Oh, you naughty naughty naughty naughty elf!


AkuTenshiiZero

 

Posted

Quote:
Trolls believe strongly in survival of the fittest. The junior members are known respectively as Trollkin, Jutal, Gardvord, Ogre, and Caliban. The highest ranking Trolls have mutated into grotesque abominations – they have horns, bulge with oversized muscles, and are relatively sexless.
...Bugbear of mine.

Please note that it states "relatively sexless" and not "sterile/unsexed" (like a SuperMutant from Fallout would be in one time period).

I take this to mean the normal human tells of gender identity have diminished to the point of difficulty telling the genders of Trolls apart - not that they are barbie dolls/action man.

The oversized muscles and lack of body fat would cause the bodyshapes of male and female Trolls to look almost identical (I guess the females may be slightly shorter with narrower shoulders and wider hips... but then Dyne mutates bones as well to make the horns come through so that might not count!).

Also, the fact they lose most if not all their bodyhair as they go up the ranks and heavily tattoo their bodies would complete the transition from what the public (or the IC person writing the entry) would see. Their behaviours are a mixture of news stories and eye-witness accounts of their violence - the raves are off limits, so the genders involved/reported would fall to the same pitfalls the person on the street faces.

I would suspect doctors and Trolls can tell each other apart. The people on the street, and most heroes would see what was described, a bunch a relatively sexless musclebound green thugs covered in tattoos.

From a strictly story/RP point of view, Trolls should still have genders and still be able to function biologically - because we've not been shown otherwise. A good rule of thumb is that never commenting on it usually means canon follows real life.

---

Note - I have no idea either way how closely Dyne follows steroids. But it is a good comparison to make. I'm not sure whether steroids can make someone sterile (though I am aware of the tissue wastage and possibly impotence too), but they certainly don't make people sexless.

Note 2 - For the purpose of my post, "Gender" refers to the ideological identity the person attributes to themselves "Man vs Woman vs <Of choice>". "Sex" refers to the biological status of the person, "Male vs Female vs Transitional".

Note 3 - For the purpose of my post's terms, it appears the official documentation on Trolls should actually read "Relatively genderless" and not "relatively sexless". Unfortunately that's likely because it was written by a writer and not a medical professional/psychologist/etc etc.


Forse: lvl 22 FF/NRG Defender
Tam Krannock: lvl 37 Shield/Mace Tanker
Toppa Grace: lvl 25 Fire/Ice Blaster
----
Red Commissar: I'm in the Queen Mother. Only more awesome. And alive

 

Posted

I didn't know crotches were relocated to the kneecap region. Then again, the lady appears to be some sort of mutant green elf...


The off-beat space pirate...Capt. Stormrider (50+3 Elec/Storm Science Corruptor)
The mysterious Djinn...Emerald Dervish (50+1 DB/DA Magic Stalker)
The psychotic inventor...Dollmaster (50 Bot/FF Tech Mastermind)

Virtue Forever.

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Golden Girl View Post
[IMG Redacted]
Wow. I guess I should be careful what I wish for... I might just get a horrifying plasticy re-imagining of it.



 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Venture View Post
According to the official Trolls background file, once they pass the Trollkin stage Trolls are genderless.

Devs am hating Trolls.


"How do you know you are on the side of good?" a Paragon citizen asked him. "How can we even know what is 'good'?"

"The Most High has spoken, even with His own blood," Melancton replied. "Surely we know."

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Zombie Man View Post
Here you go. No more revealing than the elf or what you can see in game and just as related to the Holiday Pack as the elf. Santa has a package for you...

WELL. That wasn't something I was expecting to like as much as I did.

I've ruined Christmas


In the room the women come and go
Talking of Michelangelo.

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by BrandX View Post
Of course it is. Freedom Phalanx, CoH heroe/villains.

I don't want to read "Let me grab some enhancements, oh and some inspirations, oh and look, I took out these Hellions, and now some new ones just respawned in their place, Ill be here all day!"

That makes for some of the worst comic book universe writing

Apex showing up under Atlas Park statue and yelling "Lvl 14 Scrapper looking for team" ruined that comic so much more for me.

/em sarcasm

Yes, I picture characters with badges and enhancements all over them

/em endsarcasm

There's game mechanics and then there's making an interresting story. Adding in game mechanics ruins the story.
How is that different from the Top Cow series with Freedom Phalanx?




 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Arctic Man View Post
How is that different from the Top Cow series with Freedom Phalanx?



You know, when I read it from the Top Cow series it was nothing like that.

And if I HAD read those issues, I would of said they were the suckie as well.


BrandX Future Staff Fighter
The BrandX Collection

 

Posted

I think those are supposed to be "jokes."


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Scythus View Post
I think those are supposed to be "jokes."
"Breaking the Fourth Wall"
Deadpool does it all the time


@War-Nugget
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wavicle View Post
CoH players are stupid and incompetent compared to WoW players.
As was said in Gran Torino, "Your world is nothing more than all the tiny things you've left behind", let CoH be one of those things. Don't forget, forgive.

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by War-Nugget View Post
"Breaking the Fourth Wall"
Deadpool does it all the time
Which is fine with one character who can be played off as it being part of some insanity. Doing the whole universe thing of badges and enhancements ruins the comic book universe (for me...others may very well like it).


BrandX Future Staff Fighter
The BrandX Collection

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by War-Nugget View Post
"Breaking the Fourth Wall"
Deadpool does it all the time
Quote:
Originally Posted by BrandX View Post
Which is fine with one character who can be played off as it being part of some insanity. Doing the whole universe thing of badges and enhancements ruins the comic book universe (for me...others may very well like it).
Messing with the Fourth Wall is a very tricky proposition.

It is one thing to wink at the audience by say, having the author(s) make a cameo. As long as the major players are not breaking the wall, it is still possible to carry forward with the integrity of the narrative intact. For example, I thought it was GREAT to see Ascendant in the comics. (If you are not familiar with this hero, take a look at his phone call transcripts in the CoH Wiki.) Ascendant's presence was a wink at the audience that still left the wall intact.

It is another thing altogether once a major player breaks the Fourth Wall because once it is done, you cannot take it back. If Hamlet steps to the edge of the stage and says, "Geez, I wish Shakespeare would make up my mind for me!" then the tragedy has turned into a farce. It is not possible to have a straight narrative drama any longer, since the audience has been informed that at least one (or more) of the players is aware that they are in Strawberry Fields, where "nothing is real." If the characters have, as it were, suspended the suspension of disbelief, then it is all over unless the story is a farce.

Ms. Liberty resuming her station as a trainer does not strike me as all that problematic; new heroes need training, and that does not necessarily scream "MMORPG!" Getting awarded an Exploration Badge, however, does. It is a cheap laugh like Hamlet's quip that cannot be undone.

If writing superhero comics were easy, we would all be Troy Hickman.


"How do you know you are on the side of good?" a Paragon citizen asked him. "How can we even know what is 'good'?"

"The Most High has spoken, even with His own blood," Melancton replied. "Surely we know."

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Zombie Man View Post
So, what does T for Teen mean anyway?

There's this:



Wowsa. Look at all that leg showing!

But that's nothing compared to the drawn version:



From Paragon Studio's email advertising the Holiday Pack.

So, what's being sold in this pic? Look, just like the Give Gift emote, she's giving a present. Only thing is, she's presenting like a baboon in estrus. And she's offering a box. A box by her crotch. A crotch that seems to imply she's not wearing anything over her crotch. Did I mention a *box* by her *crotch*? You know that looks nothing like the Give Gift emote, right?

I expect such a graphic on the cover of Playboy. I've had a less revealing pic removed from the forums for not being "T for Teen."

There's enjoying the beauty of the human form (even if green) and then there's overt sexual pandering. This is the latter. I'd rather have seen this elf nude in just the gloves and boots frolicking in the snow and throwing a snowball then... *this* pose.

I mean, what was even the thought here: That you would get sales by sexualizing fur-lined clothing? Is there a big market for that fetish? "Oh, yeah, jus' like Mrs. Cluas, baby!"

And when you were selling the Gunslinger Pack, where was the drawing of the shirtless cowboy in what appeared to be assless chaps? Oh, that wouldn't have been appropriate? Hmmm....

Yeah, I know, this thread will be full of those saying, "The comic book industry panders to cheap sex all the time." My response, "Yes, but Paragon Studios doesn't have to also."
"T for Teen" as defined by the ESRB:

Quote:
Titles rated T (Teen) have content that may be suitable for ages 13 and older. Titles in this category may contain violence, suggestive themes, crude humor, minimal blood, simulated gambling, and/or infrequent use of strong language.
So far, everything you evinced is right on the money. What now, Puritan Zombie Man?

(I can't tell if you're trying to be funny, sarcastic, serious or the town crier. Doesn't sound like you IMO, but I really didn't feel like reading the followup responses, so wanted to at least get the actual ESRB definition in there.)


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Turgenev View Post
So far, everything you evinced is right on the money. What now, Puritan Zombie Man?

(I can't tell if you're trying to be funny, sarcastic, serious or the town crier. Doesn't sound like you IMO, but I really didn't feel like reading the followup responses, so wanted to at least get the actual ESRB definition in there.)
Puritan?

Quote:
I'd rather have seen this elf nude in just the gloves and boots frolicking in the snow and throwing a snowball
Do you not understand what 'Puritan' means or did you not really read even the first post?


Speeding Through New DA Repeatables || Spreadsheet o' Enhancements || Zombie Skins: better skins for these forums || Guide to Guides

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Zombie Man View Post
Puritan?
Your OP came across as kneejerk "omg u see her knees THINK ABOUT THE CHILDREN" reactive. This is commonly associated with the perception of Puritanism where anything pleasurable is considered sinful.

(Side note: If you dig into Puritanical precepts of sex and marriage, they're actually something of party animals. So long as you're married.)

So, Zomb: Serious? Not serious? Making a point that I'm not getting? Take it at face value?

EDIT: On your second point, yep, I understand what it means. Your take on their marketing of this green elf is what I branded as a Puritanical stance. I read your post twice. Both times, I imagined you wearing a black hat and looking like you had a Titan Weapon shoved somewhere uncomfortably. You couldn't have fit the picture better if you broke out a ruler and measured the pixel distance between fuzzy knee cuffs to crotch. That's why it didn't make sense to me: Didn't sound like you, so I stuck with the actual ESRB definition in my original post.


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Turgenev View Post
This is commonly associated with the perception of Puritanism where anything pleasurable is considered sinful.
It's associated with them because it's true - the Puritans were horrible people


@Golden Girl

City of Heroes comics and artwork

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Turgenev View Post
Your OP came across as kneejerk "omg u see her knees THINK ABOUT THE CHILDREN" reactive. This is commonly associated with the perception of Puritanism where anything pleasurable is considered sinful.

(Side note: If you dig into Puritanical precepts of sex and marriage, they're actually something of party animals. So long as you're married.)

So, Zomb: Serious? Not serious? Making a point that I'm not getting? Take it at face value?
You're sure quick to refute what you're not sure about!

What I have written, I have written.

And I think I have written an verbal Rorschach test.


Speeding Through New DA Repeatables || Spreadsheet o' Enhancements || Zombie Skins: better skins for these forums || Guide to Guides

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Zombie Man View Post
You're sure quick to refute what you're not sure about!

What I have written, I have written.

And I think I have written an verbal Rorschach test.
What did I refute? I just gave you the definition of the ESRB, and applied it to the pictures you offered.

(I updated my earlier post, btw, so read there for more info.)

*EDIT: Okay, by definition, it's "refute". I refuted you. I agree. Still, you're wrong. Discuss.


 

Posted

I guess it's all really a matter of whether sex/sexuality is implied by the artist, or inferred by the viewer.

I have seen artwork that I didn't get the slightest impression that sex or sexuality was implied, that upon reading a little by the artist, he TOTALLY intended for there to be sexual overtones.

My guess is that the artist intended for this elf to be 'cute,' and maybe be 'sexy.' I do NOT get the impression that it was intended to be 'provocative.'

I guess it's just a matter of what baggage is brought along....


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Turgenev View Post
*EDIT: Okay, by definition, it's "refute". I refuted you. I agree. Still, you're wrong. Discuss.
Turgenev refutes Zombie Man because he believes that Zombie Man is wrong.

And if Turgenev's beliefs are not in Turgenev's direct control, does Turgenev have free will?


Speeding Through New DA Repeatables || Spreadsheet o' Enhancements || Zombie Skins: better skins for these forums || Guide to Guides

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Zombie Man View Post
Turgenev refutes Zombie Man because he believes that Zombie Man is wrong.

And if Turgenev's beliefs are not in Turgenev's direct control, does Turgenev have free will?
Of course he does. Free will is predicated on a subjective analysis of the perceived environment and its factors, as known by the observer. Based on observed scenarios, the observer can make conclusions. Free will is not impacted by the angle of "truthiness", as the choice of action still falls upon the actor. Whether one can be manipulated into choosing an action they would not otherwise pursue is, however, relevant.

However, the perceived intent of your post decrying the extremes of Paragon Studios' marketing effort in accordance with the ESRB "Rated T for Teen" was fairly neatly debunked as falling within definition of their rating. Based on the original post, you are a prude.


 

Posted

I don't understand. If you dropped the skirt off entirely she'd be in a one-piece bathing suit-type outfit... pretty classic female superheroine look. I've seen the ninja robes without pants many times in-game and not thought too much about it. The drawn image is much cuter, even without hair, but she isn't a mature (the rating beyond T-for-Teen) image by any stretch I can imagine. Heck, I wouldn't care if my 5-year old grandson saw that image.

Maybe I just don't have enough imagination.


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ascendant View Post
I earnestly hope and pray for the day where we've resolved the rest of the world's problems to such an extent that the subject of sexuality in promotional comic book artwork for an MMORPG becomes an actual, viable topic worthy of this kind of attention.

Seriously, wake me up when we get there.
It's on page six after "Are we eating too much garlic as a people?"


My guides:Dark Melee/Dark Armor/Soul Mastery, Illusion Control/Kinetics/Primal Forces Mastery, Electric Armor
"Dark Armor is a complete waste as a tanking set."