CERN: Speed of Light possibly broken


all_hell

 

Posted

If there's one rule that's true, it's that NOTHING moves faster than light.

Quote:
GENEVA -- Scientists at the world's largest physics lab say they have clocked subatomic particles traveling faster than light, a feat that - if true - would break a fundamental pillar of science.

The readings have so astounded researchers that they are asking others to independently verify the measurements before claiming an actual discovery.
Source: Associated Press via Forbes

Except for a neutrino traveling from Geneva to Italy 60 nanoseconds faster than light. In an experiment with a 10 nanosecond margin of error. CERN calls for aid in reproducing the experiment after spending several months confirming that, yes, they did measure what they think they did.

If this turns out to be verified, then wow. This is that one barrier that shouldn't be breachable, yet... I hope that this checks out. No clue what practical use it might have, but for now, it's the Lightspeed Barrier that's being challenged and that's awesome enough on its own.


Aegis Rose, Forcefield/Energy Defender - Freedom
"Bubble up for safety!"

 

Posted

Ok, seriously, what is with Quantum Mechanics?


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by _Klaw_ View Post
Ok, seriously, what is with Quantum Mechanics?
I could answer that, but then you wouldn't know how fast Quantum Mechanics is going anymore.


Goodbye, I guess.

@Lord_Nightblade in Champions/Star Trek Online

nightblade7295@gmail.com if you want to stay in touch

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by _Klaw_ View Post
Ok, seriously, what is with Quantum Mechanics?
I have learned a very basic way of understanding all of Quantum Mechanics: "Everything you know is wrong." It's served me well so far.


Aegis Rose, Forcefield/Energy Defender - Freedom
"Bubble up for safety!"

 

Posted

wibbly wobbly quantumey wumey...stuff.


 

Posted

That is...neat.
Hopefully it really is what it seems to be and won't just end up as "Oops, we didn't really break it. Just a data error." a few months down the line.


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by McNum View Post
If there's one rule that's true, it's that NOTHING moves faster than light.

Source: Associated Press via Forbes

Except for a neutrino traveling from Geneva to Italy 60 nanoseconds faster than light. In an experiment with a 10 nanosecond margin of error. CERN calls for aid in reproducing the experiment after spending several months confirming that, yes, they did measure what they think they did.

If this turns out to be verified, then wow. This is that one barrier that shouldn't be breachable, yet... I hope that this checks out. No clue what practical use it might have, but for now, it's the Lightspeed Barrier that's being challenged and that's awesome enough on its own.
Cool and all. But other experiments have show in the past that using waveguides (in one form or another) can allow this sort of thing.



Clicking on the linked image above will take you off the City of Heroes site. However, the guides will be linked back here.

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by McNum View Post
I have learned a very basic way of understanding all of Quantum Mechanics: "Everything you know is wrong." It's served me well so far.
Including everything you learn within Quantum Mechanics (whether that's been discovered yet or not).



Honestly, I laugh every time humans talk about absolute rules (and often times cringe as well).
Don't get me wrong, it is through many of these theories - turned rules - turned foundations for further exploration/experimentation - that has led to a great many achievements and discoveries, which is fascinating...
However, people get so ahead of themselves in believing in that rule that they've made up because they haven't discovered any way to disprove it yet.
These rules are tools to try and explore things farther.
However, and many have, you must constantly recheck these rules and see if it is time to bring things back to formula, so to speak, hehe.

Anyway... fun stuff.


@Zethustra
"Now at midnight all the agents and the superhuman crew come out
and round up everyone that knows more than they do"
-Dylan

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Electric-Knight View Post
Including everything you learn within Quantum Mechanics (whether that's been discovered yet or not).



Honestly, I laugh every time humans talk about absolute rules (and often times cringe as well).
Don't get me wrong, it is through many of these theories - turned rules - turned foundations for further exploration/experimentation - that has led to a great many achievements and discoveries, which is fascinating...
However, people get so ahead of themselves in believing in that rule that they've made up because they haven't discovered any way to disprove it yet.
These rules are tools to try and explore things farther.
However, and many have, you must constantly recheck these rules and see if it is time to bring things back to formula, so to speak, hehe.

Anyway... fun stuff.
Of course. In Quantum Mechanics we have laws of physics that change depending on if it's being observed or not. That just messes with my mind. And that's the easy parts of it.

The fun thing is, if this checks out, do you know which formula we're gong back to? "E=mc^2" Back to basics indeed.

But going public with this before it's been independently verified is a risk. They might be wrong, but one things for sure. Anyone with the machines needed to replicate this will do so now. It's quite the gamble, but if it checks out, it'll be huge.


Aegis Rose, Forcefield/Energy Defender - Freedom
"Bubble up for safety!"

 

Posted

Dammit, now all I can picture is the sun shaking it's fist at CERN and yelling "You break my record, now I break you, like I break your friend", right before it swallows Mercury.


They ALL float down here. When you're down here with us, you'll float too!

@Starflier

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lazarillo View Post
That is...neat.
Hopefully it really is what it seems to be and won't just end up as "Oops, we didn't really break it. Just a data error." a few months down the line.
From the guy at CERN who used to work on the Mars orbiter mission team:

Sorry. Our speed calculations were measuring the distance from Geneva to Italy in kilometers and not miles.

http://www.cse.ohio-state.edu/sce/now/mars-orbiter.html


We don' need no stinkin' signatures!

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hyperstrike View Post
Cool and all. But other experiments have show in the past that using waveguides (in one form or another) can allow this sort of thing.
Thing is, this isn't making stuff travel effectively faster than c, this is measuring something travelling faster than c which shouldn't be. Not by much, I grant you, but *anything* going faster than light (in a given medium, without "cheating") is a major change to our understanding of physics as a whole.


Omnes relinquite spes, o vos intrantes

My Characters
CoX Chatlog Parser
Last.fm Feed

 

Posted

Ahem...

Professor Farnsworth: These are the dark matter engines I invented. They allow my starship to travel between galaxies in mere hours.
Cubert: That's impossible. You can't go faster than the speed of light.
Professor Farnsworth: Of course not. That's why scientists increased the speed of light in 2208.


We're only off by about a hundred years...



 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dark One View Post
Ahem...

Professor Farnsworth: These are the dark matter engines I invented. They allow my starship to travel between galaxies in mere hours.
Cubert: That's impossible. You can't go faster than the speed of light.
Professor Farnsworth: Of course not. That's why scientists increased the speed of light in 2208.


We're only off by about a hundred years...
...or 200


They ALL float down here. When you're down here with us, you'll float too!

@Starflier

 

Posted

Cool. I shall be eagerly watching for further developments from this story.


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Starflier View Post
...or 200
You gotta remember, it's relativistic and deals with quarks and neutrinos and...

Shut up...



 

Posted

If true, then it opens up the possibility of realtime interplanetary and maybe even realtime interstellar communications. Although, there is no use for the technology at the moment if we don't have people on other planets or aliens communicating directly with us. It looks like such communication would be similar to laser communication so unless a beam of accelerated neutrinos is directed towards us, then no communication can occur.


The first step in being sane is to admit that you are insane.

 

Posted

Sweet, Alpha Centauri here we come!


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by starphoenix View Post
If true, then it opens up the possibility of realtime interplanetary and maybe even realtime interstellar communications. Although, there is no use for the technology at the moment if we don't have people on other planets or aliens communicating directly with us. It looks like such communication would be similar to laser communication so unless a beam of accelerated neutrinos is directed towards us, then no communication can occur.
Still, SETI could use this to try improving it's listening tech, as I always doubted that aliens were chatting with each other with HAMs.


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Scythus View Post
Still, SETI could use this to try improving it's listening tech, as I always doubted that aliens were chatting with each other with HAMs.
That is based under the assumption that alien races use this technology and have the desire to communicate with others. There might be different stages of technology and each civilization progresses to the next one after they discover it. So the amount of time that an alien race uses a specific technology is limited to maybe a few hundred years at the most for primitive technologies like radio and neutrino.

Of course, there is always the possibility that we are constantly being monitored and when we reach interstellar communication, then aliens will contact us.


The first step in being sane is to admit that you are insane.