Admission of Wealth
The problem with this logic is: That IO or recipe or whatever is for sale was already there.
If I wanted it, I could bid 1 mil, have it immediately and be a happy camper. In your situation you have removed that opportunity from me due to your own greed. I cannot buy that IO for a fair price immediately, that option is gone. Why should I have to wait simply because you want me to when the IO was already there for a fair price? Why should I have to pay your Greed tax if the IO was already there for a fair price? You aren't providing a service, you are taking one away. |
or simply do not comprehend.
Yes, the item was already there, for sale ... for a moment. It was purchased.
Somebody got it before you did. They put their bid in earlier than you, or bid
more than you were willing to, but in any case, it was offered and sold.
For all you know, that particular item was actually used in a toon by the purchaser.
Maybe it was re-listed - there's simply no way to know with any specific item.
The key point you're missing is this:
Undervalued, high demand items will sell out quickly, and produce a supply shortage.
Think of iPods/iPads, Beanie Babies, Transformers, Super Bowl tickets or any
number High Demand items that were simply unavailable because the price
was low enough (or the supply was restrictive enough) that more people
bought them faster than other people were able to produce them.
So, in those cases, what usually happens? You get a finite number that sell out
instantly, and you get a few on EBay for crazy prices.
There is a name for this: Volatility... Which, in practical terms, means extreme
price swings, and extreme levels of availability or shortage.
The "service" that flippers provide is to reduce Volatility.
To be sure, he is compensated for his savvy and patience, but those are
actual skills, just as the doctor or the tax guy, or the electrician get compensated
for their specialized knowledge as well.
In actual fact, flippers narrow the extreme price ranges, by bringing the price back
into the "normal" range where producers are supplying the item at roughly the
rate that people are still willing to buy them, without creating a shortage.
What you "lost out" on was a bargain. Getting it "on the cheap".
Next time, bid earlier...
What the flipper did was make sure you could *still* get one, if you really needed
to have it (and by "need", we mean "pony up and pay the normal price these
usually sell at").
It has absolutely nothing to do with morality - believe it or don't.
Regards,
4
I've been rich, and I've been poor. Rich is definitely better.
Light is faster than sound - that's why some people look smart until they speak.
For every seller who leaves the market dirty stinkin' rich,
there's a buyer who leaves the market dirty stinkin' IOed. - Obitus.
It makes me think of a book sale I went to this Summer. Half Price Books had a weekend book sale, all of their discounted stuff discounted even more. On Sunday the price became "everything for $1.00" and then at 2 in the afternoon "all you could fit in a shopping bag (one of their eco-friendly ones) for $20.00".
My friend and I had been by this sale on Saturday and decided to come back on Sunday. he filled a bag with movies for $20.00. He's a movie-holic, he'll watch almost anything, but there were some good deals to be had.
Anyway... the point of the story... is right at 9 AM when they opened up and everything was $1.00, there were the professional buyers right there with their little handheld scanners. They'd scan barcodes and only pause to look at something if the scanner beeped. They were only buying to resell. It's their job, their business, how they make their money.
So... if they got to a $1.00 movie that I wanted before I saw it, was their purchase somehow less moral than mine, just because they were planning to resell it on eBay or whatever? Half Price Books didn't care, they wanted people to take their junk off their hands for any price they could get. Whoever found that book or movie or dvd first and decided it was worth more than $1.00 was entitled to it. I could complain that the reseller was cheating me out of a good deal by snapping it up first, only to make money on it... but that would be silly. First come, first serve.
(Things I bought for $1.00: Stuart Little 2, Corpse Bride, Wallace & Grommet's Three Amazing Adventures, Final Fantasy VII Advent Children, Superman Returns, X-Men III the Last Stand, The Watchmen, & for music Me First and the Gimmee Gimmee's are a Drag, Velvet Revolver - Liberdad, Them Crooked Vultures, The Very Best of Sweet, The Righteous Brothers - Anthology, The Blue Aeroplanes - Swagger, and a few more. ^_^)
my lil RWZ Challenge vid
Is the "Very Best of Sweet" the British Glam band? If so, Rock On brother!
Along with Bowie, T. Rex and Slade, Sweet were the very best of actual Glam rock (not 80's hair rock that stole the name)
I cannot buy that IO for a fair price immediately, that option is gone.
|
Who's to say "fair" isn't the 10 million inf asking price of the flipper?
And how are you to even know that someone has one listed for 1 million inf in the first place? Simply because SOMEONE bought one for a million within the last five doesn't mean it was "stolen" from you.
In short, your example is arbitrary and self-servingly slanted.
Why should I have to wait simply because you want me to when the IO was already there for a fair price? |
Why should I have to pay your Greed tax if the IO was already there for a fair price? |
You aren't providing a service, you are taking one away. |
For what it is worth, I don't blame the marketeers for this. In real life, producers how found a way to protect their goods from such treatment by a middle man. They write the recommended retail price directly on the packaging - we have no protection from such things in this game and that is the Dev's fault not yours. |
The market is just that. A market. Open to all. As long as you get there before everyone else and are willing the pay the price listed, it's yours. If someone beats you to it, tough noogies.
The market is NOT a store. Prices are NOT fixed, no matter HOW you hunger for that.
That brings me back to my initial post.
The difference lies in the excess, if I am buying something to relist it for a profit. I am denying someone else a fair deal simply to hoard away a fortune far beyond that of my needs then I am denying someone else's need for no reason other than greed. The market can not determine who's need is greatest but if my need is 0 I can be sure someone out there has greater need than I do. |
For all you know, that particular item was actually used in a toon by the purchaser.
Maybe it was re-listed - there's simply no way to know with any specific item. |
The key point you're missing is this:
Undervalued, high demand items will sell out quickly, and produce a supply shortage.
Think of iPods/iPads, Beanie Babies, Transformers, Super Bowl tickets or any number High Demand items that were simply unavailable because the price was low enough (or the supply was restrictive enough) that more people bought them faster than other people were able to produce them. So, in those cases, what usually happens? You get a finite number that sell out instantly, and you get a few on EBay for crazy prices. |
The very laws designed to force mankind to live ethically are telling you that what you are doing is wrong. Sure you might like to see this as play money and differentiate it from genuine earned cash but I don't see the difference.
Their value to an individual is determined by the amount of effort required to get it, this is as true with real money as it is with influence.
It takes me two minutes real time to earn a dollar.
It takes me an hour real time to earn 10 million influence if it is generated purely through grinding.
Due to the time invested, for me 10 million influence is worth 30x more than a dollar.
There is a name for this: Volatility... Which, in practical terms, means extreme
price swings, and extreme levels of availability or shortage. The "service" that flippers provide is to reduce Volatility. To be sure, he is compensated for his savvy and patience, but those are actual skills, just as the doctor or the tax guy, or the electrician get compensated for their specialized knowledge as well. |
They aren't generating any new goods for sale nor are they reducing demand, they are simply moving the goods along the graph beyond the point of equilibrium.
That isn't a service.
In actual fact, flippers narrow the extreme price ranges, by bringing the price back
into the "normal" range where producers are supplying the item at roughly the rate that people are still willing to buy them, without creating a shortage. What you "lost out" on was a bargain. Getting it "on the cheap". Next time, bid earlier... What the flipper did was make sure you could *still* get one, if you really needed to have it (and by "need", we mean "pony up and pay the normal price these usually sell at"). |
I can assure you if people stopped flipping, prices would be noticeably cheaper. They would revert back to their default equilibrium value.
The fact that you are pushing the prices beyond that does not make those prices "normal" actually, by pure definition, it makes those prices abnormal.
It has absolutely nothing to do with morality - believe it or don't.
Regards, 4 |
With respect to the scalping that you brought up, would you think it okay if you desperately wanted to go to the once-affordable Superbowl but the Scalpers bought all the tickets up and pushed them beyond your price range? What of the organizers of the event who quite purposefully set their prices because they wanted to fill the stands? How would they feel about those empty seats Scalpers took from the public?
It might be a good way to make a quick buck but that doesn't change the morality of the situation: that quick buck is coming at the expense of others.
Marketing follows the exact same principle. It might be "play money" but morality doesn't make that distinction.
I have a question.
If there is nothing inherently wrong with flipping, why is it so frowned upon in the real world?
Why is it illegal to scalp?
Why do producers feel the need to add a recommended retail price to their products?
Why is flipping treated differently?
What do you think stock brokers do for a living?
Buy low and sell high.
Does that sound familiar to you?
It is completely legal (barring insider trading).
50s: Inv/SS PB Emp/Dark Grav/FF DM/Regen TA/A Sonic/Elec MA/Regen Fire/Kin Sonic/Rad Ice/Kin Crab Fire/Cold NW Merc/Dark Emp/Sonic Rad/Psy Emp/Ice WP/DB FA/SM
Overlord of Dream Team and Nightmare Squad
What do you think stock brokers do for a living?
Buy low and sell high. Does that sound familiar to you? It is completely legal (barring insider trading). |
They are effectively providing a loan to companies most in need and gaining returns based on that service.
Flippers and scalpers aren't providing a service for their mark up, they are merely profiting off the misfortune of others.
This is just something I can't understand. You are taking something available to all and artificially inflating their prices so they are out of reach to those lowest socio-economic classes. How can that be considered anything but immoral?
|
If you need inf, go out and kill stuff. That's it. Anyone can do it. Maybe not at the same pace, but anything you're buying on the market isn't stuff you "need" to play, anyway. Taking away someone's ability to insta-buy a luxury item by buying it first isn't immoral.
Taking away someone's ability to insta-buy a luxury item by buying it first isn't immoral.
|
It is my opinion that taking away someone's ability to do ANYTHING for no reason beyond personal greed can only be considered immoral.
Whether I am taking someone's IO or their ability to feed themselves for a week doesn't matter - it is one's intentions not actions nor circumstance that define morality.
This is where our opinions differ.
It is my opinion that taking away someone's ability to do ANYTHING for no reason beyond personal greed can only be considered immoral. Whether I am taking someone's IO or their ability to feed themselves for a week doesn't matter - it is one's intentions not actions nor circumstance that define morality. |
So if I'm flipping an item in order to make enough inf to supply the "lowest socio-economic classes" in my SG with IO builds, doesn't my charitable intention trump your selfish one? After all, you're only buying those enhancements for *yourself*... and taking them out of the hands of an entire *group* of people. For shame.
|
For one thing I very rarely buy enchancements for myself, the last dozen or so builds I have IOd have not been mine.
Secondly, what you are describing isn't morally ambiguous in the slightest - it is very noble, charitable and commendable.
I have said all along I have my problem lies with those who do it simply for the sake of swimming in influence. They have more than they need - if you are spending it then awesome. If you are spending it on others, that is even more awesome of you. If you are stockpiling it for no reason beyond making sure others don't have it, that is slightly less awesome but still relatively commendable - I have enough trouble juggling the influence I do have with these caps, adding an excessive amount to that would just make it more problematic.
As an aide, I am also not criticizing those who buy cheap recipes, craft the IO and re-sell it for a mark up. They have earned their cut.
If there is nothing inherently wrong with flipping, why is it so frowned upon in the real world? |
Additionally: isn't it dishonorable to spend so much time arguing on the boards instead of using that time to help out those in "need" ingame?
For what it is worth, I don't blame the marketeers for this. In real life, producers how found a way to protect their goods from such treatment by a middle man. They write the recommended retail price directly on the packaging - we have no protection from such things in this game and that is the Dev's fault not yours.
|
In CoH, the cost to create the items is ZERO. They drop on you out of the void. There is no cost so there is no basis to determine a 'fair' price. The only factors to determine the price are how many there are and how many people want the item - i.e. supply and demand.
Fortunately, there is no need for "protection" from the devs against these dishonorable gouging vermin. You already have the ultimate protection - don't buy it.
Paragon City Search And Rescue
The Mentor Project
I have a question.
If there is nothing inherently wrong with flipping, why is it so frowned upon in the real world? |
Taking away someone's ability to insta-buy a luxury item by buying it first isn't immoral.
|
Paragon City Search And Rescue
The Mentor Project
This is irrelevant. Whether or not I know it is happening on a case by case basis means nothing. Ignorance doesn;t change the morality of the situation.
|
I will repeat this with bigger letters since you are having trouble seeing what's being told to you.
THERE IS NO MORALITY!
The market is an interactive PVP minigame within the greater venue of CoH.
You are NOT entitled to ANYTHING but ACCESS to it (which'll change under Freedom) and the ability to pay what you want and not an inf more.
THAT'S IT BUBBA!
This is called scalping and is illegal. |
Salvage, recipes, crafted enhancements, etc in CoH are, effectively, unlimited.
Scalping is not ENTIRELY illegal. Hawking them on the street at a concert/game is. Because you're running a business without a license.
Take a look at various "premium ticket" services around. That's STILL scalping. But it's legal. And in some cases condoned (or even operated by) the venue.
The very laws designed to force mankind to live ethically are telling you that what you are doing is wrong. |
Sure you might like to see this as play money and differentiate it from genuine earned cash but I don't see the difference. |
Uh. No. Go talk to a shrink. The real world (the really real world) doesn't function like that. Nor does the game world.
Due to the time invested, for me 10 million influence is worth 30x more than a dollar. |
Inf has a net, real-world value of ZERO (0). You know, nada, jack, bupkiss, naught, zip, zilch, one-less-than-uno, NOTHING. This is NOT Adam's second wife. You have not gotten Another Life. In-game currency is worthless.
If YOU choose to attempt to assign a real-world value to it, you're only deluding yourself.
This would be true if you had an impact on supply or demand but a flipper doesn't.
They aren't generating any new goods for sale nor are they reducing demand, they are simply moving the goods along the graph beyond the point of equilibrium.
That isn't a service.
And what right do you have to define what the "normal" price is? |
I can assure you if people stopped flipping, prices would be noticeably cheaper. |
They would revert back to their default equilibrium value. |
The fact that you are pushing the prices beyond that does not make those prices "normal" actually, by pure definition, it makes those prices abnormal. |
This is just something I can't understand. |
You are taking something available to all and artificially inflating their prices so they are out of reach to those lowest socio-economic classes. |
The *devs* don't think that way. Hell, for upcoming F2P players, they quite simply CAN'T use them. They can't even get into the market to buy them!
How can that be considered anything but immoral? |
This isn't about NEED. This is about WANT. YOU want nice stuff. But YOU don't want to pay anything for it (though I'm sure you're glad when someone pays a huge "Buy it NAO" markup on the stuff YOU put up).
Again, I don't FORCE people to buy my crap. They're falling all over each other to buy it. Sometimes at 10,000x the price I list at.
Or do you go out of your way to try and find people and say "Nonono! You paid me too much for this! Here's the difference back!"
With respect to the scalping that you brought up, would you think it okay if you desperately wanted to go to the once-affordable Superbowl but the Scalpers bought all the tickets up and pushed them beyond your price range? |
Again. Some applications of scalping are legal and condoned.
Does this mean I don't go to some events I'd like to?
Sure!
But *I* am the one who sets the price on what *I* find acceptable.
Ruminate on this at length...
What of the organizers of the event who quite purposefully set their prices because they wanted to fill the stands? How would they feel about those empty seats Scalpers took from the public? |
Guess who's going to tell you "I don't give a ****. I got paid."
It might be a good way to make a quick buck but that doesn't change the morality of the situation: that quick buck is coming at the expense of others. |
THERE IS NO MORALITY ISSUE HERE!
Marketing follows the exact same principle. It might be "play money" but morality doesn't make that distinction. |
That is all.
Flippers and scalpers aren't providing a service for their mark up, they are merely profiting off the misfortune of others.
|
Please stop propagating bad information.
It is my opinion that taking away someone's ability to do ANYTHING for no reason beyond personal greed can only be considered immoral. |
Whether I am taking someone's IO or their ability to feed themselves for a week doesn't matter - it is one's intentions not actions nor circumstance that define morality. |
CLUUUUUUUUUUUUUE!
The best comics are still 10�!
My City of Heroes Blog Freedom Feature Article: "Going Rageless?"
If you only read one guide this year, make it this one.
Super Reflexes: the Golden Fox of power sets!
WARNING: I bold names.
Consider two ways to dole out shinies to people.
- Temporal priority. In plain English, this just means "people get in line". If something is free, but in limited supply, you give them out to the next person in line, until you run out, and then the next person in line (and all the people behind them) have to wait.
- Payment priority. This means that whoever pays more gets the item first. Then the next person down gets the next one, and so on. When you run out, everyone has to wait, but when you get another one, it's the person offering to pay the most who gets it.
The odd, non-ordered behavior of the temporal priority we have aside, the ideal version of neither system is more objectively "fair" than the other. They just prioritize different things - being first in line is not a virtue, any than being the player who has racked up the highest score "arresting" critters.
If someone beats you to an item, either temporally or financially, it's theirs. They can do with it what they please. If that thing they do with it is to sell it back to someone who is actually willing to pay more for it, that's their prerogative. You don't get a say, because you didn't buy it. If Player B else is willing to pay 10x what you are for something, how is it morally objectionable for Player A to sell that something to them at that price? Player B isn't getting screwed, because they're honestly willing to pay 10x what you are willing to pay. You can't claim you were screwed, because you never got the chance to buy the item.
Most objections to existence of flippers assume that if the evil flipper didn't exist, the poor, downtrodden player would get the chance to buy what the flipper would have hoovered up. But there is no promise of that outcome - the item may have been gone to either a different downtrodden player or a simply rich player - the Player B from before who will bid 10x what he needs to just to have the item right damn now.
Bidders are lazy. I consistently make millions, sometimes many 10s of millions of inf a day listing things well below their historical price. I will often list things for 60% of what's in the last 5 history and make a sale at full historical max within an hour or less. Selling things like I do is begging someone to flip my goods. Of course no one does, because most of what I sell is low-margin stuff. I make my money because I sell a lot of it, not because it's that valuable.
Lazy bidders and either lazy or just canny sellers create opportunities for flipping. (Lazy sellers create better margins.) If I list for 60% of the historical max, and that's what someone pays me, I got what I asked for. If that was a flipper who then sells the item back with a 70% markup over my price, odds are someone will happily buy it, because they buy mine at that markup all the time. No one gets fleeced in that scenario. Are there some people who went bargain hunting and missed out? Maybe. But the flipper got there first. He has every right to do whatever he wants with what he got by being there first.
Blue
American Steele: 50 BS/Inv
Nightfall: 50 DDD
Sable Slayer: 50 DM/Rgn
Fortune's Shadow: 50 Dark/Psi
WinterStrike: 47 Ice/Dev
Quantum Well: 43 Inv/EM
Twilit Destiny: 43 MA/DA
Red
Shadowslip: 50 DDC
Final Rest: 50 MA/Rgn
Abyssal Frost: 50 Ice/Dark
Golden Ember: 50 SM/FA
my problem lies with those who do it simply for the sake of swimming in influence |
We swim in TEARS.
Having said that, there are two things you're doing wrong:
1) You're the guy on the sidelines yelling at the players. You're not in the game. LaDiva sold me something off-market the other day: it was a fair price. She thought so, I thought so, and you don't get an opinion because it's literally none of your business: the people doing business did not include you.
2) You think there's ONE point of equilibrium, when there are TWO. One is the "buy it nao" price, or close to it; the point where you ratchet your bid up until you buy the lowest item currently for sale. The other is the "Take it away" price: the point where you exactly buy for the highest bid currently out there. Understand this and your stress will disappear.
For items that cost enough to care about, and are in enough supply to move smoothly, the Buy it Nao price is pretty close to the Take It Away price- usually around 20-30% different or 10 million different, whichever is larger. Anything under that isn't worth the market slot or the time to fill it. Anything between those two prices either changes one price, or disappears.
I'm tempted to find the thread where Nethergoat took an item with ZERO supply and ZERO demand and made it a stable niche. He was willing to invest the time and market slots in buying what people otherwise couldn't sell and selling what people couldn't otherwise buy. He made a market, in the financial sense.
That's what marketeers do.
You're welcome.
Mini-guides: Force Field Defenders, Blasters, Market Self-Defense, Frankenslotting.
So you think you're a hero, huh.
@Boltcutter in game.
He's need to sell it for a profit is not more or less moral than your need to slot it NAO. Both are are self satisfying needs ancillary to the play of the game. It's something that you do to make the game more fun for you.
What if a dozen people all show up wanting to buy it for a million inf? How does the market determine the one with highest moral need? It can't.
To take in-game, merging the markets means that items from blueside are constantly being boughtt by villians for immoral purposes. Is it moral to even list an item that could be used bya villian to spread evil?
This isn't the real world. Huge amounts of coin in COH is not causing wild and reckless behavior that is resulting in the devaluing of COH's Bond rating nor is it forcing Pargon City residents to make cuts in welfare and Medicare.
The difference lies in the excess, if I am buying something to relist it for a profit. I am denying someone else a fair deal simply to hoard away a fortune far beyond that of my needs then I am denying someone else's need for no reason other than greed.
The market can not determine who's need is greatest but if my need is 0 I can be sure someone out there has greater need than I do.