Discussion: What's your Origin?
Quote:
Well, if you've ever been to a weekend-long gaming con of any kind, then I think you'll agree that a "Stinklines" aura is a possible choice.
Feel free to describe what a "natural" aura or cape would look like
|
A second aura could be a special bright gleam that only rarely appears, centered on either an eye or the teeth.
As for the cape, how about a beach towel or bedsheet tied around the neck?
"I do so love taking a nice, well thought out character and putting them through hell. It's like tossing a Faberge Egg onto the stage during a Gallagher concert." - me
@Palador / @Rabid Unicorn
No. And you don't either, because we've had more costume content through the packs than we ever got for free over the same period of time. Plus, we are still getting free costume pieces at about the same rate as before too.
Quote:
Since the dvd editions, there has always been paid costume options. The difference between free and paid ones, are that the paid ones are accessory extras, while the free ones are something new, or left out.
Fair enough, yes I understand there's been a mixture of paid and free costume options. But to me it just seems that the focus lately has been on paid costume pieces. I had forgotten the animated tails, that was my bad, but when comparing the options offered with monthly payment and separate payments, I still see a difference in amount and quality.
But why all the hyberbole? I haven't seen anyone else talk about "dark current regime" "rainbows" or "golden times." Sounds almost like a straw man. |
Capes, auras, more than 1 costume, moving tails, trench coats, are part of the fundamentals of the game, and not all of which were put in when COH went live.
There is always new costumes with updates, they just get less attention because they are free.
Different regimes? Stateman (jack) regime, no stateman (Positron, Babs, Castle regime?), now its dark (with no babs?).
Quote:
I haven't really seen anyone who has been critical about boosters being hyperbolic. Even in the party pack thread majority of the people who were against it had reasonable and well thought out arguments, for example Tommy Troy.
More like calling a spade a spade than a Straw man. Every time someone invokes "the suits" or "Marketing" and complains about how we have to pay now when we didn't before, it's really not any different than the terms Nethergoat used. Just different codewords for the same concept.
Nethergoat isn't engaging the Hyperbolic drive, he's just pointing out when people crank it to Ludicrous Speed. |
Granted I could've worded my initial post way better and that was my fault. I didn't really mean to convey a concept that everything used to be free.
However I do not agree that the rate has been the same all the time coming up until this current point.
Quote:
Then to you I say the same I've been saying to everyone else who feels that way in these threads. Prove it. It's not that complicated a thing to count and graph each release on a timeline and demonstrate this decline you "feel" is something genuine.
However I do not agree that the rate has been the same all the time coming up until this current point.
|
No one's done it yet. They just like to trust vague memories and even vaguer assertions about what that means for the future.
"Null is as much an argument "for removing the cottage rule" as the moon being round is for buying tennis shoes." -Memphis Bill
Quote:
Uh, I did it. It's just that everyone is ignoring it. :P Look back one page.
Then to you I say the same I've been saying to everyone else who feels that way in these threads. Prove it. It's not that complicated a thing to count and graph each release on a timeline and demonstrate this decline you "feel" is something genuine.
No one's done it yet. They just like to trust vague memories and even vaguer assertions about what that means for the future. |
You came up with a great list. I saw it and I agree. That's not the same thing as what I'm saying though. The main thing people are arguing here is a trend. A list doesn't demonstrate one way or the other. A graph with accurate counts of all free/paid changes would, because then you could determine a trendline.
"Null is as much an argument "for removing the cottage rule" as the moon being round is for buying tennis shoes." -Memphis Bill
Yeah I was about to count the costume pieces for this year and last year when the majority of current boosters appeared. But then again all of them should be calculated starting from first issue that introduced more costumes, I reckon. To see a trend I mean.
But I don't know what to do with the power customization options. I had this discussion before as far as I can recall. Some people say they're costumes, some don't. Then again the power customization excludes some ATs. :/
Honestly, I expect the capes to look batter when people like bAss_ackwards [and at the danger of sounding like I'm tooting my own horn... me] get their hands on them. No disrespect to the devs, but the very best costumes I've seen are player-created.
Quote:
The first issue to introduce new costume pieces was i2, which introduced capes.
Yeah I was about to count the costume pieces for this year and last year when the majority of current boosters appeared. But then again all of them should be calculated starting from first issue that introduced more costumes, I reckon. To see a trend I mean.
But I don't know what to do with the power customization options. I had this discussion before as far as I can recall. Some people say they're costumes, some don't. Then again the power customization excludes some ATs. :/ |
The first paid booster was Sept 06, which was the GvE pack and included the GvE options separate from the combined game.
Technically speaking the first paid booster was the CoH Collector's edition Item pack.
"Null is as much an argument "for removing the cottage rule" as the moon being round is for buying tennis shoes." -Memphis Bill
For 8 dollars I would have bought it . 10 ? No thanks.
Quote:
If you change it in the Costume screen (weapons) it counts as a costume.
But I don't know what to do with the power customization options. I had this discussion before as far as I can recall. Some people say they're costumes, some don't. Then again the power customization excludes some ATs. :/
|
If you change it in the power customization screen, it doesn't.
That's a simple and technical way to go about it, and even if some people don't agree stylistically, you have a firm methodology.
"Null is as much an argument "for removing the cottage rule" as the moon being round is for buying tennis shoes." -Memphis Bill
Yes. They sold small boxes with all the extras and a code for the ingame badge, power, and cape, but no DVD.
"Null is as much an argument "for removing the cottage rule" as the moon being round is for buying tennis shoes." -Memphis Bill
Quote:
Yeah I thought so as well.
If you change it in the Costume screen (weapons) it counts as a costume.
If you change it in the power customization screen, it doesn't. That's a simple and technical way to go about it, and even if some people don't agree stylistically, you have a firm methodology. |
But I'm not too certain about comparing just numbers. For example if an issue provides an invert gladiator shoulder pad or inverted robotic arm or just a new pattern for lower body thights, booster offers one detailed chest piece or helmet, or vice versa.
At this point it'd be 1:1, but the other costume option is of higher quality in a way.
Quote:
People are arguing that 5 capes and 10 auras "isn't enough" without stopping to take a look at qualitative concerns. Even though this argument is fundamentally a qualitative one (do you like the pieces enough to buy them) people are defending that position (or positing the trend) in a quantitative fashion.
Yeah I thought so as well.
But I'm not too certain about comparing just numbers. For example if an issue provides an invert gladiator shoulder pad or inverted robotic arm or just a new pattern for lower body thights, booster offers one detailed chest piece or helmet, or vice versa. At this point it'd be 1:1, but the other costume option is of higher quality in a way. |
My advice is don't get bogged down in qualitative issues. Each costume piece is going to have a totally different set of validating factors for each user. Since people are choosing to argue about numbers, stick to the numbers, and treat everything equally. I feel like that will average things out between generally useful and marginally useful items.
Better to be comprehensive than to cherry pick.
"Null is as much an argument "for removing the cottage rule" as the moon being round is for buying tennis shoes." -Memphis Bill
Quote:
At this point, the posts replying to/mocking/arguing with far outnumber the (mostly simply stated) posts stating "no thanks/will not buy".
I admit, I am enjoying the histrionics surrounding the notion that the devs are making TOO MUCH STUFF. Who would have thought gamers would complain about a consistent schedule of new options and shinies?
|
Which "side", exactly, are the "histrionics" occurring on?
i was thinking of a towel or sheet tied around the neck appearance. Two brooch options: knotted fabric or big safety pin.
Maybe a third cape that resembles a cheap children's costume cape. Short, shiny plastic finish, and the only brooch is a bow tied out of string.
Maybe a third cape that resembles a cheap children's costume cape. Short, shiny plastic finish, and the only brooch is a bow tied out of string.
Dr. Todt's theme.
i make stuff...
Quote:
LOL I totally want this!
i was thinking of a towel or sheet tied around the neck appearance. Two brooch options: knotted fabric or big safety pin.
Maybe a third cape that resembles a cheap children's costume cape. Short, shiny plastic finish, and the only brooch is a bow tied out of string. |
Quote:
Since you seem to be swimming in money, why don't you purchase the new booster pack for all of us you can't afford it and the small amount of content provided within? It must be nice to live in your world of wealth and leisure. Not everyone is so blessed. But I guess you could not understand that from way up there on your high pedestal.
They're aiming these at players who don't mind spending the equivalent of a movie ticket, six pack or frozen pizza to spruce up their characters, not people who think ten bucks constitutes a "pile of money".
Opt in, opt out, your choice. But please don't pretend the price tag represents some kind of undue financial burden. |
Acroyear
Founder/Leader of the JUSTICE F0RCE
http://JusticeForce.guildportal.com
Quote:
This.
Actually, both are personal. One for financial reasons and the other for opinion reasons. Both are also valid to the people with the issues. For you to dismiss someone's feelings about this Pack is just as inappropriate as it would be for other people to dismiss yours.
|
Acroyear
Founder/Leader of the JUSTICE F0RCE
http://JusticeForce.guildportal.com
Quote:
I don't think his view comes from a position of wealth, and I think you completely misunderstood his point. I can't afford the Boosters to this game at all, but I completely agree with him.
Since you seem to be swimming in money, why don't you purchase the new booster pack for all of us you can't afford it and the small amount of content provided within? It must be nice to live in your world of wealth and leisure. Not everyone is so blessed. But I guess you could not understand that from way up there on your high pedestal.
|
That's why I intend to save up for my aforementioned 1 Day Purchase, but if I fall short, that's my fault, not the developers.
Ditto, just like the costume packs the magic one is the best IMO and worth the cost on its own.
The City of Heroes Community is a special one and I will always look fondly on my times arguing, discussing and playing with you all. Thanks and thanks to the developers for a special experience.
But why all the hyberbole? I haven't seen anyone else talk about "dark current regime" "rainbows" or "golden times." Sounds almost like a straw man.
Nethergoat isn't engaging the Hyperbolic drive, he's just pointing out when people crank it to Ludicrous Speed.
"Null is as much an argument "for removing the cottage rule" as the moon being round is for buying tennis shoes." -Memphis Bill