Re: Sister Psyche and Manticore


Amerikatt

 

Posted

Honestly, I don't know why you guys bother, it's not like you're going to convince her of anything.


 

Posted

Introduction of souls = fail. You might as well say a god told you or you divined it from pig entrails.

*wipes hands*

And I'm out.


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Shadow State View Post
Honestly, I don't know why you guys bother, it's not like you're going to convince her of anything.
Because, it's my duty as a scientist to try.


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by RadDidIt View Post
Because, it's my duty as a scientist to try.
Well that's just silly.

Scientist's keep saying one thing, then discovering they were wrong.


BrandX Future Staff Fighter
The BrandX Collection

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Golden Girl View Post
A machine doesn't have a soul - we do.
I remember when I was grappling with all this stuff. Not to sound like "oh, that was just a phase." These are important things to ask oneself about. Not sure if arguing on the Internet will accomplish as much, though I never tried. I didn't necessarily come to any conclusions anyway. I got burned out somewhere halfway through Being and Nothingness (I'm talking about the book by Jean-Paul Sartre, not the Concealment power pool).

Something funny. I wouldn't let machines find dates for me (as many do nowadays) because I want there to be some magic in things like that. And yet, I don't believe in magic. That's humans for ya. And whatever constitutes a human soul, I recognize that my belief in one has precedents. People have believed all sorts of "certainties" which placed us front and center in the universe, only to be informed by meddling science and technology origin contacts that the universe likely HAS no center, and if it does we're certainly off to one side. Our minds, "sufficiently advanced", seem labyrinthine, unsolvable, magical. This is (paradoxically) why I suspect sentient artificial intelligence may be possible some day. It will be those meddling science and technology origin contacts. Our arrogance--er, I mean majesty--is always undone by those fools!


@Captain-ElectricDetective MarvelThe Sapien SpiderMoravec ManThe Old Norseman
Dark-EyesDoctor SerpentineStonecasterSkymaidenThe Blue Jaguar
Guide to AltitisA Comic for New PlayersThe Lore ProjectIntro to extraterrestrials in CoH

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Golden Girl View Post
A machine doesn't have a soul - we do.
Prove a soul exists.


 

Posted

Yeah, it's probably best if I sit this argument out, right?


to TO THE END!
Villains are those who dedicate their lives to causing mayhem. Villians are people from the planet Villia!

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by BrandX View Post
Well that's just silly.

Scientist's keep saying one thing, then discovering they were wrong.
And if they didn't try, they never would.

Funny how that works.


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Golden Girl View Post
Emotions are something deeper than just stimulation - they're part of our consciousness, which makes us who we are.



Our life spirit isn't - our souls are something deeper.
If the soul is not 'knowable', how do you know it exists?


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Golden Girl View Post
Not really, no - flight is a simple physical thing - it can be defined by physics, and is based on solid principles that can be broken down and studied, and then created and recreated.
Emotions are the opposite - they can't be defined or rationalized or broken down to be studied, or be created or recreated.
If someone wanted to know how flight works, they could read about it and understand it - but something like love can't be defined or understood - it can't be made to happen and it can't be made to stop, and it can't be copied - it's just something that's inside all of us, and it's one of the things that makes us human - and it's something that a computer can never feel.
That's wrong. Emotions can be manipulated, and to some degree created, by chemical means. That's how drugs work. (both recreational and medecinal)


"Men strunt �r strunt och snus �r snus
om ock i gyllne dosor.
Och rosor i ett sprucket krus
�r st�ndigt alltid rosor."

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Golden Girl View Post
Feel free to show me a robot that can do anything other than respond from a pre-selected set of responses
Machines can never have an imagination - they're too limited - the best they can ever do is respond to things based on the stuff we've programmed into them - they can never have emotions.
Prove to me that humans can do anything other than respond toa pre-selected set of responses.


"Men strunt �r strunt och snus �r snus
om ock i gyllne dosor.
Och rosor i ett sprucket krus
�r st�ndigt alltid rosor."

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Arilou View Post
Prove to me that humans can do anything other than respond toa pre-selected set of responses.
Well, as our imaginations are unlimited, it's kinda hard for me to list something that's infinite - so it'd probably be better for you to list the pre-selected responses you think we have


@Golden Girl

City of Heroes comics and artwork

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Arilou View Post
That's wrong. Emotions can be manipulated, and to some degree created, by chemical means. That's how drugs work. (both recreational and medecinal)
But they're only shallow responses, not the genuine deep emotions that we get in our normal lives.


@Golden Girl

City of Heroes comics and artwork

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Golden Girl View Post
But they're only shallow responses, not the genuine deep emotions that we get in our normal lives.
*sigh*

You would be the expert on shallow responses.


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Golden Girl View Post
This discussion is the proof - among many other things
No it isn't.


 

Posted

Your selection of responses and train of thought is just offensive, and I'd like to mention that no ammount of smileys will make it ok.

All your talk of emotion, have you ever considered those that are incapable of expressing or feeling emotion the same way you are? Do you believe that people with emotional and behavioral disorders, or cognitive disabilities are less human? Do you have a similar ability to discout their existance because they function differently? How about harming them, do you get to harm people with lesser to no emotional function, in the same way you believe is acceptable to act toward technologically Created intelligence? Oh, and could you please share your depth of awareness and knowledge in the field of computer programming, psychology, and biology that give you the ability to completely discount the future possibility to program emotion, intelligence, or both.

By the way to address your ignorance; as you seem to have forgotten high school biology, DNA is the outline that guides how we function. DNA stores information, and passes that information to cells. Cells are the fundimental building blocks of living orginisms.

I would like to point out that I am an incredibly religous person. One thing I despise, however, is the use of religion to prevent intellectual growth, spew hate, or replace personal responsibility. Read Richard Dawkins. He may not agree with religious opinion, but that makes him no less brilliant in his field. Questions must be asked, ideas must be challenged, and nothing must be kept so sacred as to be beyond intellectual curiosity. To do so is waste the gift of thought we have been given.


Murphys Military Law

#23. Teamwork is essential; it gives the enemy other people to shoot at.

#46. If you can't remember, the Claymore is pointed towards you.

#54. Killing for peace is like screwing for virginity.

 

Posted

With her limited range of responses at most times I'm willing to believe GG might actually be a chat bot.


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dark_Respite View Post
Personally, I always saw Manticore, Back Alley Brawler, and Ms. Liberty as the poster children for Vigilante (before we actually had it). Sure, Posi, States, Psyche and Synapse are as foursquare heroic as you can get (pretty much), but Manticore is not. And considering Manticore is practically our version of Batman, anyone wanna say HE'S not a hero?

Dark, yes. Grim, yes. Blood on his hands, gallons. Hero? Absolutely.

And yes, Psyche knows. One of the most powerful psychics on the planet. And she loves him (God only knows why, the two always struck me as oil and water), so she accepts it. Maybe she fell back on that fallacy of "I can change him".

(This is of course just MY opinion - and it helps that in COH, I run in an SG where the group as a whole walks just shy of the line of Vigilante.)

Michelle
aka
Samuraiko/Dark_Respite
I thought the whole marriage thing wasn't about in-game stuff or did I totally not read anything about that correctly? like they just wrote it in game to fit with what they did in real life sort of thingy? I mean not of having an in-game explanation would be weird but it would be very close to bottom of story problems for me.


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Golden Girl View Post
A machine doesn't have a soul - we do.
No, we don't. "Souls" are just a cushy lie we tell ourselves to distract our brains from the the very clear and very real notion that one day, we'll die, and it's all over. We like to think that our "souls" will go off to a better place, but they won't. We cease to exist, and that frightens people.

Humans are nothing more than very complex machines made out of meat. Both history and medicine have demonstrated that emotions, love, dreams and personality can be controlled by purely physical means. If it makes people feel better about themselves by believing they are somehow more "special" than that pile of rocks over there, then I'm not about to stop them, but don't try to dismiss other people's ideas just because you need to believe that humans aren't precisely as soulless as a computer.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Golden Girl View Post
Well, as our imaginations are unlimited, it's kinda hard for me to list something that's infinite - so it'd probably be better for you to list the pre-selected responses you think we have
This is also false. Our imaginations are not unlimited. In fact, they feel unlimited simply because we're not even imaginative enough to see the boundaries of cognition. Different people's finite imaginations don't always overlap, which means a lot of people have ideas a lot of other people don't, creating the illusion of infinity. But imagination is no more infinite than the water in the ocean is. Yes, when you're adrift out at sea and there's nothing but water as far as you can see in all directions, including down, it "feels" infinite, but it's not.

Romantic ideas like souls, imagination, love, good and evil and all of that are perfectly fine for fictional stories. Prudent, in fact, as they make for some very engaging themes. But they cannot and should not be applied to the real world because the real world doesn't work that way.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Arcanaville View Post
Samuel_Tow is the only poster that makes me want to punch him in the head more often when I'm agreeing with him than when I'm disagreeing with him.

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Golden Girl View Post
This discussion is the proof - among many other things
No, this does not constitute proof of the existence of the soul.


"Men strunt �r strunt och snus �r snus
om ock i gyllne dosor.
Och rosor i ett sprucket krus
�r st�ndigt alltid rosor."

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Golden Girl View Post
But they're only shallow responses, not the genuine deep emotions that we get in our normal lives.
No, that's not actually true. Medicated states of mind may be limited in duration, but they're not any less genuine while they last.

Medical disorders can and do affect our emotions (as do the medication designed to alleviate said disorders)

Quote:
Well, as our imaginations are unlimited, it's kinda hard for me to list something that's infinite - so it'd probably be better for you to list the pre-selected responses you think we have
Human responses are not infinite. Only an omnipotent being would have an infinite (as opposed to a really frickin' huge number) of responses availible.


"Men strunt �r strunt och snus �r snus
om ock i gyllne dosor.
Och rosor i ett sprucket krus
�r st�ndigt alltid rosor."

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Samuel_Tow View Post
No, we don't. "Souls" are just a cushy lie we tell ourselves to distract our brains from the the very clear and very real notion that one day, we'll die, and it's all over. We like to think that our "souls" will go off to a better place, but they won't. We cease to exist, and that frightens people.
When I say souls, I'm not talking about religion.

Quote:
Humans are nothing more than very complex machines made out of meat. Both history and medicine have demonstrated that emotions, love, dreams and personality can be controlled by purely physical means.
No they haven't, and no they can't - the way people experience life can't be recreated or forced.

Quote:
If it makes people feel better about themselves by believing they are somehow more "special" than that pile of rocks over there, then I'm not about to stop them, but don't try to dismiss other people's ideas just because you need to believe that humans aren't precisely as soulless as a computer.
The reason that a dumb idea like that can be dismissed so easily is because it's so dumb.

Quote:
Our imaginations are not unlimited.
Show me the limits then

Quote:
Romantic ideas like souls, imagination, love, good and evil and all of that are perfectly fine for fictional stories. Prudent, in fact, as they make for some very engaging themes. But they cannot and should not be applied to the real world because the real world doesn't work that way.
Actually, it does - that's why we're here.


@Golden Girl

City of Heroes comics and artwork

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by William_Valence View Post
All your talk of emotion, have you ever considered those that are incapable of expressing or feeling emotion the same way you are? Do you believe that people with emotional and behavioral disorders, or cognitive disabilities are less human? Do you have a similar ability to discout their existance because they function differently? How about harming them, do you get to harm people with lesser to no emotional function, in the same way you believe is acceptable to act toward technologically Created intelligence?
I don't think the forums rules let us discuss the players of other MMOs.

Quote:
DNA is the outline that guides how we function. DNA stores information, and passes that information to cells. Cells are the fundimental building blocks of living orginisms.
And how many cells do dreams have?


@Golden Girl

City of Heroes comics and artwork