they did honor both global recharge and Spiritual Alpha? Player feedback was that this was whack.


Blue
American Steele: 50 BS/Inv
Nightfall: 50 DDD
Sable Slayer: 50 DM/Rgn
Fortune's Shadow: 50 Dark/Psi
WinterStrike: 47 Ice/Dev
Quantum Well: 43 Inv/EM
Twilit Destiny: 43 MA/DA
Red
Shadowslip: 50 DDC
Final Rest: 50 MA/Rgn
Abyssal Frost: 50 Ice/Dark
Golden Ember: 50 SM/FA

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Draeth Darkstar View Post
I'm actually pretty curious about this, so I'm going to run through the math here.

Acid Mortar (the power the pet launches):
Activation Time 0.0s (this is probably a bug, good thing we have The Powers Guy in here, huh?)
Recharge Time: 5.5s
Radius: 8
Area Factor: 2.2 (1 + 0.15*8)
Adjusted Area Factor: 1.9 (1 + (2.2-1)*0.75)

The Recharge can't be adjusted, because it's a pet power, so we shouldn't have to worry about variable recharge levels.

Proc Chance = PPM * (5.5 + 0.0)/(60 * 1.9)
Proc Chance = PPM * 5.5/114
Proc Chance = PPM * 0.04825

A 20% proc now will convert into a 3.75 PPM proc, and a 33% proc will convert into a 5.625 PPM proc under the proposed changes.

3.75 * 0.04825 = 0.1809
5.625 * 0.04825 = 0.2714

So, yes, Acid Mortar will see a slight reduction in proc rate, decreasing it's proc chances to ~18% with normal procs and ~27% with Ragnarok, but I'd hardly call it "ripped to shreds."
Note that ATO procs put into Acid Mortar will actually increase unilaterally in proc rate because the Recharge can't be reduced, but the PPM value of those procs will be increased by 25%.

Caltrops I'm afraid I can't help you with, as I don't feel like hunting down the pseudopet in City of Data to calculate it's Area Factor.

As a note regarding Traps, according to the Real Numbers info the powers Trip Mine and Time Bomb use to deal damage have 16 minute 40 second recharges, and Poison Trap's is 0.0 seconds, all which will break the PPM formula gloriously.
thx for that but what about 15% flat chance IOs what will they be converted to
Quote:

Edit:

Once again, being attuned is irrelevant to procs. They work purely as a function of your combat level, the level of the enhancement is used for nothing but set bonus calculation. Disregarding the Flat%/PPM disparity and set bonus calculations, a minimum-level IO proc, a maximum-level IO proc, and an Attuned proc are functionally identical.
After IO procs are converted to PPM, minimum-level IO procs will be completely identical to Attuned procs.
thx for pointing that out again


 

Posted

I'm really not understanding the why for this change.

A PPM cap, and many of the raised PPMs mean it isn't a change attempting to normalize proc rates between powers with different cycle times. A 90% cap limits the proc rates in high cycle time powers, and really, the number of times powers could be cycled in a minute limited the proc capabilties of the powers.

It isn't that the Procs were overpowered, because in many cases the proc rates are going up. If a power that could cycle 5 times a minute was too much for a proc given 6PPMs, increasing all the proc rates, in powers that can cycle that many times in a minute without exceeding the 90% rate, doesn't make sense.

If it was because the SBEs could see better performance than the standard version, there are better ways. Catalysts are all but useless after getting/using your first 5-6, and multiple people have suggested they could find a use in allowing players to attune IOs.

I just, really, don't understand why this needs to be done. Changing all procs to PPMs as a standard, that is. There's likely something I'm missing, but right now this seems like change for the sake of change.


Murphys Military Law

#23. Teamwork is essential; it gives the enemy other people to shoot at.

#46. If you can't remember, the Claymore is pointed towards you.

#54. Killing for peace is like screwing for virginity.