Furio

No, it's a passive device...it being there means it's working...you can see it's affect on your stats, but i don't think there's actual FX for when it goes off...the game gets rather visually busy by the high end...it'd just be more visual noise.

Um...he didn't say anything about where they were from, simply that they shared a mindset that he's attributing to Korean companies.

I don't see how you got that conclusion from what he wrote. He's pretty much said the exact opposite.
Your intent/topic/position on any given issue is irrelevant to whether or not people see you as a troll, it's your behavior.....and things like an OP ignoring the on-topic posts in their thread and instead arguing about what constitutes a troll....that's kinda trollish behavior.

The "project they were working on" that he's referring to is CoH, i believe.

Its a new mode. up to 6 people (from RED and BLU) vs a hoard of robots that are trying to set up a bomb

Aye....they're not really interested in the well-being of the property, or the artistic merit...simply if they can keep making money off of it. Which is why i want all the Marvel characters to go back to Marvel. They at least have an interest in the properties beyond simple dollar signs.

You seem to be confusing "Marvel movies" with "movies with Marvel characters". They're two completely different things. The Ben Affleck Daredevil movie was made by Fox, the new one would be made by Fox and is a "movie with Marvel characters". "Ang Lee's Hulk", all the Spider-Man, FF,and X-men movies, also fall into this category...a movie starring Marvel characters made by a separate movie studio.

All of the Avengers related movies of the past few years (Iron Man, Cap, Thor, Incredible Hulk, Avengers) are "Marvel movies"....made in-house by Marvel.

And while I'm biased against the X-men movies...it's the only property that I tend to geek-out over continuity changes (mainly because I feel they're ham-fisted, and often done just for the sake of doing them, and then they can't even bother keeping their own internal continuity straight), I really would be much happier if Marvel got the rights back to all their characters.


But for the short term, I'll totally be content with them extending the start deadline on a DD movie in exchange for Surfer and Galactus...they're sorta needed for where the next Avengers movie is headed.

Well, that's a given. But one step at a time

yeah....that doesn't happen till years later...Past came out in '81, Present in
'90.

Rachel isn't a hound in Days of Future Past. Her last name isn't even given,just that she's Franklin Richards' girlfriend. No actual time-travel in it, either (re: another post up there). Rachel somehow swaps adult Kitty's consciousness with her 13 year old self in order to warn the Xmen about the assassination of presidential candidate Senator Kelly by the New Brotherhood of Evil Mutants (Mystique, Destiny, Blob, Avalanche and Pyro) You're thinking of Days of Future Present, which was out about a decade later spread through a few of the Annuals released that year.

I'm surprised you're even kinda surprised about the Reeds. It has to be possible for Bran and Rickon to split up, and I can't see Bran allowing Rickon to go off with just anyone, so Osha pretty much has to leave with him....and Jojen is just too important to Bran's development.

Not an action star, so no invite. Even in that movie he was just playing a guy who was playing an action star...he's at least 2 degrees of separation from qualifying to be included in the cast here.

Probably not at all...He's only going back to 1969, not 1869, after all. Just reminded me of a Louis C.K. bit.