The game is tedious


Ad Astra

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ultimo_ View Post
Well, after a little tally (ignoring distinctions such as level range), I count 26 people that agree that there may be an issue to look at, and 26 that disagree.

50%. Is that an insignificant number?
It's a lot higher than 26 that disagree with you, trust me. Most of us read your posts, shake our heads, and ignore your ridiculous sense of entitlement and desire to make the game so easy to play that it isn't worth playing anymore. That is...until you feel the need to turn your monthly rant into a poll--so please put me down in the "disgree" column.


Feel free to try out my AE mission arc, # 473452: Praetorian Redemption
@Valerika

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Coyote_Seven View Post
You're still overstating things quite a bit. Ultimo did not bust down your door, steal your money and shoot your dog. I think you can settle down now.
I think your opinion on my reaction to liars means absolutely nothing to me.


Be well, people of CoH.

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bill Z Bubba View Post
I think your opinion on my reaction to liars means absolutely nothing to me.
Doesn't it matter what he may be lying about? Isn't there a difference between making a falsehood with regards to a videogame, and... say, hiding an extramarital affair? Both involve lying, but I would call your sense of perspective into question if you thought there was no difference between those two.

And seriously, if you're acting this way towards someone on the Internet whom you've never even met (as far as I know, or is there something going on here between you two that I'm not aware of?), then gods forbid that anything really important happen to you; you'll have a freaking stroke or something.

As well, what proof do you have that Ultimo is lying? So far I've seen no sign of that. Just because you disagree with him, however vehemently, doesn't necessarily mean that he's lying. That would imply that he actually doesn't believe what he's saying, at either rate, and that certainly doesn't seem to be the case, either.


 

Posted

Now you're going to preach to me about some lies being worse than others? Get stuffed.


Be well, people of CoH.

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bill Z Bubba View Post
Now you're going to preach to me about some lies being worse than others? Get stuffed.
Well, at least now I know who has really been overreacting in this tedious thread, so far.

It's been educational!


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Coyote_Seven View Post
Well, at least now I know who has really been overreacting in this tedious thread, so far.

It's been educational!
Bill is a walking, talking life lesson for us all.



.


 

Posted

To clarify my tally, I counted those that said they disagreed as being diesagreeing, and those that agreed as agreeing.

Those that said they agreed, but within a certain range of levels, or under some conditions, I counted as agreeing because they're agreeing there's a problem with endurance, just under some specific circustances. I'm not trying to mislead or "lie." Those kinds of posts are offering agreement, though limited. Another way to look at it is whether people are agreeing or disagreeing with my suggestion that there be a reclibration. Either way, it is not my intent to misrepresent anyone's opinion. If I have done so I do sincerely apologize.

Those I couldn't discern an opinion from I didn't count. That included, Tyrannus, Mr. Body, that guy posting pictures and not saying anything, and so on. Those that merely defended me, but not my position, were not counted either.


I consider the forums to be the only sample I have available, and so I must regard it as representative to some degree. It may or may not be so, but I have little other resource available to me.

The tally doesn't inclue those that silently disagreed, but neither does it include those that silently agreed. The frame of reference is the population that posted in the thread over 10 pages.

While I would not think it a bad thing if everyone could be a "tankmage," that's not what I'm asking for, and that's not what this thread is about.


 

Posted

The forums are not a good indicator of the thoughts and feelings of the majority of the players. As evidenced by the overreaction of, ahem, certain people, going so far as to call you a liar for merely making a suggestion, it's no wonder that the devs themselves do their own research and mine the data on their own whenever they plan to make a change instead of solely relying on anything anyone ever said here.

Be that as it may, your detractors do have a point in that this game is not a first person shooter. Anyone trying to treat it as such will very likely get bored with it and move on to something else.


 

Posted

Hey liar, I called him a liar for lying. Exactly as I'm doing for you now. Never did I call him a liar for making a suggestion. Again, get stuffed. Liars are scum. It amuses me how scum like you three gather together so easily.


Be well, people of CoH.

 

Posted

you have to build for solo play, because unlike other games that are actually tedious (Wow, FF11) you dont know what kind of team you will get.
In those other games, the holy trinity means youre playing 1 of 3 pre-concieved At's. youre one of those At's so you NEED the other 2 and have to wait around, possibly for hours trying to fill those slots.

In Cox you could get anything from try-tank stalkers to healbot defenders(mostly on Freedumb) to Av killer Controllers (not on Freedumb) to dead on the ground again Blaster.....You might see a bubbler that actually bubbles instead of standing around being a healtard....you might see a tank that is impressive....

Leadership pool is really impressive stacked, and you cant convince 5 freedumbites that heals arent neccesary to do a cape mission. Yeah, Freedumb is that dumb. Sadly the rest of the population is fairing almost slightly higher than that.

Unless you have a few friends and can static team a toon, you build solo, or you quit playing. Theres advice in the forums....just remember to use a hero builder.


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bill Z Bubba View Post
Hey liar, I called him a liar for lying. Exactly as I'm doing for you now. Never did I call him a liar for making a suggestion. Again, get stuffed. Liars are scum. It amuses me how scum like you three gather together so easily.
Now it looks like he's trying to get the thread shut down by a mod.



.


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Coyote_Seven View Post
The forums are not a good indicator of the thoughts and feelings of the majority of the players. As evidenced by the overreaction of, ahem, certain people, going so far as to call you a liar for merely making a suggestion, it's no wonder that the devs themselves do their own research and mine the data on their own whenever they plan to make a change instead of solely relying on anything anyone ever said here.

Be that as it may, your detractors do have a point in that this game is not a first person shooter. Anyone trying to treat it as such will very likely get bored with it and move on to something else.
I agree, the forums may not be the best sample, but it's all I have (alas). Really, all I asked for was for the devs to have a look at endurance use using their resources because I'm percieveing a potential problem.

I guess that's a lot to ask.

I also agree, it's not an FPS, but neither do I want it to be that. If I had been designing the game, and was required to use ATs, I wouldn't have tied powers to ATs. That way, anyone could have used any powers (as long as the powers themselves were balanced). Of course, this isn't what I suggested and isn't the topic of the thread either.


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Johnny_Butane View Post
Now it looks like he's trying to get the thread shut down by a mod.



.
This thread probably should be locked down.

Personally, I think that respect for differing viewpoints is an important quality of mature and intellegent human beings. Looking around the world and watching the news makes me wonder how many of them we actually have on the planet, but I remain optimistic.

We don't have to all agree, but discussing our disagreements should not result in "name-calling".
That's something we used to do on the playground when we had only single-digit birthdays.

I would hope the forums could be an example of the better nature of MMO players but when it gets ugly like this, it should be stopped.


BIOSPARK :: DARKTHORN :: SKYGUARD :: WILDMAGE
HEATSINK :: FASTHAND :: POWERCELL :: RUNESTAFF

 

Posted

Quote:
If I had been designing the game, and was required to use ATs, I wouldn't have tied powers to ATs. That way, anyone could have used any powers (as long as the powers themselves were balanced).
Kinda funny you say that. In coh beta, you could choose from any powers available, and they were not tied to AT's. It was also found to be a bad idea.


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Biospark View Post
Personally, I think that respect for differing viewpoints is an important quality of mature and intellegent human beings.
You sound concerned.

Sorry, let me elaborate.

By drawing attention to this terrible woe, in our society, you have clearly positioned yourself as a true and clear-thinking indvidual who's so much better than hoi polloi who let ourselves get worked up, and point out when wrong is wrong and fail to accord respect to a person who has, through years of posting, through a long, protracted, and deliberate set of actions, chosen to make himself a laughingstock.

We are being respectful human beings; we are according to Ultimo every bit of respect he has earned, complete with his multiple second chances.


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by SinisterDirge View Post
Kinda funny you say that. In coh beta, you could choose from any powers available, and they were not tied to AT's. It was also found to be a bad idea.
I've heard that, but I wasn't there so I can't say for sure why. I suspect it has to do with the power sets not being balanced enough in themselves, but it's just speculation.


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Biospark View Post
This thread probably should be locked down.

Personally, I think that respect for differing viewpoints is an important quality of mature and intellegent human beings. Looking around the world and watching the news makes me wonder how many of them we actually have on the planet, but I remain optimistic.

We don't have to all agree, but discussing our disagreements should not result in "name-calling".
That's something we used to do on the playground when we had only single-digit birthdays.

I would hope the forums could be an example of the better nature of MMO players but when it gets ugly like this, it should be stopped.
I agree. It's unfortunate that people find it difficult to disagree without being disagreeable.

I also wouldn't complain if the thread was closed, I think it's achieved its purpose for the most part.


 

Posted

I agree with Ultimo_ that Endurance is a very poorly designed mechanic. Yes, there are ways around Endurance problems, but if you look at the lengths people go to just to be able to fight and not rest, it highlights how broken it really is (notice how most people with access to Quick Recovery still take Stamina! It's just that badly designed).

Unfortunately, I think the ship has sailed on this. At this point in the game's life it'd be kind of a waste to try to revamp the whole Endurance system.

What might help though is putting Endurance Reduction enhancements on a different, more forgiving schedule. I'd love to see Endurance Reduction Enhancements put on Schedule D (a power costing 10 Endurance would cost 6.5 with a single level 50 +3 SO if this were done; personally, I don't think that's unbalanced, and it would make the game much more playable).


The best comics are still 10�!
My City of Heroes Blog Freedom Feature Article: "Going Rageless?"
If you only read one guide this year, make it this one.
Super Reflexes: the Golden Fox of power sets!
WARNING: I bold names.

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Talen Lee View Post
You sound concerned.

Sorry, let me elaborate.

By drawing attention to this terrible woe, in our society, you have clearly positioned yourself as a true and clear-thinking indvidual who's so much better than hoi polloi who let ourselves get worked up, and point out when wrong is wrong and fail to accord respect to a person who has, through years of posting, through a long, protracted, and deliberate set of actions, chosen to make himself a laughingstock.

We are being respectful human beings; we are according to Ultimo every bit of respect he has earned, complete with his multiple second chances.
I am not positioning myself in any way. Never did I say that I was better than anyone else in any way. In fact, I am sure that my many faults and foibles as a human being place me nowhere near the top of the "ultimate example of humanity". But if I said that a plant was "green" and you disputed my right to say so because you think I am trying to place myself above a blind man is kind of silly, since "truth" can fall from the lips of a moron just as easily as from a genius. It doesnt change what is true.

And you Talen_Lee are well known as a person that speaks his mind in blunt, harsh, cruel, sarcastic ways at times( thats how I choose to describe it). Whether your point is "truthfull" doesnt change the manner in which it is presented. So speaking your mind in a disdainful way is NOT respectful, even if it is correct.

Just to clarify my position on the whole thread as well. I dont agree that there is a problem.
I DO agree that getting from level 1-22 on ANY character (some more than others) is an endurance challenge. Luckily, there is plenty of game to explore after 22, so its not a major concern for me (or others, apparently). Can the road to 22 be improved? Certainly. Should it be improved ? Dont know. Will I stop enjoying the game either way ? Nope.
Can all these points be discussed without getting offended ? I would sure like to think so.
But apparently not.

P.S. Thanks for the NEG Rep too.


BIOSPARK :: DARKTHORN :: SKYGUARD :: WILDMAGE
HEATSINK :: FASTHAND :: POWERCELL :: RUNESTAFF

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Talen Lee View Post
One could choke on that kind of hypocritical piety; try to be careful.
Wow.... You are an unusual person Talen_Lee.

Try to remember that every person that posts on the forums is a human being, with feelings, faults, desires and impulses. You can never know what effect your words can have. That Karma goes to you whether you believe in it or not.

I wish you all the best, even though you probably don't feel the same.


BIOSPARK :: DARKTHORN :: SKYGUARD :: WILDMAGE
HEATSINK :: FASTHAND :: POWERCELL :: RUNESTAFF

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bill Z Bubba View Post
Hey liar, I called him a liar for lying. Exactly as I'm doing for you now. Never did I call him a liar for making a suggestion. Again, get stuffed. Liars are scum. It amuses me how scum like you three gather together so easily.
And I'm calling you an idiot for acting stupid. And for being a troll.

Seriously, you call anyone who disagrees with you a liar? I guess this means every word from your mouth is the absolute truth. What's it like to be God?

If you're the best that Ultimo has to put up with, I don't think he has anything to worry about.

Oh yeah, and you've challenged my honor by falsely calling me a liar. This makes you a liar. And a hypocrite 'cause you hate liars but you don't hate yourself. Pistols at dawn, etc.


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Johnny_Butane View Post
Now it looks like he's trying to get the thread shut down by a mod.
YOU LIE!!!! On Ceti Alpha Five there was life! A fair chance!!!


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by UberGuy View Post
If IOs were removed from the game, I would probably stop playing, as chasing them is one of my sole long-term interests. By your logic, I "need" IOs. Should we therefore conclude that it's OK for other people to claim to "need" IOs, and thus conclude that IOs (and the levels of performance they offer) should be far easier to obtain?
It's absolutely OK to conclude that, regardless of whether you call them "wants" or "needs". As long as you understand that either way you're drawing a conclusion based on subjective desire and are comfortable doing that.

And it's not "by my logic" it's by the very definitions of the words. A need is a lack of something wanted, and to want something is to feel a need for it.

Quote:
The same line of thinking arises from the existence of Stamina. Nearly everyone likes what it does for them, (they "need" it by your logic) so the argument is that everyone should get its benefits automatically. I don't believe that follows.
It's one conclusion that could be arrived at. One might also conclude that there's cause to look into why so many deem it necessary and take measures to fix the problem, such as it is, at the root cause. One might also conclude that a bit of struggle is more beneficial in the end and take the aforementioned desires as a sign that everything is WAI. Despite how much the parties involved would like to think otherwise, none of the approaches is necessarily more correct than the other - not even the one that actually gets implemented.


Goodbye may seem forever
Farewell is like the end
But in my heart's the memory
And there you'll always be
-- The Fox and the Hound

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Coyote_Seven View Post
YOU LIE!!!! On Ceti Alpha Five there was life! A fair chance!!!
I no, rite! We're all big scummy liars!



.