Why Movies Suck Today ?


2short2care

 

Posted

ya gotta think about movies within the context of who is making this movie and who will be the target audience. 1960s war movies, were being made by adults who most likely served in the armed forces in a war against an actual evil, namely, three fascist/imperialist regimes bent on domination of their respective areas and with some very nasty agendas whereupon lesser classes and races of peopel we subjugated, enslaved and killed. Real evil crap mind you. Notsomuch guerilla warfare as emplyed in lets say, vietnam, and not as much civilian casualties encountered when you arent in the midst of guerilla warfare and your enemy doesnt bother to wear a uniform to distinguish itself from the general populace. So you have vets of WWII making pictures that retell some of their experiences, where they felt a sense of PRIDE at being part of a VICTORIOUS effort against true evil, for a target audience of mostly males that would be going on to serve in the military for Johnson and Kennedy and Nixon. fast forward post Vietnam. Audience has changed, and from older siblings/media they learned that marching off to war doesnt get you a tickertape parade when you come home, you might be minus a limb and pretty much despised as an instrument of oppression or a tool of anti commie propaganda by the general public, while dealing with the same amount of shellshock or whatever teh politically correct word for it is now, post traumatic stress disorder (WWI and WWII vets were encouraged to bury the symptoms more strongly by the society in which they were raised.) SO a natural derivative of movies being made by 70s and 60s contemporary vets tended to emphasize a different side of war itself, placing greater emphasis on the loss (well ya know, they did lose) and the futility of the war as THEY experienced it. Not suprsingly, they are bitter. Who was the target audience for these movies, other vets, who sypathized with their plight, females as they become a greater component of a viewing audience, LIKE the drama. SO you preach to the choir, and you sell tickets.

You want a good war movie, watch inglorious basterds. full metal jacket. you will always find an exception to a trend within any system, if only because someone is trying to make a buck sideways or trying to use thier vision to tell a story from a different angle. On top of that you got a whole generation of parents raising their kids with more pacifist tendencies and a whole generation of kids grew up that werent actively encouraged to enlist. There goes most of your target audience that would laud the glory of war, even with a competent dose of reality paired with it.

Today, you got twenty bucks a month to entertain with, and if u opt for a movie out, it will likely be a compromise between you and your chick caus eit aint no fun to go alone, with her seeing a chick flick and you wtching a straight up action flick.

I watched Cap and I watched Thor. First iron man kicked butt. Second notsomuch cause I wanted original rhodey back not don cheadle, even tho don looks more the part when compared to the comic.

Cap was a good story and was true to the generation, that took pride in serving its country. gonna be interesting seeing his take on modern day living.

Thor. if you stick to comic book origins should even be more of an anachronism than Cap. Im not too fond of science so spiffy its magic take, takes the honor and glory of achieving valhalla.. the wife enjoyed it cause of natalie, go a real chuckle when Mjolnir got mispronounced , but I really dont think she would have enjoyed it as much as she did if there was no love interest angle. Thats what gets female fannies in the seats, and you kinda have to nurse that along, so as an aftereffect what spats of action we get to see has to be a bit condensed so that you can devote time to developing the back story (have to make it appeal to the non comic reader audience) and teh love story and yadda yadda.

wanna know why comic readers are inspiring so much movie creation? cause they miss the way comics USED to be written! the storytelling isnt there anymore, they restart the universe so they can rehash old plots yaddda yadda.. so where can tehy get a story with which we are familiar? where Power Man and Spiderman and Wolverine arent Avengers? why, the movies of course... where teh stories with which we are familiar are retold, albeit with a little polishing to offset 40 years of anachronism if we just lifted the plot and popped it in with the CGI and let her rip.. but enough of the core story is there so that we can feel that elusive reconnect with something we treasured from our childhood.

granted, these will not be teh original avengers, Janet filled the role of the typical shallow heiress which was ok in teh sixties and wont play today, and Hank is a bit of a poor man's Reed Richards and through his own adoption and abandonment of costumed identities through the years to be picked up by other persons has pretty much diluted himself into an unrecognizable guy that just plays himself when last i cared. Janet evolved in the comics of course into a strong leader, but that was primarily through her experience and you cant build that into a 2 hour movie.

I worry about this 3rd Hulk, I like mark ruffalo but ed norton was friggin brilliant. when a star doesnt want to reprise a role, he should make an attempt to figure out WHY he would be asked to reprise the role and sit down and read the first few avengers comics and get up to speed.

I loathed the initial Hulk and i think the majority of the planet would concur. Ang Lee cant direct his way out of a wet paper bag.

One bright side in the change in our target audience is the emersion of chicks what kick *** movies. The female warrior ala Kill Bill, Underworld, the one with the zombies, forgive me its late.. has promise, in the sense of the whole "honor over physical comfort" tenet that used to just be attributed to a male dominated genre...

when the boys stop strapping themselves to wires and putting on blue screen suits to portray their prowess, we'll see strong male heros return. I love Jackie Chan, but he is old school by todays standards, and the old ones some of us grew up with or were raised wath an appreciation of, thanks to our fathers, are sadly too aged or have passed.

It usually takes a big social change or world event to generate large scale changes in the socioeconomic structure, and we really havent had a big one since the sixties. who knows, we might be due for one. Fight Club kinda carried that flag.

My heroes were crafted by George Lucas, and I root for the Empire. The prequels had their faults and their merits. The imagination that these movies sparked (as well as Indiana Jones) is one of a more intellectual (not necessarily winning the war by brute force) variety. Its still a sense of discovery, and of hopefulness for the future. The guys a little older than me may have been more into Star Trek. they kinda share a similar result in fostering an environment where the nerd can triumph, but we do what we can, at least until they come up with a super serum.


 

Posted

I was hoping for a solid thread where we just rag on movies we didn't like and explain why we rag on them but it looks like it got derailed by the original poster on the original post LOL! C&H/VC isn't the first place I go when I want to read someone's social commentary/ rant. As a matter of fact, C&H/VC is where I go when I want to get away from all that. It's almost like the post was disguised in a way so it looks like it's about lame movies but it really serves as a vehicle for the OP to politicize things. Way to go, Trojan Thread!

Anyhoo, in keeping with what I thought the spirit of the discussion was, I do find there are more and more movies out there that don't pass muster but I think it's mainly because every good movie raises the bar. Also, there are different styles of storytelling that I may not be accustomed to. I thought Tron Legacy was going to be this amazing updated version of the original and would cater to today's audiences' tastes but it turned out to be this long and drawn out special effects display. Funny enough, that's exactly how I felt about the first film. It got me to thinking that maybe these stories were written for an audience comfortable with that kind of pacing and if that's who they were targeting then my hat's off to them for their consistency. In other words, I may not have liked it but maybe both films were written with a different audience in mind.

To the OP, I'm sorry it feels like the real estate is shrinking on good movies but I hope something comes along that gets you enthusiastic about them again. Also, I'd like to say I appreciate your service to our country. God bless you and Happy Holidays.


Magus Prime- lev 50 kin/ elec defender
Meta-Human- lev 50 fire/ ss tank
Cabal Bravo- lev 50 merc/ ff master mind
Schwarzchild- lev 50 grav/ ff controller
Shanghai Storm- lev 50 ma/invinc scrapper
Nicodemus- lev 50 db/ regen scrapper
Dragonhyde- lev 50 wp/ sm tank
On The Pinnochle server!

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Blood Red Arachnid View Post
^Its called Godwin's law. The longer an online discussion grows, the probability of a comparison involving Nazi's or Hitler approaches 1.
I guess I completely missed the joke in Dirge's post


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by New_Dark_Age View Post
And apparently you are the intellectual big shot of these forums? No wonder you people are so easy to dominate in an argument if you are the best these forums can produce.

Stick with math ace.
So alright....I was going to make a post about why Hollywood mainstream films are bad, which had nothing to do with political correctness, emasculation, the Communist Party or some sort of agenda which I presume the OP knows but noone else seems to be able to decipher, but wanting to 'dominate' an argument?

I'm sorry, did I miss the part of the forums that said by virtue of my gender, I was obligated to intellectually beat you into submission to become the 'alpha male'? Or you me, for that matter?

You started this thread with a very clear agenda, and that agenda had little to do with movies and more about your viewpoints on society, gender equality, racial equality and moral/racial/cultural superiority.

No, I'm not going to debate film with you even though unlike yourself I actually am qualified to discuss film, having graduated from university with a degree in filmmaking and film analysis. You made it clear when you started in on sexual and racial grounds why both areas were, shall we say, 'not as able as white males' where your argument was rooted.

You sir, are a troll. Do not expect a reply from me should you respond, because I have learned the first lesson: do not feed the troll. However, this post is an exception as I feel you need some basic nutrients in order to sustain the lack of credibility you continue to demonstrate here.

You attack anyone who disagrees with you. You then scramble to strawman arguments when directly called out upon your actual agenda in an attempt to give yourself legitimacy.

I would urge any and all posters to simply read the posts to date, acknowledge the trolling for what it is and let the thread perish and the original poster suffer the consequences for his deliberate behavior.



S.


Part of Sister Flame's Clickey-Clack Posse

 

Posted

Wow, I'm amazed this thread is still here... either the mods are asleep at the board, or they're using this thread to stress-test the forum servers before they melt down, implode, or simply disintegrate.

Michelle
aka
Samuraiko/Dark_Respite


Dark_Respite's Farewell Video: "One Last Day"
THE COURSE OF SUPERHERO ROMANCE CONTINUES!
Book I: A Tale of Nerd Flirting! ~*~ Book II: Courtship and Crime Fighting - Chap Nine live!
MA Arcs - 3430: Hell Hath No Fury / 3515: Positron Gets Some / 6600: Dyne of the Times / 351572: For All the Wrong Reasons
378944: Too Clever by Half / 459581: Kill or Cure / 551680: Clerical Errors (NEW!)

 

Posted

Honestly New_Dark_Age, your abilities as a troll would be pretty good in most other places like Fark or Reddit. There they would be bound to get a few rises even though a large percentage of the population there expects trolling. Now someplace like the WoW forums you don't have to put out any effort at all. Just type "You are stupid" and you will have people frothing at the mouth and typing death threats.

Problem is that the CoH forums are different. For some reason the forums here are home to mostly nice people. Most don't even respond to personal attacks, and if they do it is with a reasoned reply rather than blind hatred.

And a second problem is that if it does escalate to personal attacks, threats or outright racist statements then that person often winds up with a temporary or even permanent ban from the forum. Knowing this means that the people who post here frequently aren't going to rise to your bait and start spewing hate filled bile at you. Some of them might be saying those things out loud but they won't post them here because they don't want the ban. And those types who do post that sort of thing here do wind up banned so they aren't here to respond the next time a troll comes around.

My advice would be to try the pvp forums. Since it is a competitive forum there has been a greater degree of leniency there as far as posting insults and threats. You might actually get a rise out of somebody there. Good luck with your future endeavors in the trolling field.


Don't count your weasels before they pop dink!

 

Posted

well it's the weekend now unless Zwill decides to pop up and nuke it from orbit


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dark_Respite View Post
Wow, I'm amazed this thread is still here... either the mods are asleep at the board, or they're using this thread to stress-test the forum servers before they melt down, implode, or simply disintegrate.

Michelle
aka
Samuraiko/Dark_Respite
No open threats. No major insults, just insinuations. And the holiday weekend.

Edit: And see what I mean Dark? Samuraiko expected this thread to have been deleted by the mods already even though there has been only minor conflict here. This is not a ground ripe for trolling.


Don't count your weasels before they pop dink!

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Innovator View Post
Cause it happens in real life. Companies hire the best person for the job no matter where they are. Just last year, a Norwegian company had commissioned my brother to oversee the opening of their stores all over the world (and no he isn't white). He ended up traveling to several locations around world staying at each location for a month or two including Norway. I'm pretty sure they could have found someone in Norway to do it, but they wanted him.

Besides, its not like hiring from America or even coming here means the US Government knows automatically what is going on.

Understandable but wasn't the Norweign base in the THING a facility controlled by the Norweign government? To my knowledge it was not a company. What company would seek profits in Anarctica?

So if it was a governmental facility , the Norweigns hiring an American scientist to study alien remains they want kept secret is equivalent to Americans hiring a Norweign scientist to study the suspected alien remains at Roswell , New Mexico and then letting the scientist return to Norway when they want the discovery hidden from the public. The Norweign is not bound by American law.

If the directors had any boldness the film should have been in Norweign but I guess the moronic populace does not want to suffer the agony of reading subtitles. The American scientists was just an excuse to put an American in the movie and have the movie in English. America after all is the center of the world..according to the wise American population.


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Slazenger View Post
Why Movies suck today?

In my view it's all to do with censorship, if I were to put it into computer terms and base it on my old ZX Spectrum games, Jet set willy and Leisure Suit Larry would have a 18 cert nowadays with my old tape deck to play them having a parental control button.

Censorship ruins a lot of films as directors have to cater to masses to recoup the monies required for top actors/actresses, CGI etc.

I would go as far to say that when people have a DVD collection most of their coverted movies are from a time when censorship was a null, mainly early 80's.

Even Horror movies of today, try to bring their certificate rating down to a 15 in order to have a wider scope of recoup.
I have never believed that gratuitous sex, graphic violence or astronomical amounts of cussing could ever make a movie good. If a movie sucks without all of the above, it isn't going to suddenly become a great work of art with it.

That is not to say that those things can't be used to good affect within the film, I have just always found the notion that unless a movie is allowed these things, it will be bad. Most of the biggest films of all time, and almost all of the classics, lack these things.


We often sit and think of you,
We often speak your name;
There is nothing left to answer,
But your photo in the frame.
-Anon.

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Blood Red Arachnid View Post
^Its called Godwin's law. The longer an online discussion grows, the probability of a comparison involving Nazi's or Hitler approaches 1.


From my experience, anyone who bothers to comment about how they're winning an argument or how someone else is losing is a troll. Just let this thread die.

Yeah posting " OPs opinion does not matter" and posting condescending pictures is not trolling. Giving people who do such things their just rewards is.


Good to see that if you don't agree with the topic, you want it banned. Truth is so reviled isnt it.

You people are only proving my point of why movies suck today.


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by SuperOz View Post
So alright....I was going to make a post about why Hollywood mainstream films are bad, which had nothing to do with political correctness, emasculation, the Communist Party or some sort of agenda which I presume the OP knows but noone else seems to be able to decipher, but wanting to 'dominate' an argument?

I'm sorry, did I miss the part of the forums that said by virtue of my gender, I was obligated to intellectually beat you into submission to become the 'alpha male'? Or you me, for that matter?

You started this thread with a very clear agenda, and that agenda had little to do with movies and more about your viewpoints on society, gender equality, racial equality and moral/racial/cultural superiority.
Its all related. Not to hard to understand. Society is becoming more stupid, politically correct and emasculate(weak) so movies are becoming more stupid, politically correct and emasculate (weak). Movies are just reflecting the population.



Quote:
Originally Posted by SuperOz View Post
No, I'm not going to debate film with you even though unlike yourself I actually am qualified to discuss film, having graduated from university with a degree in filmmaking and film analysis. You made it clear when you started in on sexual and racial grounds why both areas were, shall we say, 'not as able as white males' where your argument was rooted.

Yeah cause we all know degrees make a person smart. Degree in film making? ....So what you are a technician? A person with a degree in History, Psychology, Philosophy or Geography is more qualified to discuss the CONTENT of movies than you with their knowledge of historical facts, human behavior, cultural knowledge and population concensus.

How would getting a degree in film help you explain the rationality of the content of the film? Somehow you getting a degree in film rewrites history and makes slaves in 1775 South Carolina free or justifies the emasculation of men in film? Hardly.



Quote:
Originally Posted by SuperOz View Post
You sir, are a troll. Do not expect a reply from me should you respond, because I have learned the first lesson: do not feed the troll. However, this post is an exception as I feel you need some basic nutrients in order to sustain the lack of credibility you continue to demonstrate here.

You attack anyone who disagrees with you. You then scramble to strawman arguments when directly called out upon your actual agenda in an attempt to give yourself legitimacy.

I would urge any and all posters to simply read the posts to date, acknowledge the trolling for what it is and let the thread perish and the original poster suffer the consequences for his deliberate behavior.


S.

Good to see that you want whatever you disagree with banned. Guess that Film degree of yours did not teach you a thing about Constitutional law or the logic of Voltaire.


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dark_Respite View Post
Wow, I'm amazed this thread is still here... either the mods are asleep at the board, or they're using this thread to stress-test the forum servers before they melt down, implode, or simply disintegrate.

Michelle
aka
Samuraiko/Dark_Respite
Maybe the moderators are not as irrational as you and have no desire to ban a post because a couple of posters tell them too.


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by New_Dark_Age View Post
Maybe the moderators are not as irrational as you and have no desire to ban a post because a couple of posters tell them too.
Or it's Christmas Eve and the mods are busy.


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Veritech View Post
Or it's Christmas Eve and the mods are busy.
Nope. Got a PM from a Moderator telling me he altered two of my posts. They already looked at the thread and judged that it was ok.


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by New_Dark_Age View Post
Maybe the moderators are not as irrational as you and have no desire to ban a post because a couple of posters tell them too.
Irrational? That's it? Come on, I could have TOLD you I was irrational.

Oh, yeah, before I forget - was discussing this thread with the roommates over lunch. They wanted your take on BLACKHAWK DOWN (i.e., whether it sucks) - I couldn't remember if it had been mentioned in this thread or not. (BTW, they're both former Air Force, 10+ year vets.)

Michelle
aka
Samuraiko/Dark_Respite


Dark_Respite's Farewell Video: "One Last Day"
THE COURSE OF SUPERHERO ROMANCE CONTINUES!
Book I: A Tale of Nerd Flirting! ~*~ Book II: Courtship and Crime Fighting - Chap Nine live!
MA Arcs - 3430: Hell Hath No Fury / 3515: Positron Gets Some / 6600: Dyne of the Times / 351572: For All the Wrong Reasons
378944: Too Clever by Half / 459581: Kill or Cure / 551680: Clerical Errors (NEW!)

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by New_Dark_Age View Post
Good to see that you want whatever you disagree with banned. Guess that Film degree of yours did not teach you a thing about Constitutional law or the logic of Voltaire.
And if you do get banned or moderated, are you going to start yelling about freedom of speech? This forum is a privately owned venue. Those things are irrelevant here.


Paragon City Search And Rescue
The Mentor Project

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by New_Dark_Age View Post
Understandable but wasn't the Norweign base in the THING a facility controlled by the Norweign government? To my knowledge it was not a company. What company would seek profits in Anarctica?

So if it was a governmental facility , the Norweigns hiring an American scientist to study alien remains they want kept secret is equivalent to Americans hiring a Norweign scientist to study the suspected alien remains at Roswell , New Mexico and then letting the scientist return to Norway when they want the discovery hidden from the public. The Norweign is not bound by American law.

If the directors had any boldness the film should have been in Norweign but I guess the moronic populace does not want to suffer the agony of reading subtitles. The American scientists was just an excuse to put an American in the movie and have the movie in English. America after all is the center of the world..according to the wise American population.
It wasn't a millitary base of any type (heck they used an American Helicopter pilot), so it's unlikely it was a Government facility. Research facilities aren't typically run by Governments. Sure they may help fund it through grants or even set it up, but typically research facilities are either self run by the researchers commisioned for some evironmental study or supported by a private company or college. In the movie, the scientists there weren't originally looking for alien remains so their Government involvement on their findings would be dependent on how much they wanted to share with them about their findings, in most movies and in real life, researchers aren't typically willing to do that so easily.


 

Posted

As long as we are talking about Historical facts here, I'd like to point out to the OP that there were in fact free Blacks (both immigrants from the Carribean and freed slaves) in the south and even in South Carolina in 1775. No there weren't a lot but the concept that any person of color in 1775 was automatically a slave is inaccurate and factually wrong. Africans and African Americans fought on both sides of the Revolutionary War from all parts of the Colonies.


@Mental Maden @Maden Mental
"....you are now tackle free for life."-ShoNuff

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by MentalMaden View Post
As long as we are talking about Historical facts here, I'd like to point out to the OP that there were in fact free Blacks (both immigrants from the Carribean and freed slaves) in the south and even in South Carolina in 1775. No there weren't a lot but the concept that any person of color in 1775 was automatically a slave is inaccurate and factually wrong. Africans and African Americans fought on both sides of the Revolutionary War from all parts of the Colonies.
In 1775 one of the richest free blacks in the country was in Charleston, SC. He was a guy by the name of Thomas Jeremiah and was a self-made man. he was hung in 1775 after a kangaroo court convicted him of formenting a slave revolt.


 

Posted

I noticed the Mods have done some editing in this thread. You missed some ugly stuff:

Quote:
Originally Posted by New_Dark_Age View Post
G.I. JANE

Yeah cause a woman can really survive Navy Seal training....insulting to all Navy Seals


ALIENS VS PREDATOR

Leadership figure is a woman..yeah let me tell you she is really convincing when she lays down the law and tells everyone "Dont be a hero" and not to help anyone in trouble. I really bought that


Gotta love these female warrior figures that are coming out...Centurion , King Arthur, Pirates of the Carribbean .. cause women are so convincing at it.
Better to just wipe the whole thing.


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vox Populi View Post
I noticed the Mods have done some editing in this thread. You missed some ugly stuff:



Better to just wipe the whole thing.
Seriously , if you think a woman can survive SEAL training, you need your head examined. You are totally ignorant about military training.

Of course you want it banned and removed from my post...cause it shows that you are completely crazy and ignorant.


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by MentalMaden View Post
As long as we are talking about Historical facts here, I'd like to point out to the OP that there were in fact free Blacks (both immigrants from the Carribean and freed slaves) in the south and even in South Carolina in 1775. No there weren't a lot but the concept that any person of color in 1775 was automatically a slave is inaccurate and factually wrong. Africans and African Americans fought on both sides of the Revolutionary War from all parts of the Colonies.
Yep the probability of the half a dozen or more blacks working on Mel Gibsons farm all being free in 1775 South Carolina is virtually impossible.

But who am I to judge. Mel Gibson always beats the odds.


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ironblade View Post
And if you do get banned or moderated, are you going to start yelling about freedom of speech? This forum is a privately owned venue. Those things are irrelevant here.
The forum being privately owned is irrelevant. The fact that some of these people lack the rationality to accept offensive speech shows the nature of their charater. They are so quick to hide behind a moderator that it shows that IF THEY HAD THE POWER IN REAL LIFE , they would ban anything that is offensive to them.

Lucky in real life the Constitution protects us from such crazies.


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dark_Respite View Post
Irrational? That's it? Come on, I could have TOLD you I was irrational.

Oh, yeah, before I forget - was discussing this thread with the roommates over lunch. They wanted your take on BLACKHAWK DOWN (i.e., whether it sucks) - I couldn't remember if it had been mentioned in this thread or not. (BTW, they're both former Air Force, 10+ year vets.)

Michelle
aka
Samuraiko/Dark_Respite


Overall, I thought Black Hawk Down was ok. A lot of the critics call it a propaganda piece with a great deal of ...whats that word....jingoism. I do not have a problem with war movies not viewed negatively. My main problem with the movie was there was too little exposition of the USA's purpose in Somolia , the lack of character development and the latter half drags on for a really long time.

The latter two are the biggest problems. When I hear things in the movie, like " Hunter is KIA" I really dont care cause I do not know who Hunter is because of lack of character development. The fighting drags on for a really long time as well. I remember I was getting impatient watching it in the theater.

Overall I would say its an ok war movie. Something I might watch twice or three times.