Is "Evil" defined by action, intent, both or neither?
"Samual_Tow - Be disappointed all you want, people. You just don't appreciate the miracles that are taking place here."
@Golden Girl
City of Heroes comics and artwork
Evil is real defined by the viewer, there for it can be all or none of the above.
The Resistance has boobs too, and better hair!
Star wars has a lovely four-color morality that I've started to look askew at since I've been getting older. From entertainingly contradictions like that one to the whole 'From a certain point of view' line, the Jedi aren't all -that- morally absolute in their position. There would be a lot of fridge logic about their behavior if their primary opposites weren't kicking back in a power that gives you creepy weird skin conditions and evil red underwear if Knights of the Old Republic is to be believed. Maybe that gives strength to the 'Good/Evil defined by narrative' theory.
Those are awful, awful clowns. I like your signature, though.
To throw out a point with practically no context, I'd like to differentiate between "evil" and "malicious." While I could easily call every act of pure malice evil and not bat an eye, not every act of evil is malicious, or indeed intentional. As has been mentioned before, most evil people don't sit around in their swivel chairs, pet their cat and think "I am so evil that I can't stand myself. Oh, my!" Many of them, including most of the people history calls evil, truly believed they were doing something good and great, even if the morality that lead them to that conclusion is often suspect.
In this respect, I'd say that someone who goes out to do something bad for the sake of doing something bad and making people miserable is quantifiably evil by a serious margin. However, that really isn't saying much. Serial killers aside, and they don't make good evil masterminds taking over the world, the kind of villains who admit that they are malicious and are doing what they're doing just to be evil basically come down to Gargamel and Dr. Heinz Doofenshmirtz.
Samuel_Tow is the only poster that makes me want to punch him in the head more often when I'm agreeing with him than when I'm disagreeing with him.
|
...The kind of villains who admit that they are malicious and are doing what they're doing just to be evil basically come down to Gargamel and Dr. Heinz Doofenshmirtz.
|
EDIT: On the other hand, there was that whole Doofenshmirtz Quality Bratwurst thing.
American Dawg, Starblaze, Neanderthal Joe, Shining Dawn, Tokamak Dragon, Stinger Incarnate, Burning Tyger, Dover Tornado, Big Roach, Dark Paladin, Archmage Wylde, Kings Row Hornet, Prancing Deer
Avogadro, Science Lord
Edgar Nightcraft, Doc Cicada, Chupa Macabre, Dr Forchtenstein, Blood Shrew
Okay yet another answer to the question about, Watch this, and its not a Rickroll.
http://gamevideos.1up.com/video/id/23559
by Star Ranger 4 WIN LOSE OR DRAW, WE WILL FIGHT. WE ARE HEROES This is what we DO! |
Decide that this will be another day in which you Walk The Talk.
MA #14724 Operation: Discredit @American Valor
Sentinel Of Liberty SG
Star wars has a lovely four-color morality that I've started to look askew at since I've been getting older. From entertainingly contradictions like that one to the whole 'From a certain point of view' line, the Jedi aren't all -that- morally absolute in their position. There would be a lot of fridge logic about their behavior if their primary opposites weren't kicking back in a power that gives you creepy weird skin conditions and evil red underwear if Knights of the Old Republic is to be believed. Maybe that gives strength to the 'Good/Evil defined by narrative' theory. Those are awful, awful clowns. I like your signature, though. |
Sith Master: "You either embrace power or deny it, young jedi."
jedi apprentice: "Only Siths speak in absolutes!"
Sith master: with a smile "Then you are well on your way to true wisdom, young jedi."
*blush*
To throw out a point with practically no context, I'd like to differentiate between "evil" and "malicious." While I could easily call every act of pure malice evil and not bat an eye, not every act of evil is malicious, or indeed intentional. As has been mentioned before, most evil people don't sit around in their swivel chairs, pet their cat and think "I am so evil that I can't stand myself. Oh, my!"
|
This is why I have a long-standing theory that if we could ALL hear each other's thoughts, or at least UNDERSTAND each other fully, then we'd realize that all the things we do are "good".
Well, not exactly GOOD, but at the very least, not evil. Because deep in our heart of hearts, no one believes that they, or the things that they do, are evil. At least no one sane could live with themselves with such thoughts. So I strongly believe that everyone really believes that what they are doing is good. Now that doesn't excuse them, mind you, but it does make you wonder about the reasoning behind decisions that some call "evil". If you can get inside the head of a person that does "evil" things, I mean REALLY get inside their head... will you still believe that those things are evil once you understand the motivations and reasoning behind them? |
I've come to the conclusion that holding the philosophy that the ends justify the means is in itself an inherently evil philosophy. Despite the fact that it is intended to do good, it very well may fail in that regard because more evil acts may be committed to achieve that good goal. All the good that was fought for might be lost completely with those evil acts.
and round up everyone that knows more than they do"-Dylan
The problem with that is the old adage "the ends justify the means." For those who believe that the ends justify the means, they will willingly do evil acts in an attempt to bring about the greater good. They know what they are doing is wrong, but it's for the greater good, therefor the evil acts that bring about the good are in and of themselves acceptable because they bring about great good.
I've come to the conclusion that holding the philosophy that the ends justify the means is in itself an inherently evil philosophy. Despite the fact that it is intended to do good, it very well may fail in that regard because more evil acts may be committed to achieve that good goal. All the good that was fought for might be lost completely with those evil acts. |
The problem with that is the old adage "the ends justify the means." For those who believe that the ends justify the means, they will willingly do evil acts in an attempt to bring about the greater good. They know what they are doing is wrong, but it's for the greater good, therefor the evil acts that bring about the good are in and of themselves acceptable because they bring about great good.
I've come to the conclusion that holding the philosophy that the ends justify the means is in itself an inherently evil philosophy. Despite the fact that it is intended to do good, it very well may fail in that regard because more evil acts may be committed to achieve that good goal. All the good that was fought for might be lost completely with those evil acts. |
I've come to find myself thinking that this mindset also tends to influence others to continue in that way (To do "evil" in order to achieve the greater good). And, let's face it, not everyone will always be even close to correct in their assessment of that nor in their execution of it.
I believe "evil" begets "evil".
Unfortunately, the toughest thing to do is stand against something that will help you.
Of course, no one and nothing is perfect. And thus the cycle continues, hehe.
I think Sonic The Hedgehog, himself, is evil, because I never played another sidescrolling game of that (The Super Mario Bros) style ever again after completing the original Sonic on the Genesis.
It was great fun, but that was the end of it for me. No more, hehe.
(Not important, but thought I'd mention it to lighten the mood in here)
and round up everyone that knows more than they do"-Dylan
...Star wars has a lovely four-color morality that I've started to look askew at since I've been getting older. From entertainingly contradictions like that one to the whole 'From a certain point of view' line, the Jedi aren't all -that- morally absolute in their position. There would be a lot of fridge logic about their behavior if their primary opposites weren't kicking back in a power that gives you creepy weird skin conditions and evil red underwear if Knights of the Old Republic is to be believed. Maybe that gives strength to the 'Good/Evil defined by narrative' theory...
|
The whole Sith thing, especially the Rule of Two silliness, is so contradictory though it's almost painful to read at times. I can attest to it to an extent though after running an RPVG for a while. If you don't give a group of morally unrestrained types a target, they -will- turn in on themselves. Nature of the beast, you could say.
Tales of Judgment. Also here, instead of that other place.
good luck D.B.B.
This is why I have a long-standing theory that if we could ALL hear each other's thoughts, or at least UNDERSTAND each other fully, then we'd realize that all the things we do are "good".
Well, not exactly GOOD, but at the very least, not evil. Because deep in our heart of hearts, no one believes that they, or the things that they do, are evil. At least no one sane could live with themselves with such thoughts. So I strongly believe that everyone really believes that what they are doing is good. Now that doesn't excuse them, mind you, but it does make you wonder about the reasoning behind decisions that some call "evil". If you can get inside the head of a person that does "evil" things, I mean REALLY get inside their head... will you still believe that those things are evil once you understand the motivations and reasoning behind them? |
Sounds like you define 'evil' as 'deliberate intent to be evil', and anyone who isn't deliberately intending to be evil is therefore not evil. AND you don't believe that anyone would deliberately intend to be evil... So no one is evil, by definition.
There are people who are evil without intending to be. And there are people who intend to be evil, because they like it.
"Samual_Tow - Be disappointed all you want, people. You just don't appreciate the miracles that are taking place here."