Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Haetron
YOU GUYS ARE RUINING MY FUN BY AGREEING WITH ME.
This was supposed to be my attempt to fit in and be all silly and giggly and pointless.  |
But, fun is agreeing and disagreeing and I think I agree that I should disagree, but I disagreed by agreeing!
Defcon 0 - (D4 lvl 50),DJ Shecky Cape Radio
@Shecky
Twitter: @DJ_Shecky, @siliconshecky, @thecaperadio
When you air your dirty laundry out on a clothesline above the street, everyone is allowed to snicker at the skid marks in your underoos. - Lemur_Lad
Quote:
YAY!|
Originally Posted by DJ_Shecky
But, fun is agreeing and disagreeing and I think I agree that I should disagree, but I disagreed by agreeing!
|
I need advil now.
/e gives Advil.
Here ya go.
Let us stifle under mud at the pond's edge
and affirm that it is fitting
and delicious to lose everything. ~ Donald Hall
In all seriousness, and without meaning to victimise anyone, I would like to know why The Rookery can't be consolidated into one thread?
Would the functionality of the Rookery be inhibited in any way if it was consolidated into one thread?
Sorry Haet , im actually gonna log in a bit and play dress up or maybe kick things .
do try to keep your nose clean for at least a few weeks as its always nice having you around .
I have that effect on people.
*hands over the ibuprofin*
Now back to the disagreeing on agreeing.
Defcon 0 - (D4 lvl 50),DJ Shecky Cape Radio
@Shecky
Twitter: @DJ_Shecky, @siliconshecky, @thecaperadio
When you air your dirty laundry out on a clothesline above the street, everyone is allowed to snicker at the skid marks in your underoos. - Lemur_Lad
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by reiraku
i agree, which is why i feel that the rookery posts should be consolidated into a single thread. Barring that, kept to a social group specifically (though i do understand that isn't as inclusive as they would like).
I know i've had more trouble than i'd like looking for a particular thread only to wade through dozens of others, half of which being rookery threads, to find it. The rookery is all well and good for what it is, but keep it to a thread. Daily threads are just excessive and unnecessary. |
qft
Quote:
We know how well that always works out young lady. > : (
|
Originally Posted by Deebs
Sorry Haet , im actually gonna log in a bit and play dress up or maybe kick things .
do try to keep your nose clean for at least a few weeks as its always nice having you around . |
Quote:
Well, with the way the new boards work, the answer is yes. If I log in from one machine and later log in from another, it brings me back to the last post I saw on that specific machine.|
Originally Posted by Xanatos_NA
In all seriousness, and without meaning to victimise anyone, I would like to know why The Rookery can't be consolidated into one thread?
Would the functionality of the Rookery be inhibited in any way if it was consolidated into one thread? |
Now originally, I think the rookery tried to be one thread and got way too long so they decided to break it up to a daily thread. (I could be wrong on it though).
I understand what you are saying about it being all over the place now, but in the same sentence abot fluff and what do things have to do with CoH and Virtue, I find that a lot of the psots tend to not make much sense overall.
Also the lack of topics can also be traced to it being Summer (Vacation time) and possibly the new boards (I know I don't like them) besides a fluff post like the Rookery.
Lack of posters on the other hand can be traced back to a lot of people being treated poorly on the forums overall, or just ignored and so they decided to just lurk.
Defcon 0 - (D4 lvl 50),DJ Shecky Cape Radio
@Shecky
Twitter: @DJ_Shecky, @siliconshecky, @thecaperadio
When you air your dirty laundry out on a clothesline above the street, everyone is allowed to snicker at the skid marks in your underoos. - Lemur_Lad
As far as a Social group goes, I do believe it is one, but I know that I forget about them since there is no quick link to social groups and you have to remember to go into your user control panel, in which case the thread would wind up being started by someone not knowing/remembering.
Defcon 0 - (D4 lvl 50),DJ Shecky Cape Radio
@Shecky
Twitter: @DJ_Shecky, @siliconshecky, @thecaperadio
When you air your dirty laundry out on a clothesline above the street, everyone is allowed to snicker at the skid marks in your underoos. - Lemur_Lad
There is no reason to just have a single thread, if there was the people complaining would complain about that as well. They just want to gripe and the Rookery is the target at the moment.
Heroes : Angrem (50 Stone tank), Exo Inferis (50 Fire blaster), Exo Proteus (50 ill/emp), IceVengance (50 cold defender)
Villains : AtomBomb (50 Rad/Kin corruptor), Aleks (50 SS/Inv brute), StoneLethal (50 EM/Stone brute), Davroz (50 Bots/Dark mastermind)
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by DJ_Shecky
Now originally, I think the rookery tried to be one thread and got way too long so they decided to break it up to a daily thread. (I could be wrong on it though).
. |
No, you're absolutely wrong, it started with Rookery posting "Good morning!" and then spamming about pamcakes every day, regardless of what everyone else thought.
Dude.
LOL.
Its like deja vu all over again except half the people who moaned about 'Y U H8 fluff LOL TEEHEE Where are the drugs... I have boobies!' are like, doing the whole righteous indignation thing.
Hilarious.
I was here first d---it, off my anti-fluff lawn! *shakes fist*
Noone has to read the thread if they don't want to. It's easy enough to look past it. The Mods said it's not a violation. So why would anyone so opposed to it waste time discussing it so much?
Heroes : Angrem (50 Stone tank), Exo Inferis (50 Fire blaster), Exo Proteus (50 ill/emp), IceVengance (50 cold defender)
Villains : AtomBomb (50 Rad/Kin corruptor), Aleks (50 SS/Inv brute), StoneLethal (50 EM/Stone brute), Davroz (50 Bots/Dark mastermind)
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Fedor
There is no reason to just have a single thread, if there was the people complaining would complain about that as well. They just want to gripe and the Rookery is the target at the moment.
|
Way to go guy.
And that picture applies how exactly? Everyone is aware you are obsessed with the Rookery. It's just that so few people care what you think.
Heroes : Angrem (50 Stone tank), Exo Inferis (50 Fire blaster), Exo Proteus (50 ill/emp), IceVengance (50 cold defender)
Villains : AtomBomb (50 Rad/Kin corruptor), Aleks (50 SS/Inv brute), StoneLethal (50 EM/Stone brute), Davroz (50 Bots/Dark mastermind)
Quote:
Yes, and when I call someone a stupid moron, it's easy enough to look past it, but it's still against the rules. |
Originally Posted by Fedor
Noone has to read the thread if they don't want to. It's easy enough to look past it. The Mods said it's not a violation. So why would anyone so opposed to it waste time discussing it so much?
|
It's hopeful that discussion will, you know, have the mods finally enforce the rules they are so happy to PM people with, because the Rookery is blatant rule 5 breaking.
Quote:
I would not complain if there was one thread.
|
Originally Posted by Fedor
There is no reason to just have a single thread, if there was the people complaining would complain about that as well. They just want to gripe and the Rookery is the target at the moment.
|
Quote:
Ok, then I'm wrong. Oh well. |
Originally Posted by Haetron
No, you're absolutely wrong, it started with Rookery posting "Good morning!" and then spamming about pamcakes every day, regardless of what everyone else thought.
|
None of it is worth getting upset over anyway. Even without the Rookery I couldn't find what I was looking for cause of all the other fluff that wound up in posts, the constant derailing of threads, and the silliness that goes on in the forum overall.
None of it is worth getting your panties in a bunch over really. Life is too short as it is.
Defcon 0 - (D4 lvl 50),DJ Shecky Cape Radio
@Shecky
Twitter: @DJ_Shecky, @siliconshecky, @thecaperadio
When you air your dirty laundry out on a clothesline above the street, everyone is allowed to snicker at the skid marks in your underoos. - Lemur_Lad
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Fedor
And that picture applies how exactly? Everyone is aware you are obsessed with the Rookery. It's just that so few people care what you think.
|
It applies because you said
Quote:
| There is no reason to just have a single thread, if there was the people complaining would complain about that as well. They just want to gripe and the Rookery is the target at the moment. |
You keep saying it's a violation haet, but the people that actually get to make that judgement say it's not.
That's all well and good of you to say xan, but I don't believe you. Not even for a second.
Heroes : Angrem (50 Stone tank), Exo Inferis (50 Fire blaster), Exo Proteus (50 ill/emp), IceVengance (50 cold defender)
Villains : AtomBomb (50 Rad/Kin corruptor), Aleks (50 SS/Inv brute), StoneLethal (50 EM/Stone brute), Davroz (50 Bots/Dark mastermind)
Quote:
Same here
|
Originally Posted by Xanatos_NA
I would not complain if there was one thread.
|
"the reason there are so many sarcastic pvpers is we already had a better version of pvp taken away from us to appease bad players. Back then we chuckled at how bad players came here and whined. If we knew that was the actual voice devs would listen to instead of informed, educated players we probably would have been bigger dicks back then." -ConFlict
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Xanatos_NA
I would not complain if there was one thread.
|
As opposed to one thread that manages to bloat and spawn anew each and every damn day, come hell or high water.
The Say Something Nice Thread - is one thread.
The various RP threads are singular threads.
The Person Below threads....are singular threads.
None of these respawns each and every damn day just because the date changes.
Now! This is it! Now is the time to choose! Die and be free of pain or live and fight your sorrow! Now is the time to shape your stories! Your fate is in your hands!
YOU GUYS ARE RUINING MY FUN BY AGREEING WITH ME.
This was supposed to be my attempt to fit in and be all silly and giggly and pointless.