**Spoilers** Why Not Revive Statesman With A Ritual?


Agent White

 

Posted

I looked at the Paragon Wiki page for Arbiter Hawk and the mechanics of calling the Red Widow back from the dead. I note this bit of information:

>>>I see, then you would need two obols, one to send Charon across the river Styx and one to bring him back with the soul in question in tow. Is the soul expecting to be brought back? I don't believe so. Then might I suggest a part of you take the trip as well, and for that you will need a third obol.<<<

It has already been noted that our heroes have access to Time Travel through Ouroboros, and once Darrin Wade has Described In Detail His Brilliant Evil Plan, it would not even take Bill and Ted to hop back into the past and foil him in about a dozen ways.

But if I am to understand things correctly, Ms. Liberty is also soliciting folks to raise the Red Widow from the dead, whether she wants it or not.

(I am leaving aside the notion that the terminology used by the Devs in this quest again has real-life meaning in many cases, and they go far beyond the typical Orpheus Descending sort of Go Into Hades retrieval mission and utilize self-cutting and some other unfortunate actions during "the ritual" in this scenario. This isn't Manticore swimming in the floaty-floaty netherworld and grabbing the deceased and getting beamed out sort of stuff.)

So, Ms. Liberty, why not get Statesman instead?

I mean, other than the fact the Devs want him dead.


"How do you know you are on the side of good?" a Paragon citizen asked him. "How can we even know what is 'good'?"

"The Most High has spoken, even with His own blood," Melancton replied. "Surely we know."

 

Posted

Obviously, with Statesman dead, we don't have anyone to stand up to Recluse. The only hope is to find a person who can temper Recluse' madness. Sure, she might possibly make him worse than before, but without Statesman around to save us, we have to take that chance.

*nod* yep, that's some ironclad reasoning.


 

Posted

What about reviving Miss Liberty, then? Did she die happily as well?


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Zemblanity View Post
What about reviving Miss Liberty, then? Did she die happily as well?
And what lesson would this teach other heroes and civilians of Paragon?
"If you die, it's okay! Someone will just drag your soul back : D"



http://www.virtueverse.net/wiki/Shadow_Mokadara

 

Posted

Hero-side, the Contact who gives you the obols warns you that some spirits prefer their afterlife and will not return no matter what. I haven't done the villain one (and probably won't) but it probably says the same thing somewhere in there.

Mind you, I still think the whole arc is garbage, but they did cover their bases here.


Current Blog Post: "Why I am an Atheist..."
"And I say now these kittens, they do not get trained/As we did in the days when Victoria reigned!" -- T. S. Eliot, "Gus, the Theatre Cat"

 

Posted

Leave it to us players to find the inevitable loophole in the story.

As a reader and a player, I never found Statesman's 'giving up' and going to die as credible. Does he just go into so much shock that he finds himself in a 'better place' and chooses dying over fighting for his life? Doesn't that rather betray the very values his daughter, his granddaughter, his wife and his closest contemporary recognise in him?

Instead, you get the 'but there are others who can fight the fight for you' bit which conveniently misses the point that beyond Recluse, Statesman has no equal. And oh yeah, he's an Avatar of freakin' Zeus. This is all just going to be accepted with no sense of righteous fury?

All I had to do was put myself in Statesman's shoes for a few seconds. If that had happened to me (ie I was too boneheaded to not recognise the Obvious Trap(tm) and ignore the fact Wade's been playing a master plan game which just might include taking him down), there is no way I would willingly enter the afterlife. By giving up, I'm betraying the very principles which I claim to fight for. Protecting the innocent. Upholding the law. Representing justice.

If the rationale is that Statesman was so tired of his life he just wanted to give up, then we the players didn't see it until the moment of his death.

I can happily throw down the gauntlet to Doctor Aeon to justify in a solidly consistent way how he thinks this works as a story, because we as players can and should be expected to get the gist of it from what we play.

And frankly Doc, it doesn't cut the mustard.

Just like I'd challenge him to answer why going to the Underworld, making a reasonable argument to Statesman and letting him reclaim the power that is his (Wade only stole the power, he doesn't own it) would fail beyond 'oh, he doesn't want to be'.

I swear, every time a reasonable response to the story events come up, the more embittered I am that we got a sub-standard story instead of this heavy-handed fan-fiction.



S.


Part of Sister Flame's Clickey-Clack Posse

 

Posted

Statesman is also well over 100 years old. Even though he's physically incarnate, he's still emotionally human. He must be emotionally tired, too. And remember, all this time Statesman thought he was the ONLY one who could stop Wade. He now realizes that you, the player, has just as much potential and he doesn't need to stay around forever because his principles and his efforts will be passed on to a new generation of heroes.

Not to mention, the later Statesman was only holding us back by trying to forbid access to greater power.



http://www.virtueverse.net/wiki/Shadow_Mokadara

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by SuperOz View Post
Leave it to us players to find the inevitable loophole in the story.
Except in the Valentine's mission from Duncan, there isn't a loophole. As Venture noted above, they tied that off with "[...]some souls don't want to return to the living [...]", paraphrased. That comes from the mission interaction text with The Conduit contact hero side, also not sure what the villain side has going for it.

So, no loophole there. Who's to say Duncan/Liberty didn't try it already and Statesman didn't come back? Maybe he's truly happy in the afterlife and doesn't want to return. Also, we can't assume he'd come back as "Statesman." Wade stole his powers before toasting him, so it's likely coming back to the living would bring him back as good 'ol Marcus Cole.

While I do agree that the whole "Statesman dying" story is a bunch of rubbish, at least the story here attempts to tie off any loose ends of "well if we can bring back Recluse's main squeeze, why can't we bring back the States?"


Main Character: Ice/Storm/Ice Controller (Justice, 1340 badges)

 

Posted

They should just do the same thing with Statesman as they did with Silver Agent in Astro City.

*spoilers*

Silver Agent was their finest hero, the one everyone looked up to, always did what was right.

Then in 1973 he was put on trial for the cold blooded murder of a foreign head of state who was also an alleged super villain. There was video of the assassination, but he always proclaimed his innocence.

He was found guilty, and the government pushed hard for the death penalty to send a message to the hero community. While he was in his cell waiting for execution, he disappeared and then reappeared a few seconds later. Not long after they took him to the chair and the execution was carried out. After his death, of course they find out that all the evidence was faked, and he was railroaded by the very man he was supposed to have murdered.

However, while the Silver Agent was in his cell, a group from the future with time travel technology took him to their time so he could help them fight off a massive invasion. He has many more adventures, travels through time and appears after his death in 1973 to save the day many more times. But he knows that he'll have to go back to 1973 eventually to face his death, which he does willingly, appearing back in the cell awaiting execution seconds after he left.



In CoH, time travel isn't that unusual. There's nothing to say what happens to Statesman between the time he storms off from his daughter's funeral and when he arrives at the ruins to confront Darrin Wade. Heck, if he knew what he was walking into, it would make the whole scene more powerful, instead of him blundering into an amateurish trap.



.


 

Posted

This probably would have been better mentioned in one of those other threads, but has anyone noticed that Monica's text bubbles in WWD5 are the same color as some of those in WWD3?

States probably didn't make the decision to not struggle entirely by his own will.


61866 - A Series of Unfortunate Kidnappings - More than a coincidence?
2260 - The Burning of Hearts - A green-eyed monster holds the match.
379248 - The Spider Without Fangs - NEW - Some lessons learned (more or less.)

 

Posted

Putting aside the concerns about "Who Will Die?", I have to think that just deciding Willy-Nilly to revive someone is a decision that could have consequences greater than you might be expecting.

I was never a big Buffy fan, but one of the most powerful bits ever in that show (for me, anyway) was during the "singing" episode. Buffy is still coming to terms with being revivified and she sings "Heaven... I think I was in Heaven..."

The looks on her friends' faces as that sinks in and they begin to realize the enormity of what they've done to her by resurrecting her is a moment that every hero group ought to witness before they decide that they know best about whether life or death is a preferable state of being for another person.


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by flipside View Post
Except in the Valentine's mission from Duncan, there isn't a loophole. As Venture noted above, they tied that off with "[...]some souls don't want to return to the living [...]", paraphrased. That comes from the mission interaction text with The Conduit contact hero side, also not sure what the villain side has going for it.

So, no loophole there. Who's to say Duncan/Liberty didn't try it already and Statesman didn't come back? Maybe he's truly happy in the afterlife and doesn't want to return. Also, we can't assume he'd come back as "Statesman." Wade stole his powers before toasting him, so it's likely coming back to the living would bring him back as good 'ol Marcus Cole.

While I do agree that the whole "Statesman dying" story is a bunch of rubbish, at least the story here attempts to tie off any loose ends of "well if we can bring back Recluse's main squeeze, why can't we bring back the States?"
Nah, that's implying a closed loophole without actually addressing the situation.

Look how many times you've just used the words maybe, can't assume, and likely. We're presuming and assuming we know how Statesman felt, what Ms. Liberty did and more importantly whether or not he'd want to come back given the opportunity. Shadowmoka is also inferring and presuming we know what Statesman is thinking and feeling. All I ever wanted and still want from this story is the consistency that actually says that. All we do see as TheDeepBlue says is that he may not have gone entirely of his free will. Which if you consider it is not a good situation at all.

The actual story tells us none of this. At all. I stand by what I said; what we see on the screen is what we know. And what we see is a man who not only walks into an obvious trap, but he summarily gives up for no reason that we the viewer can discern but must infer from the text. Inference is great if you're telling a morality story or are trying to argue an emotive issue, but not if you're trying to tell a story that as you put it ties off the loose ends. If that were the case, we wouldn't be posting about this. It'd be clear and without any confusion or misinterpretation.

With that as a precondition, it's entirely reasonable to put up the possibility of the afterlife as a response to the story.



S.


Part of Sister Flame's Clickey-Clack Posse

 

Posted

Forget ritual, just last night I was wondering...

"Why can't the Empath user Ressurect him?"

"What about the Thermal Radiation user who can use Power of the Phoenix?"

These powers bring you back from the dead, and they're not being used! Did Wade somehow limit these characters from using these powers?


BrandX Future Staff Fighter
The BrandX Collection

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by SlickRiptide View Post
Putting aside the concerns about "Who Will Die?", I have to think that just deciding Willy-Nilly to revive someone is a decision that could have consequences greater than you might be expecting.

I was never a big Buffy fan, but one of the most powerful bits ever in that show (for me, anyway) was during the "singing" episode. Buffy is still coming to terms with being revivified and she sings "Heaven... I think I was in Heaven..."

The looks on her friends' faces as that sinks in and they begin to realize the enormity of what they've done to her by resurrecting her is a moment that every hero group ought to witness before they decide that they know best about whether life or death is a preferable state of being for another person.
I don't think it'd be willy-nilly in this case, though. Even just a casual examination of the story, and we would probably learn what his wife and daughter said to him if we got to the underworld to ask, would reveal that it's a bit of a strawman death. I don't think anyone argues that it's a heroic death or he died saving people or anything that anyone would associate with the very best ideals that Statesman has.

I think it's a very reasonable story angle to explore, really. The means are there, the opportunity is there and there's no reason not to explore it even if just to have Statesman himself, without a cutscene, have a bit of a say in his own fate.

I'd prefer to trust in a story like that rather than a story by Doctor Aeon which has provoked feelings of ambiguity at best in people like myself who find the story as presented to simply not meet credibility and other writing standards a lot of us take forgranted.



S.


Part of Sister Flame's Clickey-Clack Posse

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by ShadowMoka View Post
And what lesson would this teach other heroes and civilians of Paragon?
"If you die, it's okay! Someone will just drag your soul back : D"
And that's a bad moral because...?

This is why you budget the power creep of your fictional world. This is why you don't make time travel and resurrection commonplace. Because then you have people asking why you couldn't just use a Phoenix Down on Aeris.

The City of Heroes of the past always had reclimators, yes, but if those failed and you DID die, you were dead for good. No reclaiming the dead. The City of Heroes of the past also didn't have time travel. Yes, there as always Holsten Armitage, but the man was widely regarded to be insane and delusional and he had no way to actually travel through time past his original journey into his past, which is our present.

When you institute "reset buttons" williy-nilly in large numbers, you introduce plot holes which CANNOT be filled in.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Arcanaville View Post
Samuel_Tow is the only poster that makes me want to punch him in the head more often when I'm agreeing with him than when I'm disagreeing with him.

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by BrandX View Post
Forget ritual, just last night I was wondering...

"Why can't the Empath user Ressurect him?"

"What about the Thermal Radiation user who can use Power of the Phoenix?"

These powers bring you back from the dead, and they're not being used! Did Wade somehow limit these characters from using these powers?
Run the SSA again and try clicking on Statesman's body after it's all over. Those powers don't work - Wade's ritual saw to that.


@Quasadu

"We must prepare for DOOM and hope for FREEM." - SirFrederick

 

Posted

Quasadu....

Is that the ritual that responds to your powers by saying 'Because'?

Why won't my powers work? Because.

Why won't my empathy work? Because.

I could kinda go on, but it's like shooting fish in a barrel at that point....



S.


Part of Sister Flame's Clickey-Clack Posse

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by flipside View Post
Who's to say Duncan/Liberty didn't try it already and Statesman didn't come back?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Johnny_Butane View Post
There's nothing to say what happens to Statesman between the time he storms off from his daughter's funeral and when he arrives at the ruins to confront Darrin Wade.
I do not disagree with the above explanations, except to note that they all have to be inferred because the Devs have NOT said.

I am still with SuperOz that Statesman summarily giving up and dying seems extremely out of character, not only for the reasons Oz notes, but because Wade is 1) the murderer of Statesman's daughter 2) is stealing his power to use against the world and quite likely also against 3) Statesman's granddaughter, who is likewise in grave danger (and even moreso if she has inherited the inferred family trait of Walking Into An Obvious Trap (tm).)

As far as Statesman not wanting to come back, he was already "too far gone" or some such for Numina to revive him when Manticore killed him in the comics, so Manticore committed suicide, swam in the floaty-floaty netherworld, found and then grabbed Statesman and Numina beamed them both back, in essence. Where was the lonely Monica, who presumably was also then waiting for Statesman back then in the afterlife? Why is okay to die when Wade pulls off his second family murder in a row but it was not back then?

As I have said before, many players have come up with explanations that are actually pretty good, but the Devs have not. There are gaps and outright silence on any number of topics. The possible answers the players provide are all inferred, one way or another, and a number of them are extremely unpalatable.


"How do you know you are on the side of good?" a Paragon citizen asked him. "How can we even know what is 'good'?"

"The Most High has spoken, even with His own blood," Melancton replied. "Surely we know."

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by SuperOz View Post
Quasadu....

Is that the ritual that responds to your powers by saying 'Because'?

Why won't my powers work? Because.

Why won't my empathy work? Because.

I could kinda go on, but it's like shooting fish in a barrel at that point....



S.
I didn't say it was good writing. It's basically what you said... "because." But it does answer the question I was responding to. Whether it's a satisfactory answer or not is subjective.

EDIT: also, it could be argued that those powers do not, in fact, bring you back from the dead. They bring you back from being "defeated" just like the hospital and your base do. There have been other deaths in game that we couldn't use rez powers on, so this one's not all that different.


@Quasadu

"We must prepare for DOOM and hope for FREEM." - SirFrederick

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by SuperOz View Post
Quasadu....

Is that the ritual that responds to your powers by saying 'Because'?

Why won't my powers work? Because.

Why won't my empathy work? Because.
IIRC, it doesn't even attempt to answer why your powers don't work. It just tells you they don't work, and you can fill in your own reason. Your resurrection serum was untested on fast-path Incarnates. Wade's ritual blocked your own spell. The tangled worldlines in the Cimeroran ruins interfere with your time reversal device. He went AFK during the cutscene, got distracted by something else, and your rez prompt timed out before he got back. Whatever you think is a good reason for the power to not work, you can say that's why. So I personally don't feel that not being able to rez him is much of a plot hole here - they specifically addressed it and let us try to rez him, and it didn't work.

They sorta barely addressed the issue in the Red Widow arc, in a much more specific way that seems to run counter to the other things we know about the character, so it's less palatable.


 

Posted

The answer is not "because", it is "because the soul refuses to return". Wade's ritual, in Statesman's case, had nothing to do with it.

Yes, this is A Wizard Did It ad-hocery but it does satisfy the complaints. Whether or not the work is served by an axiom that makes death and resurrection arbitrary is another question.


Current Blog Post: "Why I am an Atheist..."
"And I say now these kittens, they do not get trained/As we did in the days when Victoria reigned!" -- T. S. Eliot, "Gus, the Theatre Cat"

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Venture View Post
The answer is not "because", it is "because the soul refuses to return". Wade's ritual, in Statesman's case, had nothing to do with it.

Yes, this is A Wizard Did It ad-hocery but it does satisfy the complaints. Whether or not the work is served by an axiom that makes death and resurrection arbitrary is another question.
Doesn't satisfy my complaints, really. A Wizard Did It is just bad writing, and doesn't handwave any reasonable attempt to question or even criticise it.

I'm not seven years old anymore. You want to write a wizard did it, I'm going to call you out on it. It not only excuses poor writing, but also justifies as a precedent any other 'wizard doing it' stories. That's not a slippery slope I want to ski on.



S.


Part of Sister Flame's Clickey-Clack Posse

 

Posted

The reason States won't be brought back using this is simple, no matter how much i hate it personally.

When he comes back, he comes back a mortal. He won't be the States we knew, and it is very unfair to put him through the rest of his life if we can't figure out a way to get his powers back 1st.

Let his death stand for a reason, not bring him back and have age/time torment him for years, esp after he already lived well over a 100 years on this planet.

As much as i'd like to revive him, let him be with the loved ones who have been waiting on him so long. The people we all know he missed for many decades.



Dark Energon, Founder of the Freedom Legion SG on Guardian server.
(SG founded on 12-08-'09, Top100: 08-17-'10, Top50: 12-23-'10, Top25: 12-11-'11)
Crab Spider Nephila on Titan Tracker
Weekly events on Guardian: W.A.V.E. & FNFN