Quote:
No I mean ad hominem. As my arguments are based in logic, ad hominem (read: emotive) points are largely irrelevant. Besides, I have seen the error of my ways :P|
Originally Posted by YellowjacketX
You mean less truth? I am sure I am not the only person who remembers the Sorah threads, bub.
|
You have a lot of venom Yellowjacket. Please stop telling me how I am, why I do things, and what my motivations are. Chill out. We're not going to have an adult debate if you keep slinging mud.
Ooh ooh me, I remember. And I complained about fluff then and at least three of the offended by the Rookery here told me to eff of, that it was their right to spew nonsense everywhere ;D
I love the smell of hypocrisy in the forum....
Quote:
But high horses aren't the same if everyone gets off them.
|
Originally Posted by Xanatos_NA
You have a lot of venom Yellowjacket. Please stop telling me how I am, why I do things, and what my motivations are. Chill out. We're not going to have an adult debate if you keep slinging mud.
|
Now! This is it! Now is the time to choose! Die and be free of pain or live and fight your sorrow! Now is the time to shape your stories! Your fate is in your hands!
Quote:
So you support the Rookery?|
Originally Posted by _Kai_
Ooh ooh me, I remember. And I complained about fluff then and at least three of the offended by the Rookery here told me to eff of, that it was their right to spew nonsense everywhere ;D
I love the smell of hypocrisy in the forum.... |
But you used to be anti-fluff?
Doesn't that make you a hypocrite too?
I suppose antagonism > "reasoned compromise".
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by _Kai_
I love the smell of hypocrisy in the forum.... |
*inhales*.....It smells like....Victory!
er, or Virtue.
Anyway, Charlie don't surf!
Quote:
There's nothing adult about this debate. The adults in this room fall into two camps: those who just ignore Rookery if they don't like it, and those who enjoy Rookery and partake of it when they feel like it.|
Originally Posted by Xanatos_NA
No I mean ad hominem. As my arguments are based in logic, ad hominem (read: emotive) points are largely irrelevant. Besides, I have seen the error of my ways :P
You have a lot of venom Yellowjacket. Please stop telling me how I am, why I do things, and what my motivations are. Chill out. We're not going to have an adult debate if you keep slinging mud. |
Guess what Xan: you're in neither.
LOL, forums: most balanced PvP ever.
Tacos > Zombies
Quote:
Nope. Hate it. Think its stupid, pointless, spam. |
Originally Posted by Xanatos_NA
So you support the Rookery?
|
Would I rather it be one topic? Yes.
Do I find it hard to just...not click on the topics? Nope.
Is it worth bothering to moan endlessly about? Not really.
Honestly the whole bandwagoning of 'Hey, people kinda like this Haet guy, if I agree with him I'll be cool too!' irritates me more than the entire Rookery. The reason silent majority's are silent is because until there's a spotlight to leap into no one really cares enough.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by _Kai_
Nope. Hate it. Think its stupid, pointless, spam.
Would I rather it be one topic? Yes. Do I find it hard to just...not click on the topics? Nope. Is it worth bothering to moan endlessly about? Not really. Honestly the whole bandwagoning of 'Hey, people kinda like this Haet guy, if I agree with him I'll be cool too!' irritates me more than the entire Rookery. The reason silent majority's are silent is because until there's a spotlight to leap into no one really cares enough. |
Truth.
LOL, forums: most balanced PvP ever.
Tacos > Zombies
Thanks for the insults Yellow Jacket. I'm done with this. It's not a big deal to me and I'm not going to get into a heated debate over a fluff thread LOL.
Quote:
Actually, Sorah kept her fluff to already created threads. If it pertained to her, it would be in the "ZOMG What!?" thread. Otherwise, she'd post in context to whatever the thread at hand had derailed into (which was par for the course).|
Originally Posted by YellowjacketX
You mean less truth? I am sure I am not the only person who remembers the Sorah threads, bub.
I'll spell it out for you: It's not hard to just ignore Rookery as is right now, but if you did that you wouldn't have a high horse to be on. |
There's quite a bit of difference between that and a thread recreated daily.
"the reason there are so many sarcastic pvpers is we already had a better version of pvp taken away from us to appease bad players. Back then we chuckled at how bad players came here and whined. If we knew that was the actual voice devs would listen to instead of informed, educated players we probably would have been bigger dicks back then." -ConFlict
Quote:
And one overwhelming, trumping similarity: you can ignore them both easily.
|
Originally Posted by Reiraku
Actually, Sorah kept her fluff to already created threads. If it pertained to her, it would be in the "ZOMG What!?" thread. Otherwise, she'd post in context to whatever the thread at hand had derailed into (which was par for the course).
There's quite a bit of difference between that and a thread recreated daily. |
LOL, forums: most balanced PvP ever.
Tacos > Zombies
Quote:
When did this start happening and why was I not notified. |
Originally Posted by _Kai_
'Hey, people kinda like this Haet guy, if I agree with him I'll be cool too!'
|
> : (
Quote:
I think this quote goes to the 'defence' of the Rookery, thank you.|
Originally Posted by _Kai_
no one really cares.
|
Seriously, I should put money on which hornets stir up. Patterns aren't just easy to spot, they're laughable.
Now! This is it! Now is the time to choose! Die and be free of pain or live and fight your sorrow! Now is the time to shape your stories! Your fate is in your hands!
Quote:
Far easier to ignore one thread amongst a month's worth of postings than it is to ignore 30 threads within the same time.
|
Originally Posted by YellowjacketX
And one overwhelming, trumping similarity: you can ignore them both easily.
|
"the reason there are so many sarcastic pvpers is we already had a better version of pvp taken away from us to appease bad players. Back then we chuckled at how bad players came here and whined. If we knew that was the actual voice devs would listen to instead of informed, educated players we probably would have been bigger dicks back then." -ConFlict
Quote:
Ignoring one thread as opposed to ignoring one thread each and every day.|
Originally Posted by YellowjacketX
And one overwhelming, trumping similarity: you can ignore them both easily.
|
One of these things is not like the other.
Now! This is it! Now is the time to choose! Die and be free of pain or live and fight your sorrow! Now is the time to shape your stories! Your fate is in your hands!
Quote:
So, fluff that pervades every thread on the forum is preferable to fluff cordoned off in its own thread each day?
|
Originally Posted by Reiraku
Actually, Sorah kept her fluff to already created threads. If it pertained to her, it would be in the "ZOMG What!?" thread. Otherwise, she'd post in context to whatever the thread at hand had derailed into (which was par for the course).
There's quite a bit of difference between that and a thread recreated daily. |
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Eikochan
So, fluff that pervades every thread on the forum is preferable to fluff cordoned off in its own thread each day?
|
There you guys go with that logic talk again...
LOL, forums: most balanced PvP ever.
Tacos > Zombies
Seriously, when did people start liking this haet guy, I heard he's kind of a jerk.
Quote:
I hate him, but I hate everyone.
|
Originally Posted by Haetron
Seriously, when did people start liking this haet guy, I heard he's kind of a jerk.
|
I think it was around the same time as mudkips.
Now! This is it! Now is the time to choose! Die and be free of pain or live and fight your sorrow! Now is the time to shape your stories! Your fate is in your hands!
Quote:
Well it worked for the Native Americans, right?|
Originally Posted by Eikochan
So, fluff that pervades every thread on the forum is preferable to fluff cordoned off in its own thread each day?
|
... this thread was a lot funner about six pages ago.
The Elysienne; Magical controller
Silent Sickle; Natural scrapper
And many more.
Aenigma Rebis: "Actually, Ely's more like Jean Grey. Only... smart."
Quote:
But neither of them is so terribly, horrifically difficult that it cannot be done! I am pretty sure that you guys can soldier on, heroically, as it were, though the prescence of the Rookery offends you. You can do it. We have faith in you! Just one more click on the scrollwheel and you won't have to see the Rookery and the Rookery people can just keep on having fun. Everyone wins!
|
Originally Posted by Flea_Mark_Evil
Ignoring one thread as opposed to ignoring one thread each and every day.
One of these things is not like the other. |
LOL, forums: most balanced PvP ever.
Tacos > Zombies
One fluff a day, fine.
10+ a day, got sickening.
No, I don't like the Rookery, but I can live with one fluff a day. It's labeled well so it's easily skipped. One thread a day, with all the fluff for that day in it. No problem. Sorah's was everywhere. That was what was annoying.
Quote:
I have no idea Haet, but it pisses me off too because occasionally I have to agree with you(which does cause its own anguish) and I find I'm surrounded by fangirl/bois....
|
Originally Posted by Haetron
When did this start happening and why was I not notified.
> : ( |
Ima quoting this jus cuz i luv dat smilee