Is "Evil" defined by action, intent, both or neither?


Agonus

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bill Z Bubba View Post
Ahh, eugenics is a good thing, then?
See the great thing is that we don't have to filter entire human beings, we just needed to trade "Eugenics" for "Genetics" and it's all good even thought the results are fundamentally the same.


"Samual_Tow - Be disappointed all you want, people. You just don't appreciate the miracles that are taking place here."

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by SDragon View Post
Slavery too! As long as you're making sure you enslave at least one less person then benefits from it.
Or we can pay people a dollar a day to make shoes in one country that sell for a hundred and fifty in another. See, all good.


"Samual_Tow - Be disappointed all you want, people. You just don't appreciate the miracles that are taking place here."

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by ObiWan View Post
You know what's truely evil...Clowns.
That's precisely why Masterminds need a clown set.


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Scythus View Post
That's precisely why Masterminds need a clown set.
Positron said at Hero Con they were leaving the silly stuff to that other superhero MMO


@Golden Girl

City of Heroes comics and artwork

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Golden Girl View Post
Positron said at Hero Con they were leaving the silly stuff to that other superhero MMO
So.... elves, fairies, gnomes, and visual sounds aren't silly? Okay then!


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Golden Girl View Post
Positron said at Hero Con they were leaving the silly stuff to that other superhero MMO
What exactly are you calling "silly?"







Clowns are terrifying beasts.


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Scythus View Post
What exactly are you calling "silly?"







Clowns are terrifying beasts.
Only Deadpool knows how to deal with clowns...


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by The_Volt View Post
Only Deadpool knows how to deal with clowns...
The zombie clown off Zombieland is 100 times scarier than those!


@Damz Find me on the global channel Union Chat. One of the best "chat channels" ingame!

 

Posted

Evil is real defined by the viewer, there for it can be all or none of the above.


Doom/Batman in 2012

The Resistance has boobs too, and better hair!

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Golden Girl View Post
*City of heroes/Champions Online boxes snipped*
Okay, I'll admit it. I laughed.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tokyo View Post
Only Siths speak in absolutes... d;D
Star wars has a lovely four-color morality that I've started to look askew at since I've been getting older. From entertainingly contradictions like that one to the whole 'From a certain point of view' line, the Jedi aren't all -that- morally absolute in their position. There would be a lot of fridge logic about their behavior if their primary opposites weren't kicking back in a power that gives you creepy weird skin conditions and evil red underwear if Knights of the Old Republic is to be believed. Maybe that gives strength to the 'Good/Evil defined by narrative' theory.

Quote:
Originally Posted by The_Volt View Post
Only Deadpool knows how to deal with clowns...
Those are awful, awful clowns. I like your signature, though.


 

Posted

To throw out a point with practically no context, I'd like to differentiate between "evil" and "malicious." While I could easily call every act of pure malice evil and not bat an eye, not every act of evil is malicious, or indeed intentional. As has been mentioned before, most evil people don't sit around in their swivel chairs, pet their cat and think "I am so evil that I can't stand myself. Oh, my!" Many of them, including most of the people history calls evil, truly believed they were doing something good and great, even if the morality that lead them to that conclusion is often suspect.

In this respect, I'd say that someone who goes out to do something bad for the sake of doing something bad and making people miserable is quantifiably evil by a serious margin. However, that really isn't saying much. Serial killers aside, and they don't make good evil masterminds taking over the world, the kind of villains who admit that they are malicious and are doing what they're doing just to be evil basically come down to Gargamel and Dr. Heinz Doofenshmirtz.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Arcanaville View Post
Samuel_Tow is the only poster that makes me want to punch him in the head more often when I'm agreeing with him than when I'm disagreeing with him.

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Samuel_Tow View Post
...The kind of villains who admit that they are malicious and are doing what they're doing just to be evil basically come down to Gargamel and Dr. Heinz Doofenshmirtz.
Doc D. only THINKS he's evil. His best friend is his nemesis!

EDIT: On the other hand, there was that whole Doofenshmirtz Quality Bratwurst thing.


American Dawg, Starblaze, Neanderthal Joe, Shining Dawn, Tokamak Dragon, Stinger Incarnate, Burning Tyger, Dover Tornado, Big Roach, Dark Paladin, Archmage Wylde, Kings Row Hornet, Prancing Deer
Avogadro, Science Lord
Edgar Nightcraft, Doc Cicada, Chupa Macabre, Dr Forchtenstein, Blood Shrew

 

Posted

Okay yet another answer to the question about, Watch this, and its not a Rickroll.

http://gamevideos.1up.com/video/id/23559


Quote:
by Star Ranger 4
WIN LOSE OR DRAW, WE WILL FIGHT.
WE ARE HEROES This is what we DO!
When you wake up seek the courage and strength to do the right thing.
Decide that this will be another day in which you Walk The Talk.

MA #14724 Operation: Discredit @American Valor
Sentinel Of Liberty SG

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Scientist_16 View Post



Star wars has a lovely four-color morality that I've started to look askew at since I've been getting older. From entertainingly contradictions like that one to the whole 'From a certain point of view' line, the Jedi aren't all -that- morally absolute in their position. There would be a lot of fridge logic about their behavior if their primary opposites weren't kicking back in a power that gives you creepy weird skin conditions and evil red underwear if Knights of the Old Republic is to be believed. Maybe that gives strength to the 'Good/Evil defined by narrative' theory.


Those are awful, awful clowns. I like your signature, though.
My inner geek would love to read this interaction between Sith master and Jedi apprentice:

Sith Master: "You either embrace power or deny it, young jedi."

jedi apprentice: "Only Siths speak in absolutes!"

Sith master: with a smile "Then you are well on your way to true wisdom, young jedi."

*blush*


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Samuel_Tow View Post
To throw out a point with practically no context, I'd like to differentiate between "evil" and "malicious." While I could easily call every act of pure malice evil and not bat an eye, not every act of evil is malicious, or indeed intentional. As has been mentioned before, most evil people don't sit around in their swivel chairs, pet their cat and think "I am so evil that I can't stand myself. Oh, my!"
I have a cat and I used to have a swivel chair....


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Westley View Post
This is why I have a long-standing theory that if we could ALL hear each other's thoughts, or at least UNDERSTAND each other fully, then we'd realize that all the things we do are "good".

Well, not exactly GOOD, but at the very least, not evil. Because deep in our heart of hearts, no one believes that they, or the things that they do, are evil. At least no one sane could live with themselves with such thoughts. So I strongly believe that everyone really believes that what they are doing is good.

Now that doesn't excuse them, mind you, but it does make you wonder about the reasoning behind decisions that some call "evil". If you can get inside the head of a person that does "evil" things, I mean REALLY get inside their head... will you still believe that those things are evil once you understand the motivations and reasoning behind them?
The problem with that is the old adage "the ends justify the means." For those who believe that the ends justify the means, they will willingly do evil acts in an attempt to bring about the greater good. They know what they are doing is wrong, but it's for the greater good, therefor the evil acts that bring about the good are in and of themselves acceptable because they bring about great good.

I've come to the conclusion that holding the philosophy that the ends justify the means is in itself an inherently evil philosophy. Despite the fact that it is intended to do good, it very well may fail in that regard because more evil acts may be committed to achieve that good goal. All the good that was fought for might be lost completely with those evil acts.


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Electric-Knight View Post
When the cat ripped the chair to threads, was that an act of evil?


Actually, the chair got old and fell apart under its on volition.


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Evilanna View Post
The problem with that is the old adage "the ends justify the means." For those who believe that the ends justify the means, they will willingly do evil acts in an attempt to bring about the greater good. They know what they are doing is wrong, but it's for the greater good, therefor the evil acts that bring about the good are in and of themselves acceptable because they bring about great good.

I've come to the conclusion that holding the philosophy that the ends justify the means is in itself an inherently evil philosophy. Despite the fact that it is intended to do good, it very well may fail in that regard because more evil acts may be committed to achieve that good goal. All the good that was fought for might be lost completely with those evil acts.
You can only find fault with the principle of the ends justifying the means if you believe in objective evil. And since you literally can't prove the existence of evil, it can't be objective


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Evilanna View Post
The problem with that is the old adage "the ends justify the means." For those who believe that the ends justify the means, they will willingly do evil acts in an attempt to bring about the greater good. They know what they are doing is wrong, but it's for the greater good, therefor the evil acts that bring about the good are in and of themselves acceptable because they bring about great good.

I've come to the conclusion that holding the philosophy that the ends justify the means is in itself an inherently evil philosophy. Despite the fact that it is intended to do good, it very well may fail in that regard because more evil acts may be committed to achieve that good goal. All the good that was fought for might be lost completely with those evil acts.
I hear you on that.
I've come to find myself thinking that this mindset also tends to influence others to continue in that way (To do "evil" in order to achieve the greater good). And, let's face it, not everyone will always be even close to correct in their assessment of that nor in their execution of it.

I believe "evil" begets "evil".

Unfortunately, the toughest thing to do is stand against something that will help you.

Of course, no one and nothing is perfect. And thus the cycle continues, hehe.

I think Sonic The Hedgehog, himself, is evil, because I never played another sidescrolling game of that (The Super Mario Bros) style ever again after completing the original Sonic on the Genesis.

It was great fun, but that was the end of it for me. No more, hehe.

(Not important, but thought I'd mention it to lighten the mood in here)


@Zethustra
"Now at midnight all the agents and the superhuman crew come out
and round up everyone that knows more than they do"
-Dylan

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Scientist_16 View Post
...Star wars has a lovely four-color morality that I've started to look askew at since I've been getting older. From entertainingly contradictions like that one to the whole 'From a certain point of view' line, the Jedi aren't all -that- morally absolute in their position. There would be a lot of fridge logic about their behavior if their primary opposites weren't kicking back in a power that gives you creepy weird skin conditions and evil red underwear if Knights of the Old Republic is to be believed. Maybe that gives strength to the 'Good/Evil defined by narrative' theory...
I'm as big a Star Wars fan as the next guy, but I'll also admit it doesn't hold up well under examination. Jedi don't have it so bad, they're cautious to a fault, but I like that. They aren't perfect, they aren't always right, and while some of them know that, some also refuse to accept it.

The whole Sith thing, especially the Rule of Two silliness, is so contradictory though it's almost painful to read at times. I can attest to it to an extent though after running an RPVG for a while. If you don't give a group of morally unrestrained types a target, they -will- turn in on themselves. Nature of the beast, you could say.


Tales of Judgment. Also here, instead of that other place.

good luck D.B.B.

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Golden Girl View Post
/thread


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Westley View Post
This is why I have a long-standing theory that if we could ALL hear each other's thoughts, or at least UNDERSTAND each other fully, then we'd realize that all the things we do are "good".

Well, not exactly GOOD, but at the very least, not evil. Because deep in our heart of hearts, no one believes that they, or the things that they do, are evil. At least no one sane could live with themselves with such thoughts. So I strongly believe that everyone really believes that what they are doing is good.

Now that doesn't excuse them, mind you, but it does make you wonder about the reasoning behind decisions that some call "evil". If you can get inside the head of a person that does "evil" things, I mean REALLY get inside their head... will you still believe that those things are evil once you understand the motivations and reasoning behind them?
Yes.

Sounds like you define 'evil' as 'deliberate intent to be evil', and anyone who isn't deliberately intending to be evil is therefore not evil. AND you don't believe that anyone would deliberately intend to be evil... So no one is evil, by definition.

There are people who are evil without intending to be. And there are people who intend to be evil, because they like it.