Why so complicated?


Adeon Hawkwood

 

Posted

*rant on* I know this has been mentioned a few(hundred) times already, but why is the new incarnate system so overly complex? It's not that I don't understand how it works, it just a pain in the rear for no apparent reason. If all common comps cost 20 threads, and all common abilities cost 3 commons, why not just make the abilities cost 60 threads and forget about having 50 different components?! Seriously, why have the components at all? Just make each level of ability cost x# of threads. *rant off*


 

Posted

Yeah, I'm not sure I get why the need for all the options either. Especially since a reward table gives you a choice of one of all the same kind of reward.


Make a man a fire and keep him warm for the day, SET a man on fire and keep him warm for the rest of his life.
Incarnates: K'lir(Fire/Dark Corr):Hot-House Flower(Plant/Fire Dom):Kinrad X(Kin/Rad Def):Itsy-Bitsy Spider(Crab):Two Ton Tony(Mace/WP Broot):Teeny Weeny Widow(Fortunata/Widow) : Zeroth Law (Ice/Fire Tank)

 

Posted

I would imagine they wanted to create a system people could really sink their teeth into, not something they could sort of walk through in a couple of play sessions. Getting to 50 isn't easy, quick or without complexity either.


 

Posted

This is really a good question.


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by NightmareWyvern View Post
*rant on* I know this has been mentioned a few(hundred) times already, but why is the new incarnate system so overly complex? It's not that I don't understand how it works, it just a pain in the rear for no apparent reason. If all common comps cost 20 threads, and all common abilities cost 3 commons, why not just make the abilities cost 60 threads and forget about having 50 different components?! Seriously, why have the components at all? Just make each level of ability cost x# of threads. *rant off*
Specifically because of the reward table. If there were no components, just threads, then everyone would still be grinding to get T3s and T4s. I'm at work, so my math may be off, but a Very Rare component takes 1060 threads to craft (adding up att the sub component thread costs). Even if say the Trial awarded you 50 threads at a success, it would still take you more then 15 good runs to get what you need. (thats assuming 3-4 Astral Merits per run as well) That's also assuming you have everything ELSE crafted beforehand. (actually, to craft a T4 from the start you would need I think 1720 threads)

Thats grindy in a bad way even to players who don't mind grinding. With the Components, the reward table give's you a "shortcut" to get your shinies faster, simple as that. It's also no more complicated then the IO system, just 1 more "salvage" layer added to it.




"Well, there's going to be some light music and a short note of apology saying, 'The universe ended last week, we're really sorry, we don't know what you're doing here, didn't you get the message?'"- Steve Moffat

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Clave_Dark_5 View Post
I would imagine they wanted to create a system people could really sink their teeth into, not something they could sort of walk through in a couple of play sessions. Getting to 50 isn't easy, quick or without complexity either.
Taking away all the options wouldn't make it any easier to obtain, just to understand.

Why have 12 different commons with different names when you can just have 'common incarnate component'?

You still need the same number of commons, uncommons, rare, and very rares to make your stuff, you just wouldn't need all the fancy names to make figuring out which one you need harder.


Make a man a fire and keep him warm for the day, SET a man on fire and keep him warm for the rest of his life.
Incarnates: K'lir(Fire/Dark Corr):Hot-House Flower(Plant/Fire Dom):Kinrad X(Kin/Rad Def):Itsy-Bitsy Spider(Crab):Two Ton Tony(Mace/WP Broot):Teeny Weeny Widow(Fortunata/Widow) : Zeroth Law (Ice/Fire Tank)

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Clave_Dark_5 View Post
I would imagine they wanted to create a system people could really sink their teeth into, not something they could sort of walk through in a couple of play sessions. Getting to 50 isn't easy, quick or without complexity either.
Yes, but they could do that just as well without all the wonky components. I suppose it's a way to add randomness to the system without making it obvious.

Obvious unfair random rewards:

He got 30 threads for completing the trial when I only got 10, that's unfair!

Essentially the same, but appears more fair:

He got a rare component where I only got a common component. But hey, we each only got 1 component. That's fair because it's random.


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Clave_Dark_5 View Post
I would imagine they wanted to create a system people could really sink their teeth into, not something they could sort of walk through in a couple of play sessions. Getting to 50 isn't easy, quick or without complexity either.
But, they don't cost different amounts, the commons are all the same cost. There's no real complexity other than switching back and forth between two menus to make sure you pick the right one.


 

Posted

Hmm...yeah, it does seem to be a bit of overkill. For the Alpha, at least different components were linked to different tasks. If you need something, take a little bit of a shortcut and do that task.

That doesn't seem to be the case here though. And if you haven't planned things out, it can lead to a bit of confusion. I started doing a few trials just for the sake of doing trials (well, and to unlock slots). I was surprised when one succeeded and I got a rare reward table. I had no clue what any of the components did, as I hadn't planned out what to put in any of the four slots (certainly didn't have a plan in place for a Tier 4). So I tried to hastily figure something out before I goofed something up and got left with super insps. Rather tough on-the-fly, especially given the somewhat muddy power descriptions (Seeker who does what now???)


Suggestions:
Super Packs Done Right
Influence Sink: IO Level Mod/Recrafting
Random Merit Rolls: Scale cost by Toon Level

 

Posted

@Benchpresser,

But what if you kept the 4 types of components, and just didn't bother naming them?

At the end of the trial your reward table would be:
1) common component
2) 10 Threads

or

1) uncommon component
2) 2 super insps

or

1) rare component
2) 3 super insps

or

1) very rare component
2) 4 super insps


You lose 'flavor' without having names, but it would certainly simplify your salvage.


Make a man a fire and keep him warm for the day, SET a man on fire and keep him warm for the rest of his life.
Incarnates: K'lir(Fire/Dark Corr):Hot-House Flower(Plant/Fire Dom):Kinrad X(Kin/Rad Def):Itsy-Bitsy Spider(Crab):Two Ton Tony(Mace/WP Broot):Teeny Weeny Widow(Fortunata/Widow) : Zeroth Law (Ice/Fire Tank)

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kinrad View Post
Taking away all the options wouldn't make it any easier to obtain, just to understand.

Why have 12 different commons with different names when you can just have 'common incarnate component'?

You still need the same number of commons, uncommons, rare, and very rares to make your stuff, you just wouldn't need all the fancy names to make figuring out which one you need harder.
Same reason there's 5 different sets of SO's...flavor. It's a little thing, and yeah, back in the day figuring out which mutation enhancement was to-hit debuff could be a tad annoying, I think it would loose something (indeed, with IO's it kinda has) if all the recipes for Inc powers just said "3 common" or "1 very rare, 2 commons and 1 rare power"


Furio--Lvl 50+3 Fire/Fire/Fire Blaster, Virtue
Megadeth--Lvl 50+3 Necro/DM/Soul MM, Virtue
Veriandros--Lvl 50+3 Crab Soldier, Virtue
"So come and get me! I'll be waiting for ye, with a whiff of the old brimstone. I'm a grim bloody fable, with an unhappy bloody end!" Demoman, TF2

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kinrad View Post
@Benchpresser,

But what if you kept the 4 types of components, and just didn't bother naming them?

At the end of the trial your reward table would be:
1) common component
2) 10 Threads

or

1) uncommon component
2) 2 super insps

or

1) rare component
2) 3 super insps

or

1) very rare component
2) 4 super insps


You lose 'flavor' without having names, but it would certainly simplify your salvage.
It would simplify it yes, but unlike a fantasy MMO with its generic "+5 sword of smiting" or whatever, a Comic MMO relies a lot more on Flair.

Its much more fun for a person to go "ooh, got a Self-Replicating Alloy" then it is to say.. "cool, a purple component." It's all about a 'comic' state of mind. It helps some people get in groove with the game. It's the same reason we have totally different names for SOs, and 4-5 different sets of IOs for each type.




"Well, there's going to be some light music and a short note of apology saying, 'The universe ended last week, we're really sorry, we don't know what you're doing here, didn't you get the message?'"- Steve Moffat

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kinrad View Post
You lose 'flavor' without having names, but it would certainly simplify your salvage.
If I want "simple", I'll play a Facebook game.

I like the fact that it has flavor, and it really isn't that hard to understand.

It is no more complex than the invention system. And let's face it, if the invention system were all things like "Targeted AoE" "Ranged Damage" and "Melee Damage", not only would there not be very much variety due to there only being one type of IO set, but it would be pretty boring too.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Dechs Kaison
See, it's gems like these that make me check Claws' post history every once in a while to make sure I haven't missed anything good lately.

 

Posted

Personally, I prefer simpler games with simpler mechanics which one doesn't need a sheet of paper and a pen to keep track of. Look at a game like Portal. I honestly don't understand why RPGs are always understood to require a degree of complexity to rival professional accounting (to the point where lack of micromanagement is seen as a flaw), but I do not miss it.

I still prefer the original Diablo and its clone, the original Dungeon Siege to most other click-n-kill that came after them, including Diablo 2 and Dungeon Siege 2.

...

Hmm... I wonder which game Dungeon Siege 3 will rip off this time. Maybe Devil May Cry?


Quote:
Originally Posted by Arcanaville View Post
Samuel_Tow is the only poster that makes me want to punch him in the head more often when I'm agreeing with him than when I'm disagreeing with him.

 

Posted

Why so serious?

had to!


@Damz Find me on the global channel Union Chat. One of the best "chat channels" ingame!

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by ClawsandEffect View Post
If I want "simple", I'll play a Facebook game.

I like the fact that it has flavor, and it really isn't that hard to understand.

It is no more complex than the invention system. And let's face it, if the invention system were all things like "Targeted AoE" "Ranged Damage" and "Melee Damage", not only would there not be very much variety due to there only being one type of IO set, but it would be pretty boring too.
I agree. As far as crafting systems go the Incarnate one is really rather simple. I don't see people complaining that there is more than one of each rank of invention salvage ...


@True Metal
Co-leader of Callous Crew SG. Based on Union server.

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by TrueMetal View Post
I agree. As far as crafting systems go the Incarnate one is really rather simple. I don't see people complaining that there is more than one of each rank of invention salvage ...
Because it's how many years after the fact? Those of us who complained have moved on to other complaints, but this has not become less irritating. I've been called a surprisingly large amount of insulting names for the simple fact of saying "I find Inventions too complicated to bother with." Surely I must be stupid, because Inventions are so simple, and surely Inventions must be so simple because no-one ever complains about them being too complex. Except when people do, but those don't count.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Arcanaville View Post
Samuel_Tow is the only poster that makes me want to punch him in the head more often when I'm agreeing with him than when I'm disagreeing with him.

 

Posted

I just find it wierdthat when I went to my Cardiac Core Revamp, in norder to get to my Paragon, I needed to start all over again to beginning and work on my radial tree to get to the component I need for my Paragon which is the radial boost revamp.

I know I need to do it, but...Im just not used to trees working like that really.


 

Posted

I guess I really don't care one way of the other. It could be made simpler, but as has been stated you would certainly lose 'flavor' to do it. The reality is that it isn't that hard, I mean I've already slotted all 4 new powers successfully and managed the crafting just fine.


Make a man a fire and keep him warm for the day, SET a man on fire and keep him warm for the rest of his life.
Incarnates: K'lir(Fire/Dark Corr):Hot-House Flower(Plant/Fire Dom):Kinrad X(Kin/Rad Def):Itsy-Bitsy Spider(Crab):Two Ton Tony(Mace/WP Broot):Teeny Weeny Widow(Fortunata/Widow) : Zeroth Law (Ice/Fire Tank)

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by TrueMetal View Post
I agree. As far as crafting systems go the Incarnate one is really rather simple. I don't see people complaining that there is more than one of each rank of invention salvage ...
The only thing with this vs invention salvage though is that you have to plan better. If I get a Hamidon Goo from a drop and later I happen to find out that I need a Pangean Soil, no big deal - I go to the market and sell one and buy the other. If I get a very rare reward table and happen to pick the wrong piece of incarnate salvage, I've lost a good deal of value - I now have a piece of purple salvage I may not be able to use which would make little sense to break down, AND I still need another bit of purple salvage that I either have to get lucky (again) to roll or have to build.


Suggestions:
Super Packs Done Right
Influence Sink: IO Level Mod/Recrafting
Random Merit Rolls: Scale cost by Toon Level

 

Posted

Also, this could have something to do with it:

When I play, I'm often on Vent. And at the end of the trial, we (almost) all pipe up and say,
"Yay! Rare!" or
"Super YAY! Very Rare!" (to which we all hastily reply, "HAX!") or
"**** on all of you, 10 threads, this game sux." (to which we all hastily reply, "SLACKA!"

But then we get down to the Serious Business of figuring out which ^%*&% piece of salvage we need to use to get what we want. That takes some time, and some... the word escapes me, you do it with your head-part... sometimes it hurts... ah yes, thinkerating!

And during the thinkerating process, unbeknownst to us, but knownst to many psychologistical-type-people (I will call them 'Shrinks' to protect their feelings from that other derogatory term I used, cause they hate that) you become invested more in the characters, and in the powers, and feel like what some people call these 'tacked-on powers' become more intrinsically part of the player's experience with the character.

But maybe they're just doing it to mess with our heads, and punish us for our evildoing.


Arc #6015 - Coming Unglued

"A good n00b-sauce is based on a good n00b-roux." - The Masque

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Samuel_Tow View Post
"I find Inventions too complicated to bother with."
I'm not calling you dumb, because I know from reading you're post that you're not, but really? Where's the complication? You match names of 'ingredients' to a list and you click create ... how's that complicated?


@True Metal
Co-leader of Callous Crew SG. Based on Union server.

 

Posted

OK There seems to be a bit of confusion here.

The components are for 2 reasons to look nice and to soak up threads when people make mistakes because they didn't plan out their build.

1) If they wanted to just make 4 components called common, uncommon, rare and very rare (or some such) granted it wouldn't look as cool,

2) BUT the breakdown conversion of one component to another means that you can't just swap them out since you don't end up with enough threads to go from one rare to another for example.

This is why I say Devs made an intentional thread sink. Just as they did for the Alpha slot, I got lots of Alpha components I had no use for when working on Alpha slots.

At least this time you can choose your reward instead of knowing your reward is on a TF no one else wants to do. Oddly so far I am having the problem of only getting Rares so I have to plan really far out.


----------------------------
You can't please everyone, so lets concentrate on me.

 

Posted

Right - and that's what got me. First successful run and I am presented the Very Rare option. And I'm like, "Wait, what? I don't even have my first slot unlocked yet, I need to quick choose a T4 in something? I uh, haven't planned quite that far out yet."

Actually that brings me to a point about the requirements interface. I'm sure I'll get the hang of it eventually, but for right now I can't look at the requirements for an ability and know which are the very rares, rares, etc. They are all just SuperX or PolyY written in the same font color. If they were identified as purple, orange, yellow it would be much easier to identify them.

"Ok, I might want a Seer eventually. The top two require this purple and that purple. Ok, those are in my reward table - great!"


Suggestions:
Super Packs Done Right
Influence Sink: IO Level Mod/Recrafting
Random Merit Rolls: Scale cost by Toon Level

 

Posted

I understand people wanting something complex, something to sink their teeth into.

However, this is the wrong kind of complex.

Interesting complex is "Hm, do I want to use Kinetic Combat on this attack for the Smash/Lethal defense bonus, or slot more and use Touch of Death and go for Melee Defense instead?"

Or any variation thereof. That is interesting because it requires making decisions based on what one wants to achieve, and where having a deeper knowledge of the game system in question allows for being able to think up more complex interactions, and having a better end result due to this knowledge (and using Mids', heh).

"WTF do I take... Okay lemme open the incarnate window... Search the bloody enhancement I have already decided I want... Right, I need this... Wait, this is a rare, that's for tier 3... Okay, a Semi-Conscious Energy."

The "interesting" bit is deciding what path I want to take up the Incarnate enhancement trees, depending on the character, build, and strengths and weaknesses and how I want to adress them. A scavenger hunt through a bunch of menus that slow down the whole game whenever they're opened to find out what the bloody bollocks I need to pick from the rewards table is NOT interesting in the least. There's nothing even minimally clever about it, like having to choose the right Taskforce to pick the right component.

So yes, if all they have is pretty different names and all can be grabbed from the same tasks, on the same table, depending on whatever the RNG has decided to award you (that is, if it's even random, which it may not be), they may as well save it and just use differently named "something of the well" for different ranks and be well done with it.


Players' Choice Awards: Best Dual-Origin Level Range Arc!

It's a new era, the era of the Mission Architect. Can you save the Universe from...

The Invasion of the Bikini-clad Samurai Vampiresses from Outer Space? - Arc ID 61013