John Carter: Well Worth Seeing


Agonus

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Samothrake View Post
I'm a little confused by that article.

They say the film cost $350 million to make, but needs to gross $600 million to 'break even'? Somehow I just can't see them spending $250 to distribute and market this movie.

Something's not right with the math in Hollywood, and this ain't the first time I've noticed. But it is the most recent and the biggest difference.
In Hollywood, or big corporations for that matter, "break-even" includes all the bonuses for the executives and a good rate of return for the investors.


 

Posted

Well.. I thought it was a near perfect movie adaption. And liked the movie lots!

Its an old story.. but unless they make it adult version it is what I expected. This is how a John Carter movie should look like. I had fun at least. And it would be a shame if there was never a sequal.


- The Italian Job: The Godfather Returns #1151
Beginner - Encounter a renewed age for the Mook and the Family when Emile Marcone escapes from the Zig!
- Along Came a... Bug!? #528482
Average - A new race of aliens arrives on Earth. And Vanguard has you investigate them!
- The Court of the Blood Countess: The Rise of the Blood Countess #3805
Advanced - Go back in time and witness the birth of a vampire. Follow her to key moments in her life in order to stop her! A story of intrigue, drama and horror! Blood & Violence... not recommend to solo!

 

Posted

I went to the midnight showing last week, partly because I was up anyway. It wasn't the book, which is one of my favorites. I went in knowing it could never live up to that, and so I wasn't disappointed. Indeed, I found it very entertaining.

The high point for me was the portrayal of the Green Men, almost exactly as I had imagined them. I understand the director was primarily an animation guy, so I suppose this makes sense.

The low point was the performance of the actor who portrayed John Carter. Aside from his just being rather wooden, you know something's off when a character who proclaims himself a Virginian at every possible opportunity is the only character in a scene without a Southern accent. Again, with a director unused to working with live actors, this, too, makes sense.

A disappointing but extremely necessary point to make the movie work were the changes to the villains, Carter's transportation to Mars, and even Carter's backstory. I can't imagine a film audience, or even a literary audience, for that matter, accepting these things in the form Burroughs wrote them originally (villains as almost unnoticeable characters, totally unexplained, and being a mysteriously ageless soldier, respectively, for those who don't know the novels). Story conventions have just changed too much over the past century. I was disappointed to lose the original version here, but I thought the changes were handled well.

On the last point, (the literary) Carter's unexplained agelessness, my personal pet theory has always been that Carter is, in fact, the basis for the legends of the god Mars himself. Burroughs never gives any hint of having even thought of this, let alone written it into a story, but I still enjoy the idea. What do you think?


"Bombarding the CoH/V fora with verbosity since January, 2006"

Djinniman, level 50 inv/fire tanker, on Victory
-and 40 others on various servers

A CoH Comic: Kid Eros in "One Light"

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Olantern View Post
The low point was the performance of the actor who portrayed John Carter. Aside from his just being rather wooden, you know something's off when a character who proclaims himself a Virginian at every possible opportunity is the only character in a scene without a Southern accent. Again, with a director unused to working with live actors, this, too, makes sense.
Not everyone who fought for the Confederacy sported the "southern drawl".

Quote:
A disappointing but extremely necessary point to make the movie work were the changes to the villains, Carter's transportation to Mars, and even Carter's backstory. I can't imagine a film audience, or even a literary audience, for that matter, accepting these things in the form Burroughs wrote them originally (villains as almost unnoticeable characters, totally unexplained, and being a mysteriously ageless soldier, respectively, for those who don't know the novels). Story conventions have just changed too much over the past century. I was disappointed to lose the original version here, but I thought the changes were handled well.
Agreed. While the whole ubermensch theme running through much of Burroughs' works had to be toned down. I think that's partially what was behind the whole dialog between Matai Shang and Carter (the line about the transfer process not really making him any smarter).

Quote:
On the last point, (the literary) Carter's unexplained agelessness, my personal pet theory has always been that Carter is, in fact, the basis for the legends of the god Mars himself. Burroughs never gives any hint of having even thought of this, let alone written it into a story, but I still enjoy the idea. What do you think?
Honestly I don't remember enough of the novels. I got through the first and the second. But Burroughs' style has always been somewhat painful to read.



Clicking on the linked image above will take you off the City of Heroes site. However, the guides will be linked back here.

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Zombie Man View Post
Thanks for the link - that's an interesting opening weekend postmortem. There's a similar expose behind this disappointment-in-the-making at Vulture: The Inside Story of How John Carter Was Doomed by Its First Trailer. It's much the same story of studio office politics, the directorial ego of a trufan, and a marketing campaign that seemed almost deliberately obtuse. Seriously, why wasn't the tag line "From the creator of Tarzan" or at least "By the director of WALL-E and Finding Nemo"? No wonder the abysmal Lorax movie, which did everything right except the adaptation of the source material, clobbered it.

Like Stanton, I devoured Burroughs's Mars books as a kid, which might be my problem with his treatment of the subject matter: It's too much his own. Nothing in what I've seen so far truly brings to life either what I imagined reading them or even the old pulp and sci-fi cover art of the paperbacks I found.

This is "A Princess of Mars":



This is just too much red filter in Photoshop*:



* EDIT: Presumably to make up for the beige wash that defines the movie's look. Mars is the "Red Planet", not the "Khaki Planet".


 

Posted

Saw this yesterday. I thought it was fairly entertaining. There were times where I was genuinely surprised at how much it seemed everyone bought into this movie, from the amount of CGI that no doubt shot up the budget like a rocket to the lines that were at least half Martian verbage. At the very least you can say that the movie has some heart and imagination for such a big budget spectacle. It could have used some polish in areas, but it did quite a bit right and received laughs and even applause for all the right moments.

Still, with this CGI epic that's essentially introducing a new generation to a space-based franchise I can't help but be reminded of how WB bastardized Green Lantern by giving it neither heart or imagination and I worry about the future of DC movies post-Bat-Nolan.


- CaptainFoamerang

Silverspar on Kelly Hu: A face that could melt paint off the wall *shivers*
Someone play my AE arc! "The Heart of Statesman" ID: 343405

 

Posted

#1. For understanding how messed up the movie business is you should watch movie bob's explanation on hollywood history and such on the escapist.com. Not to bring in economics and such into this or anything but the shady business practices of these massive conglomerates is what is damaging them everything from how they treat the customer to the talent that creates the work is so irrational and illogical to obfuscate loses and gains so that they can grab every cent from every where that it is in end destroying their entire world.

#2. The movie was decent, but considering I've seen several renditions of this movie, I don't think that this needed to be made if the weren't going to give us anything really different from the others.

#3. The change they made to use technology rather than mysticism while it is interesting, ultimately cripples the story as it makes it less believable and makes it so if there are sequels they'll have a ripple effect causing tons more changes that aren't for the best.

#4. On the plus side it has made me look into getting the audiobook form of these books and I'm going to listen to them as they sound interesting.


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Durakken View Post
The movie was decent, but considering I've seen several renditions of this movie, I don't think that this needed to be made if the weren't going to give us anything really different from the others.
I'd like to see a list of those other versions, since I'm only aware of one.


'I don't like the look of it at all,' said the King: 'however, it may kiss my hand if it likes.'
'I'd rather not,' the Cat remarked.
'Don't be impertinent,' said the King, 'and don't look at me like that!' He got behind Alice as he spoke.
'A cat may look at a king,' said Alice.

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Aneko View Post
I'd like to see a list of those other versions, since I'm only aware of one.
My memory may be flawed and i saw the same movie several times. It's possible. I've seen the same name or nearly the same name as it so yeah... It's still nothing really different from that previous movie from my recollection.


 

Posted

The wife and I loved it. Definitely want to see it again on the big screen.

-LR


Lightning Rod
<Guardians>

"I am certain that all CoX will be humbled by the might of the Lightning Rod." -Lady_Sadako

 

Posted

Just returned from seeing it in 3D - There were a few cringe worthy parts while getting used to the John Carter's acting style, as well as a few parts with Dejah that felt off. I'd chalk it up to inexperience directing live actors - the body language was just a little off, inflection on some lines needed a tiny bit of tweaking, etc. This only really came out in the quiet lulls between moving the plot along, so it wasn't too jarring.

With that out of the way I was very, very entertained. I love old serials, old sci-fi, "Humans are superior!" silliness, and it hit all of those beautifully. The visuals, costumes, and gadgets were stunning and looked like someone had made a full movie set in Asgard from Thor. And the story pieced everything together in a fun, entertaining, and engaging way.

I'm generally an easy to please movie-goer, but John Carter was just all around good, even excellent outside of the small, slow bits of relationship drama during the beginning of the film. I have no regrets paying the obscene cost to watch a 3D film in theaters for this one - I'll probably even see it again with a friend who hasn't seen it yet. It's close to my perfect movie with a touch of camp, drama, action, and a "save the world" plot; it's interesting and entertaining, and doesn't try to shoe-horn in the pretense of trying to challenge or send a message to the viewer.

I'm praying that the film will somehow surge in viewings. I'd love to see a sequel.


The Paladin
Steel Canyon, Virtue
Exalted

@Paladin

 

Posted

So yea, I just saw this tonight myself. I'd kind of despaired of it being any good once I started seeing the commercials and once the reviews started popping up I'd pretty much written it off as not being any good. Still I went to go see it out of the same sense of morbid curiosity that keeps on dragging me to Michael Bay movies and I have to say I'm rather happy I went.

It's certainly not a cinematic masterpiece by any stretch, but it's a lot of good solid fun in the same vein as movies like The Rocketeer or the '93 version of The Three Musketeers. It manages to have a decent amount of character development and plot mixed in with its action scenes and the special effects were quite well done. I'd give it about a 7/10 with 5 being a completely average 'meh' film.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Durakken View Post
I've seen the same name or nearly the same name as it so yeah... It's still nothing really different from that previous movie from my recollection.
The only other version I'm aware of is Princess of Mars. It's kind of a terrible film, which makes sense since I believe it's done by The Asylum, and I'll grant that it's not bad for one of their films but it's still pretty horrible. They do have the same general plot since they're mostly based on the same book, but aside from a couple similarities they're pretty different I thought.


MA Arcs: Yarmouth 1509 and 58812

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Durakken View Post
#3. The change they made to use technology rather than mysticism while it is interesting, ultimately cripples the story as it makes it less believable and makes it so if there are sequels they'll have a ripple effect causing tons more changes that aren't for the best.
Sorry, just noticed this.

I'm not completely sure what you're talking about here. Granted it's been quite a while since I read the books, but I pretty much recall everything being presented as technology not magic. Granted, it's pretty absurd tech but so are a lot of other things in the sci-fi genre and not all of them were written 100 years ago.


MA Arcs: Yarmouth 1509 and 58812

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Oliin View Post

The only other version I'm aware of is Princess of Mars. It's kind of a terrible film, which makes sense since I believe it's done by The Asylum, and I'll grant that it's not bad for one of their films but it's still pretty horrible. They do have the same general plot since they're mostly based on the same book, but aside from a couple similarities they're pretty different I thought.
I've not known about this being a book series and I knew most of the movie...

The story diverges only a little when they leave the Tharks and is actually better in overall because of it because the story of the movie is "we must save Barsoom" but there is no "saving" of Barsoom in the 2012 one other than maybe in some meta way where saving the princess saves the planet where as in the other one I saw saves the planet via literal saving the planet's atmosphere, which if wiki is to be believed from a slight skimming seems to be taking a few elements from later stories or the book that this movie left out.

I read the a little bit on some of the other stuff and it seems that one of the more interesting parts that could be expanded on in later sequels, the Therms, can't really be done right because no matter what they do you have to either break completely from the novels and if you do that, what's the point? Or they could keep the story from the novels and ruin the set up in the movie.


 

Posted

I think the point being the Barsoom novels have been mined over the decades and various elements are found in stories and movies like Flash Gordon, Star Wars, Avatar, and other space operas.

It's sadly humorous that people wrongly think John Carter stole from those stories and movies. But like I've said, everyone knows Tarzan, few know of John Carter or David Innes (Pellucidar series).


Father Xmas - Level 50 Ice/Ice Tanker - Victory
$725 and $1350 parts lists --- My guide to computer components

Tempus unum hominem manet

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Oliin View Post
Sorry, just noticed this.

I'm not completely sure what you're talking about here. Granted it's been quite a while since I read the books, but I pretty much recall everything being presented as technology not magic. Granted, it's pretty absurd tech but so are a lot of other things in the sci-fi genre and not all of them were written 100 years ago.
according to wiki the "transported" is treated as an astral projection of sorts where they aren't really on the same plain, if I'm reading it correctly... That being the case the point before where Carter is transported can't happen, the reason for the tomb is ruined, and the threat carter gives doesn't make much sense as does a few things that happen like the translator drink.

In the movie the transportation is handled as some sort of technology that doesn't quite jive right.


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Father Xmas View Post
I think the point being the Barsoom novels have been mined over the decades and various elements are found in stories and movies like Flash Gordon, Star Wars, Avatar, and other space operas.
Let's not forget Adam Strange, a fairly blatant lifting.


'I don't like the look of it at all,' said the King: 'however, it may kiss my hand if it likes.'
'I'd rather not,' the Cat remarked.
'Don't be impertinent,' said the King, 'and don't look at me like that!' He got behind Alice as he spoke.
'A cat may look at a king,' said Alice.

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Oliin View Post
Sorry, just noticed this.

I'm not completely sure what you're talking about here. Granted it's been quite a while since I read the books, but I pretty much recall everything being presented as technology not magic. Granted, it's pretty absurd tech but so are a lot of other things in the sci-fi genre and not all of them were written 100 years ago.
I'm reading A Princess of Mars, having already seen the film. The way he originally gets to Mars in the book is: he goes into a cave in Arizona, somehow his "soul" gets outside of his body, then he walks outside, looks up in the sky, see Mars, and BAM, he's on Mars.

Sounds like Astral projection to me, but he does have a duplicate physical body when he gets to Mars.

It could be technology, but it comes across more as super-advanced psychic powers or magic, to me.

I totally see why they didn't follow this in the movie, because no one would have bought it.

An interesting side note is that he immediately knows he's on Mars in the book, where he has to figure that out in the movie. Again, they had to do this with the changes they made.


Agua Man lvl 48 Water/Electric Blaster


"To die hating NCSoft for shutting down City of Heroes, that was Freedom."

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mental_Giant View Post
I totally see why they didn't follow this in the movie, because no one would have bought it.
... Ummm What?

The story is science fantasy. It's ok for that to happen. Souls and astral projection are completely within our list of global references and works. What is in the movie tries to keep it Science Fiction and doesn't work because we are given the Therms who supposedly go between planets at will and if that's the case then they'd have to have bodies laying around the universe which is extremely dangerous and no one in their right mind would even remotely use or develop that technology. It makes no sense to create that technology nor to use it and scientifically it's bankrupt. I see where they were going, but it simply doesn't work... and the only reason they did that is so thy can maintain the ERB part of the story which isn't necessary.

Also How can you even remotely say that no one would buy it? "Most" people already buy that they have a soul and "most" people know what vision quests are and "most" people know what astral projection is... Its part of the fantasy element and it works perfectly reasonably in that, but a majority of people in the real world are betting on something like that being fiction so >.>


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Durakken View Post
Also How can you even remotely say that no one would buy it? "Most" people already buy that they have a soul and "most" people know what vision quests are and "most" people know what astral projection is... Its part of the fantasy element and it works perfectly reasonably in that, but a majority of people in the real world are betting on something like that being fiction so >.>
How would they communicate it visually without a lot of cumbersome voice-over explaining what was happening? I read the book and I don't understand what happened (although I'm not done yet, so maybe a better explanation happens later).

I highly doubt that most people know what vision quests and astral projection are, although the core audience for this might. The problem is the core audience for this isn't going to make you the $600 million you need to break even. Having a device that does the translation to Mars makes it much easier for the average movie-goer to understand.


Agua Man lvl 48 Water/Electric Blaster


"To die hating NCSoft for shutting down City of Heroes, that was Freedom."

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mental_Giant View Post
How would they communicate it visually without a lot of cumbersome voice-over explaining what was happening? I read the book and I don't understand what happened (although I'm not done yet, so maybe a better explanation happens later).

I highly doubt that most people know what vision quests and astral projection are, although the core audience for this might. The problem is the core audience for this isn't going to make you the $600 million you need to break even. Having a device that does the translation to Mars makes it much easier for the average movie-goer to understand.
... Really? i'm sure if went and looked for it I could find tons of examples.

All you have to do is have John get knocked out and then "from" his body he sits, and stands up, with his body still on the ground. He then just has to ask "am I dead?" walk outside and have the same zoom thing they have in the movie.

This is a standard fair trope that happens in tons of stories. Maybe they won't know what astral projection, or vision quest, or out of body experience is by name... which I highly doubt... they know the trope. People understand this stuff more than the "science" thing that the directors/writers obviously don't understand.


 

Posted

They know the trope, but do they know it as a means of interplanetary travel? I think that's beyond the limit of the suspension of disbelief.


Agua Man lvl 48 Water/Electric Blaster


"To die hating NCSoft for shutting down City of Heroes, that was Freedom."

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mental_Giant View Post
They know the trope, but do they know it as a means of interplanetary travel? I think that's beyond the limit of the suspension of disbelief.
So an amulet that magically copies someone's body, transfers this new body to a different planet, keeping the other body in suspended animation, and at the same time transports itself without all this nonsense is more "realistic" than someone having a soul that can move magically between worlds... which is what the soul does in just about every mythology out there?

If you want it to be "less" confusing, even though its not confusing to begin with. All you have to do is have Carter ask "Is this Hell?" when he gets to Barsoom and then he learns that he is on Mars through "magical" means and if he can find his way book to Earth he can return to life... One could even make the comparison to Dante's Inferno.


 

Posted

Neither my wife nor I had ever read the books. My wife knew *nothing* about the movie heading into it, and I only knew a little from a brief synopsis I read of the Barsoom novels.

We both thought it was really well done. The female lead was weak, not in acting skill, but because (I imagine) that was how she was written. You can see they tried to spice her up a bit by giving her some sword fighting scenes, but she was clearly designed to be the 'damsel in distress' to be saved by the 'big strong man'.

I hope they do a sequel or two, because it really was a fun movie. I may have to go hunt down a novel or two to read as well.


Make a man a fire and keep him warm for the day, SET a man on fire and keep him warm for the rest of his life.
Incarnates: K'lir(Fire/Dark Corr):Hot-House Flower(Plant/Fire Dom):Kinrad X(Kin/Rad Def):Itsy-Bitsy Spider(Crab):Two Ton Tony(Mace/WP Broot):Teeny Weeny Widow(Fortunata/Widow) : Zeroth Law (Ice/Fire Tank)