Still Sexism in costume choices? Really?
I, for one, see a disturbing trend that women got wedding tuxedos but men didn't get Hearts Plus.
Actually, men only get the tux coat out of that pack where women get the tux coat, veil, two bridal tops, bridal skirts, two styles of shoes and three "Plus" style "w/ skin" sets. Kvetching about how terrible it is that we have Excess Plus aside, male characters got all sorts of cheated in the "parity in number of parts" department on that one.
I do believe men got access to the hearts pattern from the Valentine's Event *shudder*
@Brightfires - @Talisander
That chick what plays the bird-things...
Terrorists win
My position is basically this:
I have no problems with the Devs, or anybody, making gender based decisions. My problem is that every time they do make a gender based decision, it caters to a very particular sexist stereotype (witness the difference in the walk emotes).
I have a separate problem in that they continue to choose to make a gender-based decision almost every time they add some kind of clothing (as opposed to the armors and animal pieces and so forth). As a result, they haven't really been expanding the range of options available to toons (male or female), and have simply been adding in more variations on themes that already have an incredibly strong showing.
I have no problem with them adding in a nice corset piece, and I'll even accept the really odd choice of what looks like a padded bra, because, well, it doesn't hurt me that those pieces exist and more options is always good. But when they add those instead of other things that the playerbase has been clamoring for for years and would be more in theme, I get annoyed.
Global @Diellan - 5M2M
Mids' Hero/Villain Designer Lead
Virtue Server
Redside: Lorenzo Mondavi
Blueside: Alex Rabinovich
Got a Mids suggestion? Want to report a Mids bug?
I have no problem with them adding in a nice corset piece, and I'll even accept the really odd choice of what looks like a padded bra, because, well, it doesn't hurt me that those pieces exist and more options is always good. But when they add those instead of other things that the playerbase has been clamoring for for years and would be more in theme, I get annoyed. |
funny aside due tot he "its all skimpy lingeree" crowd here, i actually used the corset and long dress to make 2 of my character's outfits more modest, i apparently am doing it wrong.
some people have weird definitions of skimpy, that's all.
Well one thing I can say about female costumes in general is that I find them easier to layer. The newest pieces are really good for that and can be used to make everything from churchlady to Amy Fisher.
The problem is with Bottoms. Firstly, there's no "Athletic Shorts" option, and I do know a number of men who wear those (yes, they're all cyclists). The closest you can come is tights with Bare feet. There's not even a "no socks" option for sneakers with tights (which women do get). The only skimpy option is really "Bare" which gets you the type of shorts men wear for body building. It's not underwear, it's not a speedo, it's not anything.
|
Actually, you can do a pantless castrato as long as you make it a zombie or werewolf.
ok, im not even getting in the middle of this pirahana filled minefield of understated gender politics, but this one sticks out, which specifically steampunk options for a female top were we asking for that we wanted but didnt get? ill admit, im not super into steampunk, but based on what i have seen in abney park costumes, girl genius, and that lady mechanica comic david posted up, the outfits we were asking for were pretty much as exactly as we could get without getting us sued. what specific steampunk type for women was asked for that was not addressed? i tend to haunt the costume threads and i missed the steampunk thing that was asked for for years that we didnt get. can i get some links?
|
I was expecting "Victorian Steampunk" to be, well, more Victorian than it is. It could've been more like Soulless (technically more a gaslamp fantasy than steampunk, but the point is the same). I don't understand why the Victorian Steampunk and Classic Steampunk jackets on women are the same except for a few textures.
Global @Diellan - 5M2M
Mids' Hero/Villain Designer Lead
Virtue Server
Redside: Lorenzo Mondavi
Blueside: Alex Rabinovich
Got a Mids suggestion? Want to report a Mids bug?
People wanted a long coat for females. Which is fine and understandable but people have also been asking for corset type pieces for years so to complain that we got one instead of the other (and this means the Devs didn't listen) is a little bizarre.
|
But corsets, in general, seem to be the general fallback that the Devs make whenever they decide to make a female specific piece (see witch outfit, wedding outfit).
Global @Diellan - 5M2M
Mids' Hero/Villain Designer Lead
Virtue Server
Redside: Lorenzo Mondavi
Blueside: Alex Rabinovich
Got a Mids suggestion? Want to report a Mids bug?
Corsets pretty much are the default top to a wedding dress.
I don't know any real life Croatoa style witches though to ask them about it from their angle.
The new waistcoats would have been nice for the ladies, ladies in waistcoats is pretty darn steampunk.
And yes... long coats with shoulders that don't look awful: many of the shoulder pads are shifted oddly on the female rig, the worst offender is the armoured body, I can't use any shoulder-pads with that mesh, they look terrible, the female crab outfit messes up the shoulder positioning as well.
In specific: Long coats for women? They're a staple part of the genre (that's why men got them), people were clamoring for them ever since the Magic Pack mysteriously denied it, and this was a perfect opportunity to add it.
I was expecting "Victorian Steampunk" to be, well, more Victorian than it is. It could've been more like Soulless (technically more a gaslamp fantasy than steampunk, but the point is the same). I don't understand why the Victorian Steampunk and Classic Steampunk jackets on women are the same except for a few textures. |
1) most of the victorian female longcoats wrap around the legs, rather than fly back, like our trenchcoats are required to do due to the tech. It might have been difficult to make something thematically consistent and still keep with that trend.
...Of course something that's not trenchcoat-length could probably be done with a matching knee-length skirt and matching jacket top.
2) if you used "steampunk female" in google image search (warning: enable safesearch) you see hundreds of images of corsets and bared legs and cleavage and... where was I... oh, yeah... lots of that stuff*. I didn't find a long coat anywhere on the first few pages. Much of Steampunk fashion does take Victorian-era themes and apply more modern expressions of sexuality to them- things that would get you arrested in that era... and even many of the longcoats I did find were sexualized beyond their norm.
Longcoats certainly have their place, but if you were researching, trying to produce pieces that were ICONIC to the genre and had broad appeal, you can't be faulted for concluding that longcoats were lower on the list.
I am happy for the little things, though-- making the chest pieces "detail" instead of just "chest" gives us a great deal more flexibility in their design - both skimpy and conservative. Compare that to if they'd been just another 'tops with skin' option. Much the same with the belt pieces- many of those could have been hard-defined directly onto a skirt, but the way they delivered it gave us the ability to add it in many different ways, depending on our preferences.
* yes, I have to joke about being sexist in a thread about sexism in costume choices. I'm weird that way.
A coat! A coat! My MMO for a coat!
In general, this link. And...
Speeding Through New DA Repeatables || Spreadsheet o' Enhancements || Zombie Skins: better skins for these forums || Guide to Guides
I can't imagine ever living in a time when that stuff would have been fashionable
@Golden Girl
City of Heroes comics and artwork
I don't really happen to think that actual Victorian costume is really a good example of what would be the opposite of sexist.
Anyway, if you want to build something more modest, layer the costume pieces. You don't have to wear them over keyhole lycra. For an imperfect example of it taken to an extreme:
The problem with any outfit like this of course is that dresses aren't long enough, so you are forced into dealing with the length of the leg. This is a more or less unfixable issue due to how the game works. However, any time you give a model pieces that lace all the way up to the neck, I don't see how you can say it's not adding less modesty rather than more.
Short version: coats would still be nice of course but just because a piece is layerable doesn't mean you have to dress like a streetwalker.
Actually, I realised today, the real problem with costumes isn't the sexism, it's the complete lack of regular non-martial arts robes for everyone.
Can't do proper Lich costumes without it! D:
And the lack of Gothic Plate Armour. And Tabards.
And while we're at it I want a Great Knife available as sword choice, please!
Reference: http://boards.cityofheroes.com/showthread.php?t=247757
With the new and awesome steampunk set that has been released, people are already complaining about the still lack of costume piece choices being only male or only female. http://boards.cityofheroes.com/showt...66#post3667966 The people have spoken and are still yelling at you CoH Dev team! So the only questions I have are is when? And why not sooner then that? |
Virtue: @Santorican
Dark/Shield Build Thread
I don't really happen to think that actual Victorian costume is really a good example of what would be the opposite of sexist.
Anyway, if you want to build something more modest, layer the costume pieces. You don't have to wear them over keyhole lycra. For an imperfect example of it taken to an extreme: The problem with any outfit like this of course is that dresses aren't long enough, so you are forced into dealing with the length of the leg. This is a more or less unfixable issue due to how the game works. However, any time you give a model pieces that lace all the way up to the neck, I don't see how you can say it's not adding less modesty rather than more. Short version: coats would still be nice of course but just because a piece is layerable doesn't mean you have to dress like a streetwalker. |
Her first costume: .................................................. .. And, using the new pack:
Don�t say things. What you are stands over you the while, and thunders so that I cannot hear what you say to the contrary. - R.W. Emerson |
YUMMY Low-Hanging Fruit for BASE LUV
That seems like a trend to me.
The Wedding Pack. Female characters got the Wedding Tuxedo and a selection of bridal textures and items. I lack the imagination to picture a "Bridal set" that offers absolutely nothing Lacy.
You're already down two to packs from which to extrapolate a trend.
I'll give you that the Magic set is rather lacy and skimpy. Witch Bare and Witch Lacy are both nearly lingerie.
I don't agree with you on the steampunk pack, though.
You tell me that the Bustier and Leather Bustier are lingerie are skimpy? I suppose, in a certain context, they are. A T-shirt, in a certain context, can be skimpy. A men's dress shirt, in a certain context, can be skimpy. A Burlap Sack, in a certain context, can be skimpy.
I really don't think you have enough data points to see a trend here.