Overanalying Comics (Survivng what would kill normal people)


Arcanaville

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Zikar View Post
Um, no. We can't dodge bullets. We can maybe get out of the trajectory of the bullet before it's fired, but once it's fired, if they're aimed at you, you're getting hit.
v.v This is what I said earlier. They aren't dodging the lazer, they don't need to. That's the whole point. of what I said.


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Durakken View Post
How is it an order of magnitude when the fastest draw, a skilled timed event is the same speed. I'm saying I can touch anywhere on my body in x amount of time... I should say not anywhere, but anywhere i'd care to in x amount of time... And we're not talking precise movement either. A quick draw's speed is limited by the fact the gun has to move up from the holster making the arm pull back first and then turn and horizontal and pointed at something, and completely change the direction of movement.
You're saying you can touch anywhere on your body in the same amount of time these world-class quick draw shooters can move their hands about three inches. Quick draw holsters do not require two different motions to draw the pistol out of, and then aimed towards, the target. They are open in the front and the gun can basically be pivoted forward and drawn in one continuous motion.

For reference, you're saying you can reach any part of your body in the same amount of time that this guy quick draws. The numbers being called out by the announcer are, I believe, the firing times in hundredths of a second (usually he doesn't say the decimal point). So they are firing on timescales of about 260 milliseconds, or a quarter of a second. That includes the reaction time to see the starting light and begin to draw. The actual draw is taking about a tenth to a sixteenth of a second.

And just to head off a potential objection, they aren't actually precision firing at those balloons. They are basically firing blanks and the hot black powder from the cartridge breaks the balloon as long as the pistol is pointed in approximately the right direction. So there is zero time being spent actually "aiming" - the balloon will break as long as the gun is fully drawn at the moment it is fired.

To be able to touch any specific point on your body in the same amount of time requires moving several times the distance in a similar or less time. Assuming infinite reaction speed, you'd have to be physically many times faster than these guys. Factoring in reaction speed, you'd need to be a cyborg.


[Guide to Defense] [Scrapper Secondaries Comparison] [Archetype Popularity Analysis]

In one little corner of the universe, there's nothing more irritating than a misfile...
(Please support the best webcomic about a cosmic universal realignment by impaired angelic interference resulting in identity crisis angst. Or I release the pigmy water thieves.)

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Arcanaville View Post
To be able to touch any specific point on your body in the same amount of time requires moving several times the distance in a similar or less time. Assuming infinite reaction speed, you'd have to be physically many times faster than these guys. Factoring in reaction speed, you'd need to be a cyborg.
Just for giggles, add in the multitasking to accurately measure yourself while doing all of this.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Arcanaville View Post
Softcapping an Invuln is fantastic. Softcapping a Willpower is amazing. Softcapping SR is kissing your sister.

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Arcanaville View Post
To be able to touch any specific point on your body in the same amount of time requires moving several times the distance in a similar or less time. Assuming infinite reaction speed, you'd have to be physically many times faster than these guys. Factoring in reaction speed, you'd need to be a cyborg.
I is a cyborg ^.^

Anyways, the point was more or less to establish an outer limit for what Batman can do roughly for how long Batman has to respond to recognizing that Superman has gone rogue and where there is a point where victory for one or the other is absolute.

My point is more so that if more than x fractions of a second pass before Superman can stop him, Batman wins 100%.

Anyways, since you're better with the maths and all like that How far does Superman have to be for Batman to have adequate time to trigger a Superman Stop-gap if Superman's full speed is light speed and he is going full throttle.

For, even rough estimates, I would say that any time Superman is out of the country or half way across the country (considering the Earth in the DCU is like 4x as big) from Metropolis Batman has more than enough time to stop Superman.


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Durakken View Post
Anyways, since you're better with the maths and all like that How far does Superman have to be for Batman to have adequate time to trigger a Superman Stop-gap if Superman's full speed is light speed and he is going full throttle.

For, even rough estimates, I would say that any time Superman is out of the country or half way across the country (considering the Earth in the DCU is like 4x as big) from Metropolis Batman has more than enough time to stop Superman.
Ignoring the fact that Superman moving at or near the speed of light anywhere near the ground would kill everyone anywhere near his flight path, and kill Batman whether he had a way to kill Superman or not, Superman could reach any point on the Earth from any other point in less than seven hundredths of a second. Assuming Batman could react and actually do something meaningful in about a quarter of a second, Superman would need to be about seventy five thousand kilometers away. Significantly farther away than geosynchronous orbit, and about a quarter of the way to the moon.

Since when is the Earth in the DCU four times larger than Earth?

There's no way Batman would make a Superman fail safe that was contingent on him being able to out-react or outfight Superman. I'm sure he'd give it a shot, but the real failsafe would be something that would be triggered upon some sequence of events, something which would work even if Superman killed or incapacitated Batman. However, it would also need to correctly sit idle if Batman were killed or defeated by someone other than Superman. What that could possibly be, or have been as the case may be, I don't have a guess.


[Guide to Defense] [Scrapper Secondaries Comparison] [Archetype Popularity Analysis]

In one little corner of the universe, there's nothing more irritating than a misfile...
(Please support the best webcomic about a cosmic universal realignment by impaired angelic interference resulting in identity crisis angst. Or I release the pigmy water thieves.)

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Arcanaville View Post
Ignoring the fact that Superman moving at or near the speed of light anywhere near the ground would kill everyone anywhere near his flight path, and kill Batman whether he had a way to kill Superman or not, Superman could reach any point on the Earth from any other point in less than seven hundredths of a second. Assuming Batman could react and actually do something meaningful in about a quarter of a second, Superman would need to be about seventy five thousand kilometers away. Significantly farther away than geosynchronous orbit, and about a quarter of the way to the moon.

Since when is the Earth in the DCU four times larger than Earth?

There's no way Batman would make a Superman fail safe that was contingent on him being able to out-react or outfight Superman. I'm sure he'd give it a shot, but the real failsafe would be something that would be triggered upon some sequence of events, something which would work even if Superman killed or incapacitated Batman. However, it would also need to correctly sit idle if Batman were killed or defeated by someone other than Superman. What that could possibly be, or have been as the case may be, I don't have a guess.
batman redshifts the sun, and vaccinates the population with, you guessed it, kyptonite.

it all began with batman being defeated and sending you, er batman, a letter in the past....


Kittens give Morbo gas.

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Arcanaville View Post

Since when is the Earth in the DCU four times larger than Earth?
Well for what it's worth, DC Earth is larger than Marvel Earth.


http://www.seventhsanctum.com/index-anim.php
Can't come up with a name? Click the link!

 

Posted

Earth's size...

Basically if we take numbers from Batman and Superman comics they place the range of population of these cities in the 6-14 million range. These 2 cities along with Blud Haven are all in roughly the same area of New York and supposed to be semi stand ins for New York. This means that for one city there is 4, all with huge populations... There are also tons of countries and other cities on the DCU Earth. It has also been confirmed that Pre-52 Earth-1 is bigger than Marvel (Real Size) Earth. This, all together, pretty much implies 4x size.

But it can be anywhere between 1 and 4 times the size... interestingly though New Earth population sizes are quoted as real Earth which means there is more land but people clump together more which is odd and shows how trying to figure out comic figures will leave you wrong some where.


Also... I just caught a math fail of mine >.> which noone seems to have caught. I reversed the light can travel around the earth 8 times in 1 second for it takes light 8 seconds to travel around the earth 1 time. And there are more problems with all that. The math part of my brain must have wanted to play a practical joke.


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nightphall View Post
Well for what it's worth, DC Earth is larger than Marvel Earth.
If it is, it is, although a reference for that fact would be helpful. Either way, I don't think its credible that the DCU earth could be four times larger than the real Earth in either radius or surface area (implying double the radius). That large of a discrepancy would create a cascade of blatant differences that I don't think could be marginalized.


[Guide to Defense] [Scrapper Secondaries Comparison] [Archetype Popularity Analysis]

In one little corner of the universe, there's nothing more irritating than a misfile...
(Please support the best webcomic about a cosmic universal realignment by impaired angelic interference resulting in identity crisis angst. Or I release the pigmy water thieves.)

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Arcanaville View Post
If it is, it is, although a reference for that fact would be helpful. Either way, I don't think its credible that the DCU earth could be four times larger than the real Earth in either radius or surface area (implying double the radius). That large of a discrepancy would create a cascade of blatant differences that I don't think could be marginalized.
yeah I know... also with Mars... it is likely bigger as well because it seems to be able to hold an atmosphere considering the recent plant life springing up on it.


 

Posted

New Earth has been stated to be "slightly larger" than our Earth. Slightly larger implies 110-125% to me. Four times is not slightly by any stretch.


"I wish my life was a non-stop Hollywood movie show,
A fantasy world of celluloid villains and heroes."

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Durakken View Post
yeah I know... also with Mars... it is likely bigger as well because it seems to be able to hold an atmosphere considering the recent plant life springing up on it.
If someone put an atmosphere there relatively recently through some kind of terraforming, Mars would still take tens of millions or hundreds of millions of years to lose it to atmospheric escape at its current size.


[Guide to Defense] [Scrapper Secondaries Comparison] [Archetype Popularity Analysis]

In one little corner of the universe, there's nothing more irritating than a misfile...
(Please support the best webcomic about a cosmic universal realignment by impaired angelic interference resulting in identity crisis angst. Or I release the pigmy water thieves.)

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Arcanaville View Post
If it is, it is, although a reference for that fact would be helpful. Either way, I don't think its credible that the DCU earth could be four times larger than the real Earth in either radius or surface area (implying double the radius). That large of a discrepancy would create a cascade of blatant differences that I don't think could be marginalized.
the size of the DCU Earth vs. Marvel earth was brought up in the JLA/Avengers crossover, which to a extent, is considered partially canon for the DCU since it's been referenced in a couple of mainstream books over the years. i dont know if it's 4x larger, but it is bigger.


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Durakken View Post
yeah I know... also with Mars... it is likely bigger as well because it seems to be able to hold an atmosphere considering the recent plant life springing up on it.
There's also the small matter of a lack of Van Allen belts preventing the solar wind from stripping the Martian atmosphere away.

The Earth's spinning magnetic core is useful for more than figuring direction.



-np


I see myself as witty, urbane, highly talented, hugely successful with a keen sense of style. Plus of course my own special brand of modesty.

Virtue: Automatic Lenin | The Pink Guy | Superpowered | Guardia | Guardia Prime | Ultrapowered

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Veritech View Post
the size of the DCU Earth vs. Marvel earth was brought up in the JLA/Avengers crossover, which to a extent, is considered partially canon for the DCU since it's been referenced in a couple of mainstream books over the years. i dont know if it's 4x larger, but it is bigger.
This indeed where the DC Earth vs. Marvel Earth size difference is officially stated. As I recall though, the DC earth has a slightly larger diameter - which gives it the extra surface needed to hold all of those fictional nations and cities. Nothing even remotely suggested it was 4x as large as Marvel Earth.


http://www.change.org/petitions/ncso...city-of-heroes#

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ulysses_Dare View Post
This indeed where the DC Earth vs. Marvel Earth size difference is officially stated. As I recall though, the DC earth has a slightly larger diameter - which gives it the extra surface needed to hold all of those fictional nations and cities. Nothing even remotely suggested it was 4x as large as Marvel Earth.
The number of cities compacted into similar area suggests it.

Star & Central City are in the same area as their City of origin (i dunno what it is). Metropolis, Gotham, Bludhaven, and New York are all in the same area...

This suggests that the world has to be quite a bit bigger for those cities to all be in the same area as the original city.


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Durakken View Post
The number of cities compacted into similar area suggests it.

Star & Central City are in the same area as their City of origin (i dunno what it is). Metropolis, Gotham, Bludhaven, and New York are all in the same area...

This suggests that the world has to be quite a bit bigger for those cities to all be in the same area as the original city.
Not really. A small increase in diameter (say 5%) would add a lot of surface area. There's no need for DC Earth to 4x as large.


http://www.change.org/petitions/ncso...city-of-heroes#

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ulysses_Dare View Post
Not really. A small increase in diameter (say 5%) would add a lot of surface area. There's no need for DC Earth to 4x as large.
What' the criteria for "4x as large"? 4x the diameter? 4x the surface area? 4x the landmass?


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nightphall View Post

"He's only human! He shouldn't be able to dodge lasers!"


Not to totally thread jack, but dodging lasers isn't that hard. In fact I've done it hundreds of times.

Ever played laser tag? You probably dodged some too.

Lasers travel at the speed of light, true, they are "light" after all.

However the person firing the laser, still has to wield the gun accurately and fire it quickly.

If you can move fast enough to throw off their accuracy or avoid their aim, you can dodge lasers.

Batman is fast enough and agile enough that he would have no trouble dodging things being shot at him since he is usually much faster than the people shooting at him.


"Where does he get those wonderful toys?" - The Joker

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ironik View Post
I go to the hospital for a little bit and come back to people touching themselves too fast to see and others dodging lasers, all on an Earth that's 4 times larger than it used to be.

Did I wake up in the Matrix?
The dream is collapsing.

*BRAAAAAAWWWWWMMMMM*


- CaptainFoamerang

Silverspar on Kelly Hu: A face that could melt paint off the wall *shivers*
Someone play my AE arc! "The Heart of Statesman" ID: 343405

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by CaptainFoamerang View Post
The dream is collapsing.

*BRAAAAAAWWWWWMMMMM*
BRAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAWWWWWMMMMM


"Ben is short for Frank."
-Baffling Beer-Man, The Tenacious 3: The Movie

[IMG]http://i197.photobucket.com/albums/aa10/BafflingBeerman/teamjackface1.jpg[/IMG]

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ice_Wall View Post
Not to totally thread jack, but dodging lasers isn't that hard. In fact I've done it hundreds of times.

Ever played laser tag? You probably dodged some too.

Lasers travel at the speed of light, true, they are "light" after all.

However the person firing the laser, still has to wield the gun accurately and fire it quickly.

If you can move fast enough to throw off their accuracy or avoid their aim, you can dodge lasers.

Batman is fast enough and agile enough that he would have no trouble dodging things being shot at him since he is usually much faster than the people shooting at him.
this is why flechettes should be in every capable villains' arsenal.


Kittens give Morbo gas.