i18 Brutes the sad tale


Another_Fan

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Talen Lee View Post
I just started playing a new brute today. Those who think Praetoria is hard are smoking crack, or just never learned to actually play the low level characters they've supposedly had.
It's the constant ambushes and sieges (I now hate the word "incoming") that are the problems. :/ Especially on characters who are low on damage and have just gotten rid of the first foe in the first wave when the next wave shows up...

Other than those, and Blast Masters (sorry, but not everyone can afford to send their alts -KB IOs), it's not so bad.


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by JD_Gumby View Post
It's the constant ambushes and sieges (I now hate the word "incoming") that are the problems. :/ Especially on characters who are low on damage and have just gotten rid of the first foe in the first wave when the next wave shows up...

Other than those, and Blast Masters (sorry, but not everyone can afford to send their alts -KB IOs), it's not so bad.
My character is totally unenhanced. Don't get me wrong, I can afford to send myself -KB IOs.

The 'constant ambushes and sieges'? Good grief. We're talking about playing BRUTES. BRUTES. What is this malarkey about low on damage?

Praetoria may challenge some people, but any one who rolls a brute and has a hard time in Praetoria who has so much as a single vet badge needs to delete that brute, because it's like failing to fall down.


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Arcanaville View Post
Do you really expect anyone to take you seriously when you're claiming that the Brute changes caused you to now level more than twice as slowly? There's no way the small changes in Going Rogue could possibly do that.

I know everyone plays differently and circumstances can be radically different and yada yada, but this is just blatantly impossible.
Not quite impossible; if they were tuning their difficulty setting right to the edge and only just managing to kill spawns in I17 then the slight change in damage output could result in them dying a lot to those same mobs and spending the entire time in debt. Twice as slow levelling.

Would only take a couple of seconds at a fateweaver to correct the problem, but people trying to prove a point can be remarkably stubborn about changing anything about their 'proof'.


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Talen Lee View Post
My character is totally unenhanced. Don't get me wrong, I can afford to send myself -KB IOs.

The 'constant ambushes and sieges'? Good grief. We're talking about playing BRUTES. BRUTES. What is this malarkey about low on damage?
I don't think he's talking about brutes being low on damage.

That said... my elec/elec dom and fire/storm controller (neither "high damage" at level 10 or so) laugh at his statement.


 

Posted

I'm bothered by the changes for a couple reasons. I'm not interested in /Fire, so I really don't care about the buff there. Lower fury degradation doesn't really help me much because I've never been dumb enough to play a brute primary with slow animations or long recharge times.

However, making maintaining high levels harder does affect me, because my Brutes are always built with as many fast animating, fast recharge attacks as possible so I am always hovering near max fury. Making that harder to maintain affects me, whereas making it easier to maintain low levels is really irrelevant for me.

I guess it's a boost for people who were playing Axe or Mace or Stone... But it feels like punishing those who were actually building their characters to properly make use of the AT's strengths :/


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Talen Lee View Post
I just started playing a new brute today. Those who think Praetoria is hard are smoking crack, or just never learned to actually play the low level characters they've supposedly had.
From what I've noticed, it's the big rooms with loads of enemies and them all getting agroed at once because people don't know how to do agro control.


@True Metal
Co-leader of Callous Crew SG. Based on Union server.

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Paladin_Musashi View Post
I'm bothered by the changes for a couple reasons. I'm not interested in /Fire, so I really don't care about the buff there. Lower fury degradation doesn't really help me much because I've never been dumb enough to play a brute primary with slow animations or long recharge times.

However, making maintaining high levels harder does affect me, because my Brutes are always built with as many fast animating, fast recharge attacks as possible so I am always hovering near max fury. Making that harder to maintain affects me, whereas making it easier to maintain low levels is really irrelevant for me.

I guess it's a boost for people who were playing Axe or Mace or Stone... But it feels like punishing those who were actually building their characters to properly make use of the AT's strengths :/
...

So people using sets like Axe or Mace or Stone weren't using brutes properly? What kind of BS is that?

It's the same as with the dominator changes really, they toned down the top performers (or the ones with loads of inf to waste in any case) and made it a bit easier for the average player.


@True Metal
Co-leader of Callous Crew SG. Based on Union server.

 

Posted

I can't wrap my head around why that's a good thing. Shouldn't experience with the game and skill at character building give you an edge? A game where a person who picked it up would be just as good as someone who had been playing for years in a matter of minutes or hours doesn't sound like a very good game to me.


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Paladin_Musashi View Post
A game where a person who picked it up would be just as good as someone who had been playing for years in a matter of minutes or hours doesn't sound like a very good game to me.
I agree. Glad I don't play that game.


 

Posted

And I never said this game was like that. I'm simply pointing out that this is a step in that direction. I don't agree with flattening the curve. Noobs should suffer and fail horribly while they learn the game and become awesome with years of practice. In my day when you picked up a new game you by god expected to lose and die for a while!


 

Posted

Oh, oh! And lemme guess! When you walked to school, you had to walk uphill both ways, barefoot and in the snow, and you liked it!

Seriously, making a game where new players can't effectively play is a good way to kill your game. I'm pretty sure the devs want all the new players to actually stick around when all is said and done.


 

Posted

When a game like CoH gets to this age. Its not attracting new players, its more in the stage of recyling. I only speak of this because I come from a 13 yr old MMO. I play a few games atm CoH, UO, & GW. I`m not a huge in NC Soft fan, but they are better than EA.


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Black_Sabath View Post
When a game like CoH gets to this age. Its not attracting new players, its more in the stage of recyling.
Right. Have fun with that mindset.

And how exactly did this turn into a discussion about "new players"? Fury changes were introduced to prevent Tankers and Scrappers from becoming obsolete with GR. What does that have anything to do with attracting new players and ignoring Veterans? xD


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Black_Sabath View Post
When a game like CoH gets to this age. Its not attracting new players, its more in the stage of recyling. I only speak of this because I come from a 13 yr old MMO. I play a few games atm CoH, UO, & GW. I`m not a huge in NC Soft fan, but they are better than EA.


Though it's at this age the Devs have done a good job with this expansion.
It's piqued the interest of older players who quit years ago.

Like me, for example.

And based on the reaction from other forums I frequent, it's also seem to grabbed the attention of some new players. Granted it will never have the draw of games like WoW, but then nothing ever will.


"Through Avarice evil smiles; through insanity it sings"
Forum Troll Rule #1: Anyone who disagrees with my point of view is either a fanboy or an idiot.
I'm a proud carebear.

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Neiphan View Post
Oh, oh! And lemme guess! When you walked to school, you had to walk uphill both ways, barefoot and in the snow, and you liked it!

Seriously, making a game where new players can't effectively play is a good way to kill your game. I'm pretty sure the devs want all the new players to actually stick around when all is said and done.
Meh. I don't think it's ethically sound to encourage the modern mindset of not doing anything that's slightly difficult, and expecting there to be someone to hold your hand and wipe you after you use the toilet.

Regardless, this is a pointless tangent. The topic at hand is the change to make it harder to maintain near-max fury...


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Paladin_Musashi View Post
Meh. I don't think it's ethically sound to encourage the modern mindset of not doing anything that's slightly difficult, and expecting there to be someone to hold your hand and wipe you after you use the toilet.

Regardless, this is a pointless tangent. The topic at hand is the change to make it harder to maintain near-max fury...
Are you familiar with the term 'slippery slope' argument, and why they're not taken seriously?


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Paladin_Musashi View Post
I'm bothered by the changes for a couple reasons. I'm not interested in /Fire, so I really don't care about the buff there. Lower fury degradation doesn't really help me much because I've never been dumb enough to play a brute primary with slow animations or long recharge times.

However, making maintaining high levels harder does affect me, because my Brutes are always built with as many fast animating, fast recharge attacks as possible so I am always hovering near max fury. Making that harder to maintain affects me, whereas making it easier to maintain low levels is really irrelevant for me.

I guess it's a boost for people who were playing Axe or Mace or Stone... But it feels like punishing those who were actually building their characters to properly make use of the AT's strengths :/
Welcome to CoH, where the people who play and build smart are routinely screwed for the "benefit" of the rest of the players.


@macskull, @Not Mac | XBL: macskull | Steam: macskull | Skype: macskull
"One day we all may see each other elsewhere. In Tyria, in Azeroth. We may pass each other and never know it. And that's sad. But if nothing else, we'll still have Rhode Island."

 

Posted

Mac your sig is almost as funny as the guy who has Posi stating they will never merge markets


/gignore @username is the best feature of this game. It's also probably the least used feature.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nights_Dawn View Post
Hazy is right
Can't get enough Hazy? /chanjoin robo's lounge today!

 

Posted

I don't find maintaining max fury to be anymore difficult than it was. It's just now that the max fury you can obtain is slightly lower.


[U][URL="http://boards.cityofheroes.com/showthread.php?t=251594"][/URL][/U]

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bright Shadow View Post


Right. Have fun with that mindset.

And how exactly did this turn into a discussion about "new players"? Fury changes were introduced to prevent Tankers and Scrappers from becoming obsolete with GR. What does that have anything to do with attracting new players and ignoring Veterans? xD
Read a few of the posts on the last page & you will see were I coming from. If you don`t get it then. Forget my posts & move on.

Faolon never said the Devs are doing a bad job at all ^^. I`m just a bit tainted because of EA ><


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by macskull View Post
Welcome to CoH, where the people who play and build smart are routinely screwed for the "benefit" of the rest of the players.
Let me know when you find an MMO that balances their game by buffing the strong and nerfing the weak because they didn't do a good enough job of making the difference high enough the first time.


[Guide to Defense] [Scrapper Secondaries Comparison] [Archetype Popularity Analysis]

In one little corner of the universe, there's nothing more irritating than a misfile...
(Please support the best webcomic about a cosmic universal realignment by impaired angelic interference resulting in identity crisis angst. Or I release the pigmy water thieves.)

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Edana View Post
Not quite impossible; if they were tuning their difficulty setting right to the edge and only just managing to kill spawns in I17 then the slight change in damage output could result in them dying a lot to those same mobs and spending the entire time in debt. Twice as slow levelling.

Would only take a couple of seconds at a fateweaver to correct the problem, but people trying to prove a point can be remarkably stubborn about changing anything about their 'proof'.
It seems unlikely that the poster would have lodged all those complaints about the Brute changes and then failed to mention that on top of all of that they were dying all the time besides.


[Guide to Defense] [Scrapper Secondaries Comparison] [Archetype Popularity Analysis]

In one little corner of the universe, there's nothing more irritating than a misfile...
(Please support the best webcomic about a cosmic universal realignment by impaired angelic interference resulting in identity crisis angst. Or I release the pigmy water thieves.)

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Arcanaville View Post
Let me know when you find an MMO that balances their game by buffing the strong and nerfing the weak because they didn't do a good enough job of making the difference high enough the first time.
Star Wars Galaxies.

Even Enhancement Diversification (which was supposed to kill CoH--even I bought that hype, back in the day) was nothin' compared to the Epic Nerfs that were the Combat Upgrade and the New Game Enhancements (seriously, it was like language out of Praetorian propaganda).

That game would have given you fits and nightmares. Try balancing a Bounty Hunter with a Tailor.


40062: The World's Worst PUG
84008: Jenkins's Guide to Super-Villainy
230187: The Hero of Kings Row
No H8 - 08.04.10
@Circuit Boy - Moderator - Pride global chat channel

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Arcanaville View Post
It seems unlikely that the poster would have lodged all those complaints about the Brute changes and then failed to mention that on top of all of that they were dying all the time besides.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Q_Candy View Post
The brute I am leveling now moves less than half as fast on the experience bar. I cannot max my fury bar even when I am taking on enough mobs to pound me into the dust. I die way more easily... so really now I am forced to take all my IO's off my Brutes and move them to Scrapper or Tank.
They did. In the section you originally quoted at that.


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Edana View Post
They did. In the section you originally quoted at that.
That doesn't change the OP's ability to turn down their freaking difficulty and/or be more sensible with their post. Arcanaville is right, to a degree. Other posters have said this, so I take no credit: Maybe Mr. Fussy Britches is unable to level because he keeps getting stomped by his +4/x8 mission he used to "own".


My guides:Dark Melee/Dark Armor/Soul Mastery, Illusion Control/Kinetics/Primal Forces Mastery, Electric Armor
"Dark Armor is a complete waste as a tanking set."