Conversations or monologues?
Let me set up the scenario for you. We're following a story arc where a mobster by the name of Vinnie has dabbled into Black Magic for some reason that isn't important. He has possessed another mobster, a woman by the name of Helga, whom the player has previously had a chance to kill, arrest or set free to work with her on stopping Vinnie. This conversation is with a third mobster by the name of Bubba, from whom we need to get the information on where exactly Vinnie is.
Yes, I'm aware that the full sum of the conversation is very long, but you're not supposed to read through the whole thing. You're supposed to pick a path and stick with it, and each path is really only five or six screens long. The rest is just for options. I haven't really defined what each outcome means, so feel free to infer. If I messed up the numbering somewhere or forgot to add screen directions to options, please let me know.
---
Screen 1: Opening
A hero? Well, that explains what Tony was yappin about on the radio. Why are you raidn my legitimate warehouse? All this stress aint good on my delicate heart. If get any palpitations, my lawyers gonna eat you for breakfast.
Option 1: Bubba (move to screen 2)
Option 2: Warehouse (move to screen 3)
Option 3: Family (move to screen 4)
Option 4: Mission (move to screen 5)
Option 5: Attack
---
Screen 2: Bubba
Me? Yeah, about me! You got any idea who I am, hero? Im Bubba Striker and I own the biggest damn shippin company in town. You bustin into my warehouse was a big mistake, cause see, I got all them friends in high places. You lay a finger on me and youre goin down!
Option 1: Return (move to screen 1)
---
Screen 3: Warehouse
What about it? Its mine and youre tresspassin. I got hundreds of em all over the city. Striker Shippings been in my family for 60 years... Well, its been in the Family, anyway. We got money and connections comin outta our ears, hero. So lemme give you a bit of advice, all friendly-like: Turn around an go home. You dont wanna mess with us.
Option1: Return (move to screen 1)
---
Screen 4: Family
Hah, as if Id be dumb enough to confess. You wearin a wire, hero? Dont matter none, cause I dont know what youre talkin about. But lemme tell ya somethin, hero: The Family aint guys you wanna mess with, cause when you do, you gonna get fitted for a pair of cement shoes and sleep with the fishes before you know it. S all rumour and what they say, course. I dont know nothin bout no Family. Im a legitimate businessman here.
Option 1: Return (move to screen 1)
---
Screen 5: Mission
Vinnies involved in black magic? Ugh, idiot! I mean... I dont know nothin bout no Vivnnie Anzio! Now get outta my warehouse unless you got a warrant, cause Im gonna have to defend myself, see.
Option 1: Warrant (move to screen 6)
Option 2: Helga (move to screen 19)
Option 3: Vinnie (move to screen 35)
Option 4: Attack
---
Screen 6: Warrant
Wait, so you do have a warrant? Huh, figured heroes these days just busted into places on their own head. Well, that puts us in quite a predicament, doesnt it? See, I dont wanna go to jail and you dont wanna get dead, so how bout we make a little deal: You turn around and walk and me... Well, I disappear. You tell the cops whatever you want, I dont care, and I me... Well, I aint never seen you, I dont know you, I dont care about you. That sound good?
Option 1: Vinnie (move to screen 7)
Option 2: Helga
Option 3: Attack
---
Screen 7: Warrant/Vinnie
Yeah, OK, I know im. Vinnie Anzio, an... Associate of mine. But I aint no rat and, more importantly, I aint no wimp! I aint tryin to weasel my way outta this, hero. Im givin you a chance to not get your face punched in. Your call whether you wanna take it or not. Fine by me either way.
Option 1: Leniency (move to screen 8)
Option 2: Threaten (move to screen 9)
Option 3: Black Magic (move to screen 10)
Option 4: Attack
---
Screen 8: Warrant/Vinnie/Leniency
A deal with the prosecution? You think Im stupid? I rat on the Family, theyll find me, dont matter where I am. Your idiot police cant protect me, cause the heavies my guys havell tear them to shreads. Sides, like I said, I aint no snitch. Were all family. They take care of me, I take care of them, and if any one of us sinks, we keep our yaps shut. No deal, hero, and no deal means you die!
Option 1: Attack
---
Screen 9: Warrant/Vinnie/Threaten
So, what? Youre goona beat me up? Kill me? OK, I got an idea. Say that again, so I can laugh appropriately! Ha ha ha! I eat heroes like you for breakfast, punk! You think I got to where I am cause of my fancy oratory skills? No, I got here cause all the losers what wanted my pace are dead. Where do you get off threatening me! I can kill you with one arm tied behind my back, and I dont need no capos to help me, neither!
Option 1: Attack
---
Screen 10: Warrant/Vinnie/Black Magic
That idiot. I told him not to mess with that stuff. Ive seen black magic before, I know what it does to people. I tried to stop Vinnie from meeting with that shaman, but the guy has rocks for brains... And it aint just him, neither. Seems like a lotta guys been goin off the deep end these days. If it aint death magic its dyne or Freakshow stuff or who knows what. Whats this Family coming to?
Option 1: Arrest (move to screen 11)
Option 2: Deal (move to screen 12)
Option 3: Helga (move to screen 13)
---
Screen 11: Wrrant/Vinnie/Black Magic/Arrest
Say what? No! Just cause I think my associates are idiots dont mean I wanna go to jail! Hell, what am I even sayin? Deals over, hero. First you die, then Im gonna find that idiot Vinnie and make him dead, too. Eat lead!
Option 1: Attack
---
Screen 12: Warrant/Vinnie/Black Magic/Deal
You got a better deal, then? So, what, I rat on Vinnie and you let me go? You know, I aint no rat, but that idiot Ill rat out, cause he aint Family no more. Black magics evil, hero. I know I aint exactly a good guy here, but that stuffs just wrong. See, my brother, he got taken by the Pantheon a couple a years back. We got im out, but... We were too late. I dont ever wanna see that again, and if Vinnies dealing with that stuff, then to hell with the guy. Ill tell you what you need to know, then Im outta here. Outta the whole damn business. Ive seen enough death, and it only gets worse.
Option 1: Leave
---
Screen 13: Warrant/Vinnie/Black Magic/Helga
Helga Reinhardt? Oh, no! What did you do?
[from previous mission] Option 1: Dead (move to screen 14)
[from previous mission] Option 2: Arrested (move to screen 15)
[from previous mission] Option 3: She sent me (move to Screen 18)
---
Screen 14: Warrant/Vinnie/Black Magic/Helga/Dead
Shes what? But she was... How could you!?! Youre dead, hero! Hear me? DEAD!
Option 1: Attack.
---
Screen 15: Warrant/Vinnie/Black Magic/Helga/Arrested
What do you mean possessed by black magic? Vinnie! Oh, that little punk! Wait till I get my hands on him! I mean, OK, hes a crook, fine. We all are. But to get Helga in trouble like that? Hes dead! And you, hero, you get outta my way! You wanna know about Vinnie, Ill tell you where to find his body when Im done. Now get outta my way!
Option 1: Comply
Option 2: Refuse
---
Screen 16: Warrant/Vinnie/Black Magic/Helga/Arrested/Comply
Smart move. Ill deal with Vinnie, you just keep outta the way and you can have whats left.
Option 1: Leave
---
Screen 17: Warrant/Vinnie/Black Magic/Helga/Arrested/Refuse
I said move! You know what? Fine. You put Helga in jail, you get to die, too. Fine by me!
Option 1: Attack
---
What do you mean possessed by black magic? And what do you mean she sent you here? Is she OK? I... I gotta see her! Look, arrest me, punch me, I dont care, but I gotta see Helga! I gotta make sure shes OK! God damn Vinnie! You wanna have a shot at him? You got it. After that... AFTER THAT! Yeah, Ill rat on the little punk! You find the guy, you kill im! I dont care bout no laws on this one! Helga didnt deserve none of this. I got er into this whole mess... Guess I gotta do what I can to get er out, eh?
---
Screen 19: Helga
Yeah, Helga Reinhard, shes a friend of mine. What about her?
[from previous mission] Option 1: Dead (move to screen 14)
[from previous mission] Option 2: Arrested (move to screen 20)
[from previous mission] Option 3: She sent me (move to screen 26)
---
Screen 20: Helga/Arrested
Shes been arrested? What the hell for! Helga never hurt nobody! And if youre gonna try to tell me she ratted me out, forget it! Helga wouldnt do that! I run a legitimate business here, and so does she. Now I suggest you get outta my warehouse. I gotta call my lawyer and sort this whole mess out.
Option 1: Helga info (move to screen 21)
Option 2: Helga testified (move to screen 22)
Option 3: Vinnie(move to screen 23)
---
Screen 21: Helga/Arrested/Helga info
Helga Reinhardt. Shes runs Reinhard Imports, and shes a good woman. Whatever you think she did, she didnt do it. Helgas one of the good ones, and in this business... Err, in the import and shipping business... Thats saying a lot!
Option 1: Return (move to screen 20)
---
Screen 22: Helga/Arrested/Helga testified
OK, now youre just fishin! Ive know Helga for 20 years, and she aint never gonna incriminate me in any illicit-like activity. Im a legit businessman, and sos she. Either youre twistin er words, or youre a damn dirty liar. Or both. Either way, I aint buyin it.
Option 1: Return (move to screen 20)
---
Screen 23: Helga/Arrested/Vinnie
What do you mean possessed by black magic? Vinnie did what?!? But shes OK, right? Thats a relief. Yeah, I dont know nothin bout no Vinnie, but you keep on lookin. Now if youll excuse me, I got some... Family business to attend to, then I gotta get Helga out of that unfortunate misunderstanding. Now get outta my warehouse if you know whats good for you.
Option 1: Comply (move to screen 24)
Option 2: Refuse (move to screen 25)
---
Screen 24: Helga/Arrested/Vinnie/Comply
Smart move. Ill remember that. I just hope nothing bad happens to this Vinnie character any time soon. Thatd be a shame, wouldnt it?
Option 1: Leave
---
Screen 25: Helga/Arrested/Vinnie/Refuse
Bad choice, hero. Looks like Im gonna hafta defend myself, what with you trespassin on my property and all that. Too bad for you!
Option 1: Attack
---
Screen 26: Helga/She sent me
Yeah, and Im the Queen of Englad. Which Im not, in case it aint obvious. What do you think I am, stupid? I know Helga, and she dont work with no heroes!
Option 1: Lie (move to screen 27)
Option 2: Vinnie (move to screen 28)
Option 3: Bubbas brother (move to screen 29)
Option 4: Attack
---
Screen 27: Helga/She sent me/Lie
Nice try, hero, but I dont buy that for a dollar. You think Im stupid? I grew up on the streets of Kings Row. If I bought lies like that, Id have been dead in a ditch 30 years ago. Like I said Helga dont work with no heroes, and thats a fact.
Option 1: Return (move to screen 26)
---
Screen 28: Helga/She sent me/Vinnie
Helga hurt by black magic? OK, that is just low. You heroes are the worst. Quit tellin lies bout my friends! And I keep tellin you! I dont know no Vinne! Sheesh! Youre worse than the cops!
Option 1: Return (move to screen 26)
---
Screen 29: Helga/She sent me/Brother
Howd you know about Miles? I never told nobody! Except... I told Helga, but she wouldnt... She told you about this? I dont believe it, but... OK, hero, if Helga trust you, then I trust you... Well, enough to hear what you got, anyway.
Option 1: Arrest (go to screen 30)
Option 2: Vinnies whereabouts (go to screen 31)
Option 3: Vinnies secret
---
Screen 30: Helga/She sent me/Brother/Arrest
Figures! You heroes are all the same. Nothins too low for. You use my bother and my best friend against me. Shoulda seen that comin. Fine, if thats how you wanna play it, then lets dance. Youre trespassin on my property. And youre gonna die for it.
Option 1: Attack
---
Screen 30: Helga/She sent me/Brother/Vinnies whereabouts
Like I said, I dont know no Vinnie. Figures youd use my Helga and my brother to get me to incriminate myself, though. You wearin a wire, hero? Dont matter none. Im done talkin, and youre gonna die for traspassin on my property. Its all legit, see.
Option 1: Attack
---
Screen 32: Helga/She sent me/Brother/Vinnies secret
He what? That son of a... Oh, no, so Helga really is hurt? Is she OK? Oh, thank god! Yeah, OK, I admit, I know the guy. Vinnie Anzio, small time hustler, works for one of the local loan sharks. Beats people up and collects loans, nothing major. But black magic? I mean, I knew the punk was up to no good, but this? And to hurt Helga? Hes gotta pay! Look, Ill make you a deal you got nothin on me, and I actually do know where Vinnie hangs out. Pretty sure hes still there. So how bout I tell you where to go and you go there n leave me alone?
Option 1: Comply (move to screen 33)
Option 2: Refuse (move to screen 34)
---
Screen 33: Helga/She sent me/Brother/Vinnies secret/Comply
Pleasure doin business with ya. Here, I got the address to Vinnies hideout, its a ratty old warehouse at the docks. One of my old ones, actually. Go there and kick the guy in the teeth for me, will ya? And if youll excuse me, I need to go get Helga out of trouble. I owe her that much.
Option 1: Leave
---
Screen 34: Helga/She sent me/Brother/Vinnies secret/Refuse
Stupid! Fine, you wanna be a boy scout, go right ahead. Good luck finding Vinnies address when youre dead!
Option 1: Attack
---
Screen 35: Vinnie
Like I said. I dont know no Vinnie and I dont know nothin bout no black magic. Are we done here? Cause Im a busy man. I gotta run a business here. Cant just go goofin off like you heroes can, cause the city aint gonna pay my bills.
Option 1: Threaten (move to screen 36)
Option 2: Trick (move to screen 37)
Option 3: Attack
---
Screen 36: Vinnie/Threaten
Ooh, Im so scared. Im quakin in my boots. Do you see me quakin in my boots? No? Thats cause I dont give a damn about your threats. Think youre the first bully to come bargin into my warehouse and want somethin? Ive taken down tougher guys than you, hero. You dont scare me. Sides, aint that illegal-like?
Option 1: Return (move to screen 35)
---
Screen 37: Vinnie/Trick
Look, for the last time, I dont know Vinnie Anzio! I mean... Ugh... OK, fine, so Ive heard the name before. What of it? I heard of that Requiem guy, too, but that dont mean I got anythin to with im. Alls I know bout Vinnie is he works for some guy givin out loans with... High interests, and thats just rumour from the guys workin the docks. So what about im?
Option 1: Whereabouts (move to screen 37)
Option 2: Black Magic (move to screen 38)
Option 3: Helga (move to screen 41)
Option 4: Attack
---
Screen 37: Vinnie/Trick/Whereabouts
Like I said, I dont know the guy, I just know the name. Try the docks. S all I know.
Option 1: Return (move to screen 36)
---
Screen 38: Black Magic
Ugh... Nightmare stuff, that. Ive seen what it does to people. So youre sayin Vinnies mixed up with that? Idiot. OK, so I know the guy. So sue me. I knew he was up to no good. He was always a small-time punk lookin to hit it big time. Guess thats was his way, eh? Figures hed try somethin stupid like that. Look, if youre looking to stop his black magic, maybe I can help you out. I know for a fact where you can find Vinnie, and Im willin to part with that info if you clear outta my warehouse soon as you know. Deal?
Option 1: Comply (move to screen 39)
Option 2: Refuse (move to screen 40)
---
Screen 39: Vinnie/Trick/Whereabouts/Comply
Guys got a warehouse at the docks, one of my old ones. I let im rent it for a while, but he trashed the place, so I moved my business. Shoulda capped the punk back then, but I was movin outta the docks anyway. Heres the address. Pleasure doin business with you.
Option 1: Leave
---
Screen 40: Vinnie/Trick/Whereabouts/Refuse
Figures. You heroes are all the same. You smash peoples stuff, you barge into peoples property and demand everything happen your way. Yeah, good luck with that. You dont wanna deal like civilised people, then fine. Youre tresspassin and Ive got a right to defend myself. Eat lead!
Option 1: Attack
---
Screen 41: Vinnie/Trick/Helga
Yeah, Helga Reinhard. Shes a friend of mine. What about her?
[from previous mission] Option 1: Dead (move to screen 14)
[from previous mission] Option 2: Arrested (move to screen 42)
[from previous mission] Option 3: She sent me (move to screen 45)
---
Screen 42: Vinnie/Trick/Helga/Arrested
What do you mean possessed by black magic? Vinnie! I should have known that punk was up to no good! How could he do that to Helga? She never hurt nobody! Listen, hero, somethin just came up. Family business. I suggest you get outta my warehouse. Now.
Option 1: Comply (move to screen 43)
Option 2: Refuse (move to screen 44)
---
Screen 43: Vinnie/Trick/Helga/Arrested/Comply
Smart move. You just remember to keep your nose outta my business.
Option 1: Leave
---
Screen 44: Vinnie/Trick/Helga/Arrested/Refuse
Fine! Dont matter to me any. You dont know when to leave well enough alone, then you can die, too. And when Im finished with you, Ill make Vinnie wish he was never born!
Screen 45: Vinnie/Trick/Helga/She sent me
What do you mean possessed by black magic? And she sent you? Huh... She was always a smart lady, Helga. Listen, you want Vinnie, you got im, but I want in! If he hurt Helga, I want in. Ill get one of the boys to show you where he hangs out. You meet me there, gimme an hour to get some muscle together and Ill meet you there. You wanna arrest me or whatever, we can talk about that when were done.
Option 1: Leave
---
Screen 41: Vinnie/Trick/Helga
Hey, you keep Helga out of this. Oh, no! What did you do to her!
[from previous mission] Option 1: Dead (move to screen 14)
[from previous mission] Option 2: Arrested (move to screen 15)
[from previous mission] Option 3: She sent me (move to screen 45)
Samuel_Tow is the only poster that makes me want to punch him in the head more often when I'm agreeing with him than when I'm disagreeing with him.
|
Sam, you need a podcast.
We've been saving Paragon City for eight and a half years. It's time to do it one more time.
(If you love this game as much as I do, please read that post.)
I think the problems with conversations is more subtle than a question of game mechanics. I think you're right that the system can support it, but it looks like a lot of work for a minimal return.
The conversations in First Ward were long. I duoed the arcs with a friend and they were his missions and there were long stretches where he was reading, clicking, reading, clicking, reading and clicking. The game is an MMO and there could be up to seven other people not participating in the conversation and just waiting for it to be over.
The other problem with the First Ward conversations were how they put words in my character's mouth. Your mileage may vary, of course, but I didn't see my character offering up the responses that were scripted. You'd need a writer with a very deft touch to find a middle ground somewhere between dull as dishwater descriptive responses and choices that project too much of a specific personality on the character.
I'm not entirely down on the idea, because I think it could add a lot of immersion into the right mission. It would almost have to be a solo mission, but if it incorporated branching choices and recognition of your badges and previous choices, I think it could be a very nice addition.
In Camazotz all are equal. Everybody is the same as everybody else.
Have to agree with Minerva here. While it's technically possible to write complex branching dialogue trees, the reward for doing so is pretty limited. It's also time consuming to outline the entire conversation web and then write a mountain of text when the average player might see less than a quarter of it on a run through. Assuming they don't just rush through the text without reading it.
That, and the usual suspects would complain anyways because it's putting words in their mouth, let alone the people screeching "But I'm a robot/alien/demon/special snowflake! Your powers have no effect on me!" or whatever. The story is more or less railroaded because of limitations of the game and time.
I'd personally like more complex dialogue trees, but I can very much understand why the devs don't really invest in them. It's not worth the trouble for the amount of time and energy they'd have to invest in it for them to appear on a regular basis.
You want to know the secret of the world? It's this: Save it, and it'll repay you, every second of every day.
@Dr. Reverend - My DeviantArt Gallery
Crow Call - Gods of the Golden Age
I concur with Doctor_Minerva and Doc_Reverend! (I mean, I do agree with them, but I really wanted to use that reference, given their names, heh)
The other thing there is to consider is the variable player base. As much as I like reading through contact story lines (and I do!), there are players out there who do not care about it. Reasoning varies from player to player, I'm sure, but there are players who won't click the text with "(optional)" next to it, and who won't even read the story line; they will just click the top prompt until they get their mission objective. For those players, a system like the one you outlined in your second post would drive them nuts.
To me, it seems the Devs use the "monologuing" design as a compromise. Those who wish to read through the story have a chunk of text they can digest. Those who want to get back to the shooty-smashy-stuff faster only have a couple clicks to get there.
For the record, I would love more dialogue options in the game, but contacts that would hypothetically have those options may be avoided by other players based simply on the fact that they have too much text to click through.
@Winter. Because I'm Winter. Period.
I am a blaster first, and an alt-oholic second.
Longest opening posts . . . ever!
[Havent got the time to add anything constructive but will say that Twinshots does have to be mostly conversation and less fighting because they are tutorial arcs, so they're ok in my mind ]
@Damz Find me on the global channel Union Chat. One of the best "chat channels" ingame!
I agree. Lengthy texts are bad. Especially when done often.
Speeding Through New DA Repeatables || Spreadsheet o' Enhancements || Zombie Skins: better skins for these forums || Guide to Guides
Something to consider. A while back I noted that the fact that we have fast and effective travel powers contributes to this game's casual teaming. The fact that we can log in any character and travel to almost any destination quickly means PUGs are easier to assemble. Take away travel powers, and both alting and casual teaming would suffer as side effects.
Right now, only the leader reads mission dialog. If it was very involved and actually fun to run through the dialog trees, mission owners would face a devil's choice: run them solo so you can take in the dialog at your own pace and never invite other people to play with you when running those missions, run them teamed and skip most of the dialog so people don't have to stand around and wait for you, or run them teamed and make your team suffer while you spend minutes running through the dialog. Or run them with teams skipping the dialog and them running the entire thing again solo in Ouroboros so you eventually get to see the dialog.
There's no question this would detract from casual teaming, because in essence there's a cost to teaming, whereas now that cost is minimal. Even at that, some people complain about the cost in terms of not being able to see the minimal dialog that occurs unless they are the mission owner. How many people have *ever* seen the opening dialog to Lambda, or Keyes? I'll bet most of the people who have run Minds of Mayhem don't know you can get the story at the end by talking to the contacts after completion and before exiting - where there is the branching dialog you mention to a degree.
A certain recently released MMO addresses this by making a dialog system in which every member of the team sees and can participate in the dialog - random rolls affect which person's decision affects the group as a whole, but individual players can get certain dialog-related rewards for their own choices even if their choice doesn't direct the conversation. In this way, everyone gets to see, everyone gets to participate, and there's even a small reward system for participating in teams so players are encouraged to participate in dialog with other team members instead of exclusively alone.
This is probably one of those game features that can't be arbitrarily changed in isolation without the wings of the butterfly changing the weather somewhere. So while I like the idea of more involved dialog personally, I don't think its as simple as just adding in pervasively without changing the dialog system or the game play of the game to adjust.
[Guide to Defense] [Scrapper Secondaries Comparison] [Archetype Popularity Analysis]
In one little corner of the universe, there's nothing more irritating than a misfile...
(Please support the best webcomic about a cosmic universal realignment by impaired angelic interference resulting in identity crisis angst. Or I release the pigmy water thieves.)
I think my intent here has gone misunderstood. I'm not really saying that adding complex, involving dialogues is necessarily a good thing for the overall future of the game. Far from it, in fact, as my aforementioned aversion to "talky missions" should attest. I am, however, going off the assertion that we HAVE these missions in the game already, they're just not very good at it. Let me explain.
Newer City of Heroes content loves to throw dialogues at us left and right. Where before we'd get a clue recording what a person has said to us, we are now given a linear dialogue vector where the same person says the same thing, but in more words and split across more screens and, crucially, without this being recorded anywhere. When you reach a dialogue, you HAVE to read it on the spot, or you don't get to read it at all, because once it's gone, you can't bring it back.
As long as we're going to pay the price of dialogue by having missions which are essentially nothing but that, we should at least go all the way and we should at least make that dialogue worthy of being called that. And if we don't feel that dialogues of actual complexity are worth making, then that's fine, too. Can we, then, stop using them but for extraordinary circumstances like the beginning or end of an arc or some special objective? I ask a simple question: Why should my interaction with a person take the form of a three-screen dialogue with no options in it when my interaction with that same person can take the form of a three-paragraph clue?
In a very real sense, the no-win situation of gameplay vs. story already exists, and has always existed. Team-mates don't see mission debriefings, and it's usually difficulty to read briefings, as well, at least when the team rushes for action. However, with dialogues, the problem is far more pronounced, because dialogues leave no written record anywhere. If you don't read them during the actual dialogue, you can't read them at all. Clues, at least, stay behind even after the fact, even after the mission and often persist across an entire arc, especially in the Mission Architect. Why, then, do we use dialogue "trees" instead of clues if NOT to make use of their full potential?
My question here can be asked in both directions. If we're going to have missions that consist primarily of conversations, then why don't we make those conversations into a gameplay element? If we're not going to make conversations into a gameplay element, why have them at all when they come with so many downsides? My suggestion is just a way to make dialogues more interesting, but if that doesn't work, then I'm fine with not having them almost ever, too.
---
Somewhat sideways of the subject is the "putting words in my mouth" issue, and it's one I heartily agree with. I HATE the way arcs like Graves and Twinshot put words in my characters' mouths that really, REALLY don't fit them. I don't really blame the writers - the breadth of character concepts here is such that it's impossible to fit everybody. That's not problem without a solution, however, and that solution is to just... Well, not put words in our mouths. Explain what it is that we are communicating, keep it vague enough to have to be interpreted but not so vague as to be unintelligible, and you're set.
You'll note that most of the conversation options I listed in the example dialogue consist of a single word with no punctuation. That's on purpose, and it's the solution as I see it. When, for instance, speaking with Bubba and needing to ask where you can find Vinnie, simply putting in the dialogue option of "Vinnie" should be enough. It's abstract enough to reinterpret that question in whatever way suits your character, and indeed abstract enough to re-interpret exactly what it is your character asked, but it's still specific enough that it tells you which direction it will steer the conversation in. It tells you - the player - that in some way, you will ask something to do with Vinnie. What you will ask and how you will ask it is yours to infer from both the context of the mission and the context of your own character.
I find this approach to be much more liberating and, to be honest, A LOT easier to write. I took the better part of four hours to write the example dialogue just because I'm VERY new to this, but I can tell you for a fact that boiling all responses down to a single word saved me a LOT of time. I never had to worry about what's appropriate to ask, how to word it and which character types I was catering to and which I was alienating. At the end of the day, I knew what the meaning of the question was so I could play off that, but I didn't have to worry about the delivery of the question, and that is quite literally a lot less work.
What I'm getting at is generic one-word conversation options are much easier to write for an actual staff writer and much easier to work with for a player. I personally see no downside to using them.
Samuel_Tow is the only poster that makes me want to punch him in the head more often when I'm agreeing with him than when I'm disagreeing with him.
|
However, with dialogues, the problem is far more pronounced, because dialogues leave no written record anywhere. If you don't read them during the actual dialogue, you can't read them at all.
|
They've taken some steps to solve this in the newer SSAs though. When there's a dialogue part in mission, the character you're talking to talks both with the dialogue menu and with a summery in the standard speech bubble fashion. This allows team-mates to follow the jist of the story and allows you to read back the summery in the speech logs.
It's certainly not perfect, and I definitely agree with what you're saying, but the devs have at least recognised the problem to some extent.
Main Hero: Mazey - level 50 + 1 fire/fire/fire blaster.
Main Villain: Chained Bot - level 50 + 1 Robot/FF Mastermind.
BattleEngine - "And the prize for the most level headed response ever goes to Mazey"
This is true and definitely a problem.
They've taken some steps to solve this in the newer SSAs though. When there's a dialogue part in mission, the character you're talking to talks both with the dialogue menu and with a summery in the standard speech bubble fashion. This allows team-mates to follow the jist of the story and allows you to read back the summery in the speech logs. It's certainly not perfect, and I definitely agree with what you're saying, but the devs have at least recognised the problem to some extent. |
What confounds me is clues really are the perfect delivery mechanism for what people said or for what you did or found. Sure, they suffer from size limitations, in the Architect at least, but they can be very much permanent until at least the end of the story that they're relevant to. What this means is you can run an entire mission and never once read a line of dialogue, log out for the night, then come back the next morning and still be able to catch up on everything that transpired in that mission. By shifting the act of reading to some indeterminate time in the future, clues eliminate the cost of large bodies of text. I suppose clues that summarise a long dialogue would be the next step, in addition to having dialogue narrated.
That's really not the primary aim of the thread, though. Originally, I wanted to examine why it is that "talky" missions in City of Heroes bug me so much whereas "talky" missions in BioWare ripoff RPGs actually come off as some of the best parts of the game. Why, for instance, was it so satisfying to defeat that politician in Human Revolution through nothing more than browbeating him into submission and exposing him for the hypocrite he is. Granted, Human Revolution has a whole system dedicated to this, but really... All of that comes down to a series of four or five three-way choices, each of which has one correct choice and two wrong ones, and it keeps score, plus a quick summary on the person's character off to the side. The City of Heroes dialogue system is capable of replicating that, even if it might be a bit cumbersome to pull off.
Basically, the answer to the original question - that being "Conversations or monologues?" - seems to be that conversations are only good if you commit to them, and actually outright bad if you half-*** them. It transpires that the reason they bug me so much in City of Heroes is they simply take up time that I could have spent punching things and both actually playing the game and being rewarded for it. Conversations take time, effort and energy, and they're simply boring to go through. As boring as plain text, but with the added problem of having to read them then and there, especially on a team. They have many drawbacks but aren't done well enough to have many perks.
Inversely, in BioWare-ripoff games, conversations are often simple, but their structure is such they feel like a gameplay element. The player actually has to do something in those conversations, and that makes it gameplay. When I have to listen to a person's manner of speaking and try to deduce his character, from which then to realise what I should say to elicit which response, this inspires me to be involved. Even if the outcome does not matter, so long as there's a game to it, I'm interested. And City of Heroes conversation simply have no game to them. They are only and ever infodumps. They very rarely offer decisions of any kind and those decisions elicit very little response from the conversation participants.
I'll give you an idle example. In another game, I found a hermit blacksmith on a cliff. The local keep needed him, but he refused to help. Though speaking with him, I realised he held a friendship with the keep's previous blacksmith and was unaware of his death. When given the choice of how to ask him to come back, I could either simply tell him, or I could use his friend's death and last wish to appeal to his higher ideals and remind him of how much he is needed. This didn't really take more than about two conversation screens, strictly speaking. Three if you count the option I didn't pick.
It transpires that if you allow players to ask NPCs as few as three questions about various topics, this is usually enough to build a decent picture of who this NPC is and how one should speak with him, provided the questions and their answers are well written. Giving the player this option up-front and then tying the personality they depict into the conversation seems like a fairly easy way to make conversations a bit more substantial without actually making them more demanding.
At the end of the day, though, conversation tress need to be treated with respect. They need to be done right if they are to be done at all. They don't all have to be as complex (or as redundant) as my example, but they have to be, in fact, conversations, otherwise... Why bother? Why bother break up the action with something if that something's not going to be worth the interruption?
Samuel_Tow is the only poster that makes me want to punch him in the head more often when I'm agreeing with him than when I'm disagreeing with him.
|
talky NPCs are fine when I'm chewing bubble gum.
but when I'm all out of bubble gum...
There are many players out there who love involved, interesting and compelling dialog. There's also many players out there who have never read a bit of mission/quest text in any MMORPG they've ever played. There's certainly a fine line we have to walk; do we provide more dialog/story and please a passionate and devoted segment of our Community or do we risk a inducing story fatigue within another, equally important segment of our player base?
As some have observed, we do have some limitations with they way our quest dialog system works, most noticeably that dialog cannot be shared amongst teammates. Of course even if we did, there's no promise that everyone would have the same level of appreciation as everyone else for dialog.
I am extremely proud of the importance we have always placed on the lore of City of Heroes/Villains. I've always found the stories of Statesman, Recluse, Tyrant and the rest of the CoH-verse entertaining and interesting. If you take into account I am one of those people who click through most quest dialog and barely reads lore, the fact that the writing of Protean, Dr. Aeon, Viridian and those who came before them actually compels me to pause and read...well, it means something. This coming from a guy who almost broke his space bar while recently playing another MMO .
Andy Belford
Community Manager
Paragon Studios
Speeding Through New DA Repeatables || Spreadsheet o' Enhancements || Zombie Skins: better skins for these forums || Guide to Guides
i dont mind an in depth story, but in game i prefer to only experience it once and then occasionally, not every single time
the first time its very intriguing i can spend 2 hours running a story arc that i could speed in 15 min if i wanted
after the first maybe 2-3 times though ive almost memorized the entire point of the story and thus i hate rereading it, so everytime i dont feel like reading it i just speed through it and ignore pretty much every bit of text since i know whats going to happen and when and what to do
...Also, in the vast majority of cases, that other game has better writing than this one. Most of the content in this game would be about as interesting as watching paint dry if I were playing it for the story and not the character and combat systems.
@Draeth Darkstar
Virtue [Heroes, Roleplay], Freedom [Villains], Exalted [All Sides, Roleplay]
I24 Proc Chance = (Enhanced Recharge + Activation Time) * (Current PPM * 1.25) / 60*(1 + .75*(.15*Radius - 0.011*Radius*(360-Arc)/30)) Single Target Radius = 0. AoE Non-Cone Arc = 360.
Should you really be publicly bashing another MMO on these forums? That's sketchy according to the rules here, even if you didn't specifically name it. You should set a better example, being that you're the guy everyone expects to enforce those rules.
...Also, in the vast majority of cases, that other game has better writing than this one. Most of the content in this game would be about as interesting as watching paint dry if I were playing it for the story and not the character and combat systems. |
But yeah...the dialogue and story in that particular MMO is well above the stuff we get in CoH...especially the SSA arcs...
Badge Earned: Wing Clipper
A real showstopper!
Dialog options would be cool.
But how many people would a dialog tree like the one that took me 15 seconds to scroll past piss off if they have to navigate something like that every single time they want to go punch stuff in the face?
I LIKE the story in the game, and a dialog tree like that would even annoy me.
It's a case of something that would be great for one part of the playerbase, but would be an unmitigated rage-inducing annoyance for another.
Originally Posted by Dechs Kaison See, it's gems like these that make me check Claws' post history every once in a while to make sure I haven't missed anything good lately. |
There are many players out there who love involved, interesting and compelling dialog. There's also many players out there who have never read a bit of mission/quest text in any MMORPG they've ever played. There's certainly a fine line we have to walk; do we provide more dialog/story and please a passionate and devoted segment of our Community or do we risk a inducing story fatigue within another, equally important segment of our player base?
|
My point is pretty much what you said, as well - by giving people the option to "space bar" through the talky bits and not feel like they've lost much of the actual immediate plot, you can put in dialogue, background information and additional reading in the actual game, yet not actually require people to read through them. Some might feel that they're missing out by not being able to read the story, but I've always been of the opinion that a story is best experienced either alone or with people who are interested in it, as opposed to with a random rush-rush PuG.
The concept of supplementary reading is something I and others have been suggesting for some time, and it goes beyond just dialogues. It involves putting in additional descriptions and explanations in missions that aren't required to beat the mission, but provide more context and story for those who go out of their way to look for them. Say you have a mission which requires you to beat up a Skull boss and confiscate his drugs. Simple enough. You only really need two objectives - a boss defeat and a glowie click. What if, however, you add in a bunch of other glowies that have, for instance, that same boss' ledgers and personal notes that give us some background on who this man is and why he turned to crime? People who don't care don't have to hunt for these extra glowies, but I would.
Dialogue goes in a very similar way. To shepherd players from one fight to the next seamlessly, you can always add a dialogue option to skip the dialogue. Instead of trying to talk down a boss, you can immediately attack him and cave his skull in. Instead of prying an enemy for information, you can clobber him and search his person for clues. That sort of thing. Conversations don't even have to result in different outcomes, just so long as they're actual conversations. And if that's seen as too much text, then simply give people the option to skip it. Those like me who really do care about what's being said will find a way do run these missions such that this story can be experienced.
About the only problem is that this genuinely does take a lot of work. The example I gave took me the better part of four hours. Granted, I'm sure I could shave a couple of hours off that if I make a few more of these and come up with a more consistent system as opposed to the chaotic approach I started with, but it's still a lot of work if you're worried most people would just skip it.
But please, whatever you do, please try to make our writers save their dialogues for instances where dialogues are actually useful, and use clues or basic text boxes, instead. The core game is very solid, so if they'll be distracting from it, it really should be worth the distraction.
Samuel_Tow is the only poster that makes me want to punch him in the head more often when I'm agreeing with him than when I'm disagreeing with him.
|
Should you really be publicly bashing another MMO on these forums? That's sketchy according to the rules here, even if you didn't specifically name it. You should set a better example, being that you're the guy everyone expects to enforce those rules.
|
But i do have to agree with Zwill on this one. I do tend to space through the conversations in that MMO. BUT i do have a tab set up for NPC conversation, so i still get the complete options (why waste 1 minute listening to something when i can read it in 5-10 seconds)
I think you can have your cake and eat it, too in this case, but it might take a lot of work for only a little return. Arcana mentions a particular problem - if you have lots of dialogue, a mission owner on a large team is put in the no-win situation of either skipping all dialogue to keep the team moving or keeping the team waiting to read the dialogue. That is indeed a problem, but I ask you this: Is it worse to have the option to stop and read lots of dialogue as well as the option to skip it than to not have any dialogue at all and essentially be forced to "skip" dialogue because it's not there to begin with?
|
My point is pretty much what you said, as well - by giving people the option to "space bar" through the talky bits and not feel like they've lost much of the actual immediate plot, you can put in dialogue, background information and additional reading in the actual game, yet not actually require people to read through them. Some might feel that they're missing out by not being able to read the story, but I've always been of the opinion that a story is best experienced either alone or with people who are interested in it, as opposed to with a random rush-rush PuG. |
The concept of supplementary reading is something I and others have been suggesting for some time, and it goes beyond just dialogues. It involves putting in additional descriptions and explanations in missions that aren't required to beat the mission, but provide more context and story for those who go out of their way to look for them. Say you have a mission which requires you to beat up a Skull boss and confiscate his drugs. Simple enough. You only really need two objectives - a boss defeat and a glowie click. What if, however, you add in a bunch of other glowies that have, for instance, that same boss' ledgers and personal notes that give us some background on who this man is and why he turned to crime? People who don't care don't have to hunt for these extra glowies, but I would. |
Could clicking one trigger something that the whole team can see? Not so sure, but it should be do-able.
Dialogue goes in a very similar way. To shepherd players from one fight to the next seamlessly, you can always add a dialogue option to skip the dialogue. Instead of trying to talk down a boss, you can immediately attack him and cave his skull in. Instead of prying an enemy for information, you can clobber him and search his person for clues. That sort of thing. Conversations don't even have to result in different outcomes, just so long as they're actual conversations. And if that's seen as too much text, then simply give people the option to skip it. Those like me who really do care about what's being said will find a way do run these missions such that this story can be experienced. About the only problem is that this genuinely does take a lot of work. The example I gave took me the better part of four hours. Granted, I'm sure I could shave a couple of hours off that if I make a few more of these and come up with a more consistent system as opposed to the chaotic approach I started with, but it's still a lot of work if you're worried most people would just skip it. But please, whatever you do, please try to make our writers save their dialogues for instances where dialogues are actually useful, and use clues or basic text boxes, instead. The core game is very solid, so if they'll be distracting from it, it really should be worth the distraction. |
I like the chat bubbles (when it is someone else's mish), and I like the private chat bubbles (when it is my mish). I also like IO/ATOs, so this must make me the antithesis of Sam.
-------
Hew in drag baby
Dialog options would be cool.
But how many people would a dialog tree like the one that took me 15 seconds to scroll past piss off if they have to navigate something like that every single time they want to go punch stuff in the face? |
This was done deliberately. I know some don't like reading text, and I honestly don't hold that against people. Hell, I wouldn't want to bother reading that after the fifth time through. That's where "Attack" comes in. You can try to solve the problem with diplomacy, or you can simply attack the guy and treat him like a regular boss fight that ends up giving you the clue anyway.
This is part of my larger point of adding dialogues that are actually dialogues instead of one text screen broken up into five parts: You can make legitimate dialogues and just let people skip them. This really isn't a question of tech or even a question of writing, it's just a question of work. With some practice and a better game plan, a dialogue tree like that can be produced in a couple of hours in a word processor, though I imagine it'd take extra time to actually execute into the game, and that's the sort of thing you only really need once or twice in a short-ish story arc. In an arc like the SSAs, you only really need one of those, if that.
It's obvious that City of Heroes is not a game where conversations can decide anything. They're just there for flavour. As such, it puts them in the favourable position of being entirely skippable, and by allowing people the option to skip them as soon as they show up, I see no real downside to actually having them. In a sense, what we have now is WORSE because you still have to progress through the dialogue in order for the story to make sense because dialogues are written as part of the overall narrative. They don't have to be.
Think back to how the game was back at Launch. You were sent to defeat a boss, you fought an NPC and then received a clue. It was assumed you defeated the boss, spoke with him and what he told you was written down in that clue. That's exactly how dialogues can be treated - as a more in-depth depiction of how that conversation took place. Of course, that's only if the player really cares to have one. If the player does not, then it's simple enough to just skip it and treat the thing like a regular boss fight. Dialogues can - and really should - be treated as extra reading to explain omitted narrative that gameplay infers, rather than an integral part equal to actual gameplay.
In a sense, the answer to my own question becomes evident: Monologues as a gameplay element, conversations as supplementary reading. ACTUAL conversations, mind you.
Samuel_Tow is the only poster that makes me want to punch him in the head more often when I'm agreeing with him than when I'm disagreeing with him.
|
It seems like ever since Freedom, I haven't had a single good word to say about most new content, but the one thing which keeps repeating is my hate for overly talky, no-action missions like Dr. Graves or Twinshot or a lot of the new stuff. However, I'm not sure that dialogues themselves are the problem. I've been messing with Kingdom of Amalur recently, and despite that game having a VERY rudimentary conversation system, I never really found myself put off by actual conversations, even though they take up such a large part of my time.
This got me to sit down and wonder exactly WHY it is that "talky" missions bother me so much. I wondered why it was that I considered punching enemies in the face proper gameplay and conversations not, despite games like Alpha Protocol, Mass Effect and Human Revolution having succeeded to such an extent almost entirely on the strength of their talking (because combat in all three is pretty garbage). And I realised something:
Conversations in City of Heroes are not gameplay. They're not even conversations, they're simply long briefings punctuated by by mouse clicks. Conversations in this game are just monologues, and it makes me wonder why that is when the very motivation behind the system which makes dialogues possible is to provide a complex system of options. That, really, is at the root of the problem - when we speak with NPCs, we aren't actually DOING anything. We're just reading text and clicking the "proceed to next text screen." option.
Of course, one can argue that City of Heroes isn't really the right game for that sort of thing, that we can't make meaningful choices and so on. But you know what? Based on what I've seen the game system actually do, I believe it's much stronger than we give it credit for. For starters, dialogue windows seem perfectly capable of swapping between a long tree of dialogue screens, even looping on themselves, such as the infodump by Prometheus. We know badges can influence what dialogue options we get, such a villain who's run the Clone Lab arc and swapped to hero-side will get a different response to Jenni Adair speculating about Protean, or how Praetorian can get an option to admit they're Praetorian to Roy Cooling. We know previous mission can have an effect on subsequent dialogues, such as deciding whether or not to kill the DUST leader for the Last Word Heatman.
To me, it seems like dialogues are less limited by technology and more limited by the effort they take to write and set up. In fact, the whole reason I made this thread is because when I woke up this morning, I was inspired to try and write a complex dialogue of my own as a suggestion and an example. I want to put this in a subsequent post, however, because what I came up with ended up very long.
Generally, though, what I mean to say with this whole things is that I'm not against dialogues themselves. In fact, I actually rather enjoy a "boss dialogue" that's as involving as an actual boss fight. I realise we don't have actual player skills to do with dialogues and I realise skipping a boss fight or even talking time to skip a boss fight may be seen as a poor return of rewards, but my point is that it can be just as entertaining, and it can actually make the dialogue seem like it has a reason to exist for more than just one screen with a binary choice on it.