Human potential


Anti_Proton

 

Posted


Quote:
Originally Posted by MaestroMavius View Post
Yes, because the truth is so very scary.


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Magus_Prime View Post
Looking at the human race as a whole I would have to disagree. Joe Rogan has a really good point in one of his stand-up routines. If the smartest people were to disappear i.e. engineers, mathematicians, physicists, etc., which I'm sure we can agree only account for a small fraction of the population, what would happen to the rest of us? In other words, who knows how stuff works? Most of us don't. Honestly, I don't know how to put together a toaster from scratch. I have no idea how a heating element works. I know electricity goes to it and that's about it. In fact, all I really know is I can make money and buy a toaster that someone somewhere put together for me. So sure, every generation exceeds the accomplishments of the one preceding it but realistically we're only talking about a handful of folks who are really capable of doing these things.
Necessity is the mother of invention and through trial and error you can accomplish alot of stuff

You have it in you to figure out a toaster. I'm no electrician, nor am I an engineer or a scientist and I could assemble a rudimentary toaster just using some steel bits and pieces, a car battery, and some trial an error.

If some cosmic force were to wipe out every scientist, doctor, and engineer on the planet and just leave us "dummies" we would revert back to a level of technology where we would be able function (which IMO would be surprisingly well) then begin the long process of building on that foundation which would probably occur sooner than later provided that cosmic force didn't wipe out the accumulated knowledge stored in books or computers.

Depending on how inquisitive you are and your penchant for study or research you'll find that you can teach yourself a great many things.



------->"Sic Semper Tyrannis"<-------

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by MaestroMavius View Post
However, in effort to clarify;
Darwin gave us a good foundation, but we've moved so far past 'survival of the fittest' at this point.
Lamark's been given the egg treatment for decades. It's good, no it's bad, no it's good. New discoveries with stem cells have proven, at least to a degree, that his theory wasn't a total wash.
The debate still rages however and I must caution here, we can't even begin to truly understand the complexity of the human mind and it's real impact on evolution (as a sentient species making more choices than before, etc.)
Actually, while some general principles of Lamarckian evolution have been accepted and even incorporated into the current theory of Darwinian evolution, the central distinguishing characteristic of Lamarckian evoution compared to Darwinian evolution is that Lamarck believed it was actual organisms that evolved to adapt to their environment and they could then pass those adaptations to their offspring. Darwin believed that biological features acquired by parents are not passed onto offspring: that offspring themselves contain natural variations which make those offspring either more or less able to succeed in passing those predetermined characteristics to future generations. Lamarck hasn't been seriously considered a viable theory of evolution since it was displaced by natural selection.

There has been evidence that a pseudo-Lamarckian inheritance can occur in some situations related to gene expression and inhibition, but that doesn't really qualify as resurrecting Lamarck.


[Guide to Defense] [Scrapper Secondaries Comparison] [Archetype Popularity Analysis]

In one little corner of the universe, there's nothing more irritating than a misfile...
(Please support the best webcomic about a cosmic universal realignment by impaired angelic interference resulting in identity crisis angst. Or I release the pigmy water thieves.)

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by ebon3 View Post
If some cosmic force were to wipe out every scientist, doctor, and engineer on the planet...

Actually, unless this cosmic force also wiped out books, instruction manuals, the internet and such... Well, I don't think it would take the world all that long to get back up to speed.

Oh sure, 20 years down the road we may not be as technologically advanced as we would have been, but I am pretty sure we'd probably be back at par to where we were.


 

Posted

Yes on turning off evolution as we know it. We've evolved into a species that can adapt so, in effect, we evolve on a case by case basis. All but gone are the days when we grow an appendage or acquire a mechanism to gain an upper hand on the world around us.


Magus Prime- lev 50 kin/ elec defender
Meta-Human- lev 50 fire/ ss tank
Cabal Bravo- lev 50 merc/ ff master mind
Schwarzchild- lev 50 grav/ ff controller
Shanghai Storm- lev 50 ma/invinc scrapper
Nicodemus- lev 50 db/ regen scrapper
Dragonhyde- lev 50 wp/ sm tank
On The Pinnochle server!

 

Posted

Anyone else read Greg Bear's Darwin's Radio? Interesting take on speciation.


Father Xmas - Level 50 Ice/Ice Tanker - Victory
$725 and $1350 parts lists --- My guide to computer components

Tempus unum hominem manet

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Caemgen View Post
Actually, unless this cosmic force also wiped out books, instruction manuals, the internet and such... Well, I don't think it would take the world all that long to get back up to speed.

Oh sure, 20 years down the road we may not be as technologically advanced as we would have been, but I am pretty sure we'd probably be back at par to where we were.
It would be more interesting if the Cosmic Force tweaked Physics a bit. For example, iremoving the bandgap energy of Silicon would make almost all electronics pieces of junk. Changing the rules we live by would cause more havoc than getting rid of all intelligent people and would be far more interesting in the long run. Of course, changing the rules every few years would be the most effective.


The first step in being sane is to admit that you are insane.

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by starphoenix View Post
The Active spends their time improving themselves in the physical and/or mental while the Non-Active spends their time just playing games, using VR, and other methods of escaping from reality. After all, why bother with getting a good home and family when you can get a better one in VR.
Yeah..... and here we are in a computer game forum. I guess that makes it clear which group we're in.


Paragon City Search And Rescue
The Mentor Project

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ironblade View Post
Yeah..... and here we are in a computer game forum. I guess that makes it clear which group we're in.
Missing the most important part of my post, just. Nothing wrong with various stress relief activities. Would be interesting to see how many forum posters are Active and how many are Non-Active.


The first step in being sane is to admit that you are insane.

 

Posted

If all the "smart" people disappeared tomorrow, Im sure a lot of people would put down their BS and figure it out.
I dont know how to fix a toaster, but I would learn if I really wanted some toast.


"Forum PvP doesn't give drops. Just so all of you who participated in this thread are aware." -Mod08-
"when a stalker goes blue side, assassination strike should be renamed "bunny hugs", and a rainbow should fly out" -Harbinger-

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by ebon3 View Post
You have it in you to figure out a toaster. I'm no electrician, nor am I an engineer or a scientist and I could assemble a rudimentary toaster just using some steel bits and pieces, a car battery, and some trial an error.
You might kill yourself before learning that you can't effectively make the heating elements from steel, and if you get lucky you may run out of batteries before you realize you're shorting all of them out too quickly.

You would probably be better off using some steel bits and pieces and a car battery to make a lighter and toast your bread over a fire.

Quote:
If some cosmic force were to wipe out every scientist, doctor, and engineer on the planet and just leave us "dummies" we would revert back to a level of technology where we would be able function (which IMO would be surprisingly well) then begin the long process of building on that foundation which would probably occur sooner than later provided that cosmic force didn't wipe out the accumulated knowledge stored in books or computers.
You could lose the scientists and engineers and work with the remants of what you have: you'd still have mechanically inclined people to make it work.

You'd tolerate the loss of every physician on the planet less. Civilization would survive for a while, just with less people, but then you run the risk of very serious things getting out of control that currently are controlled by the current modern health care system in most of the world: mass immunization would be difficult under those circumstances, and with that gone general epidemics would return.

You cannot simply reinvent twentieth century medicine from reading books in a short amount of time. Vast amounts of knowledge and skill exist primarily or solely within the minds of living physicians. Even where things are written down, it often takes trained physicians to know where to look, and what to read and what to ignore.

Depending on your definition of "engineer" there would be some significant side effects of losing literally all of them simultaneously. They include people running things that aren't designed to operate without them indefinitely: the national power grid, nuclear power plants, chemical processing facilities, etc.


Reinventing technological civilization, even with documentation, always tends to sound easier than it actually is, because so few people are aware of all the tiny details that are critical to making it all work correctly. Real scientists, engineers, and doctors know when the books are misleading or wrong or incomplete. Most people will not, and it will be costly in many ways to discover. Its not that its impossible, its more a question of how many human beings would be left alive by the time we figured it out, and also whether we would all collectively put enough effort into actually doing it. We're not really marshalling humanity's best efforts to combat global climate change even though the potential downstream effects could be catastrophic. Is it automatically true that humanity would marshal its best efforts to preserving, and then reproducing modern technology if they were told all the people who used to do it are now gone and this will have a potentially serious impact at some indetermined future date.

That's the sort of problem humanity historically has a very poor track record on.


[Guide to Defense] [Scrapper Secondaries Comparison] [Archetype Popularity Analysis]

In one little corner of the universe, there's nothing more irritating than a misfile...
(Please support the best webcomic about a cosmic universal realignment by impaired angelic interference resulting in identity crisis angst. Or I release the pigmy water thieves.)

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Arcanaville View Post
Reinventing technological civilization, even with documentation, always tends to sound easier than it actually is, because so few people are aware of all the tiny details that are critical to making it all work correctly. Real scientists, engineers, and doctors know when the books are misleading or wrong or incomplete. Most people will not, and it will be costly in many ways to discover. Its not that its impossible, its more a question of how many human beings would be left alive by the time we figured it out, and also whether we would all collectively put enough effort into actually doing it. We're not really marshalling humanity's best efforts to combat global climate change even though the potential downstream effects could be catastrophic. Is it automatically true that humanity would marshal its best efforts to preserving, and then reproducing modern technology if they were told all the people who used to do it are now gone and this will have a potentially serious impact at some indetermined future date.
I think you just hit on an idea for yet another Discovery Channel series: "Life after smart people".


 

Posted

Doesn't it depend on what your definition of "smart" person is?

Are we just losing scientists, physicians, engineers or are we also losing mechanics, electricians, carpenters, cement masons, and plumbers?

Are you talking "Life After Smart People" or "Planet of the Liberal Arts Majors"?


My COX Fanfiction:


Blue's Assembled Story Links

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by BlueBattler View Post
Doesn't it depend on what your definition of "smart" person is?

Are we just losing scientists, physicians, engineers or are we also losing mechanics, electricians, carpenters, cement masons, and plumbers?

Are you talking "Life After Smart People" or "Planet of the Liberal Arts Majors"?
LOL, fine. Let's say it's all the masters of the hard sciences that suddenly disappear. All of the doctors, physicists and engineers who perform all the research, run all the experiments, and create the designs. That will still leave you with the people who know how to maintain all systems that are already in place, but who would not necessarily know how to improve on them or create new ones....

...until they also disappear!!!

Then the plot thickens.


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Coyote_Seven View Post
-snip-


 

Posted

LOL ok I give. Even I was wincing by the time I pressed the submit button on my previous post here.


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Arcanaville View Post
You might kill yourself before learning that you can't effectively make the heating elements from steel, and if you get lucky you may run out of batteries before you realize you're shorting all of them out too quickly.
Naw, I'd get my leafspring toaster to work! I've enough burned wrenches to support my idea

Quote:
You would probably be better off using some steel bits and pieces and a car battery to make a lighter and toast your bread over a fire.
Bah, and disregard all those 9 volts and steel wool lying around

Maybe I should have been a bit more wordy in my previous reply, its not that I would expect modern civilation to go on without a hiccup or revert to something say at the technological level of the early 20th century (then again maybe they could - simple inventors were able to devise and build internal combustion engines), but if all the brainy types were to disappear, I also dont think we would be in nearly as bad a shape as you suggest. Yes, brain surgury, limb grafts and keeping the local nuke plant from putting on a helluva light show would be problematic, I certainly expect society to become more insular but given the common pool of knowledge most people have been exposed to, some things that have plauged humanity even as late as the 19th century (maternity wards using common supplies and tools as they delivered babies leading to high mother and infant mortality rates compunded by the use of lead pipes) would be avoided. We know enough about general sanitation to better protect ourselves from some of the events in the past that wreaked havoc when it came to some particulalry devastating epidemics and so on.



------->"Sic Semper Tyrannis"<-------