Updated Forum Rules and Proposed Forum Changes
One favor,
Let's not allow this conversation to solely revolve around possibly consolidating AT forums.
We would like to see other suggestions for simplifying the current forum structure.
Andy Belford
Community Manager
Paragon Studios
pohsyb: so of all people you must be most excited about the veats
Arachnos Commander: actually, I am
pohsyb: I mean you kinda were one already anyways ^_^
Arachnos Commander:
I am not a big fan of archetype merges, just because... well, there's a lot of stuff where dominator answers and troller answers are very very different. At the same time... It might not hurt to have some role-related forums.
Basically, I might have questions about a brute, whom I want to use both for tanking and for soloing. Those questions will not be well served by a tanking forum. But I might have some questions about aggro mechanics, which I care about on both a brute and a tanker. That might not be well served only by archetype-specific forums.
If you have to go one way or the other, I'd say stick with the archetype-specific forums and one general archetypes/powers forum. I can't immediately think of a good way to reduce the number of forums without making those forums less useful.
ETA:
Okay, other topics. Hmm. I don't like the player help vs. other subsets of stuff, I can never find things. I often miss stuff in CoH Life because it's on the other side of the AT forums. Also, because I only really have the one working natural language, I tend to use the "English" header as my forum link -- so I dont' see stuff that's in the top level adjacent to it, but that includes things like the beta forum threads.
There's a lot of forums here, but I'm not sure there are too many -- they're really mostly pretty useful forums which seem topically interesting. I can usually find a good forum to post in, and get interesting responses.
The simplest way for old and new would be my suggestion. Keep them exactly as they are but include in the forum title what that particular AT does. (See above post) Simple and only minimal effort and nothing to move.
@Mental Maden @Maden Mental
"....you are now tackle free for life."-ShoNuff
On the one hand, I can see the reasoning behind it. Most of the individual AT forums are pretty slow compared to, say, Player Questions or City Life.
HOWEVER!
I think simply the fact that, in game, you have multiple ATs popping up under multiple categories, is reason enough to understand that merging certain ATs' forums just isn't going to work well. Furthermore, merging like ATs still isn't going to work. A Dual Blades/Willpower Stalker plays hella different from a Scrapper or Brute with the same sets. And similarly, a DB/WP Brute, isn't much like a WP/DB tank, either. Similarly, within just the Mastermind AT, and the various EATs, you have people playing as tanks, as support, or as big damage, depending a lot on which sets they use and their general style.
If you're dead set on merging the AT forums, I'd do a few broad categories based around playstyles rather than ATs, and then naming ATs that are "possible" examples, but not restricting them to a single spot. "Squishy damage", "Crowd Control" (Controllers, Dominators, Fortunatas, Masterminds) as just a couple examples. Not too different from the original proposition, but more focused on build style than AT, and as you can see, with certain forums open to multiple ATs. Even this way, you could still probably cut the number of forums in half, at least.
It's still not that great, but it's better than saying "Blasters and Corruptors over here", "Defenders, Controllers, and Dominators here", I think. You might have to repost a few of the sticky guide listings in multiple forums, but it'd make for more ease of discussion.
I also wouldn't really bother with a separate forum, honestly, with build help if you go this way.
I don't particularly view it as pigeonholing, simply as...well...simplifying. There's a rather large amount of forums to sift through here on our boards, and to a new, or even veteran player who hasn't spent time on the forums, it's a bit confusing.
|
Some examples of topics which are prohibited to discuss on the Official City of Heroes Freedom Forum include, but are not limited to:{...}
|
I could also see "roles" as headers, as long as each archetype forum can be found under ALL the roles that the archetype can perform (not just the suggested roles) and that none of the archetypes forums are merged together.
While it might look like Defenders and Corruptors are both basically the same Archetype, they play radically differently in practice and should NOT be merged together.
I did look at the other forum subheadings (outside A & P), but I didn't see an obvious way to consolidate them given how little I visit most of them.
Blue
American Steele: 50 BS/Inv
Nightfall: 50 DDD
Sable Slayer: 50 DM/Rgn
Fortune's Shadow: 50 Dark/Psi
WinterStrike: 47 Ice/Dev
Quantum Well: 43 Inv/EM
Twilit Destiny: 43 MA/DA
Red
Shadowslip: 50 DDC
Final Rest: 50 MA/Rgn
Abyssal Frost: 50 Ice/Dark
Golden Ember: 50 SM/FA
Gonna add my voice to those saying not to merge the AT forums. It's not as confusing as you seem to think, though adding the suggested (descriptors) wouldn't be a bad thing.
Meanwhile, I'm also going to say that you guys broke the CARP MELEE out of the Calendar. Birthdays are no longer there. Please, either bring back the Birthday listing, or bring back the old Cake icon by the username of someone having a Birthday.
[ ProTip: The banner is a link to art refs!! | The Khellection | The HBAS Repository | Brute Guides (4/16/10) | How To Post An Image - A Quick Guide ]
Biggest Troll on the forums? I'll give you a hint:
A couple of things:
- I'm heads down for the rest of the afternoon working on a Power Point presentation. I'll try to check this thread when I get some time tonight.
- Keep in mind, the above proposed forum changes are *just that* - Proposed. Nothing is set in stone and is part of the reason I brought this hear to discuss with the Community.
- When proposing changes, keep two things in mind:
1. Less is better: The less you have to scroll down the page, the fewer forums there are, the simpler it's going to be for a new user/someone unfamiliar with the forums.
2. Less clicks is better: Creating more parent/child forums isn't the solution. Things need to be one click away (Web Design 101 IMO).
3. The purpose of improvement is to grow our forum Community and to make the experience better for everyone, overall.
Thanks for keeping the discussion on track!
-Z
Andy Belford
Community Manager
Paragon Studios
The one-click-away thing is why I have my links pointed to "English" rather than to "City of Heroes Forums".
Maybe make more use of vB's expand/collapse heading functionality, which I seem to recall it has some of?
Some ideas:
- Get rid of the recruitment and player events forums. People can post that sort of thing in the relevant server forum.
- A quick glance at the Mac forum shows that it is mainly tech support. Get rid of the Mac forum and let Mac users post their issues in the gameplay/technical issues and bugs forum. Sticky relevant Mac links.
- Get rid of everything in For Fun! except general discussions and suggestions. Create a new subforum in For Fun labeled Creative Works. Let the Euro and Oceanic players post their stuff in their relevant server, or in general discussions. Salt the earth where Forum Games once was.
- Consider deleting Player Guides. Most guides can go in either General Discussion or the relevant AT forum.
- Merge the server forums as follows: have a forum labeled Freedom, a forum labeled Virtue, a forum labeled Euro, and a forum labeled Other.*
*Just kidding!
Why not create forum headers along the lines suggested and have archetype subforums nested appropriately? The playstyles of the ATs are sufficiently different that merging them together will likely cause as much confusion for new players as dealing with Blue vs. Red AT counterparts.
|
Thank you very much for the improvement on the rules' change from last year ("any videogame (aside from City of Heroes) topics are not allowed.") Here's hoping that we will be able to comment on the video game industry with specific examples without either making dedicated threads/discussions or compare/contrast posts. It's a strange legal fiction here on the forums that CoH is the only video game in existence. |
As is the case with all forums rules, enforcement is at our discretion.
Andy Belford
Community Manager
Paragon Studios
Can we just rename the Suggestions Forum 'jranger'?
What?
@Mental Maden @Maden Mental
"....you are now tackle free for life."-ShoNuff
Andy Belford
Community Manager
Paragon Studios
"Trust me, it worked in the Simpsons." - Calash
I want to be very clear that this is not carte blanche to discuss other games willy nilly. We're still not going to permit direct comparison of other games to City of Heroes or each other nor dedicated discussion of competing products, however one should be able to reference a game, in an offhanded way.
As is the case with all forums rules, enforcement is at our discretion. |
... That said, having read some of the direct comparison threads other forums get, I can see not being super enthused about them.
While I certainly appreciate your viewpoint:
What if we provided guidelines so that posts were easily identifiable within each forum? I don't particularly view it as pigeonholing, simply as...well...simplifying. There's a rather large amount of forums to sift through here on our boards, and to a new, or even veteran player who hasn't spent time on the forums, it's a bit confusing. Forums should be easy to understand at a glance. |
Even arbitrary groupings can be bad, such as that of Brutes with Tankers instead of with Scrappers. Personally, I find the Brute forum posters to have more in common with Scrapper forum denizens than Tanker forumites. So arbitrarily combining forums just means those Brute/Scrapper types now have to sort through two forums that include significant amounts of data that doesn't interest them instead of having just two forums largely in line with their interests
In my opinion the one AT, one forum approach is in fact the simplest and easiest to understand. I can see ATs that share both powerset classes being grouped, such as Corruptors and Defenders and all four Melee ATs (however, in this latter case, I think the clutter in the one combined forum may be worse than the trouble of having four separate ones), but beyond that you're definitely making things worse rather than better.
Kosmos
Global: @Calorie
MA Arcs in 4-star purgatory: Four in a Row (#2198) - Hostile Takeover (#69714) - Red Harvest (#268305)
This was intentional as some users felt it infringed upon privacy.
|
Okay, I get it. Perhaps when the forum admin hobgoblins have some free time, they can make birthday display opt-in. Or opt-out.
Necrobond - 50 BS/Inv Scrapper made in I1
Rickar - 50 Bots/FF Mastermind
Anti-Muon - 42 Warshade
Ivory Sicarius - 45 Crab Spider
Aber ja, nat�rlich Hans nass ist, er steht unter einem Wasserfall.
I think refining the AT forums would bring them in line with the way ATs are grouped in the avatar creation screen in the game.
@Golden Girl
City of Heroes comics and artwork
Andy Belford
Community Manager
Paragon Studios
While I certainly appreciate your viewpoint:
What if we provided guidelines so that posts were easily identifiable within each forum? I don't particularly view it as pigeonholing, simply as...well...simplifying. There's a rather large amount of forums to sift through here on our boards, and to a new, or even veteran player who hasn't spent time on the forums, it's a bit confusing. Forums should be easy to understand at a glance. |
I don't see what's so hard about looking at the forums and finding the archetype about which you're wanting to read. After all, if I'm already playing a scrapper and need help, I come to the forums and find the scrapper forum. If I have to go through a bunch of threads in the melee dps forum I'm likely to find information about the powerset I might be playing, and have it be WRONG because it was instead a question about the stalker version of that same powerset. There will be MUCH CONFUSION in forums where several archetypes share the same powersets, mark my words!
Unless you want to mark each and every thread title according to what archetype to which it relates, and in that case you might as well keep the AT specific forums as is!
Or are you more concerned about there being so many types of archetypes that new players might be intimidated? Because - correct me if I'm wrong, here - new players likely won't even come to the forums before creating an archetype, and you've already got the whole archetype-by-playstyle merging thingie already set up at character creation.
Again, I'm not getting your concern, and am totally against merging the archetype forums. It's pointless and it actually achieves the OPPOSITE of what you're intending, in that it makes things more CONFUSING.
Please don't do it.
The Scrappers' Guide to Dark Melee | Kheldian Binds and Strategies
This was intentional as some users felt it infringed upon privacy.
|
So, what's to stop them from removing their birthday? Or choosing not to display it? Those ARE options right there in the CP...
I say bring 'em back, and make an announcement that if you don't want the info to be known, to go Control Panel > Edit Your Details, and in the second section, either click the Clear button to remove Date Of Birth, or set it to one of the 4 display options.
Ta-da! Privacy Issue resolved!
[ ProTip: The banner is a link to art refs!! | The Khellection | The HBAS Repository | Brute Guides (4/16/10) | How To Post An Image - A Quick Guide ]
Biggest Troll on the forums? I'll give you a hint:
Would also like to add that if a "simplification" needs an explanation then it's really not much of a simplification.