Quote:
You can quote me on it anytime I complain in the future. You have the ultimate ace in the hole if I ever moan about the Rookery if it ever does become consolidated in one thread.|
Originally Posted by Fedor
That's all well and good of you to say xan, but I don't believe you. Not even for a second.
|
Quote:
|
5. Non-Constructive posts are prohibited. Spam - this is considered to be repetitive posting of the same topic or text or nonsensical posts that have no substance and are often designed to annoy other forum users. |
Repetitive Posts = daily threads.
Have no substance = sillyness incarnate.
The Rookery does go against the forum rules.
Once again you are unable to discuss anything on it's merits and have to re-use the same image that didn't make sense the first time you use it. Way to get your point across.
Heroes : Angrem (50 Stone tank), Exo Inferis (50 Fire blaster), Exo Proteus (50 ill/emp), IceVengance (50 cold defender)
Villains : AtomBomb (50 Rad/Kin corruptor), Aleks (50 SS/Inv brute), StoneLethal (50 EM/Stone brute), Davroz (50 Bots/Dark mastermind)
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by YellowjacketX
This thread is alright I guess. Mildly entertaining, with a faint bouquet of hipocrisy tinged with bittersweet angst. Who knows, if we let it age a little more it might even become a epic post
|
Wait, I screwed this all up. I should have posted "HAI GUYZ ITS THURZDAY WASSUP". as a new post.
Quote:
Yep, cause repetition, nothing is wrong with that, right?|
Originally Posted by Fedor
Once again you are unable to discuss anything on it's merits and have to re-use the same image that didn't make sense the first time you use it. Way to get your point across.
|
Maybe when I start posting it daily itll become cute and acceptable?
Quote:
That is only your interpetation of the rule. The Rookery is a different topic every day and does not include the same text. The Mods have reviewed the subject and decided that your intepretation is incorrect.
|
Originally Posted by Xanatos_NA
You can quote me on it anytime I complain in the future. You have the ultimate ace in the hole if I ever moan about the Rookery if it ever does become consolidated in one thread.
Highlighted parts. Repetitive Posts = daily threads. Have no substance = sillyness incarnate. The Rookery does go against the forum rules. |
Heroes : Angrem (50 Stone tank), Exo Inferis (50 Fire blaster), Exo Proteus (50 ill/emp), IceVengance (50 cold defender)
Villains : AtomBomb (50 Rad/Kin corruptor), Aleks (50 SS/Inv brute), StoneLethal (50 EM/Stone brute), Davroz (50 Bots/Dark mastermind)
Quote:
I doubt very much that the mods have reviewed it.|
Originally Posted by Fedor
That is only your interpetation of the rule. The Rookery is a different topic every day and does not include the same text. The Mods have reviewed the subject and decided that your intepretation is incorrect.
|
Could you please tell me what Todays topic is please. I was not able to find a topic from the "Rookery: Not Quite Friday" thread.
Thanks.
Xan,
HAppy Birthday posts are non-contructive.
Movie reviews are non-constructive.
Virtue Drink game is non-contrcutive.
Travel power is Angrey Angel is non-contructive.
Hello there I just join virture is not real constructive,
and mosto of the other "Contructive" topics that have gone to fluff because of thread derailing.
So, lets just keep the forum to talks about missions, SGs that are looking for members, TFs forming, and powers. Oh wait. Powers would be wrong cause there are specific forums for that. Sgs looking as a single thread...
Mission and TF talk is it.
I do remember the Community people and Devs saying that they let things slide in the server forums due to it being more of a community area.
Defcon 0 - (D4 lvl 50),DJ Shecky Cape Radio
@Shecky
Twitter: @DJ_Shecky, @siliconshecky, @thecaperadio
When you air your dirty laundry out on a clothesline above the street, everyone is allowed to snicker at the skid marks in your underoos. - Lemur_Lad
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Fedor
That is only your interpetation of the rule. The Rookery is a different topic every day and does not include the same text. The Mods have reviewed the subject and decided that your intepretation is incorrect.
|
Seriously. How can anyone have any kind of merited discussion when you just keep replying "Nothings wrong, mods said so, go way now bye!"
*KTHUNKSPLSH*
Quote:
yep id be amazingly happy if there was only one thread
|
Originally Posted by Reiraku
Same here
|
Quote:
You think the mods are unaware of the existence of the Rookery topics? They have reviewed the situation multiple times if only to deal with haet repeatedly.
|
Originally Posted by Xanatos_NA
I doubt very much that the mods have reviewed it.
Could you please tell me what Todays topic is please. I was not able to find a topic from the "Rookery: Not Quite Friday" thread. Thanks. |
Heroes : Angrem (50 Stone tank), Exo Inferis (50 Fire blaster), Exo Proteus (50 ill/emp), IceVengance (50 cold defender)
Villains : AtomBomb (50 Rad/Kin corruptor), Aleks (50 SS/Inv brute), StoneLethal (50 EM/Stone brute), Davroz (50 Bots/Dark mastermind)
Quote:
Well first you would have to have a point to make, and since you don't you resort to the same thing over and over.
|
Originally Posted by Haetron
Seriously. How can anyone have any kind of merited discussion when you just keep replying "Nothings wrong, mods said so, go way now bye!"
*KTHUNKSPLSH* |
Heroes : Angrem (50 Stone tank), Exo Inferis (50 Fire blaster), Exo Proteus (50 ill/emp), IceVengance (50 cold defender)
Villains : AtomBomb (50 Rad/Kin corruptor), Aleks (50 SS/Inv brute), StoneLethal (50 EM/Stone brute), Davroz (50 Bots/Dark mastermind)
He had a point. You said you didn't understand it.
"the reason there are so many sarcastic pvpers is we already had a better version of pvp taken away from us to appease bad players. Back then we chuckled at how bad players came here and whined. If we knew that was the actual voice devs would listen to instead of informed, educated players we probably would have been bigger dicks back then." -ConFlict
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Fedor
Well first you would have to have a point to make, and since you don't you resort to the same thing over and over.
|
eeeeeee
Don't be silly Shecky. Those threads are all either community building & relevant to the members of the server, or are one-off threads that are not created on a daily basis.
The Rookey being a spamfest isn't a problem. The Rookery being a DAILY spamfest is a problem. All that the Virtue Liberation Front (
) is fighting for is to have it all consolidated in one thread.
Quote:
Virtue Liberation Front? Oh noes!! Terrists!|
Originally Posted by Xanatos_NA
Don't be silly Shecky. Those threads are all either community building & relevant to the members of the server, or are one-off threads that are not created on a daily basis.
The Rookey being a spamfest isn't a problem. The Rookery being a DAILY spamfest is a problem. All that the Virtue Liberation Front ( ) is fighting for is to have it all consolidated in one thread. |
*hides behind Shecky*
LOL, forums: most balanced PvP ever.
Tacos > Zombies
You said it didn't make sense, therefor you did not understand it.
"the reason there are so many sarcastic pvpers is we already had a better version of pvp taken away from us to appease bad players. Back then we chuckled at how bad players came here and whined. If we knew that was the actual voice devs would listen to instead of informed, educated players we probably would have been bigger dicks back then." -ConFlict
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Fedor
Post Deleted by Moderator_08
|
Lol, like anyone needs an excuse to troll.
LOL, forums: most balanced PvP ever.
Tacos > Zombies
Quote:
I'll have you know I totally misread that as terrierists and had hilarious visions of hordes of little black scottish terriers with red plaid sweaters and suicide bomber vests...
|
Originally Posted by YellowjacketX
... Terrists!
|
Fedor, meet Haetron.
Fedor, you can't win.
It's Haet.
He is my inspiration and legend, I makes a shrine to Haet and worship his Haet-ness.
Welcome back Haet, I miss thee and thy haet.
Oh, and by the way, I hate everyone equally. Even Haetron.
Quote:
But I thought you were part of the Virtue's Front of Liberation!|
Originally Posted by Xanatos_NA
All that the Virtue Liberation Front (
) is fighting for is to have it all consolidated in one thread. |
Seriously, though; in the past forum incarnation, I'd have been OK to keep any such "fun"/"fluff" threads as a single thread, rather than daily. However, as Shecky pointed out previously, the new forum software tracks a user's last on datetime stamp via a per-system cookie, rather than on the forum server. This means that the "latest post" clicks are not accurate (and often annoying) for those of us who use multiple systems on a daily basis.
You're not super until you put on The Cape!
Attercap.Net
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by _Kai_
I'll have you know I totally misread that as terrierists and had hilarious visions of hordes of little black scottish terriers with red plaid sweaters and suicide bomber vests...
|
...This gives me a horrible idea for a new furry villain...
LOL, forums: most balanced PvP ever.
Tacos > Zombies
Quote:
Hmm, I dunno, while there is fluff stuff in the thread I see things such as What happened to Pogo's knee and what the doctors are saying about it, people who are trying to set up TF times in it, some goofing around in it, how people are doing in it.|
Originally Posted by Xanatos_NA
Don't be silly Shecky. Those threads are all either community building & relevant to the members of the server, or are one-off threads that are not created on a daily basis.
The Rookey being a spamfest isn't a problem. The Rookery being a DAILY spamfest is a problem. All that the Virtue Liberation Front ( ) is fighting for is to have it all consolidated in one thread. |
Is there fluff in there, yep, but there is other relevant stuff in it also.
The fun thing is when I get home from work tonight I'll have to remember what page I'm on in the threads to skip over everything that I've read/posted during the day today. That is a bigger annoance than any fluff thread in my book..
Defcon 0 - (D4 lvl 50),DJ Shecky Cape Radio
@Shecky
Twitter: @DJ_Shecky, @siliconshecky, @thecaperadio
When you air your dirty laundry out on a clothesline above the street, everyone is allowed to snicker at the skid marks in your underoos. - Lemur_Lad
Quote:
But wouldn't that problem still exist even with multiple threads? On a new system, you'd still have to scroll through where you had previously read earlier in the day, then again if you returned to the previous machine in the same day. Having multiple threads doesn't change that.
|
Originally Posted by Attercap
But I thought you were part of the Virtue's Front of Liberation!
Seriously, though; in the past forum incarnation, I'd have been OK to keep any such "fun"/"fluff" threads as a single thread, rather than daily. However, as Shecky pointed out previously, the new forum software tracks a user's last on datetime stamp via a per-system cookie, rather than on the forum server. This means that the "latest post" clicks are not accurate (and often annoying) for those of us who use multiple systems on a daily basis. |
"the reason there are so many sarcastic pvpers is we already had a better version of pvp taken away from us to appease bad players. Back then we chuckled at how bad players came here and whined. If we knew that was the actual voice devs would listen to instead of informed, educated players we probably would have been bigger dicks back then." -ConFlict
That's all well and good of you to say xan, but I don't believe you. Not even for a second.