If Ninjitsu was ported to Scappers....


Adeon Hawkwood

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by JuliusSeizure View Post
It might be better for the developers to actually make a gadget-type defense set than port Ninjitsu.

Having recently played Ninjitsu as my primary Stalker, I must say that it a VERY well designed secondary for the Stalker AT. But Caltrops is integral to the set's overall function, as it lowers the rate of incoming attacks through the flee effect, and this lowered rate synergizes well with the mechanics of defense; fewer lucky attacks slip through because fewer attacks are being made, and proportionally fewer of these attacks are the hard-hitting melee type. Several players are calling for Caltrops to be removed for Scrappers, but having played Ninjitsu I would say that it is a cornerstone of the set, along with Kuji-In-Sha and Blinding Powder. Replacing Caltrops with an equally potent skill wouldn't work either, because it would arguably make Scrappers far superior to Stalkers once they take Caltrops from the APPs.

If the developers were forced to redesign 2-3 skills from the Ninjitsu set, replacing at least Hide and Caltrops (and potentially Smoke Flash), why wouldn't they just make an entirely new gadget-defense set from the ground up for multiple ATs?
Caltrops is certainly a very good power. However, at least when comparing ninjitsu to the set it's most often linked to, SR, I think ninjitsu comes off pretty favorably even without caltrops *and* blinding powder.

Assuming scrapper ninjitsu has a cloak of darkness clone in place of hide, the difference in defense between fully slotted nin and SR is only 2.9%. Slotted scrapper sha would be about 20.5 hp/s healing (remember scrappers have higher base HP), so at any incoming damage levels below 20.5/.029 ~ 706 damage per second, ninjitsu takes less net damage than SR does. From some old work of Arcanaville's, an average +3 minion is about 30 DPS, so 700 DPS is more than 20 +3 minion's worth.

In other words, even when surrounded by the aggro cap of +3 minions, ninjitsu with 4 powers is taking less net damage than SR with 6. If scrapper SR is considered even close to acceptable, I think ninjitsu would be ok even if caltrops was replaced by a power that offers less overall mitigation. And only having to fuss with 2 powers (smoke flash is fine), one of which would be a dead easy swap (hide -> CoD clone), isn't *too* much work for a proliferation. It's certainly a *lot* less work than creating a new set.

edit: If the scrapper stealth has hide's default 1.875% def to all instead of cloak of darkness' 3.75% to all, that halves the DPS number to ~350, which is still something like 12 +3 minions. I'll take that.


@MuonNeutrino
Student, Gamer, Altaholic, and future Astronomer.

This is what it means to be a tank!

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Muon_Neutrino View Post
Caltrops is certainly a very good power. However, at least when comparing ninjitsu to the set it's most often linked to, SR, I think ninjitsu comes off pretty favorably even without caltrops *and* blinding powder.

Assuming scrapper ninjitsu has a cloak of darkness clone in place of hide, the difference in defense between fully slotted nin and SR is only 2.9%. Slotted scrapper sha would be about 20.5 hp/s healing (remember scrappers have higher base HP), so at any incoming damage levels below 20.5/.029 ~ 706 damage per second, ninjitsu takes less net damage than SR does. From some old work of Arcanaville's, an average +3 minion is about 30 DPS, so 700 DPS is more than 20 +3 minion's worth.

In other words, even when surrounded by the aggro cap of +3 minions, ninjitsu with 4 powers is taking less net damage than SR with 6. If scrapper SR is considered even close to acceptable, I think ninjitsu would be ok even if caltrops was replaced by a power that offers less overall mitigation. And only having to fuss with 2 powers (smoke flash is fine), one of which would be a dead easy swap (hide -> CoD clone), isn't *too* much work for a proliferation. It's certainly a *lot* less work than creating a new set.

I think your math is off a bit on the difference in defense between a fully slotted SR and a fully slotted Ninjitsu.

Counting Hide (supressed for roughly 2% Defense across the board)...that's roughly 24% Defense (Nin) vs 33% (SR).

Now that's just with level 50 Common IO slotting, and not picking up other powers or IOs for additional Defense, for a 9% difference in Defense, not the 2.9% you were saying.

IOs and Pool Powers can change the differences on them. Both can reach the softcap (a lot easier with SR), so the question becomes (from a purely non-concept approach) which offers additional bonuses you may want?

SR has higher DDR, Knockback Protection, Quickness and could pick up Aid Self as a Pool Power.

NIN has Psi/Confuse/Fear Resist and a built in Self Heal, but need to grab Accrobatics (or IOs) to cover the knockback (though I feel High Defense covers that a lot as well), but also comes with a few gadget powers some find useful others do not.

Both have +Perception.

I find both sets pretty equal, it becomes a matter of what do I want in that perticular character really.


BrandX Future Staff Fighter
The BrandX Collection

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by MayorOfAngrytown View Post
Why does this sentence remind me of the sad fact that I'll never has a regen brute?
I agree, as it would be nice, but that's the opposite problem from Ice. Castle tested it and said that he found it way TOO good.

Personally, I feel any tweak that Regen would get to Proliferate it to Brutes would probably end up with it turning out like Willpower. That doesn't mean it couldn't be done, though. I guess the question is whether it would still be Regen, or folks would still insist on getting Regen.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Siolfir View Post
What is the concept for a Ninjitsu Scrapper? "I want to play a sneaky assassin-type who kills through stealth and skill. I just don't want to play it on the AT whose entire schtick is a sneaky assassin-type who kills through stealth and skill, because I don't like that concept." Thus the use of the term "whine" in my first post.
Because to my mind, Batman is not "a sneaky assassin-type who kills though stealth and skill." But Batman IS Ninjitsu. Argue with that all you like, but it's my opinion, and your disagreement is your opinion, and you're not going to convince me otherwise. To me, Batman is the very example of what Ninjitsu is supposed to be.

You might as well claim that Tankers shouldn't get Super Strength, because "If I want to play an angry brutish type whose strength is fueled by anger, I should play a Brute".

Honestly, if the devs did create a gadget-based defense set, combined with personal defense based on skill and dodging, then that to me would BE Ninjitsu, even if it didn't have the powers of Ninjitsu. Like Willpower and Regen, above. And if so many of the powers in Ninjitsu are special BECAUSE of how Stalkers can use them, due to their unique abilities, then even if Scrappers had them they wouldn't be able to use them the same way. Scrappers get Caltrops, (all Scrappers, potentially!) but they don't need the reduced attack rate against foes it gives them as much as Stalkers do.


 

Posted

Hmm. I didn't *think* I did the math wrong, but lemee recheck:

SR:
13.875% from toggles, 5.625% from passives. After slotting, 19.5*1.55 = 30.225%.

Ninjitsu (assuming hide replaced by a cloak of darkness clone, i.e. 3.75% def):
13.875% from basic toggles, 3.75% from cloak of darkness. After slotting, 17.625*1.55 = 27.319%. Difference: 2.91%

Ninjitsu (assuming hide replaced by a stealth with hide's base defense, i.e. 1.875 when suppressed):
13.875% from basic toggles, 1.875% from stealth. After slotting, 15.75*1.55 = 24.413%. Difference: 5.81%

Note that I'm assuming (at least in the first case) that hide is replaced by a cloak of darkness clone, with the def value that implies, and that I'm assuming full slotting of all def powers with 3 ~SO equivalents (not level 50 IOs) - including the stealth. That's probably where the difference comes in.


@MuonNeutrino
Student, Gamer, Altaholic, and future Astronomer.

This is what it means to be a tank!

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Muon_Neutrino View Post
Caltrops is certainly a very good power. However, at least when comparing ninjitsu to the set it's most often linked to, SR, I think ninjitsu comes off pretty favorably even without caltrops *and* blinding powder.
I tend to disagree, not just because you are using Cloak of Darkness with 3.75% defense to all as a replacement for Hide. Super Reflexes has access to 95% DDR, which is absolutely HUGE as far as real game survivability goes. Ninjitsu with just the Heal and its defense values would fare much poorer in real game situations with the plethora of defense debuffs. The scaling resistance in the passives offers a good boost to overall survivability for SR as well.

And here's the problem with Ninjitsu: it's already very well balanced on a Stalker. Remove Caltrops to add a fluff power and Scrappers get a crummy port. Remove Caltrops to add a different gadget that stands as a decent replacement and Ninjitsu becomes flat-out-superior on Scrappers once they take Caltrops from their APPs.

More importantly, porting skills is probably far more labor intensive than the player base thinks-- certainly not as involved as creating an entirely new set, but not the simple cut and past that takes place on a spread sheet. Any time invested in porting Ninjitsu to Scrappers-- and it would only go to Scrappers as it could never function on Tanks or Brutes-- would probably have better returns in creating a new Gadget Armor set for all melee ATs.


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by JuliusSeizure View Post
Remove Caltrops to add a different gadget that stands as a decent replacement and Ninjitsu becomes flat-out-superior on Scrappers once they take Caltrops from their APPs.
Which is why in the past I would have suggested adding a power that is currently available in a Stalker APP. That's not possible now, since Scrappers already get those APPs. Although I suppose Caltrops could be replaced with Physical Perfection, since that's what Stalkers get in their Weapon Mastery instead of Caltrops. (Eh, no, that would duplicate Body Mastery. So we're back to Quickness or an Endurance boost or the like)

As I said above, though, ALL Scrappers can take Caltrops right now. If it is that much of a benefit to Defense based power sets, then why aren't all Super Reflexes and Shield Defense Scrappers taking it? And keep in mind that the only difference between Stalker and Scrapper defense is their hit points. They get exactly the same defense numbers. So if a Stalker can increase his survivability by keeping foes fleeing from him, so can a Scrapper.

Perhaps there are two explanations for this. One is that a Scrapper's higher hit points means that he is less likely to be one or two shotted by a foe that is balanced for his level. This means the Scrapper is more likely to be able to survive and use his heal to recover. Or, perhaps that it is just that the Scrapper does not WANT foes fleeing from him, as his skills are not based around taking out foes one at a time, and thus he depends more on keeping his foes in melee, where he can finish them off more handily.

Either way, I don't think the loss of Caltrops will have as dramatic an effect as you seem to believe. The self Heal IS powerful -- as long as you can get it off. A Scrapper would have about a 10% better chance of doing that.

Quote:
More importantly, porting skills is probably far more labor intensive than the player base thinks-- certainly not as involved as creating an entirely new set, but not the simple cut and past that takes place on a spread sheet. Any time invested in porting Ninjitsu to Scrappers-- and it would only go to Scrappers as it could never function on Tanks or Brutes-- would probably have better returns in creating a new Gadget Armor set for all melee ATs.
By that logic, NO Stalker should EVER get any new Defense or Melee sets which are created for the other meleers. That always involves changing skills, to at least as much as an extent as it would involve changing Ninjitsu for Scrappers.

Of course, that's likely the very reason Scrappers didn't get Shields. They did get Kinetic Melee, though, in the latest issue. So I don't think there's that much of a cost in time. Not enough to justify the devs never considering for Proliferation a set that will require tweaking.

I would say that to remain consistent with Hide, I think the 3.75% Defense in Cloaking Device or whatever the replacement is called should suppress. Personally, to make up for this I would have the base radius of the stealth be 45 feet, with all but 15 feet suppressing during combat. This would help Scrappers get closer to melee with the foes without alerting them, and even help with Blinding Powder. (assuming they get that power)


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Muon_Neutrino View Post
Hmm. I didn't *think* I did the math wrong, but lemee recheck:

SR:
13.875% from toggles, 5.625% from passives. After slotting, 19.5*1.55 = 30.225%.

Ninjitsu (assuming hide replaced by a cloak of darkness clone, i.e. 3.75% def):
13.875% from basic toggles, 3.75% from cloak of darkness. After slotting, 17.625*1.55 = 27.319%. Difference: 2.91%

Ninjitsu (assuming hide replaced by a stealth with hide's base defense, i.e. 1.875 when suppressed):
13.875% from basic toggles, 1.875% from stealth. After slotting, 15.75*1.55 = 24.413%. Difference: 5.81%

Note that I'm assuming (at least in the first case) that hide is replaced by a cloak of darkness clone, with the def value that implies, and that I'm assuming full slotting of all def powers with 3 ~SO equivalents (not level 50 IOs) - including the stealth. That's probably where the difference comes in.
I see...I was using Stalker Defense numbers for NIN vs SR.

But your right NIN for Scrappers if Hide was replaced by a Defense Toggle would put NIN closer to SR numbers (like a 3% Defense difference between SR and NIN using lvl 50 Generic IOs).

I still think the differences in the two sets would play a difference. And there's plenty of people who would easily take Quickness, higher DDR, Knockback Protection, and the Scaling Resists, over NIN's benefits.

I think it would be a good trade off myself. And still think NIN should be ported over.


BrandX Future Staff Fighter
The BrandX Collection

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cynical_Gamer View Post
Quote:
I doubt SD would be given to Stalkers. Stalkers are like ninjas and assassins. They want to kill quickly, quietly and be gone before anyone seems them. Lugging a hunk of metal on your arm helps keep you alive, yes, but not in being quick or quiet.
Yes, because the only concepts possible with Shields are medieval knights.
Heh, yeah, I did want to add that I had thought of a concept based on something like Gauntlets or Bracers to replace Shields on Stalkers. Then again, I also suggested that as one of the replacements for Caltrops. I don't know if you could make a Bracers concept complex enough that it would be added to the arms by the power set and "extended and retracted", like a shield is when it is taken out.

An alternative might be just a small shield, or a Buckler. Ninja Blade is smaller than Katana, even though IIRC they do now share the same customization choices. The Stalker could add a buckler and bracer combination to the shield arm, or even both arms for an unarmed Primary.


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jade_Dragon View Post
Because to my mind, Batman is not "a sneaky assassin-type who kills though stealth and skill." But Batman IS Ninjitsu. Argue with that all you like, but it's my opinion, and your disagreement is your opinion, and you're not going to convince me otherwise. To me, Batman is the very example of what Ninjitsu is supposed to be.
Yes, I'd say that Batman is a heroic Stalker - MA/Nin, with the alternate animations that use punches. He certainly behaves like one, taking time and striking when and where it will hurt the most. You don't like the word "kill". Okay, replace it with the word "defeat", "arrest", or whatever you like.

Of course, you could also make the argument - and it has been made on these forums in threads that pop up about it - that Batman would be MA/WP with lots of temp powers.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jade_Dragon View Post
You might as well claim that Tankers shouldn't get Super Strength, because "If I want to play an angry brutish type whose strength is fueled by anger, I should play a Brute".
*shrug* Ninjitsu implies training as a ninja - not the use of gadgets while dodging; there is a distinct connotation as "spy" and "assassin" in the term. If you want someone who is good at dodging and uses a lot of gadgets, then take SR with weapon mastery and pick up some temp powers.

There's also the whole "Tankers were there before Brutes ever existed" counterpoint... and I stated before powerset proliferation ever came about that I'd rather see side-switching and keeping some powersets unique to some ATs rather than copying powersets to everyone; it just serves to homogenize things - which is the reason I wanted something other than a damage buff for Defenders. But I'm also willing to admit that there's a bit of contrariness to it as well, due to the blind eye towards the balance issues that Stalkers have compared to the far more popular melee ATs.


Quote:
Originally Posted by PleaseRecycle View Post
it has gone from unconscionable to downright appalling that we have no way of measuring our characters' wetness.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brillig View Post
It's hard to beat the entertainment value of Whackjob Wednesdays.

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Siolfir View Post
Yes, I'd say that Batman is a heroic Stalker - MA/Nin, with the alternate animations that use punches. He certainly behaves like one, taking time and striking when and where it will hurt the most. You don't like the word "kill". Okay, replace it with the word "defeat", "arrest", or whatever you like.

Of course, you could also make the argument - and it has been made on these forums in threads that pop up about it - that Batman would be MA/WP with lots of temp powers.


*shrug* Ninjitsu implies training as a ninja - not the use of gadgets while dodging; there is a distinct connotation as "spy" and "assassin" in the term. If you want someone who is good at dodging and uses a lot of gadgets, then take SR with weapon mastery and pick up some temp powers.

There's also the whole "Tankers were there before Brutes ever existed" counterpoint... and I stated before powerset proliferation ever came about that I'd rather see side-switching and keeping some powersets unique to some ATs rather than copying powersets to everyone; it just serves to homogenize things - which is the reason I wanted something other than a damage buff for Defenders. But I'm also willing to admit that there's a bit of contrariness to it as well, due to the blind eye towards the balance issues that Stalkers have compared to the far more popular melee ATs.
Ninja's do damage. Ninja's get in and take down that hard target.

Stalkers can't do that.

Hence, Scrappers are ninja's!

Sneak in (Stealth) then smack that target around untill they're defeated!

Not something Stalkers can do well at all.

Yeah, you could say they get in and take down their target in one hit, but we know that will never happen.


BrandX Future Staff Fighter
The BrandX Collection

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fleeting Whisper View Post
Assassin's Strike: 389.28 damage at lv50, before enhancement, to a single target.
Inferno: 472.22 damage on average* at lv50, before enhancement, to up to 16 targets

* 167.24 of that averaged damage is a DoT over 8.1s.
The damage has a lower bound of 187.68 (0.375% chance)
The damage has an upper bound of 544.29 (37.125% chance)



And let's not even talk about things like Blowback.
Lets try this.

Stalkers have the most damaging attack in the game that does not come with either a massive recharge or a huge downside.


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Toony View Post
Lets try this.

Stalkers have the most damaging attack in the game that does not come with either a massive recharge or a huge downside.
Downside: must be done from stealth (or right after placate), can be interrupted.


 

Posted

Stalkers have the strongest single target attack available to players.

Inferno
Corruptor Blizzard
Stalker AS

are the three most damaging attacks in order available to players.

plus AS is not a tier 9 attack.


 

Posted

Nothing fancy. Just add Hide that provides stealth level similar to Cloak of Darkness. They did this to Stalker's Energy Aura too. Stalker's EA Kinetic and Power Shields have higher base defense than Brute's version but Brute has Energy Cloak to make up the difference. So for Scrapper's Ninjitsu, it's vice versa. Both melee and range shields have less defense but Hide adds like 3.75%.

As for having one more caltrops, overlapping powers happen quite often in patron/epic. I don't see why that is an issue. Doesn't caltrops under Weapon set has a bit longer recharge?


What's left is to normalize all Assassin Strikes and improve Stalker's old sets (Claw, MA and EM)! You don't need to bring back the missing PbAoE attack. You just need to make the existing ones better! For example, make Slice a WIDER and LONGER cone.

 

Posted

If Ninjitsu was ported to Scrappers I'd be very torn. My MA/Inv would thematically be a better MA/Nin and he is level 42. I'm a sucker to concept, so having that possibility would suddently make him unplayable, and I'd end up rerolling him. . .

Now, he'll be a lot more fun to play... but think of the concept slaves!!!



 

Posted

In order to save Stalker population... I suggest Ninjitsu stay as Stalker-only set! hehe


What's left is to normalize all Assassin Strikes and improve Stalker's old sets (Claw, MA and EM)! You don't need to bring back the missing PbAoE attack. You just need to make the existing ones better! For example, make Slice a WIDER and LONGER cone.

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jibikao View Post
In order to save Stalker population... I suggest Ninjitsu stay as Stalker-only set! hehe

If the stalker AT needs one power set to save it over its different game mechanics. Then the AT is lost already. Port nin over and make all stalkers into scrappers. No sense to offer an AT if no one wants to play with the merits of that AT.





Dirges

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dirges View Post
If the stalker AT needs one power set to save it over its different game mechanics. Then the AT is lost already. Port nin over and make all stalkers into scrappers. No sense to offer an AT if no one wants to play with the merits of that AT.




The Stalker At needs to have it's mechanics fixed to actually be relevant for end game teaming content. Because it's mechanics suffer, the AT can't actually stand out on it's own. This has Ninjitsu standing out more than the Stalker them self. Allow the Stalker to stand out on their own first, then you can port Ninjitsu wherever you want.


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jibikao View Post
As for having one more caltrops, overlapping powers happen quite often in patron/epic. I don't see why that is an issue. Doesn't caltrops under Weapon set has a bit longer recharge?
There can occasionally be powers with similar purpose, but overlapping powers does not happen. The devs intentionally designed it that way, and in some cases altered the porting of the Epics/Patrons to the other side to eliminate any duplication. Or, altered a power in a main Set they Proliferated. (i.e., Energize)

There are NO duplicate powers currently in any Epic or Patron Pool. Likely Caltrops would not be made available to any Scrapper for this reason. (In any Power Set, not just Ninjitsu)


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kokoro View Post
If Ninjitsu were ported to Scappers...
I would have a little /nerdgasm and roll up a number of characters I would love to try out. I think the set is fantastic and has a lot of potential, but cannot stand the way that stalkers play.


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by DMystic View Post
The Stalker At needs to have it's mechanics fixed to actually be relevant for end game teaming content. Because it's mechanics suffer, the AT can't actually stand out on it's own. This has Ninjitsu standing out more than the Stalker them self. Allow the Stalker to stand out on their own first, then you can port Ninjitsu wherever you want.

Stalker mechanics are not that bad for teaming. They have a high crit chance with controlled crits and a nice debuff. The only problems with teaming are the sets that lost their only aoe for AS. Other then that it tends to be the players fault they do not work as well on teams, with players that think they should just scout missions or should only focus on AS.


Dirges

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dirges View Post
Stalker mechanics are not that bad for teaming. They have a high crit chance with controlled crits and a nice debuff. The only problems with teaming are the sets that lost their only aoe for AS. Other then that it tends to be the players fault they do not work as well on teams, with players that think they should just scout missions or should only focus on AS.
Elec/EA stalker on an ITF last night. My primary didn't lose any of its AoE potential. Far from the optimal team, but there was a force fielder, so my stalker was softcapped and then some.

The shield/SS tank was doing more AoE damage than me (and he can't double stack his rage), and the energy/fire blaster was surviving longer.

Something's bloody wrong with the AT and how it performs in teams.


Where to now?
Check out all my guides and fiction pieces on my blog.
The MFing Warshade | The Last Rule of Tanking | The Got Dam Mastermind
Everything Dark Armor | The Softcap
don'T attempt to read tHis mEssaGe, And believe Me, it is not a codE.

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dechs Kaison View Post
Something's bloody wrong with the AT and how it performs in teams.
I'm really beginning to agree with this, despite the vast changes that were made to the Stalker AT recently. The most bothersome for me is that it takes 4 players to be within 30 feet of me while on a team to roughly equal the AT damage modifier of a Scrapper (1.1+0.12 vs 1.21).

Then there is Assassin Strike, which I have tried to use primarily for concept reasons. The problem is that I am more useful employing Throw Spines from hide than using Assassin Strike. When I do want to Placate->Assassin Strike, it tends to both get interrupted and feel underwhelming; the net animation of those two skills is over 5 seconds, which means that big tasty number is easily surpassed by most Brutes and Scrappers that have been simply hammering out an attack chain.

If I could change anything, I would suggest that Assassin Strike employ a mechanic that Arcanaville suggested for Martial Arts: the increased critical chance found it Eagle's Claw on Scrappers. When a Stalker chooses to employ an Assassin Strike, no other AT in the game should have higher DPS or burst damage against that target. The problem is that burst damage isn't just about a single massive strike, it's also about layering damage during a buildup phase, which Scrappers are flat out superior at doing. I would like to see Assassin Strike grant a period of increased critical chance following a successful Assassin Strike from the hidden state, something along the lines of 30% for 5 seconds.

I have also noticed that Burst from Kinetic Melee has a 100% chance to critical from hide-- which makes the skill incredibly fun to use, but no more potent than Foot Stomp on a Brute that can be spammed without consideration of Hide/Placate. If it works for KM, why shouldn't it be applied to at least one AoE attack from the other stalker primaries? (And yes, this unfortunately does nothing for the primaries that lack any AoE attacks...)


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by RiverOcean View Post
Replace Hide, with Cloak of Darkness

Trade Caltrops for Poison Dart

Done.
Replace Grant Cover with Hide.

Trade Phalanx Fighting with Block!, a Shadow Meld type buff that improves defense for a short time with a relatively quick recharge.

Switch Against All Odds with Strike!, a passive that grants a Frenzy-like buff after using Block!

Done.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Muon_Neutrino View Post
I don't want to play a sneaky assassin type who attacks from stealth - that's not the only concept ninjitsu fits. Ninjitsu can, in many ways, also be thought of as the melee equivalent of devices/traps - it has actual toggle-based self protection as required from a melee armorset, but a third of the set is made up of gadget type powers. For the concept I have in mind, combining ninjitsu and weapon mastery to have caltrops, webnade, exploding shuriken, smoke flash, blinding powder, and whatever they replace caltrops with (assuming, as I do, that it'd be some sort of gadget to keep theme) is absolutely perfect.

I *could* make a nin/weapons stalker as well, but since I don't care for the stalker mechanics and the character concept isn't that of an assassin type, I don't want to. I don't want to take AS and placate and be saddled with powers and playstyle issues I don't care about in order to get the powerset my concept requires, and I don't want to skip AS and placate and get all of the disadvantages of a stalker with none of the advantages. Also, I don't want to take the character who's supposed to be a hero and start in the rogue isles or praetoria. And I think I'll decide for myself if I like my character's concept, thank you very much.

Or you *COULD* make a devices character that dodges by picking SR and using the Weapon Mastery Pool (and look! you get caltrops!). Or even better, make a *REAL* devices secondary and port it to all the melee ATs.

The way I see it, if you're dead set on a conceptual set being ported to a non-thematic AT (Ninjutus for Scrappers), then you can port both ways. Give Stalkers a decent version of an offensive set (Fire Armor/Shields) or a set better designed with Stalkers in mind (Ice Armor with some tweeked powers).

You want Ninjutsu? Fine, then don't be selfish. Support some ports to Stalker that offer them tactical/offensive edge.

*looks at the last prolif Stalkers got: Broadsword*

*waits for something that's actually different from what we've had forever*


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by JuliusSeizure View Post

Then there is Assassin Strike, which I have tried to use primarily for concept reasons. The problem is that I am more useful employing Throw Spines from hide than using Assassin Strike. When I do want to Placate->Assassin Strike, it tends to both get interrupted and feel underwhelming; the net animation of those two skills is over 5 seconds, which means that big tasty number is easily surpassed by most Brutes and Scrappers that have been simply hammering out an attack chain.
Look at it this way: If you were a Scrapper with Spines, how much less ST damage would you be able to accomplish without the option of Assassin's Impaler?