Discussion: Extended Live Server Maintenance - Thursday, September 22, 2011
And unless you're putting in 60-80 hours a week, don't tell me about "limited downtime". Not griping about my job. I get paid RIDICULOUSLY well for it. But I put in a LOT of hours.
|
Again, I retort, stop trolling.
To elaborate, i've seen her make assertions many times where her only argument in support of her position is that it's true because that's the way it is. No logical justification other than she believes it to be so therefore it is no matter what.
Dr. Todt's theme.
i make stuff...
@CoH Management - This is just absurd. I'm not ragequitting and I'm glad the servers are back up ahead of schedule, but: the past two months have seen a ridiculous amount of downtime both planned and unplanned. I'm in a similar business, so I understand that these things happen... and that they don't have to be repeated recurring issues if you get your **** together. Kindly do.
Are we entitled to something: No, but when the devs feel they've "let us down" they have given us extra"goodies" in the past. How did they know we were "let down"? Because we voiced our opinions and concern's. |
I'm glad you have that "DEVS CAN NEVER DO WRONG!" attitude, but people like you keep games in the stone ages. People that want progress and satisfaction from a product voice their opinion and thoughts on matters pertaining their investments. |
Investment? How about "You are paying for access to a computer game service. This includes the possibility of downtime, sometimes EXTENSIVE downtime for maintenance and hardware upgrade purposes."
What, if anything, about that is unclear?
When did NCSoft or Paragon promise you 24x7x52 access?
Who knows (not you because you aren't a dev), we may just get something out of this because this is the most I've seen the game go down so much for such large periods of time since I started playing 3 years ago. And sitting down "taking the downtime like a man" will get us squat. |
Again. I've found that giving in to this sort of greed is never a good thing.
The dev's need to keep the public happy within limits. |
People are unhappy right now. |
And of those that are unhappy, some are philosophical about the situation.
However, a group of them are hell-bent on the "I am wronged therefore I must be compensated" line of...*reasoning*.
I don't think that is too much to ask. |
50)Sinergy X/(50)Mika.
(50)MaceX/(50)Encore
Sign the petition, dont let CoH go down! SIGN!
You're dealing in physical goods. This is an electronic service.
And if your bosses want to give away their product, that's cool. It's up to them. Willing to bet they're dealing with relatively low-value items (i.e. they're not a Ferrari dealership). |
You don't have a leg to stand on. You could continue to fight like the armless and legless black knight if you wish!
Dr. Todt's theme.
i make stuff...
So you're saying yesterday morning they decided, "Hey, yknow, let's move the servers just in case.''
|
- Went "Holy crap!"
- Said "We've got to get a bigger boat."
- Had some meetings to discuss the issue.
- Had some more meetings to arrive at technical specs for new servers
- Had some more meetings to arrive at the budget.
- Ordered the new servers
- Had more meetings to plan out an upgrade schedule and process.
- Waited for the new servers
- Took delivery of the new servers.
- Unpacked and tested the parts.
- Slotted the upgrade schedule in at the earliest possible time.
- Announced it.
Clearly indicating why they wouldn't be able to notify people at the beginning of the week. Via email. |
My game company got burnt by one of our manufacturers at GenCon this year because we were promised product that they KNEW they weren't going to be able to deliver. As such, we lost over $20,000 in direct sales at GenCon.
Dr. Todt's theme.
i make stuff...
yah, i still can't get past the server selected screen for half the servers, including triumph. Triumph being the only server i have toons on, i'm pissed.
Tons of posts on this thread, so I won't reply to specific ones.
My feeling is that considering that there have been almost daily downtimes and the total number of hours is 30+ (according to one post's count) it's understandable why people are annoyed. I don't think it would be a huge deal for NCsoft and the devs to compensate people for this annoyance. It's not a mandatory thing, just the nice thing to do. Adding a week to the subscription would be one way to do it.
Yes! Be nice Paragon and NCSOFT.
I just want them to get their ducks in a row. This constant downtime has to be brought under control. I expect downtime today cause it is Thursday but I will not like the downtime tomorrow when they will need cause what seems to me to be not knowing what the heck they are doing.
No. I'm saying that they saw the loads from the opening of i21 and did something in vaguely this order. |
@Damz Find me on the global channel Union Chat. One of the best "chat channels" ingame!
After having the servers down for so long and so often now I know that NCSoft doesn't care about the loyal players.
|
They have their money, why should they care. After asking if we were going to be reimbursed or compensated for all this downtime and being told "good luck" makes me wonder why I've wasted so much time on this game. |
You're just "Internet Angry" right now. So you're choosing to ignore this.
[quotte]The loyal players are being used as guinea pigs now before the people that don't have to pay come over.[/quote]
No. There are ALWAYS things that pop up on Live that never reared their heads on Beta. Since I started playing, there have been goofy behaviors in Live issue releases that simply didn't occur during IDENTICAL circumstances on Beta or Test. If the devs could avoid this kind of stuff, don't you think they would?
If you can seriously answer that they CHOOSE not to avoid this stuff, you may as well just cancel your sub now.
They will be getting the game free which means they won't have to spend a dime after the loyal players have spent thousands of dollars on the game. That's not a made up amount. The games were $40 so there was the initial game, evil vs bad, and now going rogue. $40 times 3 comes out to $120. Then the game time is $14.99 per month. That's $179.88 which I agree is not that much but if you add it up with 7 years then it comes out to $1,259.16. |
Also, compare that number by the price of a movie ticket. Or seats at a ball game. Exactly how many of those could be gotten for that amount of money. And would it have provided anyplace CLOSE to the total number of hours played in-game in the last X-number of years.
If you need heck take 12 days, that'll just give me more time to find another game. |
Buh-bye?
Can I have your stuff?
So yeah. I DO know what they're doing. And, as someone who works IT, I have a fairly GOOD idea of EXACTLY what's going on from their descriptions, as I've done similar things myself.
They are physically moving the data to new servers.
That's great, but unless Zwill came in with a bag of new 8 terabyte solid state drives and they all started dancing around the office singing Love Train, I wouldn't call it an upgrade. |
|
If you want to complain fine. Just make sure you know what you're talking about. Avoid baseless accusations. And for the love of Bob, try to hold back on the self-entitlement of "I should be complensated" demands.
|
Additionally, it has been spelled out, the downtimes during EU primetimes are still STATISTICALLY affecting the lowest number of players. This argues as to how large your portion is.
|
Now, if you can bring on a couple tens of thousands of paying subscribers in your neck of the woods, I'm fairly certain the devs would have EVERY reason to reconsider.
|
|
I'm feeling quite content today actually.
It didn't rain. The sun is shining. The boss has been gone most of the day.
Yup, pretty good day so far.
When I get home from work, the servers will be up and I will enjoy happy CoH time.
All is good with the world.
^__________________^
If I only had a Klondike bar...
| Home Server: Virtue |
Twitter: @ZFLikesNachos Save City of Heroes (Titan Network) [Successful "The Really Hard Way" runs: 4] [Click ^]
They discovered an issue that ... caused them to bring the servers back sooner than planned? Does that mean they had to abort the hardware upgrade (and therefore that they'll do it another time), or does it mean that somehow the upgrade turned out to be easier (faster) than they'd thought?
Just curious; it seems like an odd way to phrase a good event.
So it's basically a mixed bag.
Dr. Todt's theme.
i make stuff...