Discussion: Divided We Fall


2short2care

 

Posted

now I'm wondering what COH: Family Guy would be like. "All hail Emperor Quagmire! Giggity!"


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bloodspeaker View Post
Neither is saving the human race from extinction.
Tyrant and the Hamidon share very similar goals - they both despise humanity, but they have different opinions on how to deal with the "problem" of humans being human

On Praetorian Earth, Marcus Cole and Hamidon Pasalima have had very similar career paths, motivated by the same basic goals, and are presented in-game and out of it as the twin monsters that will crush what's left of the human race on their world.


@Golden Girl

City of Heroes comics and artwork

 

Posted

Well, we draw comparisons to physical reality, how about deriving good and evil, right and wrong, or such, from physical principles? I have a suspicion that, were it even remotely possible, would end up proving sacrificing one to save two is, yeah, greater good. Everything short of this is just someone imposing their own arbitrary values system and applying it, imperfectly, to make judgments.

Like it or not, there are no absolutes in life, only these subjective human values, judgments, and resulting labels. You can come up with your carefully defined rights and wrongs, and at the end of the day, it comes down to nothing more than who, and how many, you can convince to agree with you. All this is no better than a house of cards; words that are defined in terms of each other, nothing fundamental, nothing absolute, nothing outside of the human experience. To me, the only alternative beyond that is appeal outside the human experience to a supreme being.

We have a fairly widely accepted and fairly self-consistent set of Western definitions of Right and Wrong, and even Good and Evil. They found much of our legal systems, but not all of them. They find acceptance outside of the West, but not everywhere there, nor even consistently inside the West. I'll happily accept that Cole is a Bad Guy in those terms. But those terms don't make him Evil in some absolute sense; I find it easy to conceive of a self-consistent set of definitions of Right and Wrong where he's the Hero of the story, and his supporters are heroic too, and his opponents and detractors are at best deluded fools. I don't like that vision, but my experiences and values are derived from our cultural and historical experience, not Primal Earth's, and certainly not Praetoria's. I don't like that vision, but I'm not advocating it for the real world when I explore it through imagination and storytelling in-game.

I feel trying to create or impose the absolutist frames of reference on everything halts too much of the storytelling potential of the setting. For some of the participants, I wonder what motivates them to argue it so strongly; sure, some people just love to argue. I wonder if others feel their own grasp on real-life right and wrong is threatened by it, and have to respond on that basis.

This is why I find these discussions so nearly pointless; hardly any of us are changing our minds, because the logic that could persuade us is not compelling from any side. Because it's not a matter of logic. We all have our personal experiences and interpretations of our cultural and historical heritages, and are limited by the amount of imagination we happen to have, and end up disagreeing on matters many of us feel ought to be self-evident universal truths. Newsflash! Humans are imperfect, story at 11. I'd much rather discuss the other, more interesting, parts of the game story that's evolving here.


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by fallenz View Post
There right and there wrong. What Cole is doing to for the so called greater good is wrong. How is this so hard for some to grasp?
It's that Praetorian salute - it speaks to some people on all kinds of levels, and they just can't bring themselves to think of people like that as being absolute evil


@Golden Girl

City of Heroes comics and artwork

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by UberGuy View Post
They were, but a revisitation seemed inevitable once we were "shown" Cole doing something that has a hint of goodness and honor (viewed in a vacuum, at least).
We're still waiting

Quote:
Originally Posted by Psyte View Post
now I'm wondering what COH: Family Guy would be like. "All hail Emperor Quagmire! Giggity!"
Just ask Dominatrix.


@Golden Girl

City of Heroes comics and artwork

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bloodspeaker View Post
One-dimensional thinking and black-and-white morality are certainly easier for some to grasp.
Quote:
Originally Posted by je_saist View Post
By this logic gravity doesn't exist, the sun doesn't emit electromagnetic radiation in the visible spectrum, and space is filled with oxygen at breathable concentration levels.
Ehhh.... That is a slippery slope. You are comparing morality, which is shaped by beliefs (that can be changed as needed) to a hard science.

That doesn't quite work well.


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by T_Immortalus View Post
The main question of all of the Praetorian content, and real life, is....."do the ends really justify the means?".
I don't think so. In Watchmen, Adrian was in a position of having to decide that the ends justify the means, because he was working towards a noble, in theory, end: prevent nuclear war and push the world back from the brink of mutual annihilation. He only had to murder a few million people to do it. But separate from that, the world after his intervention would continue to spin, much as it had before, without him.

Cole doesn't have a simple end that justifies his means. His means *are* an end. Do you think there will ever come a day when Cole thinks he doesn't need absolute power, that he won't need thought police, that he won't be required to crush any opposition to him or his rule, that he won't always need to have his boot on the throat of humanity for its own good?

Mother Mayhem isn't a means to an end. Mother Mayhem is an acceptable end to Cole. He's fine with Mother Mayhem thought-policing the world forever as long as she doesn't challenge his ultimate authority directly. He's fine with absolute tyranny forever as long as it generates his utopia.

There is no big payoff that comes from Cole's "means." Praetoria *is* the big payoff that comes from Cole's means. To decide if Cole is intrinsically right or wrong, all you have to ask yourself is whether Cole's absolute dictatorship and all that comes with it is acceptable FOREVER. If it is, great. If its not, then right or wrong, good or evil, he's the enemy, and you're on the other side.

Cole's philosophy is if you're not with him, you're against him. I'm certainly not with him, and Cole gives me no other grey area tightrope-walking options but to be against him.


[Guide to Defense] [Scrapper Secondaries Comparison] [Archetype Popularity Analysis]

In one little corner of the universe, there's nothing more irritating than a misfile...
(Please support the best webcomic about a cosmic universal realignment by impaired angelic interference resulting in identity crisis angst. Or I release the pigmy water thieves.)

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by T_Immortalus View Post
1) Is Tyrant truly complicit in "inhuman crimes" or unknowing of them or unwilling to deal with the issues that would come from stopping such crimes?
He tells loyalists that they both have blood on their hands


@Golden Girl

City of Heroes comics and artwork

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ardrea View Post
Well, we draw comparisons to physical reality, how about deriving good and evil, right and wrong, or such, from physical principles? I have a suspicion that, were it even remotely possible, would end up proving sacrificing one to save two is, yeah, greater good. Everything short of this is just someone imposing their own arbitrary values system and applying it, imperfectly, to make judgments.

Like it or not, there are no absolutes in life, only these subjective human values, judgments, and resulting labels. You can come up with your carefully defined rights and wrongs, and at the end of the day, it comes down to nothing more than who, and how many, you can convince to agree with you. All this is no better than a house of cards; words that are defined in terms of each other, nothing fundamental, nothing absolute, nothing outside of the human experience. To me, the only alternative beyond that is appeal outside the human experience to a supreme being.

We have a fairly widely accepted and fairly self-consistent set of Western definitions of Right and Wrong, and even Good and Evil. They found much of our legal systems, but not all of them. They find acceptance outside of the West, but not everywhere there, nor even consistently inside the West. I'll happily accept that Cole is a Bad Guy in those terms. But those terms don't make him Evil in some absolute sense; I find it easy to conceive of a self-consistent set of definitions of Right and Wrong where he's the Hero of the story, and his supporters are heroic too, and his opponents and detractors are at best deluded fools. I don't like that vision, but my experiences and values are derived from our cultural and historical experience, not Primal Earth's, and certainly not Praetoria's. I don't like that vision, but I'm not advocating it for the real world when I explore it through imagination and storytelling in-game.

I feel trying to create or impose the absolutist frames of reference on everything halts too much of the storytelling potential of the setting. For some of the participants, I wonder what motivates them to argue it so strongly; sure, some people just love to argue. I wonder if others feel their own grasp on real-life right and wrong is threatened by it, and have to respond on that basis.

This is why I find these discussions so nearly pointless; hardly any of us are changing our minds, because the logic that could persuade us is not compelling from any side. Because it's not a matter of logic. We all have our personal experiences and interpretations of our cultural and historical heritages, and are limited by the amount of imagination we happen to have, and end up disagreeing on matters many of us feel ought to be self-evident universal truths. Newsflash! Humans are imperfect, story at 11. I'd much rather discuss the other, more interesting, parts of the game story that's evolving here.
I'm sure you could generate a narrative in which Hitler was the good guy, and the Allied powers were the villains. And I'm not saying that to be flippant or to invoke Godwin, I mean its literally possible to do so if you start with no initial morality principles and try only to construct a system of morality that is self-consistent without having to adhere to any preconceived notions of right and wrong. Morality has no "first principles" in that sense that come from the physical world. The physical world frankly doesn't care.

However, I don't think anyone is debating whether or not by some weird code Cole could be interpreted as the good guy. I think most people are arguing whether some reasonable extension of commonly held beliefs of right and wrong are consistent with Cole's behavior. And I think in that sense, some people are getting hung up on whether there is a "greater good" served by Cole.

We can never know that with certainty: that's one of the limits of mortality. We'll never know the "ultimate" result of Cole's actions, because there is no ultimate result. There's only what happens next, and then what happens after that, ad infinitum. We can't judge Cole based on that criteria, because that's beyond the limits of human beings.

We *can* judge him based on his *principles* regardless of where they "ultimately" lead. And Cole's principles seem to be that first, tyranny is an acceptable price for safety taken to any extreme, and second, that might makes right so if he can enforce his morality on all of humanity, he has both the right and the obligation to do so.

All you have to do to judge Cole is ask yourself if you believe that: if safety is so important that all other human rights are expendable, and if I am stronger than you, I have the right to exercise that strength to do what I think is in your best interests regardless of your opinion on the matter, so long as I genuinely believe I'm right.

When you strip away the philosophy, I think those two questions will be easy for most people to answer, especially because, as I said, Cole shows all signs that he believes both absolutely, not just in theory.


[Guide to Defense] [Scrapper Secondaries Comparison] [Archetype Popularity Analysis]

In one little corner of the universe, there's nothing more irritating than a misfile...
(Please support the best webcomic about a cosmic universal realignment by impaired angelic interference resulting in identity crisis angst. Or I release the pigmy water thieves.)

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Golden Girl View Post
Just ask Dominatrix.
I believe any hints of an incestuous relationship was officially retconned out, and thus no longer canon.*

So, is Dominatrix Meg or Lois Griffin?

*Besides, "Mother" has bigger shenanigans.


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Arcanaville View Post
I'm sure you could generate a narrative in which Hitler was the good guy
Well, that's basically what some players have been trying to do since GR was first announced - although each new content update has seen fewer and fewer of them still trying it


@Golden Girl

City of Heroes comics and artwork

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Avatea View Post
... story removed for space...
Duray got off lightly.


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by T_Immortalus View Post
The main question of all of the Praetorian content, and real life, is....."do the ends really justify the means?".
Reminded me of the quote from the original, `The Crow` comic book:

There is more than one way to purify the soul . . . .
There is absolution and redemption, salvation and a means to an end.
And if some of these axioms are of opposing polarities there is, at least, some consolation in the fact that they have a common ground.


 

Posted

Tyrant is evil enough to be classified as evil, period. If it walks like a duck, quacks like a duck, swims/hunts like a duck, but flies like an eagle, its still a duck. It's being comfortable making a judgement dispite inconclusive data that people still find him potenitally redeeming and "not all that bad" enough to classify otherwise.

If I met Praetorian Marcus Cole on the street I would always avoid him, keep an eye on him, wouldnt trust him, not do business with him, and even if he tried to spin a behavior/action he commited in a positive light, I'd ignore it. He has his agenda and whether you die is whether you get in the way, thinks you got it the way, or some other whim, and he wouldn't care. Gangster.

His greatest act of evil is prolly make you *think* he's not that evil.


Miss Arc #147491: Rise of Bedlam
AKA Iron Smoke @Champion Server

 

Posted

It is kind of interesting te lengths to which people will go for their opinions to be validated.

Now am I confused or did Cole stalemate Hamidon? Apparently no one else could even do that.

So after that he is the driving force behind herding up everyone into a walled off mega city to protect them and keep them human.

The question put before the audience, i.e. us, is not just of whether the ends justify the means, but also how far a person should go to protect humanity. Killing people, torturing them, and modifying their mental state, that can labelled these as evil all day but if the other choice is extinction, well that is where an absolute black and white morality breaks down.

Look at the resistance, blowing up hospitals, threatening those protective walls, just for their freedom. It is an modern perversion of the ideal of liberty. Liberty which did not even exist as freedom before John Locke, is not just about getting what one wants. It is about responsibility as well. That is to say we have to deserve freedom, we have to be responsible, shouting fire in a crowded theatre is not responsible. Threatening the only barrier between humanity and extinction is not pursuit of freedom. In the case of mutual benefit or mroe seriously survival, a giverning body is expected to do what is needed to protect its citizens.

Now before someone posts about it all being a set up by the 'great emperor', I hope they will consider how that would not be supported clearly by canon, hence an opinion, just like those that suppose Emperor Cole may not be the utterly evil villain. (stones and glass houses?)

oh! one great motive for Cole never letting a single hamidon seedling into primal earth, never harming innocents and never nuking areas , would be because he wants to live there! Seriously, why wouldn't he want to bring his version of Utopia, without Hamidon threatening humanity. With a ncie and weak hamidon in primal earth he and his people would have it made. Just rememebr nuclear weapons, war and despoiling the earth make hamidon stronger too. The Hamidon is tied into the earth's self defense mechanism, if you happen upon some rubbles walking around their description explains how they arise naturally from devatastion.


 

Posted

For my part, I was unaware that Mortimer Kal reported to someone on the Praetorian side (I presume... I took the hinted, mysterious "master" to be that based on the presented flow of events, at least).

Was that a known element of his backstory that I missed/overlooked previously, or is that something new?




 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Caraecyn View Post
So after that he is the driving force behind herding up everyone into a walled off mega city to protect them and keep them human.
He isn't keeping them human - he's dehumanizing them, and turning them into mindless robots.


@Golden Girl

City of Heroes comics and artwork

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Magenta_Phoenix View Post
For my part, I was unaware that Mortimer Kal reported to someone on the Praetorian side (I presume... I took the hinted, mysterious "master" to be that based on the presented flow of events, at least).

Was that a known element of his backstory that I missed/overlooked previously, or is that something new?
He doesn't. He's reporting to the Villain players that completed his arc (in Sharkhead); found in the redside tip missions.


Apparently, I play "City of Shakespeare"
*Arc #95278-Gathering the Four Winds -3 step arc; challenging - 5 Ratings/3 Stars (still working out the kinks)
*Arc #177826-Lights, Camera, Scream! - 3 step arc, camp horror; try out in 1st person POV - 35 Ratings/4 Stars

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Golden Girl View Post
He isn't keeping them human - he's dehumanizing them, and turning them into mindless robots.
Oh, the parallels!


Apparently, I play "City of Shakespeare"
*Arc #95278-Gathering the Four Winds -3 step arc; challenging - 5 Ratings/3 Stars (still working out the kinks)
*Arc #177826-Lights, Camera, Scream! - 3 step arc, camp horror; try out in 1st person POV - 35 Ratings/4 Stars

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Yogi_Bare View Post
He doesn't. He's reporting to the Villain players that completed his arc (in Sharkhead); found in the redside tip missions.
I don't think that's who he's reporting to at all.

I think he's reporting to Prometheus.


My Stories

Look at that. A full-grown woman pulling off pigtails. Her crazy is off the charts.

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr_Grey View Post
I don't think that's who he's reporting to at all.

I think he's reporting to Prometheus.

Prometheus isn't holding his daughter captive, the player Villain is.


Apparently, I play "City of Shakespeare"
*Arc #95278-Gathering the Four Winds -3 step arc; challenging - 5 Ratings/3 Stars (still working out the kinks)
*Arc #177826-Lights, Camera, Scream! - 3 step arc, camp horror; try out in 1st person POV - 35 Ratings/4 Stars

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Yogi_Bare View Post
Prometheus isn't holding his daughter captive, the player Villain is.
Ah, then we have reached the issue that bogs down the MMO world...

Is it your villain or mine he's talking to? Or his? Or hers?

Or is there another plot in the works to render the question moot?


My Stories

Look at that. A full-grown woman pulling off pigtails. Her crazy is off the charts.

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr_Grey View Post
Ah, then we have reached the issue that bogs down the MMO world...

Is it your villain or mine he's talking to? Or his? Or hers?

Or is there another plot in the works to render the question moot?
I can't speak for everybody's villain but being that I have toons that have completed his TF, I know he's at least talking to a few of mine.

[Although those that haven't forced Kal into their employ may still get the information from the Midnight Squad or Arachnos]


Apparently, I play "City of Shakespeare"
*Arc #95278-Gathering the Four Winds -3 step arc; challenging - 5 Ratings/3 Stars (still working out the kinks)
*Arc #177826-Lights, Camera, Scream! - 3 step arc, camp horror; try out in 1st person POV - 35 Ratings/4 Stars

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Golden Girl View Post
He isn't keeping them human - he's dehumanizing them, and turning them into mindless robots.
People behave much like any animal in ultra confined spaces. They go crazy and start killing eachother. Packing people into a small refuge would definately make this happen. This explains a good bit of the resistance being whackadoodles I think. Enriche is just the praetorian prozac, modern culture had its run of dispensing prozac as a cure all for mental anxieties. Romans had their blood sports and reveleries. Greece had theatre. Of course, drugs and alcohol or classic human coping mechanisms.

Praetoria could be eating little freedom cakes and they'd still need to be laced with something.